Abstract
This chapter examines how to incorporate place-based socioscientific issues (SSI) instruction to improve preservice science teachers’ understanding and implementation of renewable energy topics, specifically focusing on perspective-taking. Acknowledging the importance of SSI in preparing informed and responsible citizens, the chapter explores how engaging with SSI promotes deeper scientific knowledge, critical thinking, and social and environmental awareness. The chapter presents a case study with eight preservice science teachers who participated in a 4-week SSI-infused place-based instruction focused on Muğla’s increasing energy demand. In this qualitative study, the data was collected through classroom observations, student artifacts, and interviews. The findings show that incorporating perspective-taking methodologies enhanced students’ holistic perspective and argumentation skills, leading to a comprehensive understanding of renewable energy and Muğla’s potential. Positive student feedback emphasized the benefits of active engagement, research, in-class discussions, and role-playing activities, while technical limitations presented challenges. The chapter recommends conducting future research to explore the long-term effects of place-based SSI instruction and improve instructional strategies for promoting student engagement and understanding of SSI in localized contexts. The results of the chapter can aid in improving preservice teacher education and the effective integration of SSI in science teaching.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Apaydın, Z., & Kandemir, M. A. (2018). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin fen bilimleri dersinde kullandıkları öğretim yöntem, teknik ve değerlendirme araçlarına ilişkin görüşleri [Opinions of classroom teachers on teaching methods, techniques and assessment tools used in science lessons]. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi, 33, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.14582/DUZGEF.1884
Aydın, G. Ş., Sarıbaş, D., Özalp, D., & Yılmaz, Ş. (2021). Biyoloji öğretmenlerinin sosyo-bilimsel konuların öğretimine yönelik görüşlerinin incelenmesi [Examination of biology teachers’ views on teaching socio-scientific issues]. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(1), 161–181. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.827736
Bang, M., & Marin, A. (2015). Nature–culture constructs in science learning: Human/non/human agency and intentionality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 530–544. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21204
Barrett, S. E., & Nieswandt, M. (2010). Teaching about ethics through socioscientific issues in physics and chemistry: Teacher candidates’ beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 380–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20343
Borgerding, L., & Dagistan, M. (2018). Preservice science teachers’ concerns and approaches for teaching socioscientific and controversial issues. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(4), 283–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1440860
Bozdoğan, A. E., & Yiğit, D. (2014). Öğretmen adaylarının alternatif enerji kaynaklarına yönelik görüşlerinin farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [Examination of preservice teachers’ views on alternative energy sources in terms of different variables]. Electronic Journal of Education Sciences, 3(6).
Brocos, P., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2020). What to eat here and now: Contextualization of scientific argumentation from a place-based perspective. In I. S. Tapia (Ed.), International perspectives on the contextualization of science education (pp. 15–46). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27982-0_2
Choi, Y., & Lee, H. (2021). Exploring the effects of implementing a research-based SSI program on students’ understanding of SSI and willingness to act. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 7(2), 477–499. https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-bja10033
Demirbaş, A., & Bakis, R. (2004). Energy from renewable sources in Turkey: Status and future direction. Energy Sources, 26(5), 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908310490429759
Evren Yapıcıoğlu, A., & Kaptan, F. (2018). Sosyobilimsel durum temelli öğretim yaklaşımının argümantasyon becerilerinin gelişimine katkısı: Bir karma yöntem araştırması [Contribution of socioscientific situation-based teaching approach to the development of argumentation skills: A mixed method research]. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(1), 39–61.
Gürbüz, E. Y., Altıntaş, A., Sürücü, B., & Tuncer, A. D. (2021). Rüzgar türbinlerinin yaban hayatına etkilerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of the effects of wind turbines on wildlife]. Politeknik Dergisi, 1(1), 953–962. https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.741965
Hancock, T. S., Friedrichsen, P. J., Kinslow, A. T., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). Selecting socio-scientific issues for teaching: A grounded theory study of how science teachers collaboratively design SSI-based curricula. Science & Education, 28, 639–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00065-x
Han-Tosunoğlu, Ç., & İrez, S. (2017). Biyoloji öğretmenlerinin sosyobilimsel konularla ile ilgili anlayışları [Biology teachers’ understanding of socioscientific issues]. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(2), 833–860. https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.369244
Herman, B. C. (2015). The influence of global warming science views and sociocultural factors on willingness to mitigate global warming. Science Education, 1(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21136
Herman, B. C. (2018). Students’ environmental NOS views, compassion, intent, and action: Impact of place-based socioscientific issues instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(4), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21433
Herman, B. C., Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., & Newton, M. H. (2018). A socioscientific issues approach to environmental education. In G. Reis & J. Scott (Eds.), International perspectives on the theory and practice of environmental education: A reader (Environmental discourses in science education) (Vol. 3). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67732-3_11
Herman, B. C., Zeidler, D. L., & Newton, M. (2020). Students’ emotive reasoning through place-based environmental socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education, 50, 2081–2109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9764-1
Herman, B. C., Newton, M. H., & Zeider, D. (2021). Impact of place-based socioscientifc issues instruction on students’ contextualization of socioscientifc orientations. Science Education, 105(4), 585–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21618
Herman, B. C., Poor, S. V., Oertli, R. T., & Schulte, K. (2022). Promoting young learners’ NOS views through place-based SSI instruction. Science & Education, 1–46, 947–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00353-z
Höök, M., & Tang, X. (2013). Depletion of fossil fuels and anthropogenic climate change – A review. Energy Policy, 52, 797–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.046
Kahn, S., & Zeidler, D. L. (2016). Using our heads and HARTSS*: Developing perspective-taking skills for socioscientific reasoning (*Humanities, ARTS, and Social Sciences). Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(3), 261–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9458-3
Kahn, S., & Zeidler, D. L. (2019). A conceptual analysis of perspective taking: Positioning a tangled construct within science education and beyond. Science & Education, 28(6–7), 605–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00044-2
Keser, Ö. (2003). Energy, environment, and education relationship, in developing countries’ policies: A case study for Turkey. Energy Sources, 25(2), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908310390142181
Kim, G., Ko, Y., & Lee, H. (2020). The effects of community-based socioscientific issues program (SSICOMM) on promoting students’ sense of place and character as citizens. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09976-1
Kinskey, M. (2020). Developing and facilitating socioscientific issues based science lessons: Elementary preservice teachers’ experiences (Publication no. 27743561). Soctoral dissertation, University of South Florida. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Kinskey, M., & Zeidler, D. (2021). Elementary preservice teachers’ challenges in designing and implementing socioscientific issues-based lessons. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(3), 350–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1826079
Kurdyavtsev, A., Stedman, R. C., & Krasny, M. E. (2012). Sense of place in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 18(2), 229–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.609615
Kutluca, A. Y., & Aydin, A. (2017). Changes in pre-service science teachers’ understandings after being involved in explicit nature of science and socioscientific argumentation processes. Science & Education, 26, 637–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9919-x
Lee, H., & Yang, J. (2019). Science teachers taking their first steps toward teaching socioscientific issues through collaborative action research. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9614-6
Lee, H., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Choi, K. (2006). Korean science teachers’ perceptions of the introduction of socioscientific issues into the science curriculum. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 6(2), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150609556691
Lee, H., Chang, H., Choi, K., Kim, S. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2012). Developing character and values for global citizens: Analysis of pre-service science teachers’ moral reasoning on socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 925–953. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.625505
Lee, H., Kyunghee, C., Kim, S., Jungsook, Y., Krajcik, J. S., Herman, B. C., & Zeidler, D. L. (2013). Socioscientific issues as a vehicle for promoting character and values as global citizens. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2079–2113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.749546
Leung, J. S. C., & Cheng, M. M. W. (2020). Conceptual change in socioscientific issues: Learning about obesity. International Journal of Science Education, 42(18), 3134–3158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1856966
Leung, J. S. C., Wong, A. S. L., & Yung, B. H. W. (2015). Understandings of nature of science and multiple perspective evaluation of science news by non-science majors. Science & Education, 24(7–8), 887–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-014-9736-4
Marker, G. W. (1991). Has the time come to revive energy education? The Social Studies, 82(5), 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.1991.9958333
Masnadi, M. S., Grace, J. R., Bi, X. T., Lim, C. J., & Ellis, N. (2015). From fossil fuels towards renewables: Inhibitory and catalytic effects on carbon thermochemical conversion during co-gasification of biomass with fossil fuels. Applied Energy, 140, 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.006
Mayer, S. F., Frantz, C. M., Bruehlman-Senecal, E., & Dolliver, K. (2009). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 607–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508319745
Ministry of National Education. (2013). İlköğretim kurumları (ilkokullar ve ortaokullar) fen bilimleri dersi (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı [Primary education institutions (primary and secondary schools) science lesson (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8th grades) curriculum]. T.C Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
Nargund-Joshi, V. (2020). Reflections from a science teacher educator: Supporting pre-service teachers to teach science in a contextualized manner. In I. S. Tapia (Ed.), International perspectives on the contextualization of science education (pp. 147–157). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27982-0_7
Newton, M. H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2020). Developing socioscientific perspective taking. International Journal of Science Education, 42(8), 1302–1319. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1756515
Okur Akçay, N., Akçay, A., & Kurt, M. (2016). Ortaokul öğretmenlerinin öğretim yöntem ve tekniklerine yönelik görüş ve yeterliklerinin incelenmesi [Examining the opinions and competencies of secondary school teachers about teaching methods and techniques]. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 333–342.
Oral, M. (2020). Yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarına ilişkin bir farkındalık araştırması [An awareness survey on renewable energy sources]. Türkiye Bilimsel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(2), 286–296.
Özkan, R., Gökdemir, A., & Şen, F. (2016). Muğla bölgesinin enerji kaynakları ve Muğla’da mevcut enerji üretimi [Energy resources of Muğla region and current energy production in Muğla]. Küresel Mühendislik Çalışmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 19–31.
Pouliot, C. (2008). Students’ inventory of social actors concerned by the controversy surrounding cellular telephones: A case study. Science Education, 92(3), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20274
Presley, M. L., Sickel, A. J., Muslu, N., Merle-Johnson, D., Witzig, S. B., Izci, K., & Sadler, T. D. (2013). A framework for socio-scientifc issues based education. Science Educator, 22(1), 26–32.
Reis, P., & Galvao, C. (2009). Teaching controversial socio-scientific issues in biology and geology classes: A case study. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 13(1), 162–185.
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientifc issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802681839
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042
Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37, 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
Saraç, E., & Bedir, H. (2014). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin yenilenebilir enerji kaynakları ile ilgili algıları üzerine nitel bir çalışma [A qualitative study on primary school teachers’ perceptions of renewable energy sources]. Kara Harp Okulu Bilim Dergisi, 24(1), 19–45.
Saunders, K. J., & Rennie, L. J. (2013). A pedagogical model for ethical inquiry into socioscientifc issues in science. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9248-z
Semken, S., & Freeman, B. C. (2008). Sense of place in the practice and assessment of place-based science teaching. Science Education, 92, 1042–1057. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20279
Sibic, O., & Topcu, M. S. (2020). Pre-service science teachers’ views towards socio-scientific issues and socio-scientific issue-based instruction. Journal of Education in Science. Environment and Health (JESEH), 6(4), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.749847
Ünal, C. (2022). Türkiye’de enerji sektörünün genişletilmiş ekserji analizi kullanılarak değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of the energy sector in Turkey using extended exergy analysis]. Unpublished master thesis. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi.
Yenişehirlioğlu, E., & Türkay, O. (2021). Yenilenebilir enerji teknolojilerinin konaklama işletmelerinde kullanımı ve turizm arzındaki paradigma kırılması: Avusturya Stadhale Hotel incelemesi [Use of renewable energy technologies in hospitality businesses and breaking the Paradigm in tourism supply: Austrian Stadhale Hotel review]. Türk Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 623–641. https://doi.org/10.26677/TR1010.2021.684
Yılmaz, Ş., & Türkyılmaz, O. (2022). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de birincil enerji arzı. TMMOB Makina Mühendisleri Odası [Primary energy supply in the world and in Turkey. TMMOB chamber of mechanical engineers]. Oda raporu. https://www.mmo.org.tr/kitaplar/turkiyenin-enerji-gorunumu-2022
Zafar, M. W., Shahbaz, M., Sinha, A., Sengupta, T., & Qin, Q. (2020). How renewable energy consumption contribute to environmental quality? The role of education in OECD countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 268, 122–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122149
Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research and practice. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 697–726). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203097267.ch34
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. L., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Muslu, N., Isik, H. (2024). Enhancing Preservice Teachers’ Understanding and Application of Place-Based Socioscientific Issues: A Focus on Renewable Energy and Perspective-Taking. In: Namdar, B., Karahan, E. (eds) Socioscientific Issues Focused Teacher Education. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, vol 60. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55233-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55233-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-55232-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-55233-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)