Abstract
Chatbots are increasingly used as digital self-coaching tools in various fields. One area of application is in higher education. Here, coaching chatbots can accompany and support students’ self-reflection processes. For the present study, a coaching chatbot on the topic of exam anxiety was developed within the Conversational AI framework Rasa, which is intended to enable low-threshold engagement with students’ exam anxiety through solution- and resource-oriented questions. In the study, the disclosure behavior of a chatbot (self-disclosure, information disclosure, no disclosure) was varied in order to draw conclusions about acceptance and working alliance in chatbot coaching. Studies show that self-disclosure and/or information disclosure of a chatbot can have a positive effect on working alliance-like constructs like rapport. The online experiment included chatbot coaching and a subsequent survey. 201 subjects participated in the three experimental conditions. Technical functionality, acceptance, and working alliance were moderate to good in all three experimental groups. The subjects were willing to engage in interaction with the chatbot. However, no statistically significant differences can be demonstrated between the three experimental groups. Self-disclosure, information disclosure, or no disclosure do not seem to have an impact on the acceptance and working alliance between user and chatbot in the use case of student coaching on exam anxiety. The results provide an important complement to previous studies on (self-)disclosure and lead to further research questions about effectiveness factors in chatbot coaching. One focus will be on exploring context. The conversation and contextual design are subject to further investigations and improvements.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kanatouri, S.: The Digital Coach. Routledge (2020)
Brandtzaeg, P.B., Følstad, A.: Why people use chatbots. In: Kompatsiaris, I., et al. (eds.) INSCI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10673, pp. 377–392. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70284-1_30
Rasa Homepage: Introduction to Rasa Open Source. https://rasa.com/docs/rasa/. Accessed 25 May 2022
De Gennaro, M., Krumhuber, E.G., Lucas, G.: Effectiveness of an empathic chatbot in combating adverse effects of social exclusion on mood. In: Frontiers in Psychol. 10, 3061 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03061
Mai, V., Neef, C., Richert, A.: Developing an AI-based coaching chatbot: a study on disclosure as effectiveness factor in human-machine-coaching. In: Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Human Interaction & Emerging Technologies: Artificial Intelligence & Future Applications, IHIET-AI (2022). https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe100917
Mai, V., Wolff, A., Richert, A., Preusser, I.: Accompanying reflection processes by an AI-based StudiCoachBot: a study on rapport building in human-machine coaching using self disclosure. In: Stephanidis, C., et al. (eds.) HCII 2021. LNCS, vol. 13096, pp. 439–457. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90328-2_29
Lee, Y., Yamashita, N., Huang, Y., Fu, W.: I hear you, i feel you: encouraging deep self-disclosure through a Chatbot. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp. 1–12 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376175
Kang, S., Gratch, J.: People like virtual counselors that highly disclose about themselves. Studies in health technology and informatics 167, 143148 (2011)
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. In: MIS Quarterly 3(27), 425–478 (2003)
Wilmers, F., et al.: Die deutschsprachige Version des Working Alliance Inventory – Short revised (WAI-SR) – Ein schulenübergreifendes, ökonomisches und empirisch validiertes Instrument zur Erfassung der therapeutischen Allianz. Klinische Diagnostik & Evaluation 1(3), 343–358 (2008)
Deepika, K., Tilekya, V., Mamatha, J., Subetha, T.: Jollitychatbot - a contextual AI assistant. In: 3rd International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT), pp. 1196–1200 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSIT48917.2020.9214076
2020 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report. Teaching and Learning Edition. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2020/3/2020-educause-horizon-report-teaching-and-learning-edition. Accessed 24 May 2022
Rauning, M.: Künstliche Interaktionspartner*innen an Hochschulen. Verein Forum neue Medien in der Lehre Austria (2020)
Graßmann, C., Schermuly, C.: Coaching with artificial intelligence: concepts and capabilities. Human Resource Dev. Rev. 20(1), 106–126 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484320982891
Mai, V., Richert, A.: AI Coaching: effectiveness factors of the working alliance in the coaching process between coachbot and human coachee – an explorative study. In: EDULEARN20 Proceedings, pp. 1239–1248 (2020). https://library.iated.org/view/MAI2020AIC
Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. CSLI Publ (1998)
Nass, C., Steuer, J., Tauber, E.: Computers are social actors. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 72–78 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.191703
Terblanche, N., Cilliers, D.: Factors that influence users’ adoption of being coached by an artificial intelligence coach. In: Philosophy of Coaching: An International J. 5(1), 61–70 (2020)
Terblanche, N.: A design framework to create artificial intelligence coaches. In: International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring 18(2), 152–165 (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRITO48877.2020.919794310.24384/b7gs-3h05
de Haan, E., Grant, A.M., Burger, Y., Eriksson, P.-O.: A large-scale study of executive and workplace coaching: the relative contributions of relationship, personality match, and self-efficacy. Consulting Psychology J.: Practice Res. 68(3), 189–207 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000058
Graßmann, C., Schölmerich, F., Schermuly, C.C.: The relationship between working alliance and client outcomes in coaching: a meta-analysis. In: Human Relations 73(1), 35–58 (2019)
Künzli, H.: Spielstand 1:0 – Die Wirksamkeit von Coaching. In: Ryba, A., Roth G. (eds.): Coaching und Beratung in der Praxis: Ein neurowissenschaftlich fundiertes Integrationsmodell, pp. 102–124. Klett-Cotta (2019)
Lindart, M.: Was Coaching wirksam macht: Wirkfaktoren von Coachingprozessen im Fokus. Springer (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11761-0
Lippmann, E.: Coaching – Angewandte Psychologie für die Beratungspraxis. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28451-6
Bordin, E.S.: The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice 16, 252–260 (1979)
Gratch, J., Wang, N., Gerten, J., Fast, E., Duffy, R.: Creating rapport with virtual agents. In: Pelachaud, C., Martin, J.-C., André, E., Chollet, G., Karpouzis, K., Pelé, D. (eds.) IVA 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4722, pp. 125–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74997-4_12
Huang, L., Morency, L.-P., Gratch, J.: Virtual rapport 2.0. In: Vilhjálmsson, H.H., Kopp, S., Marsella, S., Thórisson, K.R. (eds.) IVA 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6895, pp. 68–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23974-8_8
Zhao, R., Papangelis, A., Cassell, J.: Towards a dyadic computational model of rapport management for human-virtual agent interaction. In: Bickmore, T., Marsella, S., Sidner, C. (eds.) IVA 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8637, pp. 514–527. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09767-1_62
Sharpley, C.F.: The influence of silence upon clinet-perceived rapport. Couns. Psychol. Q. 10(3), 237–246 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1080/09515079708254176
Hauser-Ulrich, S., Künzli, H., Meier-Peterhans, D., Kowatsch, T.: A smartphone-based health care chatbot to promote selfmanagement of chronic pain (SELMA): pilot randomized controlled trial. In: JMIR mHealth and uHealth 8(4), e15806 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2196/15806
Berninger-Schäfer, E.: Online-Coaching. Springer (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10128-2
von der Pütten, A.M., Hoffmann, L., Klatt, J., Krämer, N.C.: Quid pro quo? reciprocal self-disclosure and communicative accomodation towards a virtual interviewer. In: Vilhjálmsson, H.H., Kopp, S., Marsella, S., Thórisson, K.R. (eds.) IVA 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6895, pp. 183–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23974-8_20
Traus, A., Höffken, K., Thomas, S., Mangold, K., Schröer, W.: Stu.diCo. – Studieren digital in Zeiten von Corona. Universitätsverlag Hildesheim (2020). https://hildok.bsz-bw.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/1157. Accessed 10 June 2021
Mai, V., Neef, C., Richert, A.: Clicking vs. Writing: the impact of a chatbot’s interaction method on the working alliance in AI-based coaching. In: Coaching: Theorie & Praxis, 8, 1–17 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1365/s40896-021-00063-3
Mayring, P.: Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. Beltz (2015)
Herrmann, T., Kleinbeck, U., Ritterskamp, C.: Innovationen an der Schnittstelle zwischen technischer Dienstleistung und Kunden, Heidelberg (2009)
Blanz, M.: Forschungsmethoden und Statistiken für die Soziale Arbeit, Stuttgart (2021)
Schlippe, A., Schweitzer, J.: Lehrbuch der systemischen Therapie und Beratung I. Das Grundlagenwissen. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht (2016)
Adamopoulou, E., Moussiades, L.: An overview of chatbot technology. In: Maglogiannis, I., Iliadis, L., Pimenidis, E. (eds.) AIAI 2020. IAICT, vol. 584, pp. 373–383. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49186-4_31
Hussain, S., Ameri Sianaki, O., Ababneh, N.: A survey on conversational agents/chatbots classification and design techniques. In: Barolli, L., Takizawa, M., Xhafa, F., Enokido, T. (eds.) WAINA 2019. AISC, vol. 927, pp. 946–956. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15035-8_93
Acknowledgments
This journal contribution is based on a project carried out as part of the module “Research Seminar” in the master's program Mechanical Engineering at TH Köln/University of Applied Sciences. We kindly thank the master’s students/our fellow students Laura Nehler, Pascal Bieker and Simon Froitzheim for carrying out this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mai, V., Bauer, A., Deggelmann, C., Neef, C., Richert, A. (2022). AI-Based Coaching: Impact of a Chatbot’s Disclosure Behavior on the Working Alliance and Acceptance. In: Chen, J.Y.C., Fragomeni, G., Degen, H., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2022 – Late Breaking Papers: Interacting with eXtended Reality and Artificial Intelligence. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13518. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21707-4_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21707-4_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21706-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21707-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)