Abstract
Software project success is often characterized in terms of time, cost and scope – despite that delivering benefit is the main purpose of a project. In this paper, we explore 1) to what degree benefit considerations influence major project decisions, 2) to what degree a specific set of benefits management challenge are handled and influence major project decisions and 3) if there is any realization (over time) that benefit considerations should receive greater attention. We investigate influence in projects with four types of problem severity: completed projects with only minor problems, completed projects with major problems, projects that were disrupted but completed, and projects that were terminated before completion. We asked 45 software professionals to what degree time, cost, scope, benefit and benefit/cost, as well as benefits management challenges, influence major project decisions. Our findings indicate that time, cost and scope have a significantly higher degree of influence on project decisions than benefit and benefit/cost. However, practitioners think that benefit and benefit/cost should have significantly more influence on decisions than cost. The benefits management challenges are found to have less influence in the more severe projects. We argue that giving benefits considerations a stronger voice in project decisions would be in line with the desire of practitioners and the prime objective of delivering benefit to stakeholders. We conclude that it is important to understand how to handle benefits management challenges at different stages of project life and that handling such challenges should be integrated with other prime drivers of project success.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Data analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics version 27 using test-wise deletion of missing data.
References
Arkes, H.R., Ayton, P.: The sunk cost and concorde effects: are humans less rational than lower animals? Psychol. Bull. 25(5), 591–600 (1999)
Armstrong, R.: When to use the bonferroni correction. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 34 (2014)
Ashurst, C., Doherty, N.F.: Towards the formulation of a ‘best practice’framework for benefits realisation in it projects. Electr. J. Inf. Syst. Eval. 6(2), 1–10 (2003)
Askedal, K., Flak, L.S., Aanestad, M.: Five challenges for benefits management in complex digitalisation efforts-and a research agenda to address current shortcomings. Electr. J. e-Govt. 17(2), 64–78 (2019)
Aubry, M., Boukri, S.E., Sergi, V.: Opening the black box of benefits management in the context of projects. Proj. Manag. J. 52(5), 434–452 (2021)
Ballantine, J.A., Galliers, R.D., Stray, S.J.: Information systems/technology evaluation practices: evidence from UK organizations. J. Inf. Technol. 11(2), 129–141 (1996)
Berghout, E., Nijland, M., Powell, P.: Management of lifecycle costs and benefits: lessons from information systems practice. Comput. Ind. 62(7), 755–764 (2011)
Bradley, G.: Benefit Realisation Management: A Practical Guide to Achieving Benefits through Change. Routledge, London (2016)
Breese, R.: Benefits realisation management: panacea or false dawn? Int’l J. Project Manag. 30(3), 341–351 (2012)
Breese, R., Jenner, S., Serra, C.E.M., Thorp, J.: Benefits management: lost or found in translation. Int. J. Project Manage. 33(7), 1438–1451 (2015)
Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Routledge, London (1988)
Coombs, C.R.: When planned IS/IT project benefits are not realized: a study of inhibitors and facilitators to benefits realization. Int. J. Project Manag. 33(2), 363–379 (2015)
Doherty, N.F., Ashurst, C., Peppard, J.: Factors affecting the successful realisation of benefits from systems development projects: findings from three case studies. J. Inf. Technol. 27(1), 1–16 (2012)
Farbey, B., Land, F., Targett, D.: The moving staircase - problems of appraisal and evaluation in a turbulent environment. Inf. Technol. People 12(3), 238–252 (1999)
Fernandes, G., O’Sullivan, D.: Benefits management in university-industry collaboration programs. Int. J. Project Manag. 39(1), 71–84 (2021)
Flak, L.S., Eikebrokk, T.R., Dertz, W.: An exploratory approach for benefits management in e-government: Insights from 48 Norwegian government funded projects. In: Proceedings of 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (2008), article no. 210
Gigerenzer, G.: Mindless statistics. J. Socio-Econ. 33, 587–606 (2004)
Gingnell, L., Franke, U., Lagerström, R., Ericsson, E., Lilliesköld, J.: Quantifying success factors for it projects-an expert-based Bayesian model. Inf. Syst. Manag. 31(1), 21–36 (2014)
Hannay, J.E.: Benefit/Cost-Driven Software Development with Benefit Points and Size Points. Springer, Simula Springer Briefs (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74218-8D
Hannay, J.E., Benestad, H.C., Strand, K.: Benefit points–the best part of the story. IEEE Softw. 34(3), 73–85 (2017)
Hannay, J.E., Benestad, H.C., Strand, K.: Earned business value management–see that you deliver value to your customer. IEEE Softw. 34(4), 58–70 (2017)
Hesselmann, F., Mohan, K.: Where are we headed with benefits management research? Current shortcomings and avenues for future research. In: Proceedings of 22nd European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) (2014)
Holgeid, K.K., Jørgensen, M.: Benefits management and agile practices in software projects: how perceived benefits are impacted. In: IEEE 22nd Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), vol. 2 (2020)
Jenner, S.: Managing Benefits: Optimizing the Return from Investments. The Stationery Office, APMG-International, High Wycombe (2014)
Jørgensen, M.: A survey of the characteristics of projects with success in delivering client benefits. Inf. Softw. Technol. 78, 83–94 (2016)
Jørgensen, M., Mohagheghi, P., Grimstad, S.: Direct and indirect connections between type of contract and software project outcome. Int. J. Project Manag. 35(8), 1573–1586 (2017)
Keil, M., Mann, J., Rai, A.: Why software projects escalate: an empirical analysis and test of four theoretical models. MIS Q. 24(4), 631–664 (2000)
Kirk, R.E.: Practical significance: a concept whose time has come. Educ. Psychol. Measur. 56(5), 746–759 (1996)
Leffingwell, D.: Agile Software Requirements: Lean Requirements Practices for Teams. Addison Wesley, Programs and the Enterprise (2011)
Lenhard, W., Lenhard, A.: Computation of effect sizes (2016). https://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html Psychometrica. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17823.92329
Lin, C., Pervan, G.: Is/it investment evaluation and benefits realisation issues in a government organisation. In: ACIS 2001 Proceedings, vol. 49 (2001)
Lin, C., Pervan, G.: The practice of IS/IT benefits management in large Australian organizations. Inf. Manag. 41(1), 13–24 (2003)
Lystad, J.: Det er ingen skam å snu - erfaringer fra Mattilsynet og NAV. Presentation given at Conference of the Agency for Public Management and eGovernment (DIFI), 6 December 2017
Olaussen, S., Tendal, Ø, et al.: KSP-rapport nr. 1 for Modernisering av IKT i NAV - Rapport til Finansdepartementet og Arbeids- og sosialdepartementet, Versjon: 1.0 (2015)
Rabbee, N., Coull, B.A., Mehta, C.: Power and sample size for ordered categorical data. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 12, 73–84 (2003)
Sawilowsky, S.S.: New effect size rules of thumb. J. Mod. Appl. Stat. Methods 8(2), 596–599 (2009)
Shenhar, A.J., Dvir, D., Levy, O., Maltz, A.C.: Project success: A multidimensional strategic concept. Long Range Plan. 34(6), 699–725 (2001)
Tanilkan, S.S., Hannay, J.E.: Perceived challenges in benefits management–a study of public sector information systems engineering projects. In: 2022 IEEE 24th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), June 2022
Terlizzi, M.A., Albertin, A.L., de Oliveira Cesar de Moraes, H.R.: IT benefits management in financial institutions: practices and barriers. Int’l J. Project Manag. 35(5), 763–782 (2017)
Tian, C., Manfei, X., Justin, T., Hongyue, W., Xiaohui, N.: Relationship between omnibus and post-hoc tests: An investigation of performance of the F test in ANOVA. Shanghai Arch. Psychiatry 30(1), 60–64 (2018)
Tomczak, M., Tomczak, E.: The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. Trends Sport Sci. 1(21), 19–25 (2014)
Ward, J., Daniel, E.: Benefits Management: How to increase the Business Value of Your IT Projects, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (2012)
Ward, J., Taylor, P., Bond, P.: Evaluation and realisation of IS/IT benefits: an empirical study of current practice. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 4, 214–225 (1996)
Williams, T., et al.: A cross-national comparison of public project benefits management practices - the effectiveness of benefits management frameworks in application. Prod. Plan. Control 31, 1–16 (2020)
Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Applied Social Research Methods Series, 3rd edn., vol. 5. Sage Publications 2003)
Zachariassen, E.: Nav stanser IT-prosjekt til 3,3 milliarder - Moderniseringsprogrammet var feil metode. Nav får skryt fra statlig ekspert, article published 25 October 2013
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to experienced IT professionals Kjetil Strand, Hans Christian Benestad and Bjørn Olav Salvesen for feedback on the questionnaire. The authors are further grateful to the survey respondents.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tanilkan, S.S., Hannay, J.E. (2022). Benefit Considerations in Project Decisions. In: Taibi, D., Kuhrmann, M., Mikkonen, T., Klünder, J., Abrahamsson, P. (eds) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13709. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21388-5_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21388-5_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21387-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21388-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)