Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Messung der Funktion der oberen Gliedmaßen bei Rückenmarkverletzungen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Messung von Rückenmarksverletzungen

  • 4 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Dieses Kapitel zielt darauf ab, Assessmentinstrumente zur Beurteilung der Funktion der oberen Gliedmaßen bei Menschen mit SCI durch ein systematisches Review der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zu beschreiben und zu bewerten. Das systematische Review wurde in Übereinstimmung mit den auf Konsens basierenden Standards für die Auswahl von Gesundheitsmessinstrumenten (COSMIN) auf PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL und Web of Science durchgeführt. Nach Entfernung von Duplikaten wurden 3333 Artikel gesichtet. Von diesen wurden 476 in dieses systematische Review aufgenommen. Unter diesen wurden 33 Artikel für dieses Kapitel berücksichtigt. Die Ergebnisse zeigen 17 Assessmentinstrumente, die die Funktion der oberen Gliedmaßen bei Personen mit SCI bewerten. Unter den 17 in diesem Kapitel enthaltenen Instrumenten bewerten die meisten Skalen die Geschicklichkeit von Armen und Händen sowie sensomotorische und Greiffunktionen. Die gebräuchlichsten Assessmentinstrumente sind der Van Lieshout Test (VLT), ein Instrument zur Beurteilung der Geschicklichkeit von Armen und Händen, und die Graded Redefined Assessment Of Strength, Sensibility And Prehension (GRASSP), ein klinisches Beeinträchtigungsmessinstrument für die sensomotorische und die Greiffunktion in 3 Bereichen (Kraft, Empfindung und Greifen).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Galeoto G, Berardi A, De Santis R, et al. Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Van Lieshout test in an Italian population with cervical spinal cord injury: a psychometric study. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2018;15(4):49. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-018-0083-6.

  2. Coates SK, Harvey LA, Dunlop SA, Allison GT. The AuSpinal: a test of hand function for people with tetraplegia. Spinal Cord. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2010.86.

  3. Misirlioglu TO, Unalan H, Karamehmetoglu SS. Validation of Duruöz hand index in patients with tetraplegia. J Hand Ther. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2015.10.001.

  4. Bunketorp-Käll L, Wangdell J, Reinholdt C, Fridén J. Satisfaction with upper limb reconstructive surgery in individuals with tetraplegia: the development and reliability of a Swedish self-reported satisfaction questionnaire. Spinal Cord. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2017.12.

  5. Castelnuovo G, Giusti EM, Manzoni GM, et al. What is the role of the placebo effect for pain relief in neurorehabilitation? Clinical implications from the Italian consensus conference on pain in neurorehabilitation. Front Neurol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00310.

  6. Marquez MA, De Santis R, Ammendola V, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the „spinal cord injury-falls concern scale“ in the Italian population. Spinal Cord. 2018;56(7):712–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-018-0070-6.

  7. Dattoli S, Colucci M, Soave MG, et al. Evaluation of pelvis postural systems in spinal cord injury patients: outcome research. J Spinal Cord Med. 2018;43:185–92.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berardi A, Galeoto G, Guarino D, et al. Construct validity, test-retest reliability, and the ability to detect change of the Canadian occupational performance measure in a spinal cord injury population. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-019-0196-6.

  9. Ponti A, Berardi A, Galeoto G, Marchegiani L, Spandonaro C, Marquez MA. Quality of life, concern of falling and satisfaction of the sit-ski aid in sit-skiers with spinal cord injury: observational study. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-020-0257-x.

  10. Panuccio F, Galeoto G, Marquez MA, et al. General sleep disturbance scale (GSDS-IT) in people with spinal cord injury: a psychometric study. Spinal Cord. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-020-0500-0.

  11. Monti M, Marquez MA, Berardi A, Tofani M, Valente D, Galeoto G. The multiple sclerosis intimacy and sexuality questionnaire (MSISQ-15): validation of the Italian version for individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-020-0469-8.

  12. Galeoto G, Colucci M, Guarino D, et al. Exploring validity, reliability, and factor analysis of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive Technology in an Italian Population: a cross-sectional study. Occup Ther Heal Care. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380577.2018.1522682.

  13. Colucci M, Tofani M, Trioschi D, Guarino D, Berardi A, Galeoto G. Reliability and validity of the Italian version of Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology 2.0 (QUEST-IT 2.0) with users of mobility assistive device. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1668975.

  14. Berardi A, Galeoto G, Lucibello L, Panuccio F, Valente D, Tofani M. Athletes with disability’ satisfaction with sport wheelchairs: an Italian cross sectional study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1800114.

  15. Berardi A, De Santis R, Tofani M, et al. The Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale: Italian translation, adaptation, and validation of the short form. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(4):i. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2017.1357053.

  16. Anna B, Giovanni G, Marco T, et al. The Validity of Rasterstereography as a Technological Tool for the Objectification of Postural Assessment in the Clinical and Educational Fields: Pilot Study. In: Advances in intelligent systems and computing. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23884-1_8.

  17. Panuccio F, Berardi A, Marquez MA, et al. Development of the pregnancy and motherhood evaluation questionnaire (PMEQ) for evaluating and measuring the impact of physical disability on pregnancy and the management of motherhood: a pilot study. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;2020:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1802520.

  18. Amedoro A, Berardi A, Conte A, et al. The effect of aquatic physical therapy on patients with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. In: Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2020.102022.

  19. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Rev Esp Nutr Human Diet. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

  20. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006.

  21. Terwee CB, Prinsen CAC, Chiarotto A, et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0.

  22. Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, et al. COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4.

  23. Spooren AIF, Janssen-Potten YJM, Post MWM, Kerckhofs E, Nene A, Seelen HAM. Measuring change in arm hand skilled performance in persons with a cervical spinal cord injury: responsiveness of the Van Lieshout test. Spinal Cord. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101957.

  24. Spooren AIF, Arnould C, Smeets RJEM, Snoek G, Seelen HAM. Reference values for the transformed Van Lieshout hand function test for tetraplegia. Spinal Cord. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2013.73.

  25. Spooren AIF, Arnould C, Smeets RJEM, Bongers HMH, Seelen HAM. Improvement of the Van Lieshout hand function test for tetraplegia using a Rasch analysis. Spinal Cord. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2013.54.

  26. Post MWM, Van Lieshout G, Seelen HAM, Snoek GJ, Ijzerman MJ, Pons C. Measurement properties of the short version of the Van Lieshout test for arm/hand function of persons with tetraplegia after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101937.

  27. Franke AC, Snoek GJ, De Groot S, Nene AV, Spooren AIF, Post MWM. Arm hand skilled performance in persons with a cervical spinal cord injury – long-term follow-up. Spinal Cord. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2012.95.

  28. Berardi A, Biondillo A, Màrquez MA, et al. Validation of the short version of the Van Lieshout test in an Italian population with cervical spinal cord injuries: a cross-sectional study. Spinal Cord. 2018;57:339–45.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fattal C. Motor capacities of upper limbs in tetraplegics: a new scale for the assessment of the results of functional surgery on upper limbs. Spinal Cord. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101551.

  30. Fattal C, Enjalbert M, Teissier J, Coulet B, Fachin-Martins E. Responsiveness of the motor capacities scale to upper limb reconstructive surgery in persons with tetraplegia due to cervical spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-020-0456-0.

  31. Marino RJ, Shea JA, Stineman MG. The capabilities of upper extremity instrument: reliability and validity of a measure of functional limitation in tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90412-9.

  32. Marino RJ, Patrick M, Albright W, et al. Development of an objective test of upper-limb function in tetraplegia: the capabilities of upper extremity test. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31824fa6cc.

  33. Oleson CV, Marino RJ. Responsiveness and concurrent validity of the revised capabilities of upper extremity-questionnaire (CUE-Q) in patients with acute tetraplegia. Spinal Cord. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2014.77.

  34. Marino RJ, Sinko R, Bryden A, et al. Comparison of responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the capabilities of upper extremity test (CUE-T) and the graded redefined assessment of strength, sensibility and prehension (GRASSP). Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1310/sci2403-227.

  35. Marino RJ, Kern SB, Leiby B, Schmidt-Read M, Mulcahey MJ. Reliability and validity of the capabilities of upper extremity test (CUE-T) in subjects with chronic spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000272.

  36. Kalsi-Ryan S, Curt A, Verrier MC, Fehlings MG. Development of the graded redefined assessment of strength, sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP): reviewing measurement specific to the upper limb in tetraplegia. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.6.aospine1258.

  37. Kalsi-Ryan S, Beaton D, Curt A, et al. The graded redefined assessment of strength sensibility and prehension: reliability and validity. J Neurotrauma. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2010.1504.

  38. Kalsi-Ryan S, Beaton D, Ahn H, et al. Responsiveness, sensitivity, and minimally detectable difference of the graded and redefined assessment of strength, sensibility, and Prehension, version 1.0. J Neurotrauma. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2015.4217.

  39. Velstra IM, Curt A, Frotzler A, et al. Changes in strength, sensation, and Prehension in acute cervical spinal cord injury: European Multicenter responsiveness study of the GRASSP. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968314565466.

  40. Kalsi-Ryan S, Curt A, Fehlings M, Verrier M. Assessment of the hand in tetraplegia using the graded redefined assessment of strength, sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP). Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2009;14(4):34–46. https://doi.org/10.1310/sci1404-34.

  41. Velstra IM, Fellinghauer C, Abel R, Kalsi-Ryan S, Rupp R, Curt A. The graded and redefined assessment of strength, sensibility, and Prehension version 2 provides interval measure properties. J Neurotrauma. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2017.5195.

  42. Harkema SJ, Shogren C, Ardolino E, Lorenz DJ. Assessment of functional improvement without compensation for human spinal cord injury: extending the neuromuscular recovery scale to the upper extremities. J Neurotrauma. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2015.4213.

  43. Tester NJ, Lorenz DJ, Suter SP, et al. Responsiveness of the neuromuscular recovery scale during outpatient activity-dependent rehabilitation for spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968315605181.

  44. Larson CA, Tezak WD, Malley MS, Thornton W. Assessment of postural muscle strength in sitting: reliability of measures obtained with hand-held dynamometry in individuals with spinal cord injury. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181cf5c49.

  45. Jacobs PL, Mahoney ET, Johnson B. Reliability of arm Wingate anaerobic testing in persons with complete paraplegia. J Spinal Cord Med. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2003.11753674.

  46. Kapadia N, Zivanovic V, Verrier M, Popovic M. Toronto rehabilitation institute-hand function test: assessment of gross motor function in individuals with spinal cord injury. Topics Spinal Cord Injury Rehabil. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1310/sci1802-167.

  47. Kowalczewski J, Ravid E, Prochazka A. Fully-automated test of upper-extremity function. Proc Ann Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091710.

  48. Dahlgren A, Karlsson AK, Lundgren-Nilsson Å, Fridén J, Claesson L. Activity performance and upper extremity function in cervical spinal cord injury patients according to the Klein-Bell ADL scale. Spinal Cord. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101993.

  49. Shin SY, Kim JY, Lee S, Lee J, Kim SJ, Kim C. Intentional movement performance ability (IMPA): a method for robot-aided quantitative assessment of motor function. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robotics. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2013.6650498.

  50. Grasse KM, Hays SA, Rahebi KC, et al. A suite of automated tools to quantify hand and wrist motor function after cervical spinal cord injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0518-8.

  51. Triolo RJ, Bevelheimer T, Eisenhower G, Wormser D. Inter-rater reliability of a clinical test of standing function. J Spinal Cord Med. 1995. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.1995.11719375.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. R.O.M.A. Rehabilitation Outcome Measures Assessment, Non-Profit Organization, Rome, Italy

    Francescaroberta Panuccio, Marina D’Angelo & Giulia Grieco

  2. Department of Neurorehabilitation and Robotics, Bambino Gesù Paediatric Hospital, Rome, Italy

    Marco Tofani

Authors
  1. Francescaroberta Panuccio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marina D’Angelo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Giulia Grieco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marco Tofani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Tofani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Giovanni Galeoto

  2. Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Anna Berardi

  3. Department of Neurorehabilitation and Robotics, Bambino Gesù Paediatric Hospital, Rome, Italy

    Marco Tofani

  4. Universidad Fernando Pessoa-Canarias, Las Palmas, Spain

    Maria Auxiliadora Marquez

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Panuccio, F., D’Angelo, M., Grieco, G., Tofani, M. (2024). Messung der Funktion der oberen Gliedmaßen bei Rückenmarkverletzungen. In: Galeoto, G., Berardi, A., Tofani, M., Auxiliadora Marquez, M. (eds) Messung von Rückenmarksverletzungen. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45860-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45860-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-45859-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-45860-6

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation