Abstract
Students experience development and growth during their higher education journey, but the exact mechanisms behind this process remain relatively unknown. This chapter seeks to shed light on how students develop, grow, and attain empowerment in higher education by focusing on the interactions between individuals and their surroundings (referred to as I-world interactions). Employing a multicultural and multidisciplinary approach, the chapter begins by examining various cultural and philosophical perspectives on I-world interactions, such as the German idealistic, Chinese Confucian, and Islamic Sunni philosophies. Subsequently, it delves into the implications of these interactions for individual development and growth in higher education, drawing from research in psychology, sociology, and education. The chapter argues that three fundamental elements underlie I-world interactions in all three philosophical approaches: the acknowledgement of agency, exercise of agency and enhancement of agency. Higher education allows students to exhibit agency, as supported by sociological theories and psychological evidence of human functioning. Students actively exercise their agency, especially when engaging with environmental factors both within and outside the university setting. If universities effectively structure and implement this process, they can contribute to the enhancement of students’ agency. The three shared elements among the examined cultural philosophies and the empirical evidence in educational, psychological, and sociological studies together form foundations for understanding how students become empowered in higher education and for positioning the enhancement of students’ agency at the centre of higher education across contexts.
An early version of this chapter was developed and revised from the open access article: Yang, L., Lee, S., & Oldac, Y. I. (2023). A cross-cultural exploration of student development in higher education: Acknowledging, exercising, and enhancing agency. ECNU Review of Education. Further revisions were made in the peer review process of the book.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
格物，致知，诚意，正心—Higher Learning, Book of Rites.
- 2.
齐家，治国，平天下—Higher Learning, Book of Rites.
References
Adams, M. (2006). Hybridizing habitus and reflexivity: Towards an understanding of contemporary identity? Sociology, 40(3), 511–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803850663672
Altbach, P. G. (1991). Patterns in higher education development: Toward the year 2000. The Review of Higher Education, 14(3), 293–315.
Altbach, P. G., & Balán, J. (2007). World class worldwide: Transforming research universities in Asia and Latin America. JHU Press.
Anders, G. (2017). You can do anything: The surprising power of a “useless” liberal arts education. Little, Brown.
Anderson, T. J., Clark, W. M., & Naugle, D. K. (2017). An introduction to Christian worldview: Pursuing God’s perspective in a pluralistic world. InterVarsity Press.
Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge University Press.
Archer, M. S. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139087315.001
Ashwin, P., Abbas, A., & McLean, M. (2014). How do students’ accounts of sociology change over the course of their undergraduate degrees? Higher Education, 67(2), 219–234.
Ashwin, P., Blackie, M., Pitterson, N., & Smit, R. (2022). Undergraduate students’ knowledge outcomes and how these relate to their educational experiences: A longitudinal study of chemistry in two countries. Higher Education, 1–16. [online first] https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00962-1
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26.
Bandura, A. (2018). Toward a psychology of human agency: Pathways and reflections. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 130–136.
Bellei, C., Cabalin, C., & Orellana, V. (2014). The 2011 Chilean student movement against neoliberal educational policies. Studies in Higher Education, 39(3), 426–440.
Biesta, G. (2002). How general can Bildung be? Reflections on the future of a modern educational ideal. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 36(3), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004401105_003
Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9064-9
Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Routledge. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/oxford/detail.action?docID=4186085
Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2007.11661545
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507
Case, J. M. (2013). Researching student learning in higher education: A social realist approach. Routledge.
Chesterton, G. K. (1986). In D. Dooley (Ed.), The complete works of G. K. Chesterton. Ignatius Press.
Çınar, B. (2020). İslam Kelam Ekollerinde İnsan Fiilleri ve İnsanın Sorumluluğu İlişkisi. Yalova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(21), 31–44.
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
Fryer, L. K. (2017). Building bridges: Seeking structure and direction for higher education motivated learning strategy models. Educational Psychology Review, 29(2), 325–344.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
Hackett, C., & Grim, B. J. (2012). The global religious landscape: A report on the size and distribution of the world’s major religious groups as of 2010. Pew Research Center.
Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016). The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 17, 63–84.
Jabbar, H., & Menashy, F. (2022). Economic imperialism in education research: A conceptual review. Educational Researcher, 51(4), 279–288.
Jeno, L. M., Danielsen, A. G., & Raaheim, A. (2018). A prospective investigation of students’ academic achievement and dropout in higher education: A Self-Determination Theory approach. Educational Psychology, 38(9), 1163–1184.
Kazanç, F. K. (2007). İslâm Kelâmında İnsan Fiilleri Bağlamında Kader Anlayışı. Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi, 7(1), 125–212.
Kivela, A., Siljander, P., & Sutinen, A. (2012). Between Bildung and growth: Connections and controversies. In P. Siljander, A. Kivelä, & A. Sutinen (Eds.), Theories of Bildung and growth: Connections and controversies between continental educational thinking and American pragmatism (pp. 303–312). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-031-6_19
Klemenčič, M. (2014). Student power in a global perspective and contemporary trends in student organising. Studies in Higher Education, 39(3), 396–411.
Klemenčič, M. (2015). What is student agency? An ontological exploration in the context of research on student engagement. In M. Klemenčič, S. Bergan, & R. Primozic (Eds.), Student engagement in Europe: Society, higher education and student governance (pp. 11–29). Council of Europe.
Klemenčič, M. (2017). Internationalization of universities in the peripheries. In The globalization of internationalization. Routledge.
Konrad, F.-M. (2012). Wilhelm von Humboldt’s contribution to a theory of Bildung. In P. Siljander, A. Kivelä, & A. Sutinen (Eds.), Theories of Bildung and growth: Connections and controversies between continental educational thinking and American pragmatism (pp. 107–124). Sense Publisher.
Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141, 5–20.
Lee, S. (2021). Researching higher education as students’ academic self-formation (CGHE working paper series). Centre for Global Higher Education. https://www.researchcghe.org/perch/resources/publications/working-paper-76.pdf
Levesque, C., Zuehlke, A. N., Stanek, L. R., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Autonomy and competence in German and American university students: A comparative study based on self-determination theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 68.
Li, C. (2018). Community without harmony? A Confucian critique of Michael Sandel. In M. Sandel & P. J. D’Ambrosio (Eds.), Encountering China: Michael Sandel and Chinese philosophy (pp. 3–18). Harvard University Press.
Luescher, T. M., Klemenčič, M., & Jowi, J. O. (2016). Student politics in Africa: Representation and activism (p. 280). African Minds.
Marginson, S. (2011). Higher education in East Asia and Singapore: Rise of the Confucian model. Higher Education, 61(5), 587–611.
Marginson, S. (2017). Limitations of human capital theory. Studies in Higher Education, 44(2), 287–301.
Marginson, S. (2018). Higher education as self-formation. UCL IOE Press.
McArthur, J. (2022). Rethinking authentic assessment: Work, well-being, and society. Higher Education, 1, –17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00822-y
Mead, G. H. (1913). The social self. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 10(14), 374–380. https://doi.org/10.2307/2012910
Mead, G. H., & Morris, C. W. (1962). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. University of Chicago Press.
Mill, J. S. (1859/2015). On liberty, utilitarianism, and other essays. Oxford University Press.
Nieminen, J. H. (2021). Beyond empowerment: Student self-assessment as a form of resistance. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 42(8), 1246–1264.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach (Vol. 3). Cambridge university Press.
Oldac, Y. I. (2021). Self-formation and societal contribution: The Case of Turkish international higher education graduates [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Oxford. https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.830506
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68.
Schumann, C. (2019). Aversive education: Emersonian variations on ‘Bildung’. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(5), 488–497.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
Tan, E. (2014). Human capital theory: A holistic criticism. Review of Educational Research, 84(3), 411–445.
Taylor, C. A. (2017). Is a posthumanist Bildung possible? Reclaiming the promise of Bildung for contemporary higher education. Higher Education, 74(3), 419–435.
Tinto, V. (2012). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. University of Chicago press.
Tu, W.-M. (1985). Confucian thought: Selfhood as creative transformation. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Tu, W.-M. (2013). Confucian humanism in perspective. Frontiers of Literary Studies in China, 7(3), 333–338.
Vermunt, J. D., & Donche, V. (2017). A learning patterns perspective on student learning in higher education: State of the art and moving forward. Educational Psychology Review, 29(2), 269–299.
von Humboldt, W. (2000). Theory of Bildung. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 57–62). Routledge.
Wen, W., Zhou, L., & Hu, D. (2022). Navigating and negotiating global science: Tensions in China’s national science system. Studies in Higher Education, 47 (12), 2473–2486.
Wheelahan, L., Moodie, G., & Doughney, J. (2022). Challenging the skills fetish. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 43(3), 475–494.
Yang, L. (2022). Student formation in higher education: A comparison and combination of Confucian xiushen (self-cultivation) and Bildung. Higher Education, 83(5), 1163–1180.
Young, M. (2007). Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yang, L., Lee, S., Oldac, Y.I. (2023). Agency and Student Development in Higher Education: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Disciplinary Exploration. In: Oldac, Y.I., Yang, L., Lee, S. (eds) Student Agency and Self-Formation in Higher Education. Palgrave Studies in Global Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44885-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44885-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-44884-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-44885-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)