Skip to main content

Spinal Cord Stimulation Meets Them All: An Effective Treatment for Different Pain Conditions. Our Experience and Literature Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Funnel: From the Skull Base to the Sacrum

Abstract

Introduction

Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) is an emerging minimally invasive technique which uses neuromodulation to manage different forms of intractable pain. SCS is a well-established option for the treatment of various pain conditions, and nowadays, indications are ever increasing.

Materials and Methods

In this study, we present our case series of 49 patients who underwent SCS at our Institution for the treatment of pain from different etiologies, and discuss our 10-year experience in SCS. For the purpose of this study, we also performed a systematic review of current indications and new perspectives in SCS.

Results

Among our case series, patients were differentiated into two groups upon prior spinal surgery: patients who had undergone prior spinal surgery for back pain were defined as the “FBSS (failed back surgery syndrome) group,” instead patient suffering from different types of pain but who had never undergone surgery were defined as the “naive group.” As regards clinical response to SCS, 20 patients out of 36 (55.56%) were classified as responders in the FBSS group; in the “naïve” group, 10 patients out of 13 (76.92%) were classified as responders. Among the “not responders” group, several patients suffered from infections.

Of the recent literature about SCS, 2124 records were screened and 37 studies were finally included in the qualitative synthesis for our systematic review.

Discussion

In case of FBSS, surgical revision is often associated with a high morbidity and corresponding low rates of success. Unfortunately, patients affected by chronic pain often become refractory to conservative treatments. Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) is nowadays considered as an effective therapy for several chronic and neuropathic pain conditions, such as failed back surgery syndrome. As regards the economic impact of SCS, implantation of an SCS system results in short-term costs increase, but the annual cumulative costs decrease during the following years after implantation, when compared to the costs of conventional management. Beyond the application for the treatment of FBSS, SCS has also been used for the treatment of other types of chronic non-oncological pain such as neuropathic pain and chronic back pain ineligible for surgical intervention. This evidence paved the way to establishing the potential role of SCS also for the treatment of oncological pain. However, the effectiveness and relative safety of SCS for cancer-related pain has not yet been adequately established.

Conclusions

Spinal Cord Stimulation is a well-established treatment option in for FBSS. Beyond that, SCS has also been used for the treatment of “naive” patients, suffering from other types of chronic, both oncological and non-oncological, medical-refractory pain such as neuropathic pain and chronic back pain ineligible for surgical intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Harmsen IE, Hasanova D, Elias GJB, Boutet A, Neudorfer C, Loh A, Germann J, Lozano AM. Trends in clinical trials for spinal cord stimulation. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2021;99(2):123–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rock AK, Truong H, Park YL, Pilitsis JG. Spinal cord stimulation. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2019;30(2):169–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sdrulla AD, Guan Y, Raja SN. Spinal cord stimulation: clinical efficacy and potential mechanisms. Pain Pract. 2018;18(8):1048–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Graziano F, Gerardi RM, Lo Bue E, Basile L, Brunasso L, Somma T, Maugeri R, Nicoletti G, Iacopino DG. Surgical back risk syndrome and spinal cord stimulation: better safe than sorry. World Neurosurg. 2020;133:e658–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kapural L, Yu C, Doust MW, et al. Comparison of 10-kHz high-frequency and traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain 24-month results from a multicenter, randomized, controlled pivotal trial. Neurosurgery. 2016;79(5):667–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Farber SH, Han JL, Elsamadicy AA, Hussaini Q, Yang S, Pagadala P, Parente B, Xie J, Lad SP. Long-term cost utility of spinal cord stimulation in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Physician. 2017;20(6):E797–805.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. De Andres J, Monsalve-Dolz V, Fabregat-Cid G, Villanueva-Perez V, Harutyunyan A, Asensio-Samper JM, Sanchis-Lopez N. Prospective, randomized blind effect-on-outcome study of conventional vs high-frequency spinal cord stimulation in patients with pain and disability due to failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Med (United States). 2017;18(12):2401–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Scalone L, Zucco F, Lavano A, et al. Benefits in pain perception, ability function and health-related quality of life in patients with failed back surgery syndrome undergoing spinal cord stimulation in a clinical practice setting. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nissen M, Ikäheimo T-M, Huttunen J, Leinonen V, von und zu Fraunberg M. Long-term outcome of spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome: 20 years of experience with 224 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery. 2019;84(5):1011–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rigoard P, Basu S, Desai M, et al. Multicolumn spinal cord stimulation for predominant back pain in failed back surgery syndrome patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2019;160(6):1410–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Harman F, Aydin S, Sencan S, et al. Percutaneous spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome: a retrospective study. Turk Neurosurg. 2020;30(5):739–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. De Jaeger M, Goudman L, Brouns R, De Smedt A, Linderoth B, Eldabe S, Moens M. The long-term response to high-dose spinal cord stimulation in patients with failed back surgery syndrome after conversion from standard spinal cord stimulation: an effectiveness and prediction study. Neuromodulation. 2020;24:546. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.13138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Remacle T, Mauviel S, Renwart HJ, Ghassempour K, Belle F, Lückers O, Bex V, Remacle JM, Bonhomme V. Long-term multicolumn-lead spinal cord stimulation efficacy in patients with failed back surgery syndrome: a six-year prospective follow-up study. World Neurosurg. 2020;142:e245–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Do TT, Smet I, Jerjir A, Vandamme K, Devos M, Van Buyten JP. Real-world analysis: long-term effect of spinal cord stimulation with different waveforms for patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Pract. 2021;21(2):215–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Goudman L, Van Buyten J-P, De Smedt A, Smet I, Devos M, Jerjir A, Moens M. Predicting the response of high frequency spinal cord stimulation in patients with failed back surgery syndrome: a retrospective study with machine learning techniques. J Clin Med. 2020;9(12):4131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Nissen M, Ikäheimo T-M, Huttunen J, Leinonen V, Jyrkkänen H-K, von Und Zu Fraunberg M. Higher preimplantation opioid doses associated with long-term spinal cord stimulation failure in 211 patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Neuromodulation. 2021;24(1):102–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. De Jaeger M, Goudman L, Eldabe S, Van Dongen R, De Smedt A, Moens M. The association between pain intensity and disability in patients with failed back surgery syndrome, treated with spinal cord stimulation. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;43(15):2157–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963828820191694084.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Benyamin R, Galan V, Hatheway J, et al. Options: a prospective, open-label study of high-dose spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic back and leg pain. Pain Physician. 2020;23(1):87–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kapural L, Sayed D, Kim B, Harstroem C, Deering J. Retrospective assessment of salvage to 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients who failed traditional SCS therapy: RESCUE study. J Pain Res. 2020;13:2861–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kallewaard JW, Gültuna I, Hoffmann V, et al. 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome with predominant leg pain: results from a prospective study in patients from the Dutch healthcare system. Pain Pract. 2021;21(5):490–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Motov S, Aftahy K, Jörger A-K, Wagner A, Meyer B, Shiban E. High-frequency spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome patients with predominant low back pain—single-center experience. Neurosurg Rev. 2021;2021:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Breel J, Wille F, Wensing AGCL, Kallewaard JW, Pelleboer H, Zuidema X, Bürger K, de Graaf S, Hollmann MW. A comparison of 1000 Hz to 30 Hz spinal cord stimulation strategies in patients with unilateral neuropathic leg pain due to failed back surgery syndrome: a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, crossover clinical study (HALO). Pain Ther. 2021;10:1189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-021-00268-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Witkam RL, Kurt E, van Dongen R, Arnts I, Steegers MAH, Vissers KCP, Henssen DJHA, Engels Y. Experiences from the patient perspective on spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome: a qualitatively driven mixed method analysis. Neuromodulation. 2021;24(1):112–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Maeda A, Watanabe M, Saigano C, Nakayama S, Yamaura K. Spinal cord stimulation alleviates intractable pain due to malignant pleural mesothelioma: a case report. JA Clin Rep. 2020;6:78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40981-020-00386-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Yokovlev AE, Ellias Y. Spinal cord stimulation as a treatment option for intractable neuropathic cancer pain. Clin Med Res. 2008;6:103. https://doi.org/10.3121/cmr.2008.813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yakovlev AE, Resch BE. Spinal cord stimulation for cancer-related low back pain. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2012;29(2):93–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nouri KH, Brish EL. Spinal cord stimulation for testicular pain. Pain Med. 2011;12(9):1435–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mirpuri RG, Brammeier J, Chen H, Hsu FPK, Chiu VK, Chang EY. Spinal cord stimulation for treatment of the pain associated with hereditary multiple osteochondromas. J Pain Res. 2015;8:557. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S86790.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Cata JP, Cordella JV, Burton AW, Hassenbusch SJ, Weng HR, Dougherty PM. Spinal cord stimulation relieves chemotherapy-induced pain: a clinical case report. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2004;27(1):72–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wininger KL, Bester ML, Deshpande KK. Spinal cord stimulation to treat postthoracotomy neuralgia: non-small-cell lung cancer: a case report. Pain Manag Nurs. 2012;13(1):52–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yakovlev AE, Resch BE, Karasev SA. Treatment of cancer-related chest wall pain using spinal cord stimulation. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2010;27(8):552–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Viswanathan A, Phan PC, Burton AW. Use of spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of phantom limb pain: case series and review of the literature. Pain Pract. 2010;10(5):479–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Elahi F, Callahan D, Greenlee J, Dann TL. Pudendal entrapment neuropathy: a rare complication of pelvic radiation therapy. Pain Physician. 2013;16(6):793–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yakovlev AE, Resch BE. Treatment of multifocal pain with spinal cord stimulation. Neuromodulation. 2012;15:210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00435.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Abd-Elsayed A, Schiavoni N, Sachdeva H. Efficacy of spinal cord stimulators in treating peripheral neuropathy: a case series. J Clin Anesth. 2016;28:74–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hutson N, Hung JC, Puttanniah V, Lis E, Laufer I, Gulati A. Interventional pain management for sacroiliac tumors in the oncologic population: a case series and paradigm approach. Pain Med. 2017;18:959. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnw211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lee MG, Choi SS, Lee MK, Kong MH, Lee IO, Oh HR. Thoracic spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain after spinal meningioma removal: a case report. Clin J Pain. 2009;25(2):167–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ahmadi SA, Vesper J, Schu S, Slotty PJ. High-frequency spinal cord stimulation in surgery-naïve patients—a prospective single-center study. Neuromodulation. 2017;20(4):348–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Al-Kaisy A, Palmisani S, Smith TE, Pang D, Lam K, Burgoyne W, Houghton R, Hudson E, Lucas J. 10 kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for chronic axial low back pain in patients with no history of spinal surgery: a preliminary, prospective, open label and proof-of-concept study. Neuromodulation. 2017;20(1):63–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Al-Kaisy A, Van Buyten JP, Kapural L, Amirdelfan K, Gliner B, Caraway D, Subbaroyan J, Edgar D, Rotte A. 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of non-surgical refractory back pain: subanalysis of pooled data from two prospective studies. Anaesthesia. 2020;75:775. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15036.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Baranidharan G, Feltbower R, Bretherton B, Crowther T, Cooper L, Castino P, Radford H. One-year results of prospective research study using 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation in persistent nonoperated low back pain of neuropathic origin: maiden back study. Neuromodulation. 2021;24(3):479–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pouratian N, Sheth SA. Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery - principles and applications. Berlin: Springer Nature; 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34906-6.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  43. De Jaeger M, Goudman L, Putman K, De Smedt A, Rigoard P, Geens W, Moens M. The added value of high dose spinal cord stimulation in patients with failed back surgery syndrome after conversion from standard spinal cord stimulation. J Clin Med. 2020;9(10):3126.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Maugeri R, Graziano F, Giugno A, Iacopino DG. A new concept to treat lumbar spine stenosis in a mini invasive way. J Neurosurg Sci. 2021;61:347. https://doi.org/10.23736/s0390-5616.16.03277-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Baber Z, Erdek MA. Failed back surgery syndrome: current perspectives. J Pain Res. 2016;9:979–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Amirdelfan K, Webster L, Poree L, Sukul V, McRoberts P. Treatment options for failed back surgery syndrome patients with refractory chronic pain: an evidence based approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42:S41–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Giugno A, Gulì C, Basile L, Graziano F, Maugeri R, Visocchi M, Iacopino DG. Spinal cord stimulation: an alternative concept of rehabilitation? Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2017;124:15–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Brunasso L, Basile L, Iacopino DG, Gulì C, Graziano F, Pino MA, Nicoletti GF, Tumbiolo S, Maugeri R. All that glitters is not gold: a spinal epidural empyema following epidural steroid injection. Surg Neurol Int. 2020;11:240. https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_340_2020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Daniell JR, Osti OL. Failed back surgery syndrome: a review article. Asian Spine J. 2018;12(2):372–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Waszak PM, Modric M, Paturej A, Malyshev SM, Przygocka A, Garnier H, Szmuda T. Spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome: review of clinical use, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Asian Spine J. 2016;10(6):1195–204.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Cho JH, Lee JH, Song KS, Hong JY, Joo YS, Lee DH, Hwang CJ, Lee CS. Treatment outcomes for patients with failed back surgery. Pain Physician. 2017;20(1):E29–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Giammalva GR, Iacopino DG, Azzarello G, Gaggiotti C, Graziano F, Gulì C, Pino M, Maugeri R. End-of-life care in high-grade glioma patients. The palliative and supportive perspective. Brain Sci. 2018;8(7):125.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Isagulyan E, Slavin K, Konovalov N, Dorochov E, Tomsky A, Dekopov A, Makashova E, Isagulyan D, Genov P. Spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain: technical advances. Korean J Pain. 2020;33(2):99–107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Moisset X, Bouhassira D, Avez Couturier J, et al. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for neuropathic pain: systematic review and French recommendations. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2020;176(5):325–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Caylor J, Reddy R, Yin S, et al. Spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain: evidence and theory for mechanisms of action. Bioelectron Med. 2019;5(1):1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Hamm-Faber TE, Gültuna I, van Gorp EJ, Aukes H. High-dose spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic low back pain and leg pain in patients with FBSS, 12-month results: a prospective pilot study. Neuromodulation. 2020;23(1):118–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Mekhail N, Visnjevac O, Azer G, Mehanny DS, Agrawal P, Foorsov V. Spinal cord stimulation 50 years later: clinical outcomes of spinal cord stimulation based on randomized clinical trials - a systematic review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(4):391–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Peeters JB, Raftopoulos C. Tonic, burst, high-density, and 10-kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation: efficiency and patients’ preferences in a failed back surgery syndrome predominant population. Review of literature. World Neurosurg. 2020;144:e331–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Maugeri R, Graziano F, Basile L, Gulì C, Giugno A, Giammalva GR, Visocchi M, Iacopino DG. Reconstruction of vertebral body after radiofrequency ablation and augmentation in dorsolumbar metastatic vertebral fracture: analysis of clinical and radiological outcome in a clinical series of 18 patients. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2017;124:81–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39546-3_13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Zejun Z, Lihua P, Ke W, Su M, Bennett MI. Spinal cord stimulation for cancer-related pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd009389.

  61. Bhaskar A. Interventional pain management in patients with cancer-related pain. Postgrad Med. 2020;132(Suppl 3):13–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Tapias Pérez JH. Spinal cord stimulation: beyond pain management. Neurol (Engl Ed). 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrleng.2019.05.007.

  63. Hagedorn JM, Pittelkow TP, Hunt CL, D’Souza RS, Lamer TJ. Current perspectives on spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of cancer pain. J Pain Res. 2020;13:3295. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S263857.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Chwistek M. Recent advances in understanding and managing cancer pain. F1000Research. 2017;6:945. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10817.1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Burchiel KJ, Raslan AM. Contemporary concepts of pain surgery. J Neurosurg. 2019;130(4):1039–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Maugeri R, Giammalva GR, Cicero G, De Luca R, Gulì C, Graziano F, Basile L, Giugno A, Iacopino DG. Unusual case of dorsal vertebral metastases from a male breast cancer. Acta Medica Mediterr. 2017;2017:1157–61. https://doi.org/10.19193/0393-6384_2017_6_181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Maugeri R, Giugno A, Giammalva RG, Gulì C, Basile L, Graziano F, Iacopino DG. A thoracic vertebral localization of a metastasized cutaneous Merkel cell carcinoma: case report and review of literature. Surg Neurol Int. 2017;8:190. https://doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_70_17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Shimoji K, Hokari T, Kano T, Tomita M, Kimura R, Watanabe S, Endoh H, Fukuda S, Fujiwara N, Aida S. Management of intractable pain with percutaneous epidural spinal cord stimulation: differences in pain-relieving effects among diseases and sites of pain. Anesth Analg. 1993;77(1):110–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Hamid B, Haider N. Spinal cord stimulator relieves neuropathic pain in a patient with radiation-induced transverse myelitis. Pain Pract. 2007;7(4):345–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Maugeri R, Basile L, Gulì C, Banco A, Giordano G, Giugno A, Graziano F, Giammalva RG, Iacopino DG. Percutaneous pedicle-lengthening osteotomy in minimal invasive spinal surgery to treat degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a single-center preliminary experience. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2018;79(5):365–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Graziano F, Scalia G, Cammarata G, Lo Bue E, Brunasso L, Maugeri R, Umana GE, Gerardi RM, Iacopino DG, Nicoletti GF. Letter to the Editor regarding “First report of extraspinal lead migration along a thoracic spinal nerve after spinal cord stimulation”. World Neurosurg. 2021;145:536–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.09.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Van Beek M, Geurts JW, Slangen R, Schaper NC, Faber CG, Joosten EA, Dirksen CD, Van Dongen RT, Van Kuijk SMJ, Van Kleef M. Severity of neuropathy is associated with long-term spinal cord stimulation outcome in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: five-year follow-up of a prospective two-center clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2018;41:32. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-0983.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Slangen R, Schaper NC, Faber CG, Joosten EA, Dirksen CD, Van Dongen RT, Kessels AG, Van Kleef M. Spinal cord stimulation and pain relief in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a prospective two-center randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:3016. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-0684.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Eldabe S, Thomson S, Duarte R, Brookes M, Debelder M, Raphael J, Davies E, Taylor R. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina (RASCAL study): a pilot randomized controlled trial. Neuromodulation. 2016;19:60. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Giammalva, G.R. et al. (2023). Spinal Cord Stimulation Meets Them All: An Effective Treatment for Different Pain Conditions. Our Experience and Literature Review. In: Visocchi, M. (eds) The Funnel: From the Skull Base to the Sacrum. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol 135. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36084-8_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36084-8_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36083-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36084-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics