Skip to main content

Using an Assessment for Learning Framework to Support Pre-service Teachers’ Mathematical Modelling Activities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advancing and Consolidating Mathematical Modelling

Abstract

Assessment for learning is discussed within the broader framework of formative assessments. The aim of the study is to understand the contributions of assessment for learning in a pre-service secondary teacher mathematical modelling course at a university in South Africa. A matched pairs design was adopted to analyse assessment data collected during the course, and data collected at the end of the course. Descriptive and inferential data analysis detected no statistically significant increase in the mean score from the formative phase \((M=78.33, SD=8.86)\) and the scores obtained from the final assessment at the end of the course \((M=81.52, SD=10.97)\), \(t(62)=1.728\), \(p=.089\), \({\eta }^{2}=0.218\). The study contributes to research on various assessment approaches in pre-service mathematics education courses that include mathematical modelling and understanding their practical contributions to the learning gains at the end of the courses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alagoz, C., & Ekici, C. (2020). Cognitive diagnostic modelling for mathematical modelling assessment. In G. A. Stillman, G. Kaiser, & C. E. Lampen (Eds.), Mathematical modelling education and sense-making (pp. 349–359). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Allal, L. (2010). Assessment and the regulation of learning. In E.B.P. Peterson (Ed.), International encyclopaedia of education (Vol. 3, pp. 348–352). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonius, S., Haines, C., Jensen, T. H., Niss, M., & (with Burkhardt, H.). (2007). Classroom activities and the teacher. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study (pp. 295–308). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Andrade, H. L., & Heritage, M. (2018). Using formative assessment to enhance learning, achievement, and academic self-regulation. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. S., & Le Masurier, D. (1984). OU students do it by themselves. In J. S. Berry, D. N. Burghes, I. D. Huntley, D. J. G. James, & A. O. Moscardini (Eds.), Teaching and applying mathematical modelling (pp. 48–85). Ellis Horwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besser, M., Blum, W., & Klimczak, M. (2013). Formative assessment in everyday teaching of mathematical modelling: Implications of written and oral feedback to competency-oriented tasks. In G. A. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum, & J. P. Brown (Eds.), Teaching mathematical modelling: Connecting to research and practice (pp. 469–478). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Black, P. (2015). Formative assessment–an optimistic but incomplete vision. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(1), 161–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy and Practice, 5, 7–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, W. (2015). Quality teaching of mathematical modelling: What do we know, what can we do? In The proceedings of the 12th international congress on mathematical education (pp. 73–96). Springer, Cham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, W., & LeiĂź, D. (2007). How do students and teachers deal with modelling problems? In C. R. Haines, P. L. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical Modelling (ICTMA 12): Education, Engineering and Economics (pp. 222–231). Horwood. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857099419.5.221

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed). Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Basic Education (DBE), South Africa. (2011). Curriculum and assessment policy statement: Mathematics grades 10–12. Department of Basic Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durandt, R., Blum, W., & Lindl, A. (2022). Fostering mathematical modelling competency of South African engineering students: Which influence does the teaching design have? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(2), 361–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gan, Z., He, J., & Mu, K. (2019). Development and validation of the Assessment for Learning Experience Inventory (AFLEI) in Chinese higher education. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(5), 371–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, V., Galbraith, P., Niss, M., & Delzoppo, C. (2022). Developing a task design and implementation framework for fostering mathematical modelling competencies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(2), 313–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greefrath, G., Kaiser, G., Blum, W., & Borromeo Ferri, R. (2013). Mathematisches modellieren—Eine EinfĂĽhrung in theoretische und didaktische HintergrĂĽnde. In R. Borromeo Ferri, G. Greefrath, & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Mathematisches Modellieren fĂĽr Schule und Hochschule (pp. 11–37). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01580-0_1

  • Greefrath, G., & Vorhölter, K. (2016). Teaching and learning mathematical modelling: Approaches and developments from German speaking countries. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45004-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, C., & Dunthorne, S. (Eds.). (1996). Mathematics learning and assessment: Sharing innovative practices. Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. (1984). The assessment of modelling projects. In J. S. Berry, D. N. Burghes, I. D. Huntley, D. J. G. James, & A. O. Moscardini (Eds.), Teaching and applying mathematical modelling (pp. 143–148). Ellis Horwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankeln, C., Adamek, C., & Greefrath, G. (2019). Assessing sub-competencies of mathematical modelling—Development of a new test instrument. In G. A. Stillman & J. P. Brown (Eds.), Lines of inquiry in mathematical modelling research in education (pp. 143–160). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidayat, R., Adnan, M., Abdullah, M. F. N. L., & Safrudiannur (2022). A systematic literature review of measurement of mathematical modeling in mathematics education context. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(5), Article em2108. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12007

  • Houston, K. (2007). Assessing the “phases” of mathematical modelling. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study (pp. 249–256). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Izard, J., Crouch, R., Haines, C., Houston, K., & Neill, N. (2003). Assessing the impact of teaching mathematical modelling: Some implications. In S. J. Lamon, W. A. Parker, & S. K. Houston (Eds.), Mathematical modelling: A way of life ICTMA 11 (pp. 165–177). Horwood.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, G. (2007). Modelling and modelling competencies in school. In C. R. Haines, P. L. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical modelling (ICTMA 12): Education, Engineering and Economics (pp. 110–119). Horwood. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857099419.3.110

  • Kennedy, K. J., Chan, J. K. S., Fok, P. K., & Yu, W. M. (2008). Forms of assessment and their potential for enhancing learning: Conceptual and cultural issues. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 7, 197–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klenowski, V. (2009). Assessment for learning revisited: An Asia-Pacific perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903319646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leong, R. K. E. (2012). Assessment of mathematical modelling. The Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 3(1), 61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, F. K., Jr. (2013). Thoughts about research on mathematical problem-solving instruction. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 10(1), 245–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, J. H. (Ed.). (2013). Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. S., Notz, W. I., & Fligner, M. A. (2013). The basic practice of statistics (6th ed.). Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niss, M., Blum, W., & Galbraith, P. L. (2007). Introduction. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and Applications in Mathematics Education. The 14th ICMI Study (pp. 3–32). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-29822-1_1

  • OECD (2008). Assessment for learning: The case for formative assessment. [Paper presentation] Learning in the 21st Century Research, Innovation and Policy, OECD/CERI International Conference https://www.oecd.org/site/educeri21st/40600533.pdf

  • Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, O. (1978). How can we teach mathematical modelling? Journal of Mathematical Modelling for Teachers, 1(2), 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakoczy, K., Klieme, E., LeiĂź, D., & Blum, W. (2017). Formative assessment in mathematics instruction: Theoretical considerations and empirical results of the Co2 CA project. In D. Leutner, J. Fleisher, J. GrĂĽnkom, & E. Klieme (Eds.), Competence assessment in education: Research models and instruments (pp. 447–467). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (2013). Reflections on problem solving theory and practice. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 10(1), 9–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J., Redlin, L., & Watson, S. (2015). Precalculus: Mathematics for calculus. Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wess, R., Klock, H., Siller, H.-S., & Greefrath, G. (2021). Measuring professional competence for the teaching of mathematical modelling: A test instrument. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78071-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D. (2010). An integrative summary of the research literature and implications for a new theory of formative assessment. In H. L. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 18–40). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yockey, R. D. (2011). SPSS Demystified: A step-by-step guide to data analysis for SPSS Version 18.0. Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Ekol .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ekol, G. (2023). Using an Assessment for Learning Framework to Support Pre-service Teachers’ Mathematical Modelling Activities. In: Greefrath, G., Carreira, S., Stillman, G.A. (eds) Advancing and Consolidating Mathematical Modelling. International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27115-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27115-1_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-27114-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-27115-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics