Keywords

1 Introduction

Effort has been made by the researcher to develop an aluminum conductor that has high strength and electrical conductivity [1]. A carbon nanotube (CNTs) is one of the nanoparticle’s electrical conductive reinforcement that attracts researchers’ attention due to the high electrical conductivity of CNTs on aluminum [2]. The mechanical properties, microstructure, and corrosion of Al-CNTs produced by spark plasma sintering were investigated by Ujah et al [3]. They observed higher strength overhead transmission conductor. Ujah et al [4] reported the electrical conductivity, thermal, wear properties, and microstructure of Al-CNTs produced by spark plasma sintering. They observed high wear resistance; electrical conductivity and thermal properties of overhead transmission conductor. Mansoor and Shahid [5] used the induction melting method to developed Al-CNTs. They observed 77 and 52% enhancement in yield and tensile strength.

Although with the high electrical conductivity and thermal of CNTs there is a dispersion of entanglement of the CNTs during the production and the high cost of CNTs limits their use in electronic devices [6]. A great shear force is usually needed to help disperse CNTs and avoid entanglement in the metal matrix [7]. This limitation is still a challenge in the development of Al/CNTs composites. Ultrasonic cavitations, wet mixing, and metallic nanoparticles have been used to enhance the dispersion of CNTs in aluminum by decreasing the Van der Waals and hydrogen bond interactions. The addition of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) [8] has been successful used with CNTs to produced conductive composites. Saif et al [9] reinforced on Al-1%CNTs with 0, 1, 2, 3,4% AgNPS and Cu. From the review above on the improvement of the electrical conductivity of Al/CNTs using AgNPs, it was cleared that AgNPs have a great potential in enhancing the properties of Al/CNTs. But the high demand and cost of AgNPs have been a major problem, which reduced the wide application of AgNPs to improves the properties of Al/CNTs [10,11,12,13]. However, in this work attempt was made to produce AgNPs using the biosynthesis method (Cashew leaves extract) to lower the cost of AgNPs used in the production of Al/CNTs.. Researchers [10, 11] have shown that the leaves extract from Cashew has anacardic acids which have been used as antibacterial agents (Ag+ to Ag) in the production of AgNPs [10]. The utilization of leaves extract from Cashew to produce Ag-nanoparticles will be less costly and environmentally friendly. Spark plasma sintering (SPS) was used in the production of the advanced composites. The choice of SPS in this work is regarding the ability to obtain high densification, save time, energy, and elimination coarse grain size [3, 4].

2 Methodology

The aluminum powder was purchased in Lagos Nigeria. The aluminum powder has 99.98% purity. A multi-walled CNTs with a diameter of 10–40 nm and length 10-20 µm used in this work was obtained from Hongwu Company in China. Cashew leaves extract was put inside ethanol (100 ml) for one (1) hour and then 100 ml of AgNO3 was then added to the ethanol solution and left for 30 min for reaction to take place. The samples and the solution were heated to a temperature of 100 oC under constant stirring of speed (2000 rpm). The centrifuge was then used to obtain the solid GAgNPs [10]. The particle size of the GAgNPs was 45 nm. Al-CNTs+2%GANPs were ball milled using a high-speed vibrating ball mill. The ball milling machine contains fifty (50) tungsten balls of 10mm diameter. The production of the advanced composites was done by a spark plasma sintering machine (SPS) (model: SPS10-3). A composite of Al-x%CNTs (x = 1, 2, 3, 4) and constant 2%GAgNPs were produced. Kaise insulation test (model SK5010) was used to determine the electrical conductivity measurement of the composites. The microstructure obtained in the composites was determined using scanning electron microscope (SEM) model: A VEGA 3 TESCAN. The tensile test was done by ASTM D3039 using a Testometric universal testing machine.

3 Results and Discussion

The electrical conductivity of the samples is displayed in Figure 1. It was observed that there was a significant improvement in the electrical conductivity of Al-CNTs and Al-CNTs + GAgNPs. A linear increment in the electrical conductivity as the % of CNTs and GAgNPs increases in the formulation was observed. The increment in the electrical conductivity of Al-GAgNPs+CNTs than Al-CNT was attributed to the higher electrical conductivity of GAgNPs [10] than that of the CNTs. The GAgNPs+CNTs can be used as a conducting reinforcement with a high aspect ratio with lower contact resistance at CNTs junctions. The electrical conductivity of the α-Al has been enhanced from 2.18 × 107S/cm to 2.35 × 107 S/cm for Al-4%CNTs and 4.21 × 107 S/cm for Al-4%CNTs-2%GAgNPs respectively. A 7.8% and 93.11% raise in the electrical conductivity achieved at Al-4%CNTs and Al-4%CNTs-2%GAgNPs over that of Al-matrix. The work had shown a higher electrical conductivity than the work of Ujah et al [4] that reported 2.27x107S/cm for Al-4%CNTs composite. The addition of 2%GAg.NPs to Al-4%CNTs can be used in the production of high-tension transmission conductors.

Fig. 1.
figure 1

Electrical Conductivity with percentage of CNTs

The stress-strain curves were obtained for the Al-matrix, Al-4%CNTs, Al-4%CNTs+2%GAgNPs are displayed in Fig. 2. In Fig. 2, it was evident that the pure Al has the lowest region under the stress-strain curve than the composites (compared Fig. 2a with Fig. 2b–c). That means that the nanocomposites have higher toughness than the pure Al as revealed by the values of energy absorbed before fracture and percentage of strain (Table 1). The stiffness of Al-matrixes was enhanced as a result of the addition of CNTs +GAgNPs. Al-4%CNTs+2%GAgNPs have a higher strength of all the samples. For example, a tensile strength of 113.43, 157.70, and 206.60MPa were obtained for the Al-matrix, Al-4%CNTs, Al-4%CNTs+2%GAgNPs, respectively. An 82.14% enhancement in tensile strength was recorded at Al-4%CNTs+2%GAgNPs over pure Al. The fracture mechanism of the tensile strength was done by SEM analysis. From the SEM images displays in Figure 3, it was revealed that the fracture mechanism of the α-Al consists of a mixture of both brittle-ductile fractures with transgranular cleavage and tear with ridges (Figure 3a). The nanocomposites have a different mode of fracture from the α-Al. The nanocomposite carbon particles with intercrystalline, without delamination of the particles at interfaces were observed for the Al-4%CNTs nanocomposite (Figure 3b). The addition of 2%GAgNPs to Al-4%CNTs significantly enhances the ductility mode of fracture (Figure 3c).

Fig. 2.
figure 2

Variation of stress versus strain of the samples a) pure aluminum b) Al-4%CNTs c) The addition of Al-4%CNTs + 2%GAgNPs.

Table 1. Results of the tensile properties.

EM: elastic modulus, YS: yield strength, TS: tensile strength, SB: strain at break, EB: energy at break, ELB: elongation at break.

Fig. 3.
figure 3

Fracture surface of the tensile samples: a) pure aluminum b) Al-4%CNTs c). The addition of Al-4%CNTs + 2%GAgNPs

4 Conclusions

A new nanocomposites Al-CNTs + GAgNPs was developed using the biosynthesis AgNPs from Cashew leaves extract to decorated CNTs. it can be concluded that: Al-GAgNPs + CNTs can be used to conduct reinforcement with a high aspect ratio with lower contact resistance at CNTs junctions. 7.8% and 93.11% raises are obtained the electrical conductivity of Al Al-4%CNTs and Al-4%CNTs + 2%GAgNPs composites. An 82.14% enhancement in tensile strength was recorded et al.-4%CNTs + 2%GAgNPs over pure Al. High tension conductor application can be made with these materials since the values of strength and factor of safety are within the recommended standard.

5 Disclosure Statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.