Abstract
Digital Transformation (DT) impacts industries, non-profit sectors, higher education, and even societies. As connectivity technologies blend with physical assets, modifications in value creation processes are provoked. These modifications may have positive impacts such as higher effectivity, enhanced business models, and improved customer connection. However, realizing a DT is a complex endeavor. Specific properties, so-called barriers, hinder the DT journey. Thus, it is essential to grasp the barriers and indicate ways to overcome them. We develop a decision matrix for overcoming barriers using qualitative data from participants working in different sectors. This work builds upon a pre-study developing a barrier classification and enhances it with specific recommendations such as “define clear DT responsibilities”. Thus, our work takes the development of plain barrier classifications further. From a theoretical perspective, this work contributes to developing hypothetical models of the effects of recommendations to overcome barriers in the future. From a practical perspective, companies can use the recommendations to plan actions to take.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Dehning, B., Richardson, V.J., Zmud, R.W.: The value relevance of announcements of transformational information technology investments. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 27, 637–656 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2307/30036551
Laudon, K.C., Laudon, J.P.: Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm. Pearson, New York (2020)
Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., Helbig, J.: Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative Industrie 4.0. Acatech – National Academy of Science and Engineering (2013)
Benlian, A., Hilkert, D., Hess, T.: How open is this platform? The meaning and measurement of platform openness from the complementors’ perspective. J. Inf. Technol. 30, 209–228 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.6
Schwab, K.: The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Crown Business, New York (2017)
Gnamm, J., Kalmbach, R., Schertler, M.: Digitalization must be given top priority (2018). https://www.bain.com/insights/digitalisierung-ist-chefsache-2018/
Hess, T., Matt, C., Benlian, A., Wiesböck, F.: Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy. MIS Q. Exec. 15, 123–139 (2016)
Hirsch-Kreinsen, H.: Digitization of industrial work: development paths and prospects. J. Labour Mark. Res. 49, 1–14 (2016)
Hadjimanolis, A.: The barriers approach to innovation. In: Shavinina, L.V. (ed.) The International Handbook on Innovation, pp. 559–573. Pergamon, Oxford (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044198-6/50038-3
Vial, G.: Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 28, 118–144 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
Vogelsang, K., Liere-Netheler, K., Packmohr, S., Hoppe, U.: Barriers to digital transformation in manufacturing: development of a research agenda. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 4937–4946 (2019)
Jones, M.D., Hutcheson, S., Camba, J.D.: Past, present, and future barriers to digital transformation in manufacturing: a review. J. Manuf. Syst. 60, 936–948 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.03.006
Reis, J., Amorim, M., Melão, N., Matos, P.: Digital transformation: a literature review and guidelines for future research. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Reis, L.P., Costanzo, S. (eds.) WorldCIST’18 2018. AISC, vol. 745, pp. 411–421. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77703-0_41
Pabst von Ohain, B.: Leader attributes for successful digital transformation. In: ICIS 2019 Proceedings (2019)
Wessel, L., et al.: Unpacking the difference between digital transformation and IT-enabled organizational transformation. JAIS 22, 102–129 (2021). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00655
Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O., Pavlou, P., Venkatraman, N.: Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 37, 471–482 (2013)
Yoo, Y., Lyytinen, K.J., Boland, R.J., Berente, N.: The next wave of digital innovation: opportunities and challenges: a report on the research workshop “digital challenges in innovation research”. SSRN J. (2010). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1622170
Klötzer, C., Pflaum, A.: Toward the development of a maturity model for digitalization within the manufacturing industry’s supply chain. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 4210–4219 (2017). https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2017.509
Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Q. 26, xiii–xxiii (2002)
Varwig, T., Brink, H., Packmohr, S.: A systematic literature review on barriers to digital transformation: insights and implications for overcoming. Presented at the 37th EBES Conference, Berlin (2021)
Bilgeri, D., Wortmann, F.: Barriers to IoT business model innovation. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, pp. 987–990 (2017)
Henriette, E., Feki, M., Boughzala, I., et al.: Digital transformation challenges. In: Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (MICS), pp. 1–7 (2016)
Kumar, P., Singh, R.K., Kumar, V.: Managing supply chains for sustainable operations in the era of industry 4.0 and circular economy: analysis of barriers. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 164, 105–115 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105215
Khanzode, A.G., Sarma, P.R.S., Mangla, S.K., Yuan, H.: Modeling the industry 4.0 adoption for sustainable production in micro, small & medium enterprises. J. Clean. Prod. 279, 123489 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123489
Karadayi-Usta, S.: An interpretive structural analysis for industry 4.0 adoption challenges. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 67, 973–978 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2018.2890443
Abdul-Hamid, A.-Q., Ali, M.H., Tseng, M.-L., Lan, S., Kumar, M.: Impeding challenges on industry 4.0 in circular economy: palm oil industry in Malaysia. Comput. Oper. Res. 123, 105052 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2020.105052
Agrawal, P., Narain, R., Ullah, I.: Analysis of barriers in implementation of digital transformation of supply chain using interpretive structural modelling approach. J. Modell. Manag. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-03-2019-0066
Dudenredaktion: Handlungsempfehlung. https://www.du-den.de/node/63055/revision/63091
Westerman, G., Calméjane, C., Bonnet, D., Ferraris, P., McAfee, A.: Digital transformation: a roadmap for billion-dollar organizations. MIT Cent. Digit. Bus. Capgemini Consult. 1, 1–68 (2011)
Zaychenko, I., Smirnova, A., Shytova, Y., Mutalieva, B., Pimenov, N.: Digital logistics transformation: implementing the internet of things (IoT). In: Schaumburg, H., Korablev, V., Ungvari, L. (eds.) TT 2020. LNNS, vol. 157, pp. 189–200. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64430-7_16
Mentzer, J.T.: Rigor versus relevance: why would we choose only one? J. Supply Chain Manag. 44, 72–77 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2008.00058.x
Dremel, C.: Barriers to the adoption of big data analytics in the automotive sector. In: Proceedings of the 23rd American Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), Boston, pp. 1–10 (2017)
Sarker, S., Chatterjee, S., Xiao, X., Elbanna, A.: The sociotechnical axis of cohesion for the IS discipline: its historical legacy and its continued relevance. MIS Q. 43, 695–719 (2019). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/13747
Brink, H., Packmohr, S., Paul, F.-H.: Extending a socio-technical model of the barriers to digital transformation through data triangulation. In: 2022 8th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM), pp. 68–74. IEEE, Cambridge (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIM56520.2022.00020
Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE, Los Angeles (2014)
Fetters, M.D., Molina-Azorin, J.F.: The journal of mixed methods research starts a new decade: principles for bringing in the new and divesting of the old language of the field. J. Mixed Methods Res. 11, 3–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816682092
Mayring, P.: Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution. Beltz Verlag, Klagenfurt (2014)
Stern, M.J., Bilgen, I., McClain, C., Hunscher, B.: Effective sampling from social media sites and search engines for web surveys: demographic and data quality differences in surveys of google and Facebook users. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 35, 713–732 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439316683344
Azungah, T.: Qualitative research: deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis. QRJ. 18, 383–400 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00035
Konradsen, H., Kirkevold, M., Olson, K.: Recognizability: a strategy for assessing external validity and for facilitating knowledge transfer in qualitative research. Adv. Nurs. Sci. 36, E66–E76 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0b013e318290209d
Dregger, J., Niehaus, J., Ittermann, P., Hirsch-Kreinsen, H., ten Hompel, M.: The digitization of manufacturing and its societal challenges: a framework for the future of industrial labor. In: 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science and Technology (ETHICS), pp. 1–3. IEEE, Vancouver (2016)
Kotter, J.P.: Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. Harv. Bus. Rev. 60–67 (2016)
Kane, G.: The technology fallacy. Res.-Technol. Manag. 62, 44–49 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2019.1661079
Ajmera, P., Jain, V.: Modelling the barriers of health 4.0–the fourth healthcare industrial revolution in India by TISM. Oper. Manag. Res. 12(3–4), 129–145 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-019-00143-x
Müller, J.M.: Assessing the barriers to industry 4.0 implementation from a workers’ perspective. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 52, 2189–2194 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.530
Cichosz, M., Wallenburg, C.M., Knemeyer, A.M.: Digital transformation at logistics service providers: barriers, success factors and leading practices. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 31, 209–238 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-08-2019-0229
Chen, C.-L., Lin, Y.-C., Chen, W.-H., Chao, C.-F., Pandia, H.: Role of government to enhance digital transformation in small service business. Sustainability 13, 1028 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031028
Tekic, Z., Koroteev, D.: From disruptively digital to proudly analog: a holistic typology of digital transformation strategies. Bus. Horiz. 62, 683–693 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.07.002
Vogelsang, K., Packmohr, S., Brink, H.: Challenges of the digital transformation – comparing nonprofit and industry organizations. In: Ahlemann, F., Schütte, R., Stieglitz, S. (eds.) WI 2021. LNISO, vol. 46, pp. 297–312. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86790-4_21
de Jesus Pacheco, D.A., ten Caten, C.S., Jung, C.F., Sassanelli, C., Terzi, S.: Overcoming barriers towards sustainable product-service systems in small and medium-sized enterprises: state of the art and a novel decision matrix. J. Clean. Prod. 222, 903–921 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.152
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Brink, H., Packmohr, S., Paul, FH. (2022). Overcoming Barriers to Digital Transformation – Development of a Decision Matrix. In: Carroll, N., Nguyen-Duc, A., Wang, X., Stray, V. (eds) Software Business. ICSOB 2022. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 463. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20706-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20706-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20705-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20706-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)