Skip to main content

Re-checking Normative System Coherence

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems IX (COIN 2013)

Abstract

Sets of related norms (normative systems) are likely to evolve due to changing goals of an organization or changing values of a society, this may introduce incoherence, such as the simultaneous prohibition and obligation of an action or a set of deadlocked duties. This paper presents a compositional framework that may be used for detecting whether normative systems are coherent by analysing traces of actions and their legality. Unlike other mechanisms for checking normative system coherence, the framework makes it possible to re-check just those parts of the system that have changed, without re-checking the entirety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Boella, G., Pigozzi, G., van der Torre, L.: Normative framework for normative system change. In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2009, pp. 169–176 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Governatori, G., Giusto, P.D.: Modifying is better than deleting: a new approach to base revision. AI* IA 99, pp. 145–154 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Governatori, G., Hulstijn, J., Riveret, R., Rotolo, A.: Characterising deadlines in temporal modal defeasible logic. In: Orgun, M.A., Thornton, J. (eds.) AI 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4830, pp. 486–496. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Governatori, G., Rotolo, A.: How do agents comply with norms? In: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, pp. 488–491. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hansen, J., Pigozzi, G., van der Torre, L.: Ten philosophical problems in deontic logic. In: NORMAS, Dagstuhl, Germany (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang, J., Aldewereld, H., Dignum, V., Tan, Y.-H.: Norm contextualization. In: Aldewereld, H., Sichman, J.S. (eds.) COIN 2012. LNCS, vol. 7756, pp. 141–157. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Kollingbaum, M.J., Vasconcelos, W.W., García-Camino, A., Norman, T.J.: Managing conflict resolution in norm-regulated environments. In: Artikis, A., O’Hare, G.M.P., Stathis, K., Vouros, G.A. (eds.) ESAW 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4995, pp. 55–71. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. López, F.L.y., Luck, M.: Modelling norms for autonomous agents. In: Proceedings of The Fourth Mexican Conference on Computer Science, pp. 238–245. IEEE Computer Society (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. López, F.L., Luck, M., D’Inverno, M.: A normative framework for agent-based systems. Comput. Math. Organ. Theor. 12(2–3), 227–250 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lupu, E., Sloman, M.: Conflicts in policy-based distributed systems management. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. (-) Spec. Issue Inconsistency Manag. 25(6), 852–869 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Uszok, A., Bradshaw, J., Jeffers, R., Suri, N., Hayes, P., Breedy, M., Bunch, L., Johnson, M., Kulkarni, S., Lott, J.: KAoS policy and domain services: toward a description-logic approach to policy representation, deconfliction, and enforcement. In: Proceedings of IEEE Policy 2003, Los Amitos, CA, pp. 93–98. IEEE Computer Society (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Uszok, A., Bradshaw, J.M., Lott, J., Breedy, M., Bunch, L., Feltovich, P., Johnson, M., Jung, H.: New developments in ontology-based policy management: increasing the practicality and comprehensiveness of KAoS. in: 2008 IEEE Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks, pp. 145–152, June 2008

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vasconcelos, W., Kollingbaum, M.J., Norman, T.J.: Resolving conflict and inconsistency in norm-regulated virtual organizations. In: Proceedings of AAMAS ’07, vol. 5, pp. 632–639, ACM Press, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wooldridge, M.: An Introduction to Multi-Agent Systems. Wiley, Chichester (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Christopher King .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

King, T.C., Dignum, V., van Riemsdijk, M.B. (2014). Re-checking Normative System Coherence. In: Balke, T., Dignum, F., van Riemsdijk, M., Chopra, A. (eds) Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems IX. COIN 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8386. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07314-9_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07314-9_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07313-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07314-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics