Skip to main content

About Randomized Clinical Trials Related to Lipoproteins in Diabetes Mellitus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lipoproteins in Diabetes Mellitus

Part of the book series: Contemporary Diabetes ((CDI))

  • 365 Accesses

Abstract

The results of randomized controlled clinical trials in humans provide robust evidence to guide clinical practice. Such trials related to the treatment of lipoprotein levels in people with diabetes mellitus have contributed to clinical practice guidelines and to improved clinical outcomes observed in recent years. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are often suggested and informed by epidemiology, cross-sectional studies, and preclinical studies, and their results can also guide novel basic science research. RCTs are major undertakings in effort, time, and cost; hence, their careful design, conduct, and interpretation are important. Terms such as the phases of clinical research, types of statistical errors, and Hawthorne effect are defined. Novel types of trial design are described. Important study design issues such as subject selection, sample size and randomization, choice of study end points, and potential confounding effects of metabolic memory and drug pleiotropic effects are also considered. References to major sources of further information are also provided in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Marcovecchio ML, Chiesa ST, Bond S, Daneman D, Dawson S, Donaghue KC, Jones TW, Mahmud FH, Marshall SM, Neil HAW, Dalton RN, Deanfield J, Dunger DB, AdDIT Study Group. ACE inhibitors and statins in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(18):1733–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Keech A, Gebski V, Pike R. Interpreting and reporting clinical trials: a guide to the CONSORT statement and the principles of randomised controlled trials. Sydney: Australasian Medical Publishing Company; 2007. Chapter 1

    Google Scholar 

  3. The Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) group. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet. 1994;344(8934):1383–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Colhoun HM, Betteridge DJ, Durrington PN, Hitman GA, Neil HA, Livingstone SJ, Thomason MJ, Mackness MI, Charlton-Menys V, Fuller JH, CARDS Investigators. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364(9435):685–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Keech A, Simes RJ, Barter P, Best J, Scott R, Taskinen MR, Forder P, Pillai A, Davis T, Glasziou P, Drury P, Kesaniemi YA, Sullivan D, Hunt D, Colman P, d’Emden M, Whiting M, Ehnholm C, Laakso M, FIELD Study Investigators. Effects of long-term fenofibrate therapy on cardiovascular events in 9795 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the FIELD study): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366(9500):1849–61. Erratum in: Lancet. 2006 Oct 21; 368(9545):1415. Lancet. 2006 Oct 21;368(9545):1420. PubMed PMID: 16310551

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. ACCORD Study Group, Ginsberg HN, Elam MB, Lovato LC, Crouse JR III, Leiter LA, Linz P, Friedewald WT, Buse JB, Gerstein HC, Probstfield J, Grimm RH, Ismail-Beigi F, Bigger JT, Goff DC Jr, Cushman WC, Simons-Morton DG, Byington RP. Effects of combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(17):1563–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360:7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, Honarpour N, Wiviott SD, Murphy SA, Kuder JF, Wang H, Liu T, Wasserman SM, Sever PS, Pedersen TR, FOURIER Steering Committee and Investigators. Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(18):1713–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schwartz GG, Steg PG, Szarek M, Bhatt DL, Bittner VA, Diaz R, Edelberg JM, Goodman SG, Hanotin C, Harrington RA, Jukema JW, Lecorps G, Mahaffey KW, Moryusef A, Pordy R, Quintero K, Roe MT, Sasiela WJ, Tamby JF, Tricoci P, White HD, Zeiher AM, ODYSSEY OUTCOMES Committees and Investigators. Alirocumab and cardiovascular outcomes after acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(22):2097–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sabatine MS, Leiter LA, Wiviott SD, Giugliano RP, Deedwania P, De Ferrari GM, Murphy SA, Kuder JF, Gouni-Berthold I, Lewis BS, Handelsman Y, Lira Pineda A, Honapour N, Keech AC, Sever PS, Pedersen TR. Cardiovascular safety and efficacy of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab in patients with and without diabetes and the effect of evolocumab on glycaemia and risk of new-onset diabetes: a prespecified analysis of the FOURIER randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;12:941–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ray KK, Colhoun HM, Szarek M, Baccara-Dinet M, Bhatt DL, Bittner VA, Budaj AJ, Diaz R, Goodman SG, Hanotin C, Harrington RA, Jukema JW, Loizeau V, Lopes RD, Moryusef A, Murin J, Pordy R, Ristic AD, Roe MT, Tuñón J, White HD, Zeiher AM, Schwartz GG, Steg PG, ODYSSEY OUTCOMES Committees and Investigators. Effects of alirocumab on cardiovascular and metabolic outcomes after acute coronary syndrome in patients with or without diabetes: a prespecified analysis of the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;8:618–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Keech A, Gebski V. Interpreting and reporting clinical trials: a guide to the CONSORT statement and the principles of randomised controlled trials. Sydney: Australasian Medical Publishing Company; 2007. Chapter 3, p. 12

    Google Scholar 

  13. Beller E, Gebski V, Keech A. Interpreting and reporting clinical trials: a guide to the CONSORT statement and the principles of randomised controlled trials. Sydney: Australasian Medical Publishing Company; 2007. Chapter 8

    Google Scholar 

  14. Forder P, Gebski V, Keech A. Interpreting and reporting clinical trials: a guide to the CONSORT statement and the principles of randomised controlled trials. Sydney: Australasian Medical Publishing Company; 2007. Chapter 9

    Google Scholar 

  15. AIM-HIGH Investigators. The role of niacin in raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to reduce cardiovascular events in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and optimally treated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol rationale and study design. The atherothrombosis intervention in metabolic syndrome with low HDL/high triglycerides: impact on global health outcomes (AIM-HIGH). Am Heart J. 2011;161(3):471–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rajamani K, Colman PG, Li LP, Best JD, Voysey M, D’Emden MC, Laakso M, Baker JR, Keech AC, on behalf of the FIELD study investigators. Effect of fenofibrate on amputation events in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (FIELD study): a prespecified analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9677):1780–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Pallmann PP, Bedding AW, Choodari-Oskooei B, et al. Adaptive designs in clinical trials: why use them, and how to run them. BMC Med. 2018;16:29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenberger WF, Lachin JM. Randomization in clinical trials: theory and practice, Wiley series in probability and statistics. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics. 1975;31:103–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Park JJH, Siden E, Zoratti MJ, et al. Systematic review of basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials: a landscape analysis of master protocols. Trials. 2019;20:572.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Angus DC, Alexander BM, Berry S, et al. Adaptive platform trials: definition, design, conduct and reporting considerations. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18:797–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Park JJH, Harari O, Dron L, Lester R, et al. An overview of platform trials with a checklist for clinical readers. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;125:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sydes MR, Parmar MKB, James ND, et al. Issues in applying multi-arm multi-stage methodology to a clinical trial in prostate cancer: the MRC STAMPEDE trial. Trials. 2009;10:39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Cunanan KM, Gonen M, Shen R, et al. Basket trials in oncology: a trade-off between complexity and efficiency. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:271–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hyman DM, Puzanov I, Subbiah V, et al. Vemurafenib in multiple nonmelanoma cancers with BRAF V600 mutations. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:726–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Coskinas X, Simes J, Schou M, Martin AJ. Changes to aspects of ongoing randomised controlled trials with fixed designs. Trials. 2020;21:457.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Marschner IC. A general framework for the analysis of adaptive experiments. Stat Sci. 2021;36:465–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Marschner IC, Schou IM. Analysis of adaptive platform trials using a network approach. Clin Trials. 2022;19(5):479–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Dimairo M, Pallmann P, Wason J, et al. The Adaptive designs CONSORT Extension (ACE) statement: a checklist with explanation and elaboration guideline for reporting randomised trials that use an adaptive design. BMJ. 2020;369:m115.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. FDA. Adaptive designs for clinical trials of drugs and biologics: guidance for industry. Silver Spring, MD: Food and Drug Administration; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Geiger MJ, Skrivanek Z, Gaydos B, et al. An adaptive, dose-finding, seamless phase 2/3 study of a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 analog (Dulaglutide): trial design and baseline characteristics. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6:1319–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Skrivanek Z, Gaydos BL, Chien JY, et al. Dose-finding results in an adaptive, seamless, randomized trial of once-weekly dulaglutide combined with metformin in type 2 diabetes patients (AWARD-5). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16:748–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. King C, Pires M, Ahmed N, et al. Community participatory learning and action cycle groups to reduce type 2 diabetes in Bangladesh (D:Clare trial): study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2021;22:235.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Crowther CA, Alsweiler JM, Hughes R, Brown J. Tight or less tight glycaemic targets for women with gestational diabetes mellitus for reducing maternal and perinatal morbidity? (TARGET): study protocol for a stepped wedge randomised trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:425.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. French JRP. Field experiments: changing group productivity. In: Miller JM, editor. Experiments in social process: a symposium on social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1950. p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Jenkins AJ, Best JD, Klein RL, Lyons TJ. Lipoproteins, glycoxidation and diabetic angiopathy. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2004;20(5):349–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jenkins AJ, Rowley KG, Lyons TJ, Best JD, Hill MA, Klein RL. Lipoproteins and diabetic microvascular complications. Curr Pharm Des. 2004;10(27):3395–418.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sóter MO, Gomes KB, Fernandes AP, Md C, Pinheiro PS, Bosco AA, Silva DD, Sousa MO. 1131T>C and SW19 polymorphisms in APOA5 gene and lipid levels in type 2 diabetic patients. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39(7):7541–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Deshmukh HA, Colhoun HM, Johnson T, McKeigue PM, Betteridge DJ, Durrington PN, Fuller JH, Livingstone S, Charlton-Menys V, Neil A, Poulter N, Sever P, Shields DC, Stanton AV, Chatterjee A, Hyde C, Calle RA, Demicco DA, Trompet S, Postmus I, Ford I, Jukema JW, Caulfield M, Hitman GA, CARDS, ASCOT, and PROSPER Investigators. Genome-wide association study of genetic determinants of LDL-c response to atorvastatin therapy: importance of Lp(a). J Lipid Res. 2012;53(5):1000–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Villeneuve LM, Reddy MA, Natarajan R. Epigenetics: deciphering its role in diabetes and its chronic complications. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2011;38(7):451–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Saremi A, Nelson RG, Tulloch-Reid M, Hanson RL, Sievers ML, Taylor GW, Shlossman M, Bennett PH, Genco R, Knowler WC. Periodontal disease and mortality in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(1):27–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Strong JP, Malcom GT, Newman WP III, Oalmann MC. Early lesions of atherosclerosis in childhood and youth: natural history and risk factors. J Am Coll Nutr. 1992;11:51S–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA. 10-Year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(15):1577–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. White NH, Sun W, Cleary PA, Danis RP, Davis MD, Hainsworth DP, Hubbard LD, Lachin JM, Nathan DM. Prolonged effect of intensive therapy on the risk of retinopathy complications in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: 10 years after the diabetes control and complications trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(12):1707–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Neil HA, Matthews DR. Long-term follow-up after tight control of blood pressure in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(15):1565–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jermendy G. Vascular memory: can we broaden the concept of the metabolic memory? Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2012;11(1):44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Pedersen TR, Wilhelmsen L, Faergeman O, Strandberg TE, Thorgeirsson G, Troedsson L, Kristianson J, Berg K, Cook TJ, Haghfelt T, Kjekshus J, Miettinen T, Olsson AG, Pyörälä K, Wedel H. Follow-up study of patients randomized in the Scandinavian simvastatin survival study (4S) of cholesterol lowering. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:257–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bulbulia R, Bowman L, Wallendszus K, Parish S, Armitage J, Peto R, Collins R, for the Heart Protection Study. Effects of 11-year mortality and morbidity of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin for about 5 years in 20536 high-risk individuals: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;378:2013–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ford I, Murray H, Packard CJ, Shepherd J, MacFarlane PW, Cobbe SM, for the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group. Long-term follow-up of the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1477–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Sever PS, Chang CL, Gupta AK, Whitehouse A, Poulter NR, ASCOT Investigators. The Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial: 11-year mortality follow-up of the lipid-lowering arm in the UK. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:2525–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Sjølie AK, Klein R, Porta M, Orchard T, Fuller J, Parving HH, Bilous R, Aldington S, Chaturvedi N. Retinal microaneurysm count predicts progression and regression of diabetic retinopathy. Post-hoc results from the DIRECT Programme. Diabet Med. 2011;28(3):345–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Perkins BA, Ficociello LH, Silva KH, Finkelstein DM, Warram JH, Krolewski AS. Regression of microalbuminuria in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(23):2285–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Halimi JM. The emerging concept of chronic kidney disease without clinical proteinuria in diabetic patients. Diabetes Metab. 2012;38(4):291–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Rigalleau V, Beauvieux MC, Gonzalez C, Raffaitin C, Lasseur C, Combe C, Chauveau P, De la Faille R, Rigothier C, Barthe N, Gin H. Estimation of renal function in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2011;37(5):359–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Tsmikas S, Shortal BP, Witztum JL, Palinski W. In vivo uptake of radiolabeled MDA2, an oxidation specific monoclonal antibody, provides an accurate measure of atherosclerotic lesions rich in oxidized LDL and is highly sensitive to their regression. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:689–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Jenkins AJ, Rothen M, Klein RL, Moller K, Eldridge L, Zheng D, Durazo-Arvizu R, McGee D, Lackland D, Thorpe SR, Garvey WT, Lyons TJ, DCCT/EDIC Research Group. Cross-sectional associations of C-reactive protein with vascular risk factors and vascular complications in the DCCT/EDIC cohort. J Diabetes Complicat. 2008;22(3):153–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Lopes-Virella MF, Carter RE, Gilbert GE, Klein RL, Jaffa M, Jenkins AJ, Lyons TJ, Garvey WT, Virella G, Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Intervention and Complications Cohort Study Group. Risk factors related to inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in the DCCT/EDIC cohort and their relationship with nephropathy and macrovascular complications. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(10):2006–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Florentin M, Liberopoulos EN, Kei A, Mikhailidis DP, Elisaf MS. Pleiotropic effects of nicotinic acid: beyond high density lipoprotein cholesterol elevation. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2011;9(4):385–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Mihos CG, Salas MJ, Santana O. The pleiotropic effects of the hydroxy-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors in cardiovascular disease: a comprehensive review. Cardiol Rev. 2010;18(6):298–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Foucher C, Brugère L, Ansquer JC. Fenofibrate, homocysteine and renal function. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2010;8(5):589–603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Keech AC, Mitchell P, Summanen PA, O’Day J, Davis TM, Moffitt MS, Taskinen MR, Simes RJ, Tse D, Williamson E, Merrifield A, Laatikainen LT, d’Emden MC, Crimet DC, O’Connell RL, Colman PG, FIELD Study Investigators. Effect of fenofibrate on the need for laser treatment for diabetic retinopathy (FIELD study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;370(9600):1687–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Davis TM, Ting R, Best JD, Donoghoe MW, Drury PL, Sullivan DR, Jenkins AJ, O’Connell RL, Whiting MJ, Glasziou PP, Simes RJ, Kesäniemi YA, Gebski VJ, Scott RS, Keech AC, on behalf of the FIELD Study Investigators. Effects of fenofibrate on renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the fenofibrate intervention and event lowering in diabetes (FIELD) study. Diabetologia. 2011;54(20):280–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Keech AC, Pike R, Granger R, Gebski V. Interpreting the results of a clinical trial (Chapter 20). In: Keech AC, Gebski VJ, Pike R, editors. Interpreting and reporting clinical trials: a guide to the CONSORT statement and the principles of randomised controlled trials. Sydney: AMPCo; 2007. p. 143–8.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Note for guidance on good clinical practice (CPMP/ICH/135/95). ICH topic E6. European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  65. World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 10th revision. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  66. International Conference on Harmonization. Medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA); 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  67. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Helsinki: World Medical Association; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Barter PJ, Caulfield M, Eriksson M, Grundy SM, Kastelein JJ, Komajda M, Lopez-Sendon J, Mosca L, Tardif JC, Waters DD, Shear CL, Revkin JH, Buhr KA, Fisher MR, Tall AR, Brewer B, ILLUMINATE Investigators. Effects of torcetrapib in patients at high risk for coronary events. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(21):2109–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. ACCORD Study Group, ACCORD Eye Study Group, Chew EY, Ambrosius WT, Davis MD, Danis RP, Gangaputra S, Greven CM, Hubbard L, Esser BA, Lovato JF, Perdue LH, Goff DC Jr, Cushman WC, Ginsberg HN, Elam MB, Genuth S, Gerstein HC, Schubart U, Fine LJ. Effects of medical therapies on retinopathy progression in type 2diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(3):233–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Baigent C, Landray MJ, Reith C, Emberson J, Wheeler DC, Tomson C, Wanner C, Krane V, Cass A, Craig J, Neal B, Jiang L, Hooi LS, Levin A, Agodoa L, Gaziano M, Kasiske B, Walker R, Massy ZA, Feldt-Rasmussen B, Krairittichai U, Ophascharoensuk V, Fellström B, Holdaas H, Tesar V, Wiecek A, Grobbee D, de Zeeuw D, Grönhagen-Riska C, Dasgupta T, Lewis D, Herrington W, Mafham M, Majoni W, Wallendszus K, Grimm R, Pedersen T, Tobert J, Armitage J, Baxter A, Bray C, Chen Y, Chen Z, Hill M, Knott C, Parish S, Simpson D, Sleight P, Young A, Collins R, SHARP Investigators. The effects of lowering LDL-cholesterol with simvastatin plus ezetimibe in patients with chronic kidney disease (study of heart and renal protection): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9784):2181–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/ucm204882.htm. FDA alert 28 Feb 2011.

  72. Jones PH, Davidson MH. Reporting rate of rhabdomyolysis with fenofibrate + statin versus gemfibrozil + any statin. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95(1):120–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Sandhu S, Al-Sarraf A, Taraboanta C, Frohlich J, Francis GA. Incidence of pancreatitis, secondary causes, and treatment of patients referred to a specialty lipid clinic with severe hypertriglyceridemia: a retrospective cohort study. Lipids Health Dis. 2011;10:157.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration, Baigent C, Blackwell L, Emberson J, Holland LE, Reith C, Bhala N, Peto R, Barnes EH, Keech A, Simes J, Collins R. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL-cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet. 2010;376(9753):1670–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaborators, Kearney PM, Blackwell L, Collins R, Keech A, Simes J, Peto R, Armitage J, Baigent C. Efficacy of cholesterol-lowering therapy in 18,686 people with diabetes in 14 randomised trials of statins: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2008;371:117–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Scott R, O’Brien R, Fulcher G, Pardy C, d’Emden M, Tse D, Taskinen MR, Ehnholm C, Keech A, on behalf of the FIELD Study Investigators. The effects of fenofibrate treatment on cardiovascular disease risk in 9795 people with type 2 diabetes and various components of the metabolic syndrome: the FIELD study. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(3):493–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Keech A, Gebski V, Pike R. Interpreting and reporting clinical trials: a guide to the CONSORT statement and the principles of randomised controlled trials. Sydney: Australasian Medical Publishing Company; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Liu MB, Davis K. A clinical trials manual from the Duke Clinical Research Institute. Lessons from a horse named Jim. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Clinical Trials Centre is partly supported by funding from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council. ACK and AJJ are supported by NHMRC Fellowships.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Marschner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Keech, A., Jenkins, A.J., Gebski, V., Marschner, I. (2023). About Randomized Clinical Trials Related to Lipoproteins in Diabetes Mellitus. In: Jenkins, A.J., Toth, P.P. (eds) Lipoproteins in Diabetes Mellitus. Contemporary Diabetes. Humana, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26681-2_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26681-2_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-26680-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-26681-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics