Abstract
A good knowledge of midfoot biomechanics is important in understanding the biomechanics of the entire foot, but it has never been investigated thoroughly in the literature. This study carried out in vitro experiments and finite element analysis to investigate the midfoot biomechanics. A foot-ankle finite element model simulating the mid-stance phase of the normal gait was developed and the model validated in in vitro experimental tests. Experiments used seven in vitro samples of fresh human cadavers. The simulation found that the first principal stress peaks of all midfoot bones occurred at the navicular bone and that the tensile force of the spring ligament was greater than that of any other ligament. The experiments showed that the longitudinal strain acting on the medial cuneiform bone was −26.2±10.8 μ-strain, and the navicular strain was −240.0±169.1 μ-strain along the longitudinal direction and 65.1±25.8 μ-strain along the transverse direction. The anatomical position and the spring ligament both result in higher shear stress in the navicular bone. The load from the ankle joint to five branches of the forefoot is redistributed among the cuneiforms and cuboid bones. Further studies on the mechanism of loading redistribution will be helpful in understanding the biomechanics of the entire foot.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Snedeker JG, Wirth SH, Espinosa N. Biomechanics of the normal and arthritic ankle joint. Foot Ankle Clin, 2012, 17: 517–528
Collan L, Kankare JA, Mattila K. The biomechanics of the first bone in hallux valgus: A preliminary study utilizing a weight bearing extremity CT. Foot Ankle Surg, 2013, 19: 155–161
Moshirfar A, Campbell JT, Molloy S, Jasper LE, Belkoff SM. Fifth metatarsal tuberosity fracture fixation: a biomechanical study. Foot Ankle Int, 2003, 24: 630–633
Ni M, Weng XH, Mei J, Niu WX. Primary stability of absorbable screw fixation for intra-articular calcaneal fractures: A finite element analysis. J Med Biol Eng, advance online publication 26 Mar. 2014; doi: 10.5405/jmbe.1624
Niu WX, Yao J, Chu ZW, Jiang CH, Zhang M, Fan YB. Effects of ankle eversion, limb laterality and ankle stabilizers on transient postural stability during unipedal standing. J Med Biol Eng, advance online publication 4 Dec. 2013; doi: 10.5405/jmbe.1675.
Niu W, Chu Z, Yao J, Zhang M, Fan Y, Zhao Q. Effects of laterality, ankle inversion and stabilizers on the plantar pressure distribution during unipedal standing. J Mech Med Biol, 2012, 12: 1250055 (15 pages)
Yu J, Cheung JTM, Wong DWC, Cong Y, Zhang M. Biomechanical simulation of high-heel shoe donning and walking. J Biomech, 2013, 46: 2067–2074
Benirschke SK, Meinberg E, Anderson SA, Jones CB, Cole PA. Fractures and dislocations of the midffot: Lisfrac and Chopart injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2012, 18: 1325–1337
Pearce CJ, Calder JD. Surgical anatomy of the midfoot. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2010, 18: 581–586
Makwana NK, van Lifefland MR. Injuries of the midfoot. Current Orthopaedics, 2005, 19: 231–242
Liang J, Yang Y, Yu G, Niu W, Wang Y. Deformation and stress distribution of the human foot after plantar ligament release: a cadaveric study and finite element analysis. Sci China Life Sci, 2011, 54: 267–271
Cheung JTM, Zhang M, Leung AKL, Fan YB. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the foot during standing: a material sensitivity study. J Biomech, 2005, 38: 1045–1054
Cheung JTM, An KN, Zhang M. Consequences of partial and total plantar fascia release: a finite element study. Foot Ankle Int, 2006, 27: 125–132
Cheung JTM, Zhang M. Parametric design of pressure-relieving foot orthosis using statistics-based finite element method. Med Eng Phys, 2008, 30: 269–277
Huang RH, Li XP, Rong QG. Control mechanism for the upper airway collapse in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a finite element study. Sci China Life Sci, 2013, 56: 366–372
Athansiou KA, Niederauer GG, Schenck RC Jr. Biomechanical topography of human ankle cartilage. Ann Biomed Eng, 1995, 23: 697–704
Athansiou KA, Fleischli JG, Bosma J, Laughlin TJ, Zhu CF, Agrawal CM, Lavery LA. Effects of diabetes mellitus on the biomechanical properties of human ankle cartilage. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1999, 368: 182–189
Athansiou KA, Liu GT, Lavery LA, Lanctot DR, Schenck RC Jr. Biomechanical topography of human articular cartilage in the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1998, 348: 269–291
Liu GT, Lavery LA, Schenck RC Jr, Lanctot DR, Zhu CF, Athansiou KA. Human articular cartilage biomechanics of the second metatarsal intermediate cuneiform joint. J Foot Ankle Surg, 1997, 36: 367–374
Siegler S, Block J, Schneck CD. The mechanical characteristics of the collateral ligaments of the human ankle joint. Foot Ankle, 1988, 8: 234–242
Minns RJ, Hunter JA. The mechanical and structural characteristics of the tibio-fibular interosseous membrane. Acta Orthop Scand, 1976, 47: 236–240
Pavan PG, Stecco C, Darwish S, Natali AN, De Caro R. Investigation of the mechanical properties of the plantar aponeurosis. Surg Radiol Anat, 2011, 33: 905–911
Mkandawire C, Ledoux WR, Sangeorzan BJ, Ching RP. Foot and ankle ligament morphometry. J Rehabil Res Dev, 2005, 42: 809–820
Spears IR, Miller-Young JE, Waters M, Rome K. The effect of loading conditions on stress in the barefooted heel pad. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2005, 37: 1030–1065
Rodgers MM. Dynamic biomechanics of the normal foot and ankle during walking and running. Phys Ther, 1988, 68: 1822–1830
Lin YC, Dorn TW, Schache AG, Pandy MG. Comparison of different methods for estimating muscle forces in human movement. Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 2012, 226: 103–112
Martinelli N, Marinozzi A, Schulze M, Denaro V, Evers J, Bianchi A, Rosenbaum D. Effect of subtalar arthroereisis on the tibiotalar contact characteristics in a cadaveric flatfoot model. J Biomech, 2012, 45: 1745–1748
Wang CL, Cheng CK, Chen CW, Lu CM, Hang YS, Liu TK. Contact areas and pressure distributions in the subtalar joint. J Biomech, 1995, 28: 269–279
Jung HG, Parks BG, Nguyen A, Schon LC. Effect of tibiotalar joint arthrodesis on adjacent tarsal joint pressure in a cadaver model. Foot Ankle Int, 2007, 28: 103–108
Thomas JL, Moeini R, Doileau R. The effect on subtalar contact and pressure following talonavicular and midtarsal joint arthrodesis. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2000, 39: 78–88
Momberger N, Morgan JM, Bachus KN, West JR. Calcaneocuboid joint pressure after lateral column lengthening in a cadaveric planovalgus deformity model. Foot Ankle Int, 2000, 21: 730–735
Lakin RC, Degnore LT, Pienkowski D. Contact mechanics of normal tarsometatarsal joints. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2001, 83: 520–528
Schneider T, Dabirrahmani D, Gillies RM, Appleyard RC. Biomechanical comparison of metatarsal head designs in first metatarsophalangeal joint arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int, 2013, 34: 881–889
Ward KN, Soames RW. Contact patterns at the tarsal joints. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 1997, 12: 496–507
Keaveny TM, Wachtel EF, Ford CM, Hayes WC. Differences between the tensile and compressive strengths of bovine tibial trabecular depend on modulus. J Biomech, 1994, 27: 1137–1146
Bayrakrar HH, Morgan EF, Niebur GL, Morris GE, Wong EK, Keaveny TM. Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. J Biomech, 2004, 37: 27–35
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This article is published with open access at link.springer.com
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Niu, W., Tang, T., Zhang, M. et al. An in vitro and finite element study of load redistribution in the midfoot. Sci. China Life Sci. 57, 1191–1196 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-014-4731-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-014-4731-1