Abstract
Engaging in socioscientific issues (SSI) requires considering different positions, and perspectives as well as different emotional reactions. The aim of this chapter is twofold: First, it was aimed to explain how a local gold mining case can be used for place-based SSI instruction. Each step from planning (taking required permission from the authorities) to implementation was explained in detail. The second is to explore how preservice science teachers (N = 15) experiencing local place-based SSI instruction in gold mining in Türkiye expressed different forms of emotive reasoning about people and nature affected by the local SSI (gold mining) before and after the instruction. Four types of emotive reasoning (apathy, passive case, moderated concern, and empathetic dissonance) were detected in participants’ responses. While there were fewer instances of different types of emotive reasoning, few preservice teachers showed no emotive attachment (coded as apathy) and expressed general concern (coded as passive care) toward the environment or people affected by the local SSI before the instruction. Both the number of instances and the intensity of emotive reactions (coded as moderated concern and empathetic dissonance) increased significantly after the instruction. Further in-depth analyses revealed that participants engaged in the local SSI by making value judgments, asserting helplessness, and diverting responsibility to third parties (as forms of moderated concern). In addition, they developed a deep compassion for the people and environment affected by the local SSI, guilt for failing to address SSI, rage toward those who were thought to be responsible for SSI, and righteous indignation when the moral standards of equity and justice were violated as a result of SSI. In the last part, how the gold mining case constitutes an interesting and compelling SSI that intrigued preservice science teachers’ emotive reactions and how a local SSI can be transferred to a global context were discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cebesoy, Ü. B. (2020). Investigating Turkish pre-service science teachers’ moral reasoning in genetics related socioscientific issues. Journal of Science Learning, 4(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v4i1.28155
Cebesoy, U. B. (2021a). Pre-service science teachers’ informal reasoning patterns and risk perceptions in SSI: Case of gene therapy. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(4), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/11237
Cebesoy, U. B. (2021b). Investigating Turkish pre-service primary teachers’ environmental moral reasoning patterns on environmental dilemmas. In A. Karmaoui, A. B. Salem, & M. H. Anees (Eds.), Handbook of research on environmental education strategies for addressing climate change and sustainability (pp. 39–62). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7512-3
Cebesoy, U. B., & Chang Rundgren, S. N. (2023). Embracing socioscientific issues-based teaching and decision-making in teacher professional development. Educational Review, 75(3), 507–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1931037
Dawson, V., & Venville, G. J. (2009). High-school students’ informal reasoning and argumentation about biotechnology: An indicator of scientific literacy? International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1421–1445. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690801992870
Dillon, J. (2009). On scientific literacy and curriculum reform. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4, 201–213.
Ersoy, A. (2022). The current status of gold mining in Turkey: An overview. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 11(4), 1103–1114.
Evagorou, M., & Dillon, J. (2020). Introduction: Socio-scientific issues as promoting responsible citizenship and the relevance of science. In M. Evagorou, J. A. Nielsen, & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science teacher education for responsible citizenship: Towards a pedagogy for relevance through socioscientific issues (pp. 1–11). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40229-7
Gao, L., Mun, K., & Kim, S. W. (2021). Using socioscientific issues to enhance students’ emotional competence. Research in Science Education, 51, 935–956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09873-1
Gutiérrez, M. F. (2018). Socioscientific argumentation and model-based reasoning: A study on mining exploitation in Colombia. Universitas Psychologica, 17(5), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy17-5.samb
Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In R. K. Hambleton, P. F. Merenda, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Adapting psychological and educational tests for cross-cultural assessment. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Herman, B. C. (2015). The influence of global warming science views and sociocultural factors on willingness to mitigate global warming. Science Education, 99(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21136
Herman, B. C. (2018). Students’ environmental NOS views, compassion, intent, and action: Impact of place-based socioscientific issues instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(4), 600–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21433
Herman, B. C., Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., & Newton, M. H. (2018). A socioscientific issues approach to environmental education. In G. Reis & J. Scott (Eds.), International perspectives on the theory and practice of environmental education: A reader. Environmental discourses in science education (Vol. 3, pp. 145–161). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67732-3_11
Herman, B. C., Owens, D. C., Oertli, R. T., Zangori, L. A., & Newton, M. H. (2019). Exploring the complexity of students’ scientific explanations and associated nature of science views within a place-based socioscientific issue context. Science & Education, 28, 329–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00034-4
Herman, B. C., Zeidler, D. L., & Newton, M. (2020). Students’ emotive reasoning through place-based environmental socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education, 50, 2081–2109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9764-1
Herman, B. C., Newton, M. H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2021). Impact of place-based socioscientific issues instruction on students’ contextualization of socioscientific orientations. Science Education, 105(4), 585–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21618
Herman, B. C., Poor, S. V., Oertli, R. T., & Schulte, K. (2023). Promoting young learners’ NOS views through place-based SSI instruction. Science & Education, 32(4), 947–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00353-z
Jaszczak, E., Polkowska, Ż., Narkowicz, S., & Namieśnik, J. (2017). Cyanides in the environment—Analysis—Problems and challenges. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24, 15929–15948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9081-7
Kalin, B., & Namdar, B. (2022). Preservice science teachers’ informal reasoning and scientific habits of mind: A case of hydroelectric power plants. Turkish Journal of Education, 11(1), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.980874
Karisan, D., & Cebesoy, U. B. (2021). Use of the SEE-SEP model in pre-service science teacher education: The case of genetics dilemmas. In W. A. Powell (Ed.), Socioscientific issues-based instruction for scientific literacy development (pp. 223–254). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4558-4.ch008
Kaya, M. (2009). Gold potential and production of Turkey. In Proceedings-European Metallurgical Conference, EMC.
Lederman, N. G., Antink, A., & Bartos, S. (2014). Nature of science, scientific inquiry, and socio-scientific issues arising from genetics: A pathway to developing a scientifically literate citizenry. Science & Education, 23, 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9503-3
Lee, H., Chang, H., Choi, K., Kim, S. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2012). Developing character and values for global citizens: Analysis of pre-service science teachers’ moral reasoning on socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 925–953. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.625505
Lee, H., Yoo, J., Choi, K., Kim, S. W., Krajcik, J., Herman, B. C., & Zeidler, D. L. (2013). Socioscientific issues as a vehicle for promoting character and values for global citizens. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2079–2113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.749546
Leung, J. S., Wong, K. L., & Chan, K. K. (2020). Pre-service secondary science teachers’ beliefs about teaching socio-scientific issues. In M. Evagorou, J. A. Nielsen, & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science teacher education for responsible citizenship: Towards a pedagogy for relevance through socioscientific issues (pp. 21–39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40229-7
Manning, T. J., & Kappes, D. W. (2016). Heap leaching of gold and silver ores. In Gold ore processings (pp. 413–428). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63658-4.00025-6
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Mineral Research and Exploration (MTA). (2016). Türkiye ve dünyada altın [Gold in Türkiye and in the world]. Retrieved from https://www.mta.gov.tr/v3.0/sayfalar/bilgi-merkezi/maden-serisi/img/Altin.pdf
Namdar, B., Aydin, B., & Raven, S. (2020). Preservice science teachers’ informal reasoning about hydroelectric power issue: The effect of attitudes towards socio-scientific issues and media literacy. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 6(4), 551–567.
Newton, M. H., Herman, B. C., & Zeidler, D. L. (2016, January 5). The longitudinal association of an experiential environmental SSI course with student conceptualizations and behaviors. [Conference presentation]. Association for Science Teacher Education Conference, Reno, NV, United States.
Nielsen, J. A. (2020). Teachers and socioscientific issues – An overview of recent empirical research. In M. Evagorou, J. A. Nielsen, & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science teacher education for responsible citizenship: Towards a pedagogy for relevance through socioscientific issues (pp. 13–20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40229-7
Özberk, N. (2022). Anaakım ve alternatif medyada ‘çevresel değerleme dili’: Kışladağı altın madeni örneği [‘Environmental valuation languages’ in the mainstream and alternative media: The case of kışladağı gold mine]. Kent ve Çevre Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 36–59. https://doi.org/10.48118/yykentcevre.1062319
Özen, H., & Özen, Ş. (2018). What comes after repression? The hegemonic contestation in the gold-mining field in Turkey. Geoforum, 88, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.11.002
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative evaluation & research methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Pedretti, E. (1999). Decision making and STS education: Exploring scientific knowledge and social responsibility in schools and science centers through an issues-based approach. School Science and Mathematics, 99(4), 174–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17471.x
Pedretti, E. G. (2004). Perspectives on learning through research on critical issues-based science center exhibitions. Science Education, 88(S1), S34–S47. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20019
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Moral and ethical dimensions of socioscientific decision-making as integral components of scientific literacy. The Science Educator, 13, 39–48.
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas. Science Education, 88, 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10101
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision- making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112–138.
Sağlam, H. I., & Eroglu, B. (2022). A mixed-method study on pre-service teachers’ informal reasoning regarding nuclear energy use. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.139
Suryawati, E., Suzanti, F., Zulfarina, Z., Putriana, A. R., & Febrianti, L. (2020). The implementation of local environmental problem-based learning student worksheets to strengthen environmental literacy. Journal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.22892
Thenepalli, T., Chilakala, R., Habte, L., Tuan, L. Q., & Kim, C. S. (2019). A brief note on the heap leaching technologies for the recovery of valuable metals. Sustainability, 11(12), 3347. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123347
Tidemand, S., & Nielsen, J. A. (2017). The role of socioscientific issues in biology teaching: From the perspective of teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1264644
Topçu, M. S. (2008). Preservice science teachers’ informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues and the factors influencing their informal reasoning [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Middle East Technical University.
Topcu, M. S., Sadler, T. D., & Yilmaz-Tuzun, O. (2010). Preservice science teachers’ informal reasoning about socioscientific issues: The influence of issue context. International Journal of Science Education, 32(18), 2475–2495. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903524779
Topcu, M. S., Yılmaz-Tüzün, Ö., & Sadler, T. D. (2011). Turkish preservice science teachers’ informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues and the factors influencing their informal reasoning. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(4), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9221-0
Turkish Foundation for Combating Soil Erosion (TEMA). (2021). Afyon ve çevresinde madencilik [Mining in and around Afyon]. Retrieved from https://cdn-tema.mncdn.com/Uploads/Cms/afyon-ve-cevresinde-madencilik_1.pdf
Turkish Foundation for Combating Soil Erosion (TEMA). (2022). Madenciliğe Kapalı Alanlar Politika Notu [Areas closed to Mining Policy Note]. Retrieved from https://cdn-tema.mncdn.com/Uploads/Cms/madencilige-kapali-alanlar-politika-notu_2.pdf
Turkish Foundation for Combating Soil Erosion (TEMA). (n.d.). Siyanür liçi ile altın madenciliği [Gold Mining with Cyanide Leach]. https://cdn-tema.mncdn.com/Uploads/Cms/siyanur-lici-altin-madenciligi.pdf
Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research and practice. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, volume II (pp. 697–726). Routledge.
Zeidler, D. L., & Keefer, M. (2003). The role of moral reasoning and the status of socioscientific issues in science education: Philosophical, psychological and pedagogical considerations. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 8–38). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4996-X_15
Zeidler, D. L., & Lewis, J. (2003). Unifying themes in moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 289–306). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4996-X_15
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). New directions in socioscientific issues research. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0008-7
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cebesoy, Ü.B. (2024). Exploring Preservice Science Teachers’ Emotive Reasoning through Place-Based SSI Instruction: The Case of Gold Mining. In: Namdar, B., Karahan, E. (eds) Socioscientific Issues Focused Teacher Education. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, vol 60. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55233-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55233-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-55232-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-55233-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)