Abstract
In biology, theories are constantly enriched and adapted by new examples and scientific advances. In this chapter, we focus on the debate about the rules in biology and their persistence over time as rules accepted by the scientific community. We exemplify this with Darwin’s theory of natural selection, which has been nourished by new disciplines and technologies during the twentieth and twenty-first centuries and has undergone transformations, although it undoubtedly remains the dominant explanation of the evolution of biological systems. Biological rules are dynamic, although they tend to remain relatively stable over time, and their response to the appearance of exceptions can be variable, although the integration of new knowledge into the field is usually gradual until the accumulation of exceptions is so significant that the applicability of the rules is questioned (crisis sensu Kuhnian revolution of scientific knowledge). We illustrate this concept by analyzing the historical evolution of biological species concepts, and we draw attention to the extrapolation of rules originally proposed for certain organisms and applied indiscriminately to other groups without exhaustive testing (e.g., eco-geographic rules).
One never attains the total truth, nor is one ever totally far from it
—Aristotle
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abouheif, E., Favé, M. J., Ibarrarán-Viniegra, A. S., Lesoway, M. P., Rafiqi, A. M., & Rajakumar, R. (2014). Eco-Evo-Devo: The time has come. In C. Landry & N. Aubin-Horth (Eds.), Ecological genomics. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. Springer. pp. 781.
Alho, J. S., Herczeg, G., Laugen, A. T., Räsänen, K., Laurila, A., & Merilä, J. (2011). Allen’s rule revisited: Quantitative genetics of extremity length in the common frog along a latitudinal gradient. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 24, 59–70.
Allen, J. A. (1877). The influence of physical conditions in the genesis of species. Radical Review, 1, 108–140.
Ashton, K. G., Tracy, M. C., & de Queiroz, A. (2000). Is Bergmann’s rule valid for mammals? The American Naturalist, 156(4), 390–415.
Atkinson, D. (1994). Temperature and organism size: A biological law for ectotherms? Advances in Ecological Research, 25, 1–58.
Blackman, F. F. (1905). Optima and limiting factors. Annals of Botany, 19(74), 281–295.
Baker, H. G. (1959). Reproductive methods as factors in speciation in flowering plants. In Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology (pp. 177–191). Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
Banta, J. A., & Richards, C. L. (2018). Quantitative epigenetics and evolution. Heredity, 121, 210–224.
Bateman, A. J. (1948). Intrasexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2(3), 349–368.
Bateson, W. (1902). Mendel's principles of heredity: A defence. University Press.
Bateson, G. (1971). A re-examination of “Bateson’s Rule”. Journal of Genetics, 60, 230–240.
Bergmann, C. (1847). Ueber die Verhältnisse der Wärmeökonomie der Thiere zu ihrer Grösse. Göttinger Studien, 3, 595–708.
Bernard, C. (1865). Introduction à l’étude de la médecine expérimentale. Baillière.
Biddick, M., Hendriks, A., & Burns, K. C. (2019). Plants obey (and disobey) the island rule. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(47), 201907424.
Cabej, N. (2018). Epigenetic principles of evolution. Academic Press.
Carroll, S. B. (2008). Evo-Devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: A genetic theory of morphological evolution. Cell, 13(1), 25–36.
Case, T. J. (1978). A general explanation for insular body size trends in terrestrial vertebrates. Ecology, 59(1), 1–18.
Caso, J. M. R. (2020). El “darwinismo puro” de Alfred Russel Wallace: Aportaciones a la teoría evolutiva moderna. Asclepio, 72(2), 324.
Clarke, E., & Okasha, S. (2013). Species and organisms: What are the problems? In P. Huneman & F. Bouchard (Eds.), From groups to individuals. Evolution and emerging individuality. pp. 55.
Clauss, M., Dittmann, M. T., Müller, D. W. H., Meloro, C., & Crodon, D. (2013). Bergmann’s rule in mammals: A cross-species interspecific pattern. Oikos, 122(10), 1465–1472.
Cody, M. L., & Diamond, J. M. (1975). Ecology and evolution of communities. Belknap Press, Harvard University Press.
Cope, E. D. (1887). The origin of the fittest: Essays on evolution. D. Appleton.
Crick, F. H. C. (1958). On protein synthesis. In Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology; Number XII: The Biological Replication of Macromolecules (pp. 138–163). Cambridge University Press.
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray.
Dale, H. (1935). Pharmacology and nerve-endings. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 28, 319–332.
Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford University Press.
de Queiroz, K. (1998). The general lineage concept of species, species criteria, and the process of speciation: A conceptual unification and terminological recommendations. In Endless forms: Species and speciation (pp. 57–75). Oxford University Press.
de Queiroz, K. (2005). Ernst Mayr and the modern concept of species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 6600–6607.
de Queiroz, K. (2007). Species concepts and species delimitation. Systematic Biology, 56(6), 879–886.
Delhey, K. (2019). A review of Gloger’s rule, an ecogeographical rule of colour: Definitions, interpretations and evidence. Biological Reviews, 94, 1294–1316.
Depéret, C. (1907). Les Transformations du monde animal. Ernest Flammarion.
Dillard, J. R., & Westneat, D. F. (2016). Disentangling the correlated evolution of monogamy and cooperation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31(7), 503–513.
Dobzhansky, T. (1937). Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press.
Dollo, L. (1893). Les lois de l’évolution. Bulletin de la Société Belge de Géologie de Paléontologie & D’hydrologie, VII: 164–166.
Donati, D., Bianchi, C., Pezzi, G., Conte, L., Hofer, A., & Chiarucci, A. (2016). Biogeography and ecology of the genus Turbinicarpus (Cactaceae): Environmental controls of taxa richness and morphology. Systematics and Biodiversity, 15(4), 361–371.
Drezner, T. D. (2003). Revisiting Bergmann’s rule for saguaros (Carnegiea gigantea (Engelm.) Britt. and Rose): Stem diameter patterns over space. Journal of Biogeography, 30(3), 353–359.
Eichler, W. D. (1942). Die Entfaltungsregel und andere Gesetzmäßigkeiten in den parasitogenetischen Beziehungen der Mallophagen und anderer ständiger Parasiten zu ihren Wirten. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 137, 77–83.
Eldredge, N., & Gould, S. J. (1972). Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. Models in Paleobiology, 82, 115.
Emery, C. (1909). Über den Ursprung der dulotischen, parasitischen und myrmekophilen Ameisen. Biologisches Centralblatt, 29, 352–362.
Fábregas-Tejeda, A., & Vergara-Silva, F. (2018). The emerging structure of the extended evolutionary synthesis: Where does Evo-Devo fit in? Theory in Biosciences, 137(2), 169–184.
Fisher, R. A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press.
Foster, J. B. (1964). The evolution of mammals on islands. Nature, 202(4929), 234–235.
Franklin, R. E., & Gosling, R. G. (1953). Molecular configuration in sodium thymonucleate. Nature, 171, 740–741.
Galton, F. (1889). Natural Inheritance. Macmillan & Co.
Gause, G. F. (1934). The Struggle for Existence. Williams & Wilkins.
Gayon, J. (2016). From Mendel to epigenetics: History of genetics. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 339(7–8), 225–230.
Geist, V. (1987). Bergmann’s rule is invalid. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 65(4), 1035–1038.
George, A. L., & Mayden, R. L. (2005). Species concepts and the endangered species act: How a valid biological definition of species enhances the legal protection of biodiversity. Natural Resources Journal, 45(2), 369–407.
Gloger, C. W. L. (1833). Abänderungsweise der einzelnen, einer Veränderung durch das Klima unterworfenen Farben. Das Abändern der Vögel durch Einfluss des Klimas. August Schulz.
Gould, S. J. (1990). Wonderful life: The burgess shale and the nature of history. W. W. Norton & Company.
Grinnell, J. (1904). The origin and distribution of the chest-nut-backed chickadee. The Auk, 21(3), 364–382.
Haeckel, E. (1868). Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte. Georg Reimer.
Haldane, J. B. (1922). Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. Journal of Genetics, 12, 101–109.
Haldane, J. B. S. (1932). The Causes of Evolution. Longman, Green and Co. Princeton University Press.
Hall, B. (2003). Evo-Devo: Evolutionary developmental mechanisms. International Journal of Developmental Biology, 47, 491–495.
Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour II. Journal of theoretical biology, 7(1), 17–52.
Hardy, G. H. (1908). Mendelian proportions in a mixed population. Science, 28(706), 49–50.
Harrison, L. (1915). Mallophaga from Apteryx, and their significance; with a note on the genus Rallicola. Parasitology, 8(1), 88–100.
Harvey, P. H., & Pagel, M. D. (1991). The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford: university press.
Hebb, D. O. (1949). The Organization of Behavior. Wiley & Sons.
Hennig, W. (1950). Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik. Deutscher Zentralverlag.
Hennig, W. (1966). The Diptera fauna of New Zealand as a problem in systematics and zoogeography. Pacific Insects Monograph, 9, 81.
Hertwig, O. (1884). Das Problem der Befruchtung und der Isotropie des Eies, eine Theory der Vererbung. Jenaische Zeitschrift fuer Naturwissenschaft, 18, 21–23.
Hesse, R., Allee, W. C., & Schmidt, K. P. (1937). Ecological animal geography. Wiley.
Hone, D. W., & Benton, M. J. (2005). The evolution of large size: How does Cope’s Rule work? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20, 4–6.
Hone, D. W. E., Dyke, G. J., Haden, M., & Benton, M. J. (2008). Body size evolution in Mesozoic birds. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21(2), 618–624.
Huang, M. H., & Dornhaus, A. (2008). A meta-analysis of ant social parasitism: Host characteristics of different parasitism types and a test of Emery’s rule. Ecological Entomology, 33(5), 589–596.
Huxley, J. S., & Teissier, G. (1936). Terminology of relative growth. Nature, 137(3471), 780–781.
Jablonka, E. (2017). The evolutionary implications of epigenetic inheritance. Interface Focus, 7, 20160135.
Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2014). Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. The MIT Press.
Janzen, D. H. (1967). Why mountain passes are higher in the tropics. The American Naturalist, 101(919), 233–249.
Jordan, D. S. (1892). Relations of temperature to vertebrae among fishes. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 1891, 107–120.
Jordan, D. S. (1922). Two volumes. In The days of a man: Being memories of a naturalist, teacher and minor prophet of democracy. World Book Company.
Jørgensen, S. E. (2002). Explanation of ecological rules and observation by application of ecosystem theory and ecological models. Ecological Modelling, 158, 241–248.
Kavanagh, P. H., Lehnebach, C. A., Shea, M. J., & Burns, K. C. (2011). Allometry of sexual size dimorphism in dioecious plants: Do plants obey Rensch’s rule? The American Naturalist, 178(5), 596–601.
Kimbel, W. H., & Martin, L. B. (Eds.). (1993). Species, species concepts and primate evolution. Springer.
Kleiber, M. (1932). Body size and metabolism. Hilgardia, 6, 315–353.
Lack, D. (1954). The natural regulation of animal numbers. Clarendon.
Laland, K. N., Uller, T., Feldman, M. W., Sterelny, K., Müller, G. B., Moczek, A., Jablonka, E., & Odling-Smee, J. (2015). The extended evolutionary synthesis: Its structure, assumptions and predictions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 282(1813), 20151019.
Lamarck, J. B. (1809). Philosophie zoologique. New York: Hafner Publishing Company, 1963.
Lee, M. S. Y. (2003). Species concepts and species reality: Salvaging a Linnaean rank. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 16, 179–188.
Lev-Yadun, S. (2016). Defensive (anti-herbivory) coloration in land plants. Springer International Publishing.
Lewis, F. T. (1928). The correlation between cell division and the shapes and sizes of prismatic cells in the epidermis of cucumis. The Anatomical Record, 38(3), 341–376.
Lewontin, R. C., & Levins, R. (2000). Schmalhausen’s law. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 11, 103–108.
Liebig, J. V. (1840). Die organische Chemie in ihrer Anwendung auf Agricultur und Physiologie (Organic chemistry in its applications to agriculture and physiology). Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn Publishing Company.
Lind, M. I., & Spagopoulou, F. (2018). Evolutionary consequences of epigenetic inheritance. Heredity, 121, 205–209.
Lindeman, R. L. (1942). The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology. Ecology, 23(4), 399–417.
Liò, P., & Goldman, N. (1998). Models of molecular evolution and phylogeny. Genome Research, 8, 1233–1244.
Lopez-Osorio, F., Perrard, A., Pickett, K. M., Carpenter, J. M., & Agnarsson, I. (2015). Phylogenetic tests reject Emery’s rule in the evolution of social parasitism in yellowjackets and hornets (Hymenoptera: Vespidae, Vespinae). Royal Society Open Science, 2, 150159.
Lovelock, J. E. (1972). Gaia as seen through the atmosphere. Atmospheric Environment, 6(8):580, 5–90076.
Macarthur, R. H., & Wilson, E. O. (1967). The theory of island biogeography. Princeton Univ. Press.
Mallet, J. (2007). Species, concepts of. In S. Levin et al. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of biodiversity (pp. 427–440). Elsevier.
Mateo, R. G., Mokany, K., & Guisan, A. (2017). Biodiversity models: What if unsaturation is the rule? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 32(8), 556–566.
Maynard-Smith, J. M., & Price, G. R. (1973). The logic of animal conflict. Nature, 246(5427), 15–18.
Mayr, E. (1942). Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press.
Mayr, E. (1970). Populations, species, and evolution; an abridgment of animal species and evolution. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Mendel, G. (1866). Versuche über Planzenhybriden, Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines in Brünn, Bd. für das Jahr 1865, Abhandlungen (pp. 3–47).
Mileikovsky, S. A. (1971). Types of larval development in marine bottom invertebrates, their distribution and ecological significance: a re-evaluation. Marine Biology, 10, 193–213.
Moles, A. T., Warton, D. I., Warman, L., Swenson, N. G., Laffan, S. W., Zanne, A. E., Pitman, A., Hemmings, F. A., & Leishman, M. R. (2009). Global patterns in plant height. Journal of Ecology, 97(5), 923–932.
Morgan, T. H. (1926). The theory of the gene. Yale University Press.
Morgan, T. H., Sturtevant, A. H., Muller, H. J., & Bridges, C. B. (1915). The mechanism of Mendelian heredity. H. Holt & Co..
Moseley, H. N. (1880). Deep-sea dredging and life in the deep sea. Nature, 21, 591–593.
Mousseau, T. A. (1997). Ectotherms follow the converse to Bergmann’s rule. Evolution, 630–632.
Müller, J. (1838). Handbook of human physiology (Vol. 1). J. Hölscher.
Müller, G. B. (2007). Evo-devo: Extending the evolutionary synthesis. Nature Reviews Genetics, 8, 943–949.
Müller, G. B. (2017). Why an extended evolutionary synthesis is necessary. Interface focus, 7(5), 20170015.
Mungee, M., Pandit, R., & Athreya, R. (2021). Taxonomic scale dependency of Bergmann’s patterns: a cross-scale comparison of hawkmoths and birds along a tropical elevational gradient. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 37(6), 302–312.
Nature Education. (2014). Species. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/scitable/definition/species-312/
Ohno, S. (1967). Sex Chromosomes and Sex-linked Genes. Springer.
Olalla-Tárraga, M. A. (2011). “Nullius in Bergmann” or the pluralistic approach to ecogeographical rules: A reply to Watt et al. Oikos, 120, 1441–1444.
Pigliucci, M. (2007). Do we need an extended evolutionary synthesis? Evolution, 61(12), 2743–2749.
Pigliucci, M., & Finkelman, L. (2014). The extended (evolutionary) synthesis debate: Where science meets philosophy. BioScience, 64(6), 511–516.
Pigliucci, M., & Müller, G. B. (2010). Evolution, the extended synthesis. The MIT Press.
Pincheira-Donoso, D. (2010). The balance between predictions and evidence and the search for universal macroecological patterns: Taking Bergmann’s rule back to its endothermic origin. Theory in Biosciences, 129(4), 247–253.
Popper, K. R. (1980). Selección natural y la emergencia de la mente. Teorema: Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 10(2/3), 191–213.
Popper, K. R. (1991). Conjeturas y refutaciones: El desarrollo del conocimiento científico. Paidós Ibérica.
Portin, P., & Wilkins, A. (2017). The evolving definition of the term “Gene”. Genetics, 205(4), 1353–1364.
Queller, D. C., & Strassman, J. E. (2002). Quick guide: Kin selection. Current Biology, 12(24), R832.
Raia, P., & Fortelius, M. (2013). Cope’s law of the unspecialized, Cope’s rule, and weak directionality in evolution. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 15(7), 747–756.
Rendón, C. A., & Folguera, G. (2014). Evo-devo como disciplina integradora: La temporalidad de los procesos biológicos como estrategia de análisis. Theoria, 81, 395–415.
Rensch, B. (1929). Das Prinzip geographischer Rassenkreise und das Problem der Artbildung. Gebrueder Borntraeger.
Rensch, B. (1948). Histological changes correlated with evolutionary changes of body size. Evolution, 2(3), 218–230.
Rensch, B. (1950). Die Abhängigkeit der relativen Sexualdifferenz von der Körpergrösse. Bonner Zoologische Beiträge, 1, 58–69.
Ruíz, R., & Ayala, F. J. (1998). El método en las ciencias. Epistemología y darwinismo. Fondo de Cultura Económica de España (Colección Ciencia y Tecnología).
Sagan, L. (1967). On the origin of mitosing cells. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 14(3), 225-IN6.
Salewski, V., & Watt, C. (2017). Bergmann’s rule: A biophysiological rule examined in birds. Oikos, 126, 161–172.
Sargis, E. J., Millien, V., Woodman, N., & Olson, L. E. (2018). Rule reversal: Ecogeographical patterns of body size variation in the common treeshrew (Mammalia, Scandentia). Ecology and Evolution, 8(3), 1634–1645.
Sarrus, F., & Rameaux, J. F. (1839). Application des sciences accessoires et principalement des mathématiques à la physiologie générale. Bulletin de l’Academie Royale de Medecine de Belgique, 3, 1094-1100.
Schleiden, M. J. (1838). Beiträge zur Phytogenesis. Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und wissenschaftliche Medicin, 1, 137–176.
Serrat, M. A., King, D., & Lovejoy, C. O. (2008). Temperature regulates limb length in homeotherms by directly modulating cartilage growth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(49), 19348–19353.
Serres, E. R. A. (1827). Anatomie comparée du cerveau, dans les quatres classes des animaux vertébrés: appliquée à la physiologie et à la pathologie du système nerveux.
Shelford, V. E. (1911). Physiological animal geography. Journal of Morphology, 22(3), 551–618.
Shelomi, M. (2012). Where are we now? Bergmann’s rule sensu lato in insects. The American Naturalist, 180(4), 511–519.
Simpson, G. G. (1944). Tempo and mode in evolution. Columbia University Press.
Smith, W. (1816). Strata identified by organized fossils: containing prints on colored paper of the most characteristic specimens in each stratum. W. Arding.
Stebbins, C. L. (1950). Variation and evolution in plants. Oxford University Press.
Steidinger, B. S., Crowther, T. W., Liang, J., Van Nuland, M. E., Werner, G. D., Reich, P. B., et al. (2019). Climatic controls of decomposition drive the global biogeography of forest-tree symbioses. Nature, 569(7756), 404–408.
Stevens, G. C. (1989). The latitudinal gradient in geographical range: how so many species coexist in the tropics. The American Naturalist, 133(2), 240–256.
Templeton, A. R. (1989). The meaning of species and speciation: A genetic perspective. In Speciation and its consequences (pp. 3–27). Sinauer Associates.
Templeton, A. R. (1998). Species and speciation: Geography, population structure, ecology, and gene trees. In Endless forms: Species and speciation (pp. 32–43). Oxford University Press.
Thompson, D., Regev, A., & Roy, S. (2015). Comparative analysis of gene regulatory networks: From network reconstruction to evolution. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 31, 6.1–6.30.
University of California, Berkeley. (2023). Defining a species. Understanding evolution. Retrieved from https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolution-101/speciation/defining-a-species/
Van Valen, L. (1973). A new evolutionary law. Evolution Theory, 1, 1–30.
Vinarskiĭ, M. V. (2014). On the application of Bergmann’s rule to ectothermic organisms: The state of the art. Biology Bulletin Reviews, 4(3), 232–242.
Von Baer, K. E. (1828). Über Entwickelungsgeschichte der Thiere. Beobachtung und Reflexion.
Waples, R. S. (1991). Pacific Salmon, Oncorhynchus spp., and the definition of “Species” Under the Endangered Species Act. Marine Fisheries Review, 53(3), 11–22.
Watson, J. D., & Crick, F. H. (1953). A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature, 171, 737–738.
West-Eberhard, M. J. (1989). Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 20(1), 249–278.
West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003). Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press.
West-Eberhard, M. J. (2005). Developmental plasticity and the origin of species differences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(1), 6543–6549.
Wheeler, Q. D., & Meier, R. (2000). Species concepts and phylogenetic theory: A debate. Columbia University Press.
Whelan, S., Liò, P., & Goldman, N. (2001). Molecular phylogenetics: State-of-the-art methods for looking into the past. Trends in Genetics, 17(5), 262–272.
Wilkins, M. H. F., Stokes, A. R., & Wilson, H. R. (1953). Molecular structure of deoxypentose nucleic acids. Nature, 171, 738–740.
Williston, S. W. (1914). Water reptiles of the past and present. University of Chicago Press.
Woese, C. R., & Fox, G. E. (1977). Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: The primary kingdoms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 74(11), 5088–5090.
Wright, S. G. (1931). Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics, 16, 97–159.
Wright, S. G. (1932). The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding, and selection in evolution. Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Genetics, 356–366.
Yoda, K., Kira, T., Ogawa, H., & Hozumi, K. (1963). Intraspecific competition among higher plants. XI. Self-thinning in overcrowded pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions. Journal Biology Osaka City University, 14, 107–129.
Zachos, F. E. (2016). Species concepts in biology: Historical development, theoretical foundations and practical relevance. Springer.
Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection: a selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205–214.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Peretti, A.V., Calbacho-Rosa, L.S., Olivero, P.A., Oviedo-Diego, M.A., Vrech, D.E. (2024). When THAT Rule Almost Persists as THAT Rule. In: Rules and Exceptions in Biology: from Fundamental Concepts to Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55382-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55382-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-55380-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-55382-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)