Skip to main content

Total Ankle Arthroplasty for Posttraumatic Arthritis of the Ankle Joint

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evaluation and Surgical Management of the Ankle
  • 315 Accesses

Abstract

The ankle joint is a complex structure, comprising articulations between the distal tibia, the fibula, and the talus and constrained by multiple surrounding ligaments. Despite the high proteoglycan synthesis rate of ankle joint chondrocytes, posttraumatic arthritis is the most common etiology for end stage arthritis of the ankle. In select patients, especially patients who are too young for TAA, some surgeons recommend ankle distraction arthroplasty; however, the majority of end stage ankle arthritis is managed with either ankle arthrodesis (fusion) or total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). As techniques and outcomes improve, the indications for total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) are expanding, with many more surgeons favoring arthroplasty over arthrodesis. Several design factors such as mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing prostheses, resurfacing versus flat cut talar components, intramedullary versus extramedullary referencing for component alignment, and, more recently, three-dimensional (3D) printing of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI). Advances in revision TAA, techniques for converting painful arthrodesis to TAA, and 3D printing, including custom implants and even total talus replacement, now enable preservation of motion over arthrodesis even in patients with complex ankle deformity and bone loss. Outcomes of TAA are generally favorable, but surgeons performing TAA must be prepared to manage potential complications such as wound breakdown, implant loosening, and infection. While revision TAA may be possible following even complex complications, the TAA surgeon must be familiar with salvage procedures, including tibio-talo-calcaneal arthrodesis with structural allograft or a 3D printed spacer, a procedure that is not as reliable in progressing to fusion as a primary ankle arthrodesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brockett CL, Chapman GJ. Biomechanics of the ankle. Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(3):232–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ledoux WR, Sangeorzan BJ. Clinical biomechanics of the peritalar joint. Foot Ankle Clin. 2004;9(4):663–83. v

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Niu W, Tang T, Zhang M, Jiang C, Fan Y. An in vitro and finite element study of load redistribution in the midfoot. Sci China Life Sci. 2014;57(12):1191–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Delco ML, Kennedy JG, Bonassar LJ, Fortier LA. Post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the ankle: a distinct clinical entity requiring new research approaches. J Orthop Res. 2017;35(3):440–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Punzi L, Galozzi P, Luisetto R, Favero M, Ramonda R, Oliviero F, et al. Post-traumatic arthritis: overview on pathogenic mechanisms and role of inflammation. RMD Open. 2016;2(2):e000279.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Jaakkola JI, Mann RA. A review of rheumatoid arthritis affecting the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25(12):866–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Müller AM, Toepfer A, Harrasser N, Haller B, Walther M, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Gemperlein K, Bergmann K, Bradaric C, Laugwitz KL, Ibrahim T, Dirschinger RJ. Significant prevalence of peripheral artery disease in patients with disturbed wound healing following elective foot and ankle surgery: Results from the ABI-PRIORY (ABI as a PRedictor of Impaired wound healing after ORthopedic surgerY) trial. Vasc Med. 2020;25(2):118–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X19883945. Epub 2019 Nov 15. PMID: 32366205.

  8. Saltzman CL, el-Khoury GY. The hindfoot alignment view. Foot Ankle Int. 1995;16(9):572–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Richter M, de Cesar NC, Lintz F, Barg A, Burssens A, Ellis S. The assessment of ankle osteoarthritis with weight-bearing computed tomography. Foot Ankle Clin. 2022;27(1):13–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang Q, Zhang N, Guo W, Wang W, Zhang Q. Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in total ankle arthroplasty: a systematic review. Int Orthop. 2021;45(9):2445–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shih CL, Chen SJ, Huang PJ. Clinical outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis for the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis in the last decade: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020;59(5):1032–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Reddy SC, Mann JA, Mann RA, Mangold DR. Correction of moderate to severe coronal plane deformity with the STAR™ ankle prosthesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(7):659–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Daniels TR. Surgical technique for Total ankle arthroplasty in ankles with preoperative coronal plane Varus deformity of 10° or greater. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2013;3(4):e22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Sung KS, Ahn J, Lee KH, Chun TH. Short-term results of total ankle arthroplasty for end-stage ankle arthritis with severe varus deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(3):225–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee GW, Lee KB. Outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty in ankles with >20° of coronal plane deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(24):2203–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hintermann B, Barg A, Knupp M, Valderrabano V. Conversion of painful ankle arthrodesis to total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(4):850–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pellegrini MJ, Schiff AP, Adams SB Jr, Queen RM, DeOrio JK, Nunley JA II, et al. Conversion of tibiotalar arthrodesis to total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(24):2004–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Morse KR, Flemister AS, Baumhauer JF, DiGiovanni BF. Distraction arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Clin. 2007;12(1):29–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bernstein M, Reidler J, Fragomen A, Rozbruch SR. Ankle distraction arthroplasty: indications, technique, and outcomes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017;25(2):89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang Z, Cui L, Tao S, Zhao J, Wang L, Zhang F, et al. Comparisons between ankle distraction arthroplasty and supramalleolar osteotomy for treatment of post-traumatic varus ankle osteoarthritis. BMC Surg. 2022;22(1):178.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Nguyen M, Saltzman C, Amendola A. Outcomes of ankle distraction for the treatment of ankle arthritis. Instr Course Lect. 2016;65:311–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Singh JA, Ramachandran R. Time trends in total ankle arthroplasty in the USA: a study of the National Inpatient Sample. Clin Rheumatol. 2016;35(1):239–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gougoulias N, Maffulli N. History of total ankle replacement. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2013;30(1):1–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bedard N, Saltzman CL, Den Hartog T, Carlson S, Callaghan J, Alvine G, et al. The agility total ankle arthroplasty: a concise follow-up at a minimum of 20 years. Foot Ankle Int. 2021;42(10):1241–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Saltzman CL, Mann RA, Ahrens JE, Amendola A, Anderson RB, Berlet GC, et al. Prospective controlled trial of STAR total ankle replacement versus ankle fusion: initial results. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(7):579–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tan EW, Maccario C, Talusan PG, Schon LC. Early complications and secondary procedures in transfibular total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(8):835–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Amin A, Mahoney J, Daniels TR. Anteromedial approach for ankle arthoplasty and arthrodesis: technique tip. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(11):1011–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cracchiolo A III, Deorio JK. Design features of current total ankle replacements: implants and instrumentation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16(9):530–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nunley JA, Caputo AM, Easley ME, Cook C. Intermediate to long-term outcomes of the STAR total ankle replacement: the patient perspective. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(1):43–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mann JA, Mann RA, Horton E. STAR™ ankle: long-term results. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(5):S473–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Brunner S, Barg A, Knupp M, Zwicky L, Kapron AL, Valderrabano V, et al. The Scandinavian total ankle replacement: long-term, eleven to fifteen-year, survivorship analysis of the prosthesis in seventy-two consecutive patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(8):711–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yoon HS, Lee J, Choi WJ, Lee JW. Periprosthetic osteolysis after total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(1):14–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hintermann B, Susdorf R, Krähenbühl N, Ruiz R. Axial rotational alignment in mobile-bearing total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2020;41(5):521–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hofmann KJ, Shabin ZM, Ferkel E, Jockel J, Slovenkai MP. Salto Talaris total ankle arthroplasty: clinical results at a mean of 5.2 years in 78 patients treated by a single surgeon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(24):2036–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Stewart MG, Green CL, Adams SB Jr, DeOrio JK, Easley ME, Nunley JA 2nd. Midterm results of the Salto Talaris total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38(11):1215–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Schipper ON, Haddad SL, Fullam S, Pourzal R, Wimmer MA. Wear characteristics of conventional ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene versus highly cross-linked polyethylene in total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(11):1335–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tennant JN, Rungprai C, Pizzimenti MA, Goetz J, Phisitkul P, Femino J, et al. Risks to the blood supply of the talus with four methods of total ankle arthroplasty: a cadaveric injection study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(5):395–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gagne OJ, Day J, Kim J, Caolo K, O’Malley MJ, Deland JT, et al. Midterm survivorship of the INBONE II total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2022;43(5):628–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hsu AR, Davis WH, Cohen BE, Jones CP, Ellington JK, Anderson RB. Radiographic outcomes of preoperative CT scan-derived patient-specific total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(10):1163–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hamid KS, Matson AP, Nwachukwu BU, Scott DJ, Mather RC III, DeOrio JK. Determining the cost-savings threshold and alignment accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in total ankle replacements. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38(1):49–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rushing CJ, Kibbler K, Hyer CF, Berlet GC. The INFINITY total ankle prosthesis: outcomes at short-term follow-up. Foot Ankle Spec. 2022;15(2):119–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Doets HC, van der Plaat LW, Klein JP. Medial malleolar osteotomy for the correction of varus deformity during total ankle arthroplasty: results in 15 ankles. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29(2):171–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Demetracopoulos CA, Cody EA, Adams SB, DeOrio JK, Nunley JA, Easley ME. Outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty in moderate and severe valgus deformity. Foot Ankle Spec. 2018;12(3):238–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Haddad SL, Dedhia S, Ren Y, Rotstein J, Zhang LQ. Deltoid ligament reconstruction: a novel technique with biomechanical analysis. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31(7):639–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Criswell B, Hunt K, Kim T, Chou L, Haskell A. Association of short-term complications with procedures through separate incisions during total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(10):1060–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bejarano-Pineda L, DeOrio JK, Parekh SG. Combined total talus replacement and total ankle arthroplasty. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2020;29(4):244–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Schimmel JJ, Walschot LH, Louwerens JW. Comparison of the short-term results of the first and last 50 Scandinavian total ankle replacements: assessment of the learning curve in a consecutive series. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(4):326–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Gross CE, Huh J, Green C, Shah S, DeOrio JK, Easley M, et al. Outcomes of bone grafting of bone cysts after total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(2):157–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark E. Easley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Anastasio, A.T., Haghverdian, B., Umbel, B., Easley, M.E. (2023). Total Ankle Arthroplasty for Posttraumatic Arthritis of the Ankle Joint. In: Herscovici Jr., D., Anglen, J.O., Early, J.S. (eds) Evaluation and Surgical Management of the Ankle. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33537-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33537-2_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-33536-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-33537-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics