Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Models of Professional Supervision in Social Work

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Enlightening Professional Supervision in Social Work

  • 228 Accesses

Abstract

Drawing from the available literature, this chapter will summarize and critically discuss a range of models of professional supervision under three categories. First, under the purpose- and goal-based models, we will discuss seven purposes of professional supervision in social work. Second, under the path-based models, 16 different models followed independently or in combination to achieve the purpose of supervision are summarized. In the third category, two models that integrate purpose and path-based models are presented. The models discussed in the chapter are neither inclusive nor exhaustive of all supervision models. As they mainly focus on clinical practice, the practice of supervision needs to be extended to other areas of practice, such as community organization and development and policy practice. However, we hope the chapter provides a glimpse of supervision models employed in professional social work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AASW. (2016). Self-employment/private practice. Accessed on 28 June 2022 from https://www.aasw.asn.au/document/item/4573

  • Antczak, H. B., Mackrill, T., Steensbaek, S., & Ebsen, F. (2019). What works in video-based youth statutory caseworker supervision - caseworker and supervisor perspectives. Social Work Education, 38(8), 1025–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arczynski, A., & Morrow, S. L. (2017). The complexities of power in feminist multicultural psychotherapy supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64, 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, S. B., Exum, H. A., & Tyler, R. E. (2002). The developmental process of clinical supervisors in training: An investigation of the supervisor complexity model. Counselor Education and Supervision, 42(1), 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R., Bell, K., Kalle, W., & Pawar, M. (2014). Restoring meaning to supervision through a peer consultation Group in Rural Australia. Journal of Social Work Practice: Psychotherapeutic Approaches in Health, Welfare and the Community. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2014.896785

  • Beddoe, L. (2017). Harmful supervision: A commentary. The Clinical Supervisor, 36(1), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2017.1295894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billow, R. M., & Mendelsohn, R. (1987). The peer supervisory group for psychoanalytic therapists. Group, 11(1), 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, E. J., & Austin, M. J. (2000). Social work supervision: Assessing the past and mapping the future. The Clinical Supervisor, 19(2), 85–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. (1987, May–June). The ethics of social work supervision revisited. Social Work, 32(3), 194–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cojocaru, S. (2010). Appreciative supervision in social work. New opportunities for changing the social work practice. Revista de cercetare [i interven]ie social, 29(1), 72–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davys, A., & Beddoe, L. (2021). Best practice in professional supervision: A guide for the helping professions (2nd ed.). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1998). Analysis of reflective thinking. How we think (1933). In L. A. Hickman & T. M. Alexandra (Eds.), The essential dewey (Ethics, logic, psychology) (Vol. 2). Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugmore, P., Partridge, K., Sethi, I., & Krupa-Flasinska, M. (2018). Systemic supervision in statutory social work in the UK: Systemic rucksacks and bells that ring. European Journal of Social Work, 21(3), 400–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1446914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, R., Maidment, J., & Connolly, M. (2017). Trust, power and safety in the social work supervisory relationship: Results from Australian research. Journal of Social Work Practice, 31(3), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2016.1261279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, R., Maidment, J., & Connolly, M. (2018). Supporting quality supervision: Insights for organisational practice. International Social Work, 61(3), 353–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erera, I. P., & Lazar, A. (1994). The administrative and educational functions in supervision: Indications of incompatibility. The Clinical Supervisor, 12(2), 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falender, C. A. (2009). Relationship and accountability: Tensions in feminist supervision. Women & Therapy, 33, 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02703140903404697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. (1983). Contracting in supervision: A goal oriented process. The Clinical Supervisor, 1(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1300/J001v01n01_05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. (2008). Contracting in supervision: A goal oriented process. The Clinical Supervisor, 1(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1300/J001v01n01_05. (online publication).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gitterman, A. (1972). Comparison of educational models and their influences on supervision. In F. W. Kaslow et al. (Eds.), Issues in human services (pp. 18–38). Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godden, J. (2010). Paper on supervision in social work, with particular reference to supervision practice in multi-disciplinary teams. Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golia, G. M., & McGovern, A. R. (2015). If you save me, I’ll save you: The power of peer supervision in clinical training and professional development. British Journal of Social Work, 45(2), 634–650. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, H. (2014). Power relations in supervision: Preferred practices according to social workers. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 95(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.2014.95.14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, H. J., & O'Donoghue, K. (2009). Culturally relevant, socially just social work supervision: Becoming visible through a social constructionist lens. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 18(1–2), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313200902874979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. T., & Frankena, S. T. (1972). Peer group supervision. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 42(3), 527–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, T. (2020). Successful supervision and leadership: Ensuing high-performance outcomes using the PASE model. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, T., & Slattery, M. (2021). The PASE supervision model. In K. O'Donoghue & L. Engelbrecht (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of social work supervision. Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, P., & Shohet, R. (2000). Supervision in helping professions. Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, P. (2009). The new handbook of administrative supervision in counselling. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, S. A., Knox, S., Schultz, J. M., Hill, C. E., Sloan, L., Brandt, S., et al. (2008). Predoctoral interns’ nondisclosure in supervision. Psychotherapy Research, 18, 400–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300701697505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, R. (2013). Emotions, social work practice, and supervision: An uneasy alliance? Journal of Social Work Practice, 27(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, R. (2015). Exploring emotions within formal and informal forums: Messages from social work practitioners. The British Journal of Social Work, 45(3), 896–913. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadushin, A. (1985). Supervision in social work (2nd ed.). Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadushin, A., & Harkness, D. (2002). Supervision in social work (4th ed.). Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadushin, A., & Harkness, D. (2014). Supervision in social work (5th ed.). Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, H. K., & O’Neill, P. (2018). Teaching note: Constructing critical conversations: Building the scaffold for reflection and action. Journal of Social Work Education, 54(1), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2017.1341857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, S., Carson, E., & Papatraianou, L. H. (2017). Self-managed supervision. Australian Social Work, 70(1), 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experiences as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latting, J. E. (1986). Adaptive supervision: A theoretical model for social workers. Administration in Social Work, 10(1), 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, W. (2001). Transference in analysis and supervision. In S. Gill (Ed.), The supervisory alliance: Facilitating the psychotherapist’s learning experience (pp. 75–80). Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddle, H., & Saba, G. (1983). On context replication: The isomorphic relationship of training and therapy. The Journal of Strategic and Systematic Therapies, 2, 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowy, L. (1983). Social work supervision: From models toward theory. Journal of Education for Social Work, 19(2), 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusk, M., Terrazas, S., & Salcido, R. (2017). Critical cultural competence in social work supervision. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 41(5), 464–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2017.1313801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnussen, J. (2018). Supervision in Denmark – An empirical account of experiences and practices. European Journal of Social Work, 21(3), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1451827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKibben, W. B., Cook, R. M., & Fickling, M. J. (2019). Feminist supervision and supervisee nondisclosure: The mediating role of the supervisory relationship. The Clinical Supervisor, 38(1), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2018.1509756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishna, F., Sanders, J. E., Sewell, K. M., & Milne, E. (2021). Teaching note-preparing social workers for the digital future of social work practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 57(sup1), 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrell, M. (2008). Supervision contracts revisited: Towards a negotiated agreement. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Review, 1, 22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, T. (2005). Staff supervision in social care: Making a real difference to staff and service users (3rd ed.). Pavilion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munson, C. (2002). Handbook of clinical social work supervision (3rd ed.). Taylor & Francis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muskat, B. (2013). The use of IASWG standards for social work practice with groups in supervision of group work practitioners. Social Work With Groups, 36(2–3), 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/01609513.2012.753837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. L., Gizara, S., Hope, A. C., Phelps, R., Steward, R., & Weitzman, L. (2006). A feminist multicultural perspective on supervision. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 34, 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1912.2006.tb00031.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newgent, R. A., Davis, H., & Farley, R. C. (2004). Perceptions of individual, triadic, and group models of supervision: A pilot study. The Clinical Supervisor, 23(2), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1300/J001v23n02_05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, C., & Irwin, J. (2009). Social work supervision: An exploration of the current challenges in a rapidly changing social. Economic and Political Environment. Journal of Social Work, 9(3), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017309334848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donoghue, K. (2010). Towards the construction of social work supervision in aotearoa New Zealand: A study of the perspectives of social work practitioners and supervisors. PhD thesis, Massey University, Palmerston North. http://hdl.handle.net/10179/1535; Accessed on 13 March 2022 from https://mro.massey.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10179/1535/02_whole.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y

  • O'Donoghue, K. (2015). Issues and challenges facing social work supervision in the twenty-first century. China Journal of Social Work, 8(2), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/17525098.2015.1039172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donoghue, K., Yuh, J., & P. W., & Tsui, M. S. (2018). Constructing an evidence-informed social work supervision model. European Journal of Social Work, 21(3), 348–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2017.1341387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, D. C., & Stern, S. B. (1990). Issues in the development of a family supervision model. The Clinical Supervisor, 8(2), 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, P., & Fariña, M. (2018). Constructing critical conversations in social work supervision: Creating change. Clinical Social Work Journal, 46(4), 298–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-018-0681-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patridge, K. (2010). Systemic supervision in agency contexts: An evolving conversation with clinical psychologists in a mental health trust. In C. Burck & G. Daniel (Eds.), Mirrors and reflections: Processes in systemic supervision (pp. 309–335). Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prouty, A. (2001). Experiencing feminist family therapy supervision. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 12, 171–203. https://doi.org/10.1300/J086v12n04_01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, P. (1993). The form, function and content of clinical supervision: An integrated model. The Clinical Supervisor, 11, 137–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandu, A., & Unguru, E. (2013). Supervision of social work practice in North-Eastern Romanian rural areas. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82, 386–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. Temple Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, P., & Frank, E. (1983). The use of a peer supervision group by social work clinicians. The Clinical Supervisor, 1(1), 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, K. M. (2018). Social work supervision of staff: A primer and scoping review (2013–2017). Clinical Social Work Journal, 46(4), 252–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-018-0679-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherbersky, H., Ziminski, J., & Pote, H. (2021). The journey towards systemic competence: Thoughts on training, supervision and competence evaluation. Journal of Family Therapy, 43(2), 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1993). Interactional supervision. NASW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (2016). Addressing internalized biases and stereotypes of the group leader: A life-long professional task. Social Work with Groups, 40(1), 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (2020a). Supervision. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.385

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (2020b). Interactional supervision (4th ed.). NASW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoltenberg, C. D., McNeill, B. W., & Crethar, H. C. (1994). Changes in supervision as counselors and therapists gain experience: A review. Professional Psychology—Research and Practice, 25(4), 416–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storm, C. L., & Heath, A. W. (1985). Models of supervision: Using therapy theory as a guide. The Clinical Supervisor, 3(1), 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suet Lin, H., Shui Lai, N., & Kwok Kin, F. (2010). Functions of social work supervision in Shenzhen: Insights from the cross-border supervision model. International Social Work, 53(3), 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872809359864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, D. M. (2003). The feminist supervision scale: A relational/theoretical approach. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, D. M. (2005). Feminist identity and theories as correlates of feminist supervision practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 33, 729–747. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000005278408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosone, C. (1998). Countertransference and clinical social work supervision: Contributions and considerations. Clinical Supervisor, 16(2), 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner-Daly, B., & Jack, G. (2017). Rhetoric vs. reality in social work supervision: The experiences of a group of child care social workers in England. Child & Family Social Work, 22(1), 36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, M. S. (2005). Social work supervision: Contexts and concepts. SAGE Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, M. S., & Ho, W. S. (1998). In search of a comprehensive model of social work supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 16(2), 181–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kessel, L., & Haan, D. (1993). The intended way of learning in supervision seen as a model (Vol. 11, p. 29). Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. B., & Russell, C. S. (1995). The essential elements of supervisory systems: A modified delphi study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21(1), 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, D. (2016). How is supervision recorded in child and family social work? An analysis of 244 written records of formal supervision. Child & Family Social Work, 2(3), 1130–1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, D., Forrester, D., & Grant, L. (2017). What happens in child and family social work supervision? Child and Family Social Work, 22, 942–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. J. (1988). Action methods in supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 6(2), 13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, M. C. (2008). Exploring cultural tensions in cross-cultural social work practice. Social Work, 53(4), 317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social Work and Arts; Gulbali Institute for Agriculture, Water and Environment, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia

    Manohar Pawar

  2. Australian Centre for Christianity and Culture; Gulbali Institute for Agriculture, Water and Environment, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia

    A . W. (Bill) Anscombe

Authors
  1. Manohar Pawar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A . W. (Bill) Anscombe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pawar, M., Anscombe, A...W.(. (2022). Models of Professional Supervision in Social Work. In: Enlightening Professional Supervision in Social Work. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18541-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18541-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-18540-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-18541-0

  • eBook Packages: Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation