Skip to main content

The Gaming World of Educational Robotics. A Review Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI in Games (HCII 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14047))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 571 Accesses

Abstract

Educational robotics is considered a powerful tool, not only to learn how to program artificial agents but also to support students in developing high-order thinking skills. This paper reports a narrative review of empirical studies performed in the last twenty years, that investigate the effectiveness of using playful robotics as tools for enhancing cognitive abilities such as metacognition, awareness, and problem-solving, also improving planning and executive functions.

The evidence from the scanned literature supports the effective impact of using robotics as an educational metacognitive gaming environment that allows students to monitor themselves and control their learning actions autonomously. Moreover, the data provide scientific support to the hypothesis that educational robotics can improve the ability to plan and control complex tasks, favoring the development of executive functions and math or STEM achievement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. la Paglia, F., la Cascia, C., la Barbera, D.: Educational robotics to improve mathematical and metacognitive skills. Ann. Rev. Cybertherapy Telemedicine 15, 70–75 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Caci, B.: The effectiveness of using LEGO ® robotics kits as cognitive and social rehabilitative toys. Int. J. Entertainment Technol. Manag. 1, 34–42 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chioccariello A, Manca S, Sarti L La fabbrica dei robot. Ital. J. Educ. Technol. 10, 56–56 (2002). https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/505

  4. Piaget, J.: The Psychology of Intelligence and Education. Child. Educ. 42, 528–528 (1966) https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.1966.10727991

  5. Papert, S.: The Children’s Machine. RETHINKING SCHOOL IN THE AGE OF THE COMPUTER, Basic Books, NY (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Resnick, M.: Behavior construction kits. Commun. ACM 36, 64–71 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1145/159544.159593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Papert, S., Harel, I.: Constructionism. Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vygotsky L.S.: Thought and Language. The MIT Press., Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kolb, D.A., Boyatzis, R.E., Mainemelis, C.: Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In: Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles, pp. 227–247. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ, US (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Resnick, M., Ocko, S., Papert, S.: LEGO/logo--learning through and about design (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Resnick, M.: Technologies for lifelong kindergarten. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 46, 43–55 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299672/METRICS

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., Holubec, E.J.: The nuts and bolts of cooperative learning. Interaction Book Company (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kolb, D.A., Boyatzis, R.E., Mainemelis, C.: Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. Perspectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles 227–247 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605986-9

  14. Martin FG (1994) A Toolkit for Learning: Technology of the MIT LEGO Robot Design Competition. In: Proceedings for the Workshop on Mechatronics Education. Stanford University

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kafai, Y., Resnick, M.: Constructionism in practice Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, Mahwah, NJ (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Clark, A.: Reasons, Robots and the Extended Mind. Mind. Lang. 16, 121–145 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Claude, L.-S.: The savage mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Turkle, S., Papert, S.: Epistemological pluralism and the revaluation of the concrete. In: Harel, I., Papert, S. (eds.) Constructionism, pp. 161–191. Ablex Publishing (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Caci, B., D’Amico, A.: Children’s cognitive abilities in construction and programming robots. In: Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Caci, B., D’Amico, A., Chiazzese, G.: Robotics and virtual worlds: An experiential learning lab. In: Chella, A., Pirrone, R., Sorbello, R., Jóhannsdóttir, K.R. (eds.) Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures 2012: Proceedings of the Third Annual Meeting of the BICA Society, pp. 83–87. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34274-5_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Caci, B., D’Amico, A., Cardaci, M.: New frontiers for psychology and education: Robot. Psychol. Rep. 94, 1372–1374 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, H., Wang, H., Wang, C., Soh, W.Y.C.: Cooperation-based behavior design. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 2377 LNAI:465–470 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45603-1_61/COVER

  23. Barfurth, M.A.: Understanding the collaborative learning process in a technology rich environment. 8–13 (1995). https://doi.org/10.3115/222020.222042

  24. Denis, B., Hubert, S.: Collaborative learning in an educational robotics environment. Comput. Human Behav. 17, 465–480 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00018-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kolne, K., Bui, S., Lindsay, S.: Assessing the environmental quality of an adapted, play-based LEGO® robotics program to achieve optimal outcomes for children with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 43, 3613–3622 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1743776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. D’Amico, A., Guastella, D.: The Robotic Construction Kit as a Tool for Cognitive Stimulation in Children and Adolescents: The RE4BES Protocol. Robotics,: Vol 8. Page 8(8), 8 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/ROBOTICS8010008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Flavell, J.H.: Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. Am. Psychol. 34, 906–911 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jacobse, A.E., Harskamp, E.G.: Towards efficient measurement of metacognition in mathematical problem solving. Metacogn. Learn. 7, 133–149 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11409-012-9088-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cooper, M.M., Sandi-Urena, S.: Design and validation of an instrument to assess metacognitive skillfulness in chemistry problem solving. J. Chem. Educ. 86, 240–245 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/ED086P240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Desoete, A.: Multi-method assessment of metacognitive skills in elementary school children: How you test is what you get. Metacogn. Learn. 3, 189–206 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11409-008-9026-0/TABLES/6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. van der Stel, M., Veenman, M.V.J.: Development of metacognitive skillfulness: A longitudinal study. Learn Individ Differ 20, 220–224 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LINDIF.2009.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. du Toit, S., Kotze, G.: Metacognitive strategies in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Pythagoras , 57–67 (2009). https://doi.org/10.4102/PYTHAGORAS.V0I70.39

  33. la Paglia F, Caci B, la Barbera D, Cardaci M (2010) Using robotics construction kits as metacognitive tools: A research in an Italian primary school. In: Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

    Google Scholar 

  34. la Paglia, F., la Barbera, D., Riva, G., Francomano, M.M.: Educational Robotics to develop of executive functions visual spatial abilities, planning and problem solving. Ann. Rev. CyberTherapy Telemedicine 16 80–86 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2/jquery.min.js

  35. di Lieto, M.C., Castro, E., Pecini, C., et al.: Improving executive functions at school in children with special needs by educational robotics. Front. Psychol. 10, 2813 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2019.02813/BIBTEX

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filippo La Paglia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

La Paglia, F., La Barbera, D., Caci, B. (2023). The Gaming World of Educational Robotics. A Review Study. In: Fang, X. (eds) HCI in Games. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14047. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35979-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35979-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35978-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35979-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics