Abstract
In times of rising nationalism and partisan tensions, the natural response of conscientious educators is to want more people to have more information, assuming that more knowledge will counter the ignorance that must be at the root of hate and fear. Yet we can easily see that information does not create acceptance, and a number of neurological studies might shine a light on this irrational intransigence. In these studies, researchers discovered an overwhelming correlation between subjects’ high disgust response and their political and social conservativism. Examining this subconscious knowledge of the danger of what is “wrong” and “unclean” gives educators valuable perspective on the desperately personal gut-level knowing driving students who feel existentially threatened by “unnatural” people, ideas, values, and practices. The post-truth era has widened this gap between intellectual knowing and gut-level knowing into a canyon: when all knowledge is equally true and equally suspect, resistant students have less reason than ever to accept contradictions to their innate worldview, and more reason than ever to trust their own worldview, which feels reliable and natural since it doesn’t come from suspect outside sources. This is a very real pedagogical problem for education, with its traditional commitment to the irresistibility of reason and the impartiality of information, and educators must respond with different tactics to create a place of safety and inquiry, so that students naturally prone to policing boundaries can be helped to expand their own sense of what is natural and normal for humanity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahn, W., Kishida, K. T., et al. (2014). Nonpolitical images evoke neural predictors of political ideology. Current Biology, 24, 2693–2699.
Arendt, H. (1972). Crises of the republic: Lying in politics, civil disobedience on violence, thoughts on politics, and revolution. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Arendt, H. (1976). The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Brenner, C. J., & Inbar, Y. (2015). Disgust sensitivity predicts political ideology and policy attitudes in the Netherlands. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(1), 27–38.
Choma, B. L., Haji, R., Hodson, G., & Hoffarth, M. (2016). Avoiding cultural contamination: Intergroup disgust sensitivity and religious identification as predictors of interfaith threat, faith-based policies, and islamophobia. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 50–55.
Colbert, S. (2005). The word: Truthiness [video clip]. Retrieved February 1, 2019, from http://www.cc.com/video-clips/63ite2/the-colbert-report-the-word---truthiness.
Crawford, J. T., Inbar, Y., & Maloney, V. (2014). Disgust sensitivity selectively predicts attitudes toward groups that threaten (or uphold) traditional sexual morality. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 218–223.
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. New York: Praeger.
Duschinsky, R., Schnall, S., & Weiss, D. H. (Eds.). (2016). Purity and danger now: New perspectives. New York: Routledge.
Fischer, R. W. (2016). Disgust as heuristic. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 19(3), 679–693.
Flannery, M.E. (2018). How higher education helped Derek black renounce white supremacy. Retrieved February 1, 2019, from http://neatoday.org/2018/09/19/how-higher-education-helped-derek-black-renounce-white-supremacy/.
Helzer, E. G., & Pizarro, D. A. (2011). Dirty liberals!: Reminders of physical cleanliness influence moral and political attitudes. Psychological Science, 22(4), 517–522.
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition and Emotion, 23(4), 714–725.
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2012a). Disgusting smells cause decreased liking of gay men. Emotion, 12(1), 23–27.
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., Iyer, R., & Haidt, J. (2012b). Disgust sensitivity, political conservatism, and voting. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(5), 537–544.
Kass, L. R. (1998). The wisdom of repugnance: Why we should ban the cloning of humans. Valparaiso University Law Review, 32(2), 679–705.
Kelly, D., & Morar, N. (2014). Against the yuck factor: On the ideal role of disgust in society. Utilitas, 26(2), 153–177.
Kollareth, D., & Russell, J. A. (2019). Disgust and the sacred: Do people react to violations of the sacred with the same emotion they react to something putrid? Emotion, 19(1), 37–52.
Lester, E. (2011). Teaching about religions: A democratic approach for public schools. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Miller, P. R., Flores, A. R., Haider-Markel, D. P., Lewis, D. C., Tadlock, B. L., & Taylor, J. K. (2017). Transgender politics as body politics: Effects of disgust sensitivity and authoritarianism on transgender rights attitudes. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 5, 4–24.
Murray, D. R., Jones, D. N., & Schaller, M. (2013). Perceived threat of infectious disease and its implications for sexual attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(1), 103–108.
Niemelä, J. E. (2011). What puts the ‘yuck’ in the yuck factor? Bioethics, 25(5), 267–279.
Ritter, R. S., & Preston, J. L. (2011). Gross gods and icky atheism: Disgust responses to rejected religious beliefs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1225–1230.
Ritter, R. S., Preston, J. L., Salomon, E., & Relihan-Johnson, D. (2016). Imagine no religion: Heretical disgust, anger and the symbolic purity of mind. Cognition and Emotion, 30(4), 778–796.
Schaller, M., & Neuberg, S. L. (2012). Danger, disease, and the nature of prejudice(s). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1–54.
Schaller, M., & Park, J. H. (2011). The behavioral immune system (and why it matters). Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 99–103.
Skinner, A. L., & Hudac, C. M. (2017). “Yuck, you disgust me!” Affective bias against interracial couples. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 68–77.
Soliman, T. M., Johnson, K. A., & Song, H. (2015). It’s not “all in your head”: Understanding religion from an embodied cognition perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 852–864.
Wright, J. C., & Baril, G. L. (2013). Understanding the role of dispositional and situational threat sensitivity in our moral judgments. Journal of Moral Education, 42(3), 383–397.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lovett, S. (2023). Disgust and the Limits of Reason: Countering the Fear of Contamination and Resistance to Education in a Post-modern Climate. In: Gross, Z. (eds) Reimagining the Landscape of Religious Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20133-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20133-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20132-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20133-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)