Abstract
According to the research, effective SSI instruction helps students develop various skills, including critical thinking, decision-making, moral reasoning, and argumentation. Because socioscientific issues (SSI) are open-ended, unstructured, and debatable, specific strategies and techniques for teaching SSI should be provided. Teachers play an important role in how SSI are taught in school science, so they should develop an understanding and pedagogical knowledge to implement SSI instruction. However, the literature called for research that focuses on the types of knowledge that teachers must have to incorporate SSI into their teaching effectively. Theoretical frameworks for SSI-PCK have been developed based on previous research on pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) in the relevant literature. Regarding place-based SSI, teachers’ teaching knowledge should be expanded to include all components. Teachers with adequate place-based PCK serve as local experts or curriculum developers, emphasizing real places and issues related to local places during their instruction.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anagun, S. S., & Muhammet, D. (2010). Teacher candidates’ perceptions regarding socioscientific issues in science and technology instruction. Social and Behavioral Science, 9, 981–985.
Avsar-Erumit, B., Namdar, B., & Oğuz-Namdar, A. (2023). Promoting preservice teachers’ global citizenship and contextualised NOS views through role-play activities integrated into place-based SSI instruction on climate issues. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2251189
Aydin, S., Demirdogen, B., Tarkin, A., Kutucu, S., Ekiz, B., Akin, F. N., et al. (2013). Providing a set of research-based practices to support preservice teachers’ long-term professional development as learners of science teaching. Science Education, 97(6), 903–935.
Aydin, S., Friedrichsen, P. M., Boz, Y., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2014). Examination of the topic-specific nature of pedagogical content knowledge in teaching electrochemical cells and nuclear reactions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 658–674. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00105B
Aydin-Gunbatar, S., Ekiz-Kiran, B., & Oztay, E. S. (2020). Pre-service chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for integrated STEM development with LESMeR model. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(4), 1063–1082.
Bayram-Jacobs, D., Henze, I., Evagorou, M., Shwartz, Y., Aschim, E. L., Alcaraz-Dominguez, S., et al. (2019). Science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge development during enactment of socioscientific curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(9), 1207–1233.
Capkinoglu, E., Yilmaz, S., & Leblebicioglu, G. (2020). Quality of argumentation by seventh-graders in local socioscientifc issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(6), 827–855.
Carlson, J., & Daehler, K. R. (2019). The refined consensus model of pedagogical content knowledge in science education. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski (Eds.), Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers’ knowledge for teaching science (pp. 77–94). Springer.
Carter, L., Rodriguez, C. C., & Jones, M. (2014). Transformative learning in science education: Investigating pedagogy for action. In L. Bencze & S. Alsop (Eds.), Activist science and technology education (pp. 531–545). Springer.
Cebesoy, U. B. (2023). Place-based SSI instruction: Current status and prospects. In O. Cardak & S. A. Kiray (Eds.), Current studies in educational disciplines (pp. 54–65). ISRES Publishing.
Chang, J., & Park, J. (2020). Developing teacher professionalism for teaching socio-scientific issues: What and how should teachers learn? Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(2), 423–431.
Chinn, P. W. (2012). Developing teachers’ place-based and culture-based pedagogical content knowledge and agency. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 323–334). Springer.
Dori, Y. J., Tal, R., & Tsaushu, M. (2003). Teaching biotechnology through case studies-can we improve higher order thinking skills of nonscience majors? Science Education, 87, 767–793.
Eilks, I. (2010, September). Making chemistry teaching relevant and promoting scientific literacy by focusing on authentic and controversial socio-scientific issues. Presentation at the annual meeting of the society for didactics in chemistry and physics, Potsdam, Germany.
Ekborg, M., Ottander, C., Silfver, E., & Simon, S. (2013). Teachers’ experience of working with socio-scientific issues: A large scale and in-depth study. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 599–617.
Espeja, A. G., & Lagaron, D. C. (2015). Socioscientific issues (SSI) in initial training of primary school teachers: Pre-service teachers’ conceptualization of SSI and appreciation of the value of teaching SSI. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 196, 80–88.
Favier, T., Van Gorp, B., Cyvin, J. B., & Cyvin, J. (2021). Learning to teach climate change: Students in teacher training and their progression in pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 45(4), 594–620.
Forbes, C. T., & Davis, E. A. (2008). Exploring preservice elementary teachers’ critique and adaptation of science curriculum materials in respect to socioscientific issues. Science & Education, 17(8), 829–854.
Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking of the PCK summit. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–41). Routledge.
Grossman, P. (1990). The making of a teacher. Teachers College Press.
Han-Tosunoglu, C., & Lederman, N. G. (2021). Developing an instrument to assess pedagogical content knowledge for biological socioscientific issues. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 103217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103217
Herman, B. C. (2018). Students’ environmental NOS views, compassion, intent, and action: Impact of place-based socioscientific issues instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(4), 600–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21433
Herman B. C., Sadler T. D., Zeidler D. L., & Newton M. H. (2018). A socioscientific issues approach to environmental education. In G. Reis & J. Scott (Eds.), International perspectives on the theory and practice of environmental education: A reader. Environmental discourses in science education (Vol. 3, pp.145–161). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67732-3_11
Herman, B. C., Zeidler, D. L., & Newton, M. (2020). Students’ emotive reasoning through place-based environmental socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education, 50, 2081–2109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9764-1
Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., Zangori, L., et al. (2021). Developing and using multiple models to promote scientific literacy in the context of socio-scientific issues. Science & Education, 30, 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00206-1
Kilinc, A., Demiral, U., & Kartal, T. (2017). Resistance to dialogic discourse in SSI teaching: The effects of an argumentation-based workshop, teaching practicum, and induction on a preservice science teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(6), 764–789.
Klosterman, M. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2010). Multi-level assessment of scientific content knowledge gains associated with socioscientific issues-based instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1017–1043.
Korthagen, F., Loughran, J. J., & Russell, T. (2006). Developing fundamental principles for teacher education programs and practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(8), 1020–1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.022
Lee, H. (2016). Conceptualization of an SSI-PCK framework for teaching socioscientific issues. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(4), 539–550.
Lee, H. (2018). What is SSI education? Parkyoung Story.
Lee, H. (2022). Pedagogical and epistemological challenges of pre-service science teachers teaching socioscientific issues: Based on the SSI-PCK framework. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 8(2), 301–330.
Lee, H., & Witz, K. (2009). Science teachers’ inspiration for teaching socioscientific issues (SSI): Disconnection with reform efforts. International Journal of Science Education, 31(7), 931–960.
Lee, H., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Choi, K. (2006). Korean science teachers’ perceptions of the introduction of socioscientific issues into the science curriculum. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 6(2), 97–117.
Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 370–391.
Macalalag, A. Z., Johnson, J., & Lai, M. (2020). How do we do this: Learning how to teach socioscientific issues. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15, 389–413.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Kluwer.
Mavhunga, E., & Rollnick, M. (2013). Improving PCK of chemical equilibrium in pre-service teachers. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1_2), 113–125.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Nilsson, P., & Loughran, J. (2012). Exploring the development of pre-service science elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 699–721.
Oztay, E. S., & Boz, Y. (2022). Interaction between pre-service chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge in electrochemistry. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(1), 245–269.
Park, S., Jang, J. Y., Chen, Y. C., & Jung, J. (2011). Is pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) necessary for reformed science teaching?: Evidence from an empirical study. Research in Science Education, 41, 245–260.
Parr, J. C. (2013). View of socioscientific issues among educators: The willingness of teachers to accept SSI into the classroom and the reason underlying those beliefs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Southern Mississippi.
Pitiporntapin, S., Yutakom, N., & Sadler, T. D. (2016). Thai pre-service science teachers’ struggles in using socioscientific issues (SSIs) during practicum. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching, 17(2), 1–20.
Pitpiorntapin, S., & Topcu, M. S. (2016). Teaching based on socioscientific issues in science classrooms: A review study. KKU International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 119–136.
Romine, W. L., Sadler, T. D., & Kinslow, A. T. (2017). Assessment of scientific literacy: Development and validation of the Quantitative Assessment of Socio-Scientific Reasoning (QuASSR). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(2), 274–295.
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802681839
Sadler, T. D. (2011). Socio-scientific issues-based education: What we know about science education in the context of SSI. In T. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom (pp. 355–369). Springer.
Sadler, T. D., Romine, W. L., & Topçu, M. S. (2016). Learning science content through socio-scientific issues-based instruction: A multi-level assessment study. International Journal of Science Education, 38(10), 1622–1635. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1204481
Sadler, T. D., Foulk, J. A., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2017). Evolution of a model for socio-scientific issue teaching and learning. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(2), 75–87.
Sæleset, J., & Friedrichsen, P. (2021). Pre-service science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge integration of students’ understanding in science and instructional strategies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science Technology Education, 17(5). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10859
Sande M. E. (2010). Pedagogical content knowledge and the gas laws: A multiple case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Minnesota.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and training: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Shulman, L. (2015). PCK: Its genesis and exodus. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 3–13). Routledge.
Smith, G. (2002). Place-based education, learning to be where we are. Phi Delta Kappan, 584–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170208300806
Sobel, D. (2005). Place-based education: Connecting classroom and community. Orion Society.
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). What is an “expert student?”. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 5–9.
Subramaniam, K. (2020). A place-based education analysis of prospective teachers’ prior knowledge of science instruction in informal settings. International Journal of Educational Research, 99, 101497.
Tamir, P. (1988). Subject matter and related pedagogical knowledge in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(88)90011-X
Tidemand, S., & Nielsen, J. A. (2017). The role of socioscientific issues in biology teaching: From the perspective of teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(1), 44–61.
Van Driel, J. H., De Jong, O., & Verloop, N. (2002). The development of preservice chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 86(4), 572–590.
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
Zeidler, D. L., Applebaum, S. M., & Sadler, T. D. (2011). Enacting a socioscientific issues classroom: Transformative transformations. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom (pp. 277–305). Springer.
Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). New directions in socioscientifc issues research. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1–9.
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Öztay, E.S. (2024). Preservice Teacher Education for Place-Based Socioscientific Issues. In: Namdar, B., Karahan, E. (eds) Socioscientific Issues Focused Teacher Education. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, vol 60. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55233-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55233-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-55232-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-55233-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)