Skip to main content

Management of Pancreaticobiliary Disease in the Geriatric Patient Population

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Acute Care Surgery in Geriatric Patients

Abstract

Although benign biliary disorders are commonly treated in the acute care surgery setting, the geriatric population can present a unique challenge given the anatomic and physiologic changes that evolve with increased age. Advancements in health care have afforded increased longevity in populations worldwide, thus creating a scenario in which these patients have complicated histories that include treated and untreated comorbidities, prior medical and surgical interventions, and considerations of polypharmacy. Additionally, biliary diseases in the geriatric population can present insidiously, and these patients are at high risk for acute decompensation if their pathology is not recognized and treated promptly. Each biliary disorder requires an individualized and multidisciplinary approach that is focused on defining the patient’s goals of care and aligning the patient’s treatment plan accordingly. Ideally, geriatric patients undergoing surgery complete a thorough preoperative assessment and optimization prior to intervention; however, the acute care setting does not always afford such a benefit if the initial presentation includes bleeding, obstruction, or perforation. Acute pancreatitis is one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders requiring hospitalization worldwide and patients in the geriatric population are particularly susceptible to this syndrome and its complications. The principles of management of geriatric patients with acute pancreatitis are securing the diagnosis, risk stratification of the patient, implementing appropriate treatment, and minimizing surgical interventions. It is imperative for the acute care surgeon to be able to rapidly assess the geriatric patient’s surgical risk factors and employ strategies to optimize the patient’s resuscitation without exacerbating underlying comorbidities prior to surgical intervention if indicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Institute of Medicine (US). Committee on the future health care workforce for older Americans. Retooling for an aging America: building the health care workforce. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kelly KJ, Weber SM. Cholecystitis. In: Blumgart W, editor. Surgery of the liver, biliary tract and pancreas. 6th ed. Elsevier; 2017. p. 556–63.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Loozen CS, van Ramshorst B, van Santvoort HC, Boerma D. Early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in the elderly population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Surg. 2017;34(5):371–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000455241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Adedeji OA, McAdam WA. Murphy’s sign, acute cholecystitis and elderly people. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1996;41(2):88–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Perera T, Cortijo-Brown A. Geriatric resuscitation. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2016;34(3):453–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emc.2016.04.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hu KC, Chu CH, Wang HY, Chang WH, Lin SC, Liu CC, et al. How does aging affect presentation and management of biliary stones? Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(11):2330–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.14481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dimou FM, Adhikari D, Mehta HB, Riall TS. Outcomes in older patients with grade III cholecystitis and cholecystostomy tube placement: a propensity score analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;224(4):502–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Thomas M, Baltatzis M, Price A, Fox J, Pearce L, Vilches-Moraga A. The influence of frailty on outcomes for older adults admitted to hospital with benign biliary disease: a single-centre, observational cohort study. R Coll Surg Engl. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2021.0331.

  9. Parmar AD, Sheffield KM, Adhikari D, Davee RA, Vargas GM, Tamirisa NP, et al. PREOP-gallstones: a prognostic nomogram for the management of symptomatic cholelithiasis in older patients. Ann Surg. 2015;261(6):1184–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000868.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wiggins T, Markar SR, Mackenzie H, Jamel S, Askari A, Faiz O, et al. Evolution in the management of acute cholecystitis in the elderly: population-based cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:4078–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6092-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ambe P, Weber SA, Christ H, Wassenberg D. Cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. How time-critical are the so called “golden 72 hours”? Or better “golden 24 hours” and “silver 25-72 hour”? A case control study. World J Emerg Surg. 2014;9(1):60. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-9-60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, Hofker HS, Boermeester MA, Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1491–502. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0908821.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kucserik LP, Márta K, Vincze Á, Lázár G, Czakó L, Szentkereszty Z, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotoMy for delayIng choLecystectomy in mild acute biliarY pancreatitis (EMILY study): protocol of a multicentre randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7):e025551. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025551.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Epelboym I, Winner M, Allendorf JD. MRCP is not a cost-effective strategy in the management of silent common bile duct stones. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(5):863–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2179-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Corrigan LR, Bracken-Clarke DM, Horgan AM. The challenge of treating older patients with pancreaticobiliary malignancies. Curr Probl Cancer. 2018;42(1):59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2018.01.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer M. Whittington .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Krell, M., Allendorf, J.D., Morris, M., Sohail, A., Whittington, J.M. (2023). Management of Pancreaticobiliary Disease in the Geriatric Patient Population. In: Petrone, P., Brathwaite, C.E. (eds) Acute Care Surgery in Geriatric Patients. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30651-8_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30651-8_44

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30650-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-30651-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics