Abstract
Speeding is the primary cause of traffic accidents. To improve road safety, the European Union started implementing a new regulation mandating that all new vehicles coming to the EU market must be equipped with an Intelligent Speed Assistance (ISA) system from 2022 onwards. However, the rule did not include existing vehicles on the roads. Our research aims to fulfill this gap by investigating user experiences and acceptance with a retrofit system developed by V-tron, a Dutch company. Seven participants signed up for our study and our technicians installed the ISA system on their cars. They then used the car for more than one month and reported their experiences weekly. We also recruited a driving school and conducted a focus group with five instructors. Using interview and questionnaire methods to collect their first-person experiences, we saw that all participants acknowledged the vision and potential of ISA systems in reducing speeding and improving traffic safety. While the retrofit system is easy to use, the technology needs to be improved in accuracy and robustness. The overruling mechanism also needs to minimize the latency and consider secondary users unfamiliar with the speed control. Three design concepts were proposed to improve user experiences and eventually promote the adaptation of ISA systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adell, E.: Driver experience and acceptance of driver support systems: a case of speed adaptation [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Lund University (2009)
Bainbridge, L.: Ironies of automation. Automatica 19(6), 775–779 (1983)
Bakker, S., Niemantsverdriet, K.: The interaction-attention continuum: considering various levels of human attention in interaction design. Int. J. Des. 10(2), 1–14 (2016)
Chuang, Y.: Designing the expressivity of multiple smart things for intuitive and unobtrusive interactions. In: Proceedings of the conference on designing interactive systems, pp. 2007–2019. ACM (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395450
Chuang, Y., Chen, L.-L., Liu, Y.: Design vocabulary for human–IoT systems communication. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, no. 274. ACM (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173848
Compeau, D., Higgins, C.A., Huff, S.: Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: a longitudinal study. MIS Q. 23(2), 145–158 (1999)
Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)
Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage. Sci. 35(8), 982–1003 (1989)
de Craen, S., de Niet, M.: Extra informatie op matrixborden: Mogelijkheden en effecten. Additional information on matrix boards: Possibilities and effects. SWOV (2002). https://swov.nl/nl/publicatie/extra-informatie-op-matrixborden-mogelijkheden-en-effecten
Dikmen, M., Burns, C.M.: Autonomous driving in the real world: experiences with tesla autopilot and summon. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 225–228. ACM (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/3003715.3005465
Endsley, M.R.: Autonomous driving systems: a preliminary naturalistic study of the Tesla Model S. J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Making 11(3), 225–238 (2017)
Höltl, A., Trommer, S.: Driver assistance systems for transport system efficiency: influencing factors on user acceptance. J. Intell. Transport. Syst. 17(3), 245–254 (2013)
Ingle, S., Phute, M.: Tesla autopilot: semi-autonomous driving, an uptick for future autonomy. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 3(9), 369–372 (2016)
Janssen, C., Donker, S., Hessels, R., Hooge, I., Kenemans, L., van der Stigchel, S.: De invloed van frequente aanduiding van maximumsnelheid boven de weg op het gedrag van de weggebruiker: Literatuuronderzoek [The influence of frequent indication of speed limits above the road on road user behaviour: Literature study]. Utrecht University (2021). https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/415442
Li, J., Xu, W., Zhao, X.: Technology acceptance comparison between on-road dynamic message sign and on-board human machine interface for connected vehicle-based variable speed limit in fog area. J. Intell. Connected Veh. 2(2), 33–40 (2019)
Md Isa, M.H., Md Deros, B., Abu Kassim, K.A.: A review of empirical studies on user acceptance of driver assistance systems. Global J. Business Soc. Sci. Rev. 3(3), 39–46 (2015). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3002220
Mitsopoulos, E., Regan, M. A., Haworth, N.: Acceptability of in-vehicle intelligent transport systems to Victorian car drivers (Report No. 02/02). Royal Automobile Club of Victoria (RACV) (2002). https://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/217961/racv-0202-its.pdf
Nidamanuri, J., Nibhanupudi, C., Assfalg, R., Venkataraman, H.: A progressive review-emerging technologies for ADAS driven solutions. IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. 7(2), 3122898 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIV.2021.3122898
Osswald, S., Wurhofer, D., Trösterer, S., Beck, E., Tscheligi, M.: Predicting information technology usage in the car: Towards a car technology acceptance model. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications, pp. 51–58. ACM (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2390256.2390264
Otway, H.J., Von Winterfeldt, D.: Beyond acceptable risk: on the social acceptability of technologies. Policy Sci. 14(3), 247–256 (1982)
Pianelli, C., Saad, F.: Acceptabilité du LAVIA. In Erlich, J. (ed.), Carnet de route du LAVIA: Limiteur s’adaptant à la vitesse autorisée, pp. 47–52. PREDIT (2006). https://hal.science/hal-00542631
Rahman, M.M.: Driver acceptance of advanced driver assistance systems and semi-autonomous driving systems [Doctoral dissertation]. Mississippi State University (2016). https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td/1575
Rahman, M.M., Strawderman, L., Lesch, M.F., Horrey, W.J., Babski-Reeves, K., Garrison, T.: Modeling driver acceptance of driver support systems. Accid. Anal. Prev. 121, 134–147 (2018)
Regan, M., Horberry, T., Stevens, A. (eds.) Driver acceptance of new technology: theory, measurement and optimisation. CRC Press (2014). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315578132
Rödel, C., Stadler, S., Meschtscherjakov, A., Tscheligi, M.: Towards autonomous cars: the effect of autonomy levels on acceptance and user experience. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications, pp, 1–8. ACM (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2667317.2667330
Schade, J., Schlag, B.: Acceptability of urban transport pricing strategies. Transport. Res. Part F: Traff. Psychol. Behav. 6(1), 45–61 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(02)00046-3
Strand, N., Karlsson, I. M., Nilsson, L.: End users’ acceptance and use of adaptive cruise control systems. In: Di Bucchianico, G., Vallicelli, A., Stanton, N.A., Landry, S.H. (eds.) Human factors in transportation (pp. 263–274). CRC Press (2016). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315370460
Uhde, A., Hassenzahl, M.: Towards a better understanding of social acceptability. In Extended abstracts of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (Article No. 323). ACM (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451649
Van Der Laan, J.D., Heino, A., De Waard, D.: A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics. Transport. Res.: Emerg. Techno. 5(1), 1 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-090X(96)00025-3
van Huysduynen, H.H., Terken, J., Martens, J.-B., Eggen, B.: Measuring driving styles: a validation of the multidimensional driving style inventory. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications, pp. 257–264. ACM (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799266
Venkatesh, V., Bala, H.: Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis. Sci. 39(2), 273–315 (2008)
Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage. Sci. 46(2), 186–204 (2000)
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Vlassenroot, S., Brookhuis, K., Marchau, V., Witlox, F.: Towards defining a unified concept for the acceptability of intelligent transport systems (ITS): a conceptual analysis based on the case of intelligent speed adaptation (ISA). Transport. Res. Part F: Traff sychol. Behavior 13(3), 164–178 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2010.02.001
Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., Bürer, M.J.: Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: an introduction to the concept. Energy Policy 35(5), 2683–2691 (2007)
Xiao, L., Gao, F.: A comprehensive review of the development of adaptive cruise control systems. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 48(10), 1167–1192 (2010)
Acknowledgments
This paper is part of an activity that has received funding from the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT). We want to thank all participants and the project partners, including Tractebel, the City of Helmond, POLIS, V-tron, CTAG, and TN-ITS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chuang, Y., Muyrers, T., Zhang, W., Martens, M. (2023). A Longitudinal Driving Experience Study with a Novel and Retrofit Intelligent Speed Assistant System. In: Krömker, H. (eds) HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14048. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35678-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35678-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35677-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35678-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)