Skip to main content

Overcoming Barriers to Digital Transformation – Development of a Decision Matrix

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Software Business (ICSOB 2022)

Abstract

Digital Transformation (DT) impacts industries, non-profit sectors, higher education, and even societies. As connectivity technologies blend with physical assets, modifications in value creation processes are provoked. These modifications may have positive impacts such as higher effectivity, enhanced business models, and improved customer connection. However, realizing a DT is a complex endeavor. Specific properties, so-called barriers, hinder the DT journey. Thus, it is essential to grasp the barriers and indicate ways to overcome them. We develop a decision matrix for overcoming barriers using qualitative data from participants working in different sectors. This work builds upon a pre-study developing a barrier classification and enhances it with specific recommendations such as “define clear DT responsibilities”. Thus, our work takes the development of plain barrier classifications further. From a theoretical perspective, this work contributes to developing hypothetical models of the effects of recommendations to overcome barriers in the future. From a practical perspective, companies can use the recommendations to plan actions to take.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dehning, B., Richardson, V.J., Zmud, R.W.: The value relevance of announcements of transformational information technology investments. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 27, 637–656 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2307/30036551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Laudon, K.C., Laudon, J.P.: Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm. Pearson, New York (2020)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., Helbig, J.: Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative Industrie 4.0. Acatech – National Academy of Science and Engineering (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benlian, A., Hilkert, D., Hess, T.: How open is this platform? The meaning and measurement of platform openness from the complementors’ perspective. J. Inf. Technol. 30, 209–228 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schwab, K.: The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Crown Business, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gnamm, J., Kalmbach, R., Schertler, M.: Digitalization must be given top priority (2018). https://www.bain.com/insights/digitalisierung-ist-chefsache-2018/

  7. Hess, T., Matt, C., Benlian, A., Wiesböck, F.: Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy. MIS Q. Exec. 15, 123–139 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hirsch-Kreinsen, H.: Digitization of industrial work: development paths and prospects. J. Labour Mark. Res. 49, 1–14 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hadjimanolis, A.: The barriers approach to innovation. In: Shavinina, L.V. (ed.) The International Handbook on Innovation, pp. 559–573. Pergamon, Oxford (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044198-6/50038-3

  10. Vial, G.: Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 28, 118–144 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vogelsang, K., Liere-Netheler, K., Packmohr, S., Hoppe, U.: Barriers to digital transformation in manufacturing: development of a research agenda. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 4937–4946 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jones, M.D., Hutcheson, S., Camba, J.D.: Past, present, and future barriers to digital transformation in manufacturing: a review. J. Manuf. Syst. 60, 936–948 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Reis, J., Amorim, M., Melão, N., Matos, P.: Digital transformation: a literature review and guidelines for future research. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Reis, L.P., Costanzo, S. (eds.) WorldCIST’18 2018. AISC, vol. 745, pp. 411–421. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77703-0_41

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Pabst von Ohain, B.: Leader attributes for successful digital transformation. In: ICIS 2019 Proceedings (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wessel, L., et al.: Unpacking the difference between digital transformation and IT-enabled organizational transformation. JAIS 22, 102–129 (2021). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00655

  16. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O., Pavlou, P., Venkatraman, N.: Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 37, 471–482 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoo, Y., Lyytinen, K.J., Boland, R.J., Berente, N.: The next wave of digital innovation: opportunities and challenges: a report on the research workshop “digital challenges in innovation research”. SSRN J. (2010). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1622170

  18. Klötzer, C., Pflaum, A.: Toward the development of a maturity model for digitalization within the manufacturing industry’s supply chain. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 4210–4219 (2017). https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2017.509

  19. Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Q. 26, xiii–xxiii (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Varwig, T., Brink, H., Packmohr, S.: A systematic literature review on barriers to digital transformation: insights and implications for overcoming. Presented at the 37th EBES Conference, Berlin (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bilgeri, D., Wortmann, F.: Barriers to IoT business model innovation. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, pp. 987–990 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Henriette, E., Feki, M., Boughzala, I., et al.: Digital transformation challenges. In: Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (MICS), pp. 1–7 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kumar, P., Singh, R.K., Kumar, V.: Managing supply chains for sustainable operations in the era of industry 4.0 and circular economy: analysis of barriers. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 164, 105–115 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Khanzode, A.G., Sarma, P.R.S., Mangla, S.K., Yuan, H.: Modeling the industry 4.0 adoption for sustainable production in micro, small & medium enterprises. J. Clean. Prod. 279, 123489 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Karadayi-Usta, S.: An interpretive structural analysis for industry 4.0 adoption challenges. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 67, 973–978 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2018.2890443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Abdul-Hamid, A.-Q., Ali, M.H., Tseng, M.-L., Lan, S., Kumar, M.: Impeding challenges on industry 4.0 in circular economy: palm oil industry in Malaysia. Comput. Oper. Res. 123, 105052 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2020.105052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Agrawal, P., Narain, R., Ullah, I.: Analysis of barriers in implementation of digital transformation of supply chain using interpretive structural modelling approach. J. Modell. Manag. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-03-2019-0066

  28. Dudenredaktion: Handlungsempfehlung. https://www.du-den.de/node/63055/revision/63091

  29. Westerman, G., Calméjane, C., Bonnet, D., Ferraris, P., McAfee, A.: Digital transformation: a roadmap for billion-dollar organizations. MIT Cent. Digit. Bus. Capgemini Consult. 1, 1–68 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zaychenko, I., Smirnova, A., Shytova, Y., Mutalieva, B., Pimenov, N.: Digital logistics transformation: implementing the internet of things (IoT). In: Schaumburg, H., Korablev, V., Ungvari, L. (eds.) TT 2020. LNNS, vol. 157, pp. 189–200. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64430-7_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Mentzer, J.T.: Rigor versus relevance: why would we choose only one? J. Supply Chain Manag. 44, 72–77 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2008.00058.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dremel, C.: Barriers to the adoption of big data analytics in the automotive sector. In: Proceedings of the 23rd American Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), Boston, pp. 1–10 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sarker, S., Chatterjee, S., Xiao, X., Elbanna, A.: The sociotechnical axis of cohesion for the IS discipline: its historical legacy and its continued relevance. MIS Q. 43, 695–719 (2019). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/13747

  34. Brink, H., Packmohr, S., Paul, F.-H.: Extending a socio-technical model of the barriers to digital transformation through data triangulation. In: 2022 8th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM), pp. 68–74. IEEE, Cambridge (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIM56520.2022.00020

  35. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE, Los Angeles (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Fetters, M.D., Molina-Azorin, J.F.: The journal of mixed methods research starts a new decade: principles for bringing in the new and divesting of the old language of the field. J. Mixed Methods Res. 11, 3–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816682092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mayring, P.: Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution. Beltz Verlag, Klagenfurt (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Stern, M.J., Bilgen, I., McClain, C., Hunscher, B.: Effective sampling from social media sites and search engines for web surveys: demographic and data quality differences in surveys of google and Facebook users. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 35, 713–732 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439316683344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Azungah, T.: Qualitative research: deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis. QRJ. 18, 383–400 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Konradsen, H., Kirkevold, M., Olson, K.: Recognizability: a strategy for assessing external validity and for facilitating knowledge transfer in qualitative research. Adv. Nurs. Sci. 36, E66–E76 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0b013e318290209d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Dregger, J., Niehaus, J., Ittermann, P., Hirsch-Kreinsen, H., ten Hompel, M.: The digitization of manufacturing and its societal challenges: a framework for the future of industrial labor. In: 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science and Technology (ETHICS), pp. 1–3. IEEE, Vancouver (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kotter, J.P.: Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. Harv. Bus. Rev. 60–67 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kane, G.: The technology fallacy. Res.-Technol. Manag. 62, 44–49 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2019.1661079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ajmera, P., Jain, V.: Modelling the barriers of health 4.0–the fourth healthcare industrial revolution in India by TISM. Oper. Manag. Res. 12(3–4), 129–145 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-019-00143-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Müller, J.M.: Assessing the barriers to industry 4.0 implementation from a workers’ perspective. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 52, 2189–2194 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Cichosz, M., Wallenburg, C.M., Knemeyer, A.M.: Digital transformation at logistics service providers: barriers, success factors and leading practices. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 31, 209–238 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-08-2019-0229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Chen, C.-L., Lin, Y.-C., Chen, W.-H., Chao, C.-F., Pandia, H.: Role of government to enhance digital transformation in small service business. Sustainability 13, 1028 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tekic, Z., Koroteev, D.: From disruptively digital to proudly analog: a holistic typology of digital transformation strategies. Bus. Horiz. 62, 683–693 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Vogelsang, K., Packmohr, S., Brink, H.: Challenges of the digital transformation – comparing nonprofit and industry organizations. In: Ahlemann, F., Schütte, R., Stieglitz, S. (eds.) WI 2021. LNISO, vol. 46, pp. 297–312. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86790-4_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. de Jesus Pacheco, D.A., ten Caten, C.S., Jung, C.F., Sassanelli, C., Terzi, S.: Overcoming barriers towards sustainable product-service systems in small and medium-sized enterprises: state of the art and a novel decision matrix. J. Clean. Prod. 222, 903–921 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.152

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henning Brink .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Brink, H., Packmohr, S., Paul, FH. (2022). Overcoming Barriers to Digital Transformation – Development of a Decision Matrix. In: Carroll, N., Nguyen-Duc, A., Wang, X., Stray, V. (eds) Software Business. ICSOB 2022. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 463. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20706-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20706-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20705-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20706-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics