Skip to main content

Introduction: So Many Challenges—So Many Choices (In Science Education)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Challenges in Science Education

Abstract

In this chapter we outline our thoughts regarding the rationale for this collection of works, how that thinking changed over time, and how a reader might reflect on the content of the chapters. There is an historical element to our reasoning and we have recast how we might consider issues in science education that were previously cast as dilemmas. Our aim is to assist readers of this book to see some of the issues facing science education as challenges that will likely persist and to suggest that a problem-coping approach might be best suited to how such issues are approached.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, C. W. (2007). Perspectives on science learning. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 3–30). Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, T. T. (1993). Legitimating lived curriculum: Towards a curriculum landscape of multiplicity. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 8(3), 255–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J. R. (1988). Teachers in science education. In P. Fensham (Ed.), Development and dilemmas in science education (pp. 55–72). The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boon, H. J. (2010). Climate change? Who knows? A comparison of secondary students and pre-service teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1), 104–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boon, H. J. (2011). Beliefs and education for sustainability in rural and regional Australia. Education in Rural Australia, 21(2), 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boon, H. J. (2015). Climate change ignorance: An unacceptable legacy. Australian Educational Researcher, 42(4), 405–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, V. (2002). What is science really like? Teacher commentary. In J. Wallace & W. Louden (Eds.), Dilemmas of science teaching: Perspectives on problems of practice (pp. 8–12). Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P. (Ed.). (1988). Development and dilemmas in science education. Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, B. (2002). To tell or not to tell: Commentary. In J. Wallace & W. Louden (Eds.), Dilemmas of science teaching: Perspectives on problems of practice (pp. 192–196). Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quince, A. (Presenter). (2022, July 24). Rear vision. [Radio broadcast]. Retrieved from https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/rearvision/the-ozone-hole/13983050?utm_campaign=abc_radionational&utm_content=link&utm_medium=content_shared&utm_source=abc_radionational

  • Roberts, D. A. (1988). What counts as science education? In P. Fensham (Ed.), Development and dilemmas in science education (pp. 27–54). Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, K. (2021). How do teachers’ perceptions of their agency and engagement change after participating in self-directed professional development? (Unpublished PhD thesis). The University of Alberta. https://doi.org/10.7939/r3-ftn8-fq86

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. P. (2013). Changing the metacognitive orientation of a classroom learning environment to stimulate metacognitive reflection regarding the nature of physics learning. International Journal of Science Education, 35(7), 1183–1207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. P. (2017a). “Triangulation:” An expression for stimulating metacognitive reflection regarding the use of ‘triplet’ representations for chemistry learning. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 533–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. P. (2017b). What is and what will be science learning (theory) in science education reform and practice: Stories and reflections. In J. Jagodzinski (Ed.), The precarious future of education: Risk and uncertainty in ecology, curriculum, learning, and technology (pp. 139–158). Palgrave McMillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. P., & McRobbie, C. J. (2002). Collaborating to enhance student reasoning: Frances’ account of her reflections while teaching chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 405–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J., & Louden, W. (Eds.). (2002). Dilemmas of science teaching. Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory P. Thomas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Thomas, G.P., Boon, H.J. (2023). Introduction: So Many Challenges—So Many Choices (In Science Education). In: Thomas, G.P., Boon, H.J. (eds) Challenges in Science Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18092-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18092-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-18091-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-18092-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics