Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Theory of Qualitative Structure as a Conceptual Framework for Understanding Servitization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rural Transformation through Servitization

  • 42 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is devoted to an introduction to the qualitative structure theory (Kalinauskas in Najedine s mirom. Kiev, Oktiabrj, 1991; Kalinauskas and Reinin in Method of qualitative structures (MQS). Moscow Aviation Institute Information Bulletin, Issue 4, 1995; Melnikienė and Vidickienė in Public Policy and Administration 18:52–67, 2019; Vidickienė in Evolution of manufacturer’s strategic thinking based on the qualitative structure method. Working paper No. 13-1, Naujos ekonomikos institutas, 2013) as a theoretical background to understanding servitization phenomena. The chapter introduces the potential of the qualitative structure method to be used as a tool for understanding the basic strategies of a producer and its step-by-step evolution to a more complex self-management model. The concept of qualitative structure, presented in the monograph, is a response to the increasing specialization and eclecticism in the organization and management sciences and puts forward new ways of thinking about evolutionary processes in the context of the post-industrial paradigm. The concept of qualitative structure is based on holistic and evolutionary approaches and opens an original and promising method for research and action in the service economy. Moreover, the qualitative structure method is a universal tool for any qualitative research. It offers a genuine way to understand the self-management model for any representative of species and helps to design guidelines for their evolutionary pathway.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alrøe, H. F., & Kristensen, E. S. (2002). Towards a systemic research methodology in agriculture: Rethinking the role of values in science. Agriculture and Human Values, 19, 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015040009300

  • Andersen, H. (2001). The history of reductionism versus holistic approaches to scientific research. Endeavour, 25(4), 153–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-9327(00)01387-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate strategy: An analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbnor, I., & Bjerke, B. (1997). Methodology for creating business knowledge. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botkin, J. W. (1999). Smart business: How knowledge communities can revolutionize your company. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2017). Quantitative and qualitative research: Further reflections on their integration. In Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research (pp. 57–78). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, P. (1979). Quality is free. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. (1980). Toward an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests. Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, F. C., & Casadevall, A. (2011). Reductionistic and holistic science. Infection and Immunity, 79(4), 1401–1404. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01343-10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garvin, D. A. (1983, September–October). Quality on the line. Harvard Business Review, 61(5), 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, J., Olson, J. C., & Haddock, R. A. (1971). Price, brand name and product composition characteristics as determinants of perceived quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(6), 570–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalinauskas, I. N. (1991). Najedine s mirom. Kiev, Oktiabrj.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalinauskas, I. N., & Reinin, G. P. (1995, December). Method of qualitative structures (MQS). Moscow Aviation Institute Information Bulletin, Issue 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapoulas, A., & Mitic, M. (2012). Understanding challenges of qualitative research: Rhetorical issues and reality traps. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 15(4), 354–368. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522751211257051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khankeh, H., Ranjbar, M., Khorasani-Zavareh, D., Zargham-Boroujeni, A., & Johansson, E. (2015). Challenges in conducting qualitative research in health: A conceptual paper. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 20(6), 635–641. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-9066.170010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue ocean strategy: How to create uncontested market space and make competition irrelevant. Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, T. J. (1990). Interdisciplinarity. History, theory, and practice. Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kockelmans, J. J. (1979). Why interdisciplinarity? In J. J. Kockelmans (Ed.), Interdisciplinarity and higher education (pp. i–xii). The Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koontz, H. (1961). The management theory jungle. Academy of Management Journal, 4(3), 174–188. https://doi.org/10.5465/254541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobanova, L. (2003). Human resources transformation: Framework of problem. Tiltai, 1(22), 23–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, R. (2018). Sustainable business models: Providing a more holistic perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1159–1166. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melnikienė, R., & Vidickienė, D. (2019). Lietuvos žemės ūkio politikos vertinimas remiantis kokybinės struktūros analizės metodu. Viešoji politika ir administravimas / Public Policy and Administration, 18(1), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.18.1.23128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2022). The evolving concept of market power in the digital economy, OECD Competition Policy Roundtable Background Note. www.oecd.org/daf/competition/the-evolving-concept-ofmarket-power-in-the-digital-economy-2022.pdf

  • Özmen, H. İ. (2020). The Achilles’ Heel of strategic management: Strategic leadership in a chaotic environment. In International Symposium on Chaos, Complexity and Leadership (pp. 123–135). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27672-0_1

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci, M., & Kaplan, J. (2006). Making sense of evolution: Toward a coherent picture of evolutionary theory. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polaine, A., Lovlie, L., & Reason, B. (2013). Service design. From insight to implementation. Louis Rosenfeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reingand, N. (Ed.). (2011). Intellectual property in academia: A practical guide for scientists and engineers. CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richerson, P. J., Collins, D., & Genet, R. M. (2006). Why managers need an evolutionary theory of organizations. Strategic Organization, 4(2), 201–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer, L., Rogbeer, S., & Michaelis, B. (2015). The dynamic capabilities perspective: From fragments to meta-theory. Management Research Review, 38(7), 662–684. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2013-0209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedereviciute, K., & Valentini, C. (2011). Towards a more holistic stakeholder analysis approach. Mapping known and undiscovered stakeholders from social media. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 5(4), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2011.592170

  • Shmakov, B. V., & Egorov, I. V. (2007). Managerial processes modelling of distribute firm product flows (system approach). Publishing House of SUSU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, A. E. (2010). Strategy as Metatheory. Integral Review, 6(3), 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soomro, Z. A., Shah, M. H., & Ahmed, J. (2016). Information security management needs more holistic approach: A literature review. International Journal of Information Management, 36(2), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenbacka, C. (2001). Qualitative research requires quality concepts of its own. Management Decision, 39(7), 551–556. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umpleby, S. A. (2001). Two kinds of general theories in systems science. In Proceedings of the American Society for Cybernetics, Vancouver (pp. 69–75).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Baalen, P., & Karsten, L. (2007). Is management interdisciplinary? The evolution of management as an interdisciplinary field of research and education in the Netherlands. ERIM Report series: Research in management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Baalen, P., & Karsten, L. (2012). The evolution of management as an interdisciplinary field. Journal of Management History, 18(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1108/17511341211206861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1998). Different strokes: Qualitative research in the administrative science quarterly from 1956 to 1996. In J. Van Maanen (Ed.) Qualitative studies of organizations (pp. ix–xxxii). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidickienė, D. (2013). Evolution of manufacturer’s strategic thinking based on the qualitative structure method. Working Paper No. 13-1, Naujos ekonomikos institutas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidickienė, D., Gedminaitė-Raudonė, Ž., Melnikienė, R., Simonaitytė, V., & Lankauskienė, R. (2021). Bendradarbiavimo tinklų ir jų platformų vaidmuo servitizuojant kaimiškųjų regionų ekonomiką. Monografija. Lietuvos socialinių mokslų centro Ekonomikos ir kaimo vystymo institutas. 145 p.: iliustr., santr. angl. (online) ISBN 987-609-96239-1-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidickienė, D., Gedminaitė-Raudonė, Ž., & Simonaitytė, V. (2019). Ūkininkavimo servitizacija: verslo modelio „produktų gamyba plius paslaugų teikimas“ apraiškos Lietuvoje. Mokslo studija. Lietuvos agrarinės ekonomikos institutas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidickienė, D., & Melnikienė, R. (2014). Evolution of rural policy. Lietuvos agrarinės ekonomikos institutas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (1988). The management sciences and managerial skills. Organization Studies, 9(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084068800900110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, R. (2001). What is strategy and does it matter? (2nd ed.). Cengage Learning EMEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H. (1994). Management education: Provocations to a debate. Management Learning, 25(1), 105–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507694251008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. C. (2011). Identification of customer delight for quality attributes and its applications. Total Quality Management, 22(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2010.532341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. C. (2017). The evolution of quality concepts and the related quality management. In Quality control and assurance—An ancient Greek term re-mastered. InTech.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lithuanian Centre for Social Sciences, Vilnius, Lithuania

    Dalia Vidickienė

Authors
  1. Dalia Vidickienė
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dalia Vidickienė .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vidickienė, D. (2024). Theory of Qualitative Structure as a Conceptual Framework for Understanding Servitization. In: Rural Transformation through Servitization. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47186-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation