Abstract
Most animals navigate a dynamic and shifting sea of information provided by their environment, their food or prey and other animals. How do they work out, which pieces of information are the most important or of most interest to them, and gather information on those parts to guide their action later? In this essay, I briefly outline what we already know about how animals use information flexibly and efficiently. I then discuss a few of the unsolved problems relating to how animals collect information by directing their attention or exploration selectively, before suggesting some approaches which might be useful in unravelling these problems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Although animals can generalize somewhat between learned stimuli.
- 2.
Note that while it is easier to think about these processes as sequential, they certainly occur in parallel in nature.
- 3.
That is, interacting with the environment without an immediate goal other than the collection of information.
References
Avarguès-Weber A, Dyer AG, Giurfa M (2011) Conceptualization of above and below relationships by an insect. Proc Royal Soc B Biol Sci 278(1707):898–905
Bellman R (1961) Adaptive control processes: a guided tour. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Benjamin SP, Zschokke S (2004) Homology, behaviour and spider webs: web construction behaviour of Linyphia hortensis and L. triangularis (Araneae: Linyphiidae) and its evolutionary significance. J Evol Biol 17(1):120–130
Bird CD, Emery NJ (2009a), Insightful problem solving and creative tool modification by captive nontool-using rooks. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 106(25):10,370–10,375
Bird CD, Emery NJ (2009b) Rooks use stones to raise the water level to reach a floating worm. Curr Biol 19:1410–1414
Bluff LA, Troscianko J, Weir AAS, Kacelnik A, Rutz C (2010) Tool use by wild new Caledonian crows Corvus moneduloides at natural foraging sites. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 277(1686): 1377–1385
Bonawitz E, van Schijndel T, Friel D, Schulz L (2012) Children balance theories and evidence in exploration, explanation, and learning. Cogn Psychol 64(4):215–234
Buckner C (2013) In search of balance: a review of Povinellis world without weight. Biol Philos 28(1):145–152
Cacchione T, Call J (2010) Intuitions about gravity and solidity in great apes: the tubes task. Dev Sci 13(2):320–330
Cacchione T, Call J, Zingg R (2009) Gravity and solidity in four great ape species (Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus): Vertical and horizontal variations of the table task. J Comp Psychol 123(2):168–180
Chappell J, Hawes N (2012) Biological and artificial cognition: what can we learn about mechanisms by modelling physical cognition problems using artificial intelligence planning techniques? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 367(1603):2723–2732
Chappell J, Kacelnik A (2002) Tool selectivity in a non-primate, the new Caledonian crow (Corvus moneduloides). Anim Cogn 5(2):71–78
Chappell J, Kacelnik A (2004) Selection of tool diameter by new Caledonian crows Corvus moneduloides. Anim Cogn 7(2):121–127
Chappell J, Sloman A (2007) Natural and artificial meta-configured altricial information-processing systems. Int J Unconventional Comput 3(3):211–239
Chappell J, Thorpe S (2010) AI-inspired biology: does AI have something to contribute to biology? In: Proceedings of the international symposium on AI inspired biology: a symposium at the AISB 2010 Convention, Leicester, UK, SSAISB.
Chappell J, Demery ZP, Arriola-Rios V, Sloman A (2012) How to build an information gathering and processing system: lessons from naturally and artificially intelligent systems. Behav Process 89(2):179–186
Chittka L, Jensen K (2011) Animal cognition: concepts from apes to bees. Curr Biol 21(3): R116–119
Cook C, Goodman ND, Schulz LE (2011) Where science starts: spontaneous experiments in preschoolers’ exploratory play. Cognition 120(3):341–349
Demery ZP, Chappell J, Martin GR (2011) Vision, touch and object manipulation in Senegal parrots Poicephalus senegalus. Proce R Soci B Biol Sci 278:3687–3693
Desimone R, Duncan J (1995) Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Ann Rev Neurosci 18:193–222
Dukas R (2002) Behavioural and ecological consequences of limited attention. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 357(1427):1539–1547
Dukas R, Kamil AC (2000) The cost of limited attention in blue jays. Behav Ecol 11(5):502–506
Dunbar RIM, McAdam MR, O’connell S (2005) Mental rehearsal in great apes (Pan troglodytes and Pongo pygmaeus) and children. Behav Process 69(3):323–330
Eberhard WG (1971) The ecology of the web of Uloborus diversus (Araneae: Uloboridae). Oecologia 6(4):328–342
Fragaszy D, Johnson-Pynn J, Hirsh E, Brakke K (2003) Strategic navigation of two-dimensional alley mazes: comparing capuchin monkeys and chimpanzees. Anim Cogn 6(3):149–160
Fragaszy DM, Kennedy E, Murnane A, Menzel C, Brewer G, Johnson-Pynn J, Hopkins W (2009) Navigating two-dimensional mazes: chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and capuchins (Cebus apella sp.) profit from experience differently. Anim Cogn 12(3):491–504
Gibson JJ (1977) The theory of affordances. The ecological approach to visual perception. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London, pp 127–143
Grant RA, Mitchinson B, Fox CW, Prescott TJ (2009) Active touch sensing in the rat: anticipatory and regulatory control of whisker movements during surface exploration. J Neurophysiol 101(2):862–874
Hanus D, Call J (2008) Chimpanzees infer the location of a reward on the basis of the effect of its weight. Curr Biol 18(9):R370–R372
Hanus D, Call J (2011) Chimpanzee problem-solving: contrasting the use of causal and arbitrary cues. Anim cogn 14(6):871–878
Heinke D, Humphreys GW (2003) Attention, spatial representation, and visual neglect: simulating emergent attention and spatial memory in the selective attention for identification model (saim). Psychol Rev 110(1):29–87
Held SD, Špinka M (2011) Animal play and animal welfare. Anim Behav 81(5):891–899
Keagy J, Savard JF, Borgia G (2011) Complex relationship between multiple measures of cognitive ability and male mating success in satin bowerbirds, Ptilonorhynchus violaceus. Anim Behav 81(5):1063–1070
Kirsh D, Maglio P (1994) On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cogn Sci 18(4): 513–549, doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1804_1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1804_1
Kundey SMA, de Los Reyes A (2009) Domesticated dogs’ (Canis familiaris) use of the solidity principle. Anim Cogn 13(3):497–505
Martin GR (2007) Visual fields and their functions in birds. J Ornithol 148(S2):547–562
Moore CW (1977) The life cycle, habitat and variation in selected web parameters in the spider, Nephila clavipes Koch (Araneidae). Am Midl Nat 98(1):95–108
Pearson MJ, Pipe AG, Melhuish C, Mitchinson B, Prescott TJ (2007) Whiskerbot: a robotic active touch system modeled on the Rat Whisker sensory system. Adapt Behav 15(3):223–240
Penn DC, Povinelli DJ (2007) Causal cognition in human and nonhuman animals: a comparative, critical review. Ann Rev Psychol 58:97–118
Pepperberg IM (1987) Acquisition of the same different concept by an African gray parrot (Psittacus erithacus)—learning with respect to categories of color, shape, and material. Learn Behav 15(4):423–432
Perlovsky L (1998) Conundrum of combinatorial complexity. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 20(6):666–670
Povinelli D (2011) World without weight: perspectives on an alien mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Power TG (2000) Play and exploration in children and animals. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London
Sandoval C (1994) Plasticity in web design in the spider Parawixia bistriata: a response to variable prey type. Funct Ecol 8(6):701–707
Schrauf C, Call J (2011) Great apes use weight as a cue to find hidden food. Am J Primatol 73(4):323–334
Seed AM, Call J, Emery NJ, Clayton NS (2009) Chimpanzees solve the trap problem when the confound of tool-use is removed. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 35(1):23–34
Sloman A (1999) What sort of architecture is required for a human-like agent. In: Wooldridge M, Rao A (eds) Foundations of rational agency. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 35–52
Sloman A (2005) The design-based approach to the study of mind (in humans, other animals, and machines), including the study of behaviour involving mental processes. http://cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/cogaff/misc/design-based-approach.html
Sloman A (2011) What’s information, for an organism or intelligent machine? How can a machine or organism mean? In: Dodig-Crnkovic G, Burgin M (eds) Information and computation. World Scientific, New Jersey, pp 393–438
Sloman A, Chappell J (2007) Computational cognitive epigenetics. Behav Brain Sci 30(4):375–376
Spelke ES, Kinzler KD (2007) Core knowledge. Dev Sci 10(1):89–96
Tecwyn EC, Thorpe SKS, Chappell J (2012) What cognitive strategies do orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) use to solve a trial-unique puzzle-tube task incorporating multiple obstacles? Anim Cogn 15(1):121–133
Thorpe SKS, Crompton RH (2005) Locomotor ecology of wild orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus abelii) in the Gunung Leuser ecosystem, Sumatra, Indonesia: A multivariate analysis using log-linear modelling. Am J Phys Anthropol 127:58–78
Thorpe SKS, Crompton RH (2006) Orangutan positional behavior and the nature of Arboreal locomotion in Hominoidea. Am J Phys Anthropol 131:384–401
Thorpe SKS, Crompton RH, Alexander RM (2007) Orangutans utilise compliant branches to lower the energetic cost of locomotion. Biol Lett 3:253–256
Troscianko J, von Bayern AM, Chappell J, Rutz C, Martin GR (2013) Extreme binocular vision and a straight bill facilitate tool use in new caledonian crows. Nat Commun 3:1110
Webb B (2000) What does robotics offer animal behaviour? Anim Behav 60(5):545–558
Weir AAS, Chappell J, Kacelnik A (2002) Shaping of hooks in new Caledonian crows. Science 297(5583):981
Acknowledgments
First, I would like to acknowledge my deep gratitude to Aaron Sloman for many fascinating and stimulating discussions about information processing, evolution and exploration (among many other topics). These conversations have helped me helped me to approach these problems in a new and more productive way. I would also like to thank Nick Hawes, Zoe Demery and Emma Tecwyn for productive discussions on these topics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chappell, J. (2014). Acting on the World: Understanding How Agents Use Information to Guide Their Action. In: Wyatt, J., Petters, D., Hogg, D. (eds) From Animals to Robots and Back: Reflections on Hard Problems in the Study of Cognition. Cognitive Systems Monographs, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06614-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06614-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06613-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06614-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)