Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dramaturgical and Ethical Approaches to the Dark Side: An Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Good Robot, Bad Robot

Part of the book series: Social and Cultural Studies of Robots and AI ((SOCUSRA))

  • 464 Accesses

Abstract

Robots, artificial intelligence, and autonomous vehicles are associated with substantial narrative and image-related legacies that often place them in a negative light. This chapter outlines the basics of the “dramaturgical” and technosocial approaches that are used throughout this book to gain insights about how these emerging technologies are affecting deeply-seated social and psychological processes. The robot as an “other” in the workplace and community—an object of attention and discussion– has been a frequently-utilized theme of science fiction as well as a topic for research analysis, with many people “acting out” their anxieties and grievances. Human-AI contests and displays of robotic feats are often used to intimidate people and reinforce that individuals are not in control of their own destinies, which presents unsettling prospects for the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agre, P. E. (1997). Lessons learned in trying to reform AI. Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide, 131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, S. L. (2002). John McCarthy: Father of AI. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 17(5), 84–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asimov, I. (1940). I. Robot. Narkaling Productions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausness, R. C. (2018). The current state of opioid litigation. SCL Rev., 70, 565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3): 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aymerich-Franch, L. (2020). Why it is time to stop ostracizing social robots. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2(7), 364–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baccarella, C. V., Wagner, T. F., Kietzmann, J. H., & McCarthy, I. P. (2018). Social media? It’s serious! Understanding the dark side of social media. European Management Journal, 36(4), 431–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B. (2021, August 19). Are you ready for sentient Disney robots? The New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/19/business/media/disney-parks-robots.html

  • Bartneck, C. (2004). From fiction to science—A cultural reflection on social robots. Vienna, Austria: CHI2004 Workshop on Shaping Human-Robot Interaction. Proceedings of the CHI2004 Workshop on Shaping Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 35–38. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5154820

  • Beck, B. (2020). Infantilisation through technology. In Technology, anthropology, and dimensions of responsibility (pp. 33–44). JB Metzler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04896-7_4

  • Belk, R. (2017). Consumers in an age of autonomous and semiautonomous machines. Contemporary consumer culture theory (pp. 5–32). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beyond Humanism (2018, July). Book of abstracts. http://beyondhumanism.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/BeyondHumanWroclaw2018_abstracts-rev2.pdf

  • Bhaumik, A. (2018). From AI to robotics: Mobile, social, and sentient robots. CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bindley, K., & Elliott, R. (2021, May 20). Tesla drivers test Autopilot’s limits, attracting audiences—and safety concerns. Wall Street Journal, https://www.wsj.com/articles/tesla-drivers-test-autopilots-limits-attracting-audiencesand-safety-concerns-11621503008

  • Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2021). Robots do not get the coronavirus: The COVID-19 pandemic and the international division of labor. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(6), 1215–1224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birhane, A., & van Dijk, J. (2020, February). Robot rights? Let's talk about human welfare instead. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp. 207–213).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullingham, L., & Vasconcelos, A. C. (2013). “The presentation of self in the online world”: Goffman and the study of online identities. Journal of Information Science, 39(1), 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K. (2019). Separating the wheat from the chaff: Guidance from new technologies for detecting deception in the courtroom. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 774–780. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Čapek, K. (1923). RUR (Rossum's universal robots): A fantastic melodrama. Doubleday, Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey-Maslen, S., Homayounnejad, M., Stauffer, H., & Weizmann, N. (2018). Development, use, and transfer of unmanned weapons systems. In Drones and other unmanned weapons systems under international law (pp. 8–45). Brill Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheok, A. D., Karunanayaka, K., & Zhang, E. Y. (2017). Lovotics: Human-robot love and sex relationships. Robot Ethics 2.0: New Challenges in Philosophy. Law, and Society, 193, 193–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denault, V., & Dunbar, N. E. (2019). Credibility assessment and deception detection in courtrooms: Hazards and challenges for scholars and legal practitioners. In The Palgrave Handbook of deceptive communication (pp. 915–935). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, K. (2018). Turned on: Science, sex and robots. Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dinan, M. (2017). The robot condition: Karel Čapek’s RUR and Hannah Arendt on labor, technology, and innovation. Perspectives on Political Science, 46(2), 108–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donhauser, J. (2019). Environmental robot virtues and ecological justice. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 10(2), 176–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubé, S., & Anctil, D. (2020). Foundations of erobotics. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckersall, P., Grehan, H., & Scheer, E. (2017). Robots: Asleep, awake, alone, and in love. In New media dramaturgy (pp. 107–134). Palgrave Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckersall, P. (2015). Towards a dramaturgy of robots and object-figures. Tdr/the Drama Review, 59(3), 123–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, C. (2021). Dose of droids: Doctors “need to prescribe sex robots to cure digisexual illnesses,” experts urge. The Sun. https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/15155941/medical-use-of-sex-robots-discussed/

  • Elsaesser, T. (2012). Metropolis. Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, K. (2019, November 30). 10 most terrifying robots in sci-fi movie history: Robots can be a frightening foe—can't be killed or reasoned with, most of the time! Screenrant. https://screenrant.com/sci-fi-movie-robots-scariest-best/

  • Gain, V. (2021). Meta makes robot ‘skin’ and sensors to give metaverse a new touch. Silicon Republic. https://www.siliconrepublic.com/machines/facebook-meta-robot-skin-sensor-metaverse

  • Gartenberg, C. (2021, June 29). Boston Dynamics’ Spot robot challenges BTS to a boy band dance-off in latest video. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2021/6/29/22555535/bts-k-pop-boston-dynamics-spot-robot-dancing-hyundai

  • Gellers, J. C. (2020). Rights for robots: Artificial intelligence, animal and environmental law. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1978). The presentation of self in everyday life (Vol. 21). Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guizzo, E., & Ackerman, E. (2016). When robots decide to kill. IEEE Spectrum, 53(6), 38–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, G. J. (2015). Imagining slaves and robots in literature, film, and popular culture: Reinventing yesterday’s slave with tomorrow’s robot. Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinks, T. (2021). Fear of robots and life satisfaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(2), 327–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, G. (2011). On stage: Robots as performers. In Robotics: Science and systems workshop on human-robot interaction: Perspectives and contributions to robotics from the human sciences, 1–5. RSS Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horáková, J., & Kelemen, J. (2006). Robots between fictions and facts. In International symposium on computational intelligence and informatics (pp. 21–39).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horrigan, M. (2020). A flattering Robopocalypse: Human exclusion and the procedural rhetoric of captcha. M/C Journal, 23(6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddy, L., Feldman, S., & Cassese, E. (2008). On the distinct political effects of anxiety and anger. In The affect effect (pp. 202–230). University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyrynsalmi, S., Smed, J., & Kimppa, K. (2017, May). The dark side of gamification: How we should stop worrying and study also the negative impacts of bringing game design elements to everywhere. In GamiFIN (pp. 96–104). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1857/gamifin17_p13.pdf

  • Ivanov, S. H., & Webster, C. (2017, June). The robot as a consumer: A research agenda. In Marketing: Experience and Perspectives Conference (pp. 29–30). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2960824

  • Jansen, F. (2021). “How nice that I could love someone”: Science fiction film as a virtual laboratory. Culturally Sustainable Social Robotics: Proceedings of Robophilosophy, 2020(335), 227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakoudaki, D. (2014). Anatomy of a robot. Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klima, I. (2002). Karel Čapek: Life and work. Catbird Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, E., & Watanabe, K. (2018, October). AIBO robot mortuary rites in the Japanese cultural context. In 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (pp. 2020–2025). IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, A. (2016). Killer robots: Legality and ethicality of autonomous weapons. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubrick, S. (1968). 2001: A Space Odyssey. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küster, D., Swiderska, A., & Gunkel, D. (2021). I saw it on YouTube! How online videos shape perceptions of mind, morality, and fears about robots. New Media & Society, 23(11), 3312–3331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessing, D. (1988, November 13). Sayings of the week. Observer, p. 15 (cols. 3–4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. (2009). Love and sex with robots: The evolution of human-robot relationships. Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lira, R. B., & Kowalski, L. P. (2020). Robotic neck dissection: State of affairs. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, 28(2), 96–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luguri, J., & Strahilevitz, L. J. (2021). Shining a light on dark patterns. Journal of Legal Analysis, 13(1), 43–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, D., & Smart, W. (2011). Human-robot interactions as theatre. In RO-MAN 2011: 20th International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 473–478. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lykiardopoulou, I. (2021). Self-driving cars are a no-go, so let’s all pretend flying cars are coming. The Next Web. https://thenextweb.com/news/self-driving-cars-are-no-go-lets-all-pretend-flying-cars-are-coming

  • Maslen, E. (2018). Doris Lessing. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massinger, C. (1944). The gremlin myth. The Journal of Educational Sociology, 17(6), 359–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride, J. (2021). Climate change, global population growth, and humanoid robots. Journal of Future Robot Life, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3233/FRL-200016

  • McClure, P. K. (2018). “You’re fired”, says the robot: The rise of automation in the workplace, technophobes, and fears of unemployment. Social Science Computer Review, 36(2), 139–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, M., & Proctor, W. (Eds.). (2021). Horror franchise cinema. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1965). The future as the basis for establishing a shared culture. Daedalus, 94(1), 135–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. J. (1983). The human: Alien in the robotic environment? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 470(1), 11–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musiał, M. (2019). Enchanting robots. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nas, L. (2020, July 12). Ice Cube declares hate for robots... is he afraid of the singularity? The Things. https://www.thethings.com/ice-cube-declares-hate-for-robots-is-he-afraid-of-the-singularity/

  • Nijholt, A. (2019, January). Stand-up comedy and humor by robots. In Proceedings, Sixteenth International Symposium on Social Communication (Vol. 1, pp. 228–234). https://www.persistent-identifier.nl/urn:nbn:nl:ui:28-860975b6-5ebb-46a7-9a8d-0dee121086b7

  • Oh, J. H., Hanson, D., Kim, W. S., Han, Y., Kim, J. Y., & Park, I. W. (2006, October). Design of android type humanoid robot Albert HUBO. In 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (pp. 1428–1433). IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oravec, J. A. (2002). Constructive approaches to Internet recreation in the workplace. Communications of the ACM, 45(1), 60–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/502269.502298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oravec, J. A. (2018). Cyberloafing and constructive recreation. In Encyclopedia of information science and technology, fourth edition (pp. 4316–4325). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2255-3.ch374

  • Oravec, J. A. (2019). Artificial intelligence, automation, and social welfare: Some ethical and historical perspectives on technological overstatement and hyperbole. Ethics and Social Welfare, 13(1), 18–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oravec, J. A. (2022). The emergence of “truth machines”?: Artificial intelligence approaches to lie detection. Ethics and Information Technology, 24(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09621-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, B. (2017). The machine gun hand: Robots, performance, and American ideology in the Twentieth Century. LSU Doctoral Dissertations, 4469. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/4469

  • Quadflieg, S., Ul-Haq, I., & Mavridis, N. (2016). Now you feel it, now you don’t: How observing human-robot interactions and human-human interactions can make you feel eerie. Interaction Studies, 17(2), 211–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, A. (2018). Compassionate artificial intelligence: Frameworks and algorithms. Compassionate AI Lab. (An Imprint of Inner Light Publishers)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reader, J. (2021). From new materialism to the postdigital: Religious responses to environment and technology. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(2), 546–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reagan, K. (2021, July 6). Waymo endures accidents and harassment in Chandler. San Tan Sun, https://santansun.com/2021/07/06/waymo-endures-accidents-and-harassment-in-chandler/

  • Rich, K. (2021). Equipment as living: Robotic rhetorical homology in humans. Popular Culture Studies Journal, 9(1), 117–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, K. (2016). Sex robot matters: Slavery, the prostituted, and the rights of machines. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 35(2), 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robicelli, A. (2021, August 16). Robots are infiltrating restaurants to... help? The Takeout. https://thetakeout.com/robot-servers-in-restaurants-matradee-1847474177

  • Robot Monster (1953). Film produced and directed by Phil Tucker and distributed by Astor Pictures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, E. (2021, December 5). A humanoid robot makes eerily lifelike facial expressions. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2021/12/5/22819328/humanoid-robot-eerily-lifelike-facial-expressions

  • Rushkoff, D. (2014). Present shock: When everything happens now. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainato, M. (2021). ‘Coffee-making robots’: Starbucks staff face intense work and customer abuse. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/may/26/starbuck-employees-intense-work-customer-abuse-understaffing

  • Samani, H.A. (2012). Lovotics: Loving robots. LAP Lambert, Saarbrücken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, N. (2008, December 17). The return of Electro. New Scientist. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20026873-000-the-return-of-elektro-the-first-celebrity-robot/

  • Shaw, T. (2013). “Rotten to the core”: Exposing America’s energy-media complex in The China Syndrome. Cinema Journal, 52(2), 93–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simoens, P., Dragone, M., & Saffiotti, A. (2018). The Internet of Robotic Things: A review of concept, added value and applications. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 15(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/1729881418759424

  • Sone, Y. (2016). Japanese robot culture. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strait, M. K., Floerke, V. A., Ju, W., Maddox, K., Remedios, J. D., Jung, M. F., & Urry, H. L. (2017). Understanding the uncanny: Both atypical features and category ambiguity provoke aversion toward humanlike robots. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01366

  • Sudharsan, R. R., & Deny, J. (2021). Brain–computer interface using electroencephalographic signals for the Internet of Robotic Things. In R. Anandan, G. Suseendran, S. Balamurugan, A. Mishra, & D. Balaganesh (Eds.), Human communication technology: Internet of robotic things and ubiquitous computing, Wiley, 27–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119752165.ch2

  • Sundar, S. S., Waddell, T. F., & Jung, E. H. (2016, March). The Hollywood robot syndrome media effects on older adults’ attitudes toward robots and adoption intentions. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 343–350). IEEE Press. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451771

  • Szollosy, M. (2017). Freud, Frankenstein and our fear of robots: Projection in our cultural perception of technology. AI & Society, 32(3), 433–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarafdar, M., Gupta, A., & Turel, O. (2013). The dark side of information technology use. Information Systems Journal, 23(3), 269–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taulli, T. (2021, August 20). Elon Musk’s Tesla Bot: Is Westworld coming soon? Forbes, https://www.forbes.com/sites/tomtaulli/2021/08/20/elon-musks-tesla-bot-is-westworld-coming-soon/?sh=749c363a261e

  • The Terminator (1984). Orion Pictures (US), directed by James Cameron.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzian, S. G. (2009). The 1939–1940 New York world’s fair and the transformation of the American science extracurriculum. Science Education, 93(5), 892–914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A. (1970). Future shock. Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonkin, S. (2021, December 3). Meet Ameca: ‘World’s most advanced’ humanoid robot is unveiled in a UK lab with eerily realistic facial expressions and movements. Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-10270925/Worlds-advanced-humanoid-robot-unveiled-UK-lab.html

  • Torre, B. (2021, May 29). Woman cloned into sex doll so realistic you'd need microscope to tell them apart. Daily Star. https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/weird-news/woman-cloned-sex-doll-realistic-24212090

  • Tseëlon, E. (1992). Self presentation through appearance: A manipulative vs. a dramaturgical approach. Symbolic Interaction, 15(4), 501–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullrich, D., Butz, A., & Diefenbach, S. (2021). The development of overtrust: An empirical simulation and psychological analysis in the context of human–robot interaction. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.554578

  • Un Nisa, J. (2021, April 3). People have started throwing eggs at Google’s autonomous vans. Wonderful Engineering. https://wonderfulengineering.com/people-have-starting-throwing-eggs-at-googles-autonomous-vans/

  • Upchurch, M. (2018). Robots and AI at work: The prospects for singularity. New Technology, Work and Employment, 33(3), 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilk, J., & Fitter, N. T. (2020, March). Comedians in cafes getting data: Evaluating timing and adaptivity in real-world robot comedy performance. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 223–231). https://doi.org/10.1145/3319502.3374780

  • Visitors to N.Y. Fair See Many Wonders Achieved by Science (1939, June). Science Observer 1(7), 1 and 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, M. C., Maitland, R. A., & Gallagher, C. E. (2017). A case of the “heeby jeebies”: An examination of intuitive judgements of “creepiness”. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 49(1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000066

  • Weaver, J. B., & Tamborini, R. (2013). Horror films: Current research on audience preferences and reactions. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, D., & Katsuno, H. (2021). Toward an affective sense of life: Artificial intelligence, animacy, and amusement at a robot pet memorial service in Japan. Cultural Anthropology, 36(2), 222–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woźniak, P. W., Karolus, J., Lang, F., Eckerth, C., Schöning, J., Rogers, Y., & Niess, J. (2021, May). Creepy technology: what is it and how do you measure it? In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–13). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445299

  • Wong, C., Yang, E., Yan, X. T., & Gu, D. (2018). Autonomous robots for harsh environments: A holistic overview of current solutions and ongoing challenges. Systems Science & Control Engineering, 6(1), 213–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanke, G. (2021). Tying the knot with a robot: Legal and philosophical foundations for human–artificial intelligence matrimony. AI & Society, 36(2), 417–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziff, P. (1959). The feelings of robots. Analysis, 19(3), 64–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Wisconsin–Whitewater, Whitewater, WI, USA

    Jo Ann Oravec

Authors
  1. Jo Ann Oravec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jo Ann Oravec .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Oravec, J.A. (2022). Dramaturgical and Ethical Approaches to the Dark Side: An Introduction. In: Good Robot, Bad Robot. Social and Cultural Studies of Robots and AI. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14013-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14013-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-14012-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-14013-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation