Abstract
Models and simulations represent target systems by means of relations of similarity or analogy. Two objects or systems are similar if their attributes are close to each other or approximately equal. Two objects are analogous to each other if they are partly identical. From this perspective, it is useful to distinguish similarity models and analogy models as sources of learning about real targets. Similarity models include idealized models and their computer implementations which typically represent reality by deformation: while some irrelevant properties are excluded, some relevant properties are neglected by assigning them extreme values. Inferences from ideal similarity models are obtained either by approximation or by the concretization of counterfactual assumptions. Typical analogical models allow inference from the model to the target system by inductive inference from model data D to generalization C, and analogical reasoning from the model generalization C to the same generalization C about the real system.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hartmann, S. (1996). The world as a process: Simulations in the natural and social sciences. In R. Hegselmann (Ed.), Simulations and modeling in the social sciences from the philosophy of science point of view (pp. 77–100). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation. New York: The Free Press.
Hesse, M. (1963). Models and analogies in science. Notre Dame: The University of Notre Dame Press.
Hindricks, F. (2012). Saving truth for economics. In A. Lehtinen, J. Kuorikoski, & P. Ylikoski (Eds.), Economics for real: Uskali Mäki and the place of truth in economics (pp. 43–64). London: Routledge.
Holland, J., Holoyak, K., Nisbett, R., & Thagard, P. (1986). Induction: Processes of inference, learning and discovery. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.
Knuuttila, T. (2005). Models, representation, and mediation. Philosophy of Science, 72, 1260–1271.
Kuipers, T. (1988). Inductive analogy by similarity and proximity. In D. H. Helman (Ed.), Analogical reasoning: Perspectives of artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and philosophy (pp. 299–313). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kuipers, T. (2000). From instrumentalism to constructive realism. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Mäki, U. (Ed.). (2002). Fact and fiction in economics: Models, realism, and social construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mäki, U. (2009). MISSing the world: Models as isolations and credible surrogate systems. Erkenntnis, 70, 29–43.
Niiniluoto, I. (1987). Truthlikeness. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Niiniluoto, I. (1988). Analogy and similarity in scientific reasoning. In D. H. Helman (Ed.), Analogical reasoning: Perspectives of artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and philosophy (pp. 271–298). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Niiniluoto, I. (1990). Theories, approximations, and idealizations. In J. Brzezinski et~al. (Eds.), Idealization I: General problems (pp. 9–57). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Niiniluoto, I. (1999). Critical scientific realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Niiniluoto, I. (2002). Truthlikeness and economic theories. In U. Mäki (Ed.), Fact and fiction in economics: Models, realism, and social construction (pp. 214–228). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Niiniluoto, I. (2007a). Idealization, counterfactuals, and truthlikeness. In J. Brzezinski et~al. (Eds.), The courage of doing philosophy: Essays presented to Leszek Nowak (pp. 103–122). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Niiniluoto, I. (2007b). Evaluation of theories. In T. Kuipers (Ed.), Handbook of the philosophy of science: General philosophy of science – Focal issues (pp. 175–217). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Niiniluoto, I. (2012). The verisimilitude of economic models. In A. Lehtinen, J. Kuorikoski, & P. Ylikoski (Eds.), Economics for real: Uskali Mäki and the place of truth in economics (pp. 65–80). London: Routledge.
Nowak, L. (1980). The structure of idealization. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Peirce, C. S. (1931–35). Collected papers 1–6. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Suárez, M. (2004). An inferential conception of scientific representation. Philosophy of Science, 71, 767–779.
Sugden, R. (2002). Credible worlds: The status of theoretical models in economics. In U. Mäki (Ed.), Fact and fiction in economics: Models, realism, and social construction (pp. 107–136). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sugden, R. (2009). Credible worlds: Capacities and mechanisms. Erkenntnis, 70, 3–27.
Winsberg, E. (2010). Science in the age of computer simulation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Niiniluoto, I. (2013). Models, Simulations, and Analogical Inference. In: Karakostas, V., Dieks, D. (eds) EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science. The European Philosophy of Science Association Proceedings, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01306-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01306-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01305-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01306-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)