Skip to main content

When a Sociology of Science Is Necessary: Contemporary Aspects of the Conflict Between Creationists and Evolutionists

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Marx, Spinoza and Darwin

Part of the book series: Marx, Engels, and Marxisms ((MAENMA))

  • 184 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter asserts that understanding creationist doctrines (which reject Darwin’s theory of evolution and propose a return to the biblical Book of Genesis) requires an approach on two distinct levels. On the first level of analysis, the investigation of the documents produced by this movement’s representatives demonstrates the recurrent call by creationists to fight against scientific materialism. In this appeal, authors such as Darwin, Marx and Freud appear as those responsible for the current social and moral crisis. On the second level of examination, I maintain the need for sociological research that moves beyond the religious documents toward an understanding of certain structural features of our world. These features appear as if transfigured in the creationist discourse. Among them, it is impossible not to mention the acute contradictions of contemporary life that generate an extremely hostile reality for women and men across the planet (certainly with accentuated social and national differences). In this sense, demands for greater and more inclusive access to science—undoubtedly necessary—seem insufficient to overcome the regressive social processes within which creationism is inserted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For readers unfamiliar with this debate, creationism is the name of a religious doctrine that rejects Charles Darwin’s theses regarding the origin of species and maintains the literalness of the biblical account of creation, as found in the Book of Genesis.

  2. 2.

    The equivalence of creationism and intelligent design (the latter adopting a more sophisticated language, borrowed from sciences such as biochemistry) will be explained during this chapter.

  3. 3.

    Elizabeth Watts and Ulrich Kutschera, ‘On the Historical Roots of Creationism and Intelligent Design: German Allmacht and Darwinian Evolution in Context’, Theory Biosci 140 (2021): 157–68.

  4. 4.

    The main historian of the movement, Ronald Numbers, always careful to differentiate among the strands of creationism, also allowed himself to arrive at such a generalization. It suffices to consult a chapter of his book The Creationists which is entitled “Creationism goes global.” Cf. Ronald Numbers, The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design, Expanded Edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 399–431.

  5. 5.

    The Discovery Institute is a think tank notable for the dissemination of creationism and the set of values associated with it. Based in Seattle, Washington, it was described by the tracking site NNDB (Notable Names Database) as follows: “Founded by Reagan-era bureaucrat Bruce Chapman and funded by conservatives Howard Ahmanson, Jr., Philip Anschutz, and Richard Scaife, the Discovery Institute is an umbrella organization dedicated to restructuring American government without any separation between church and state.” NNDB, ‘Discovery Institute’, accessed 27 July 2013, http://www.nndb.com/org/587/000053428.

  6. 6.

    Discovery Institute, ‘The “Wedge Document”: So What?’, 3 July 2005, 13, https://www.discovery.org/m/2019/04/Wedge-Document-So-What.pdf.

  7. 7.

    Ibid., 12.

  8. 8.

    Ibid., 6.

  9. 9.

    William Dembski, ‘The Task of Apologetics’, in Unapologetic Apologetics, ed. William Dembski and Jay Richards (Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity Press, 2001), 15.

  10. 10.

    Charles Darwin, ‘Letter to John Fordyce, 7 May 1879’, in Darwin Correspondence Project (University of Cambridge, 2021), https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-12041.xml. At the end of his life, Darwin often called himself an agnostic. More details on Darwin’s position on religion can be found in Chapter 7 of this book.

  11. 11.

    Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion (London: Bantam Press, 2006), 131; Kenneth Miller, Finding Darwin’s God: A Scientist’s Search for Common Ground Between God and Evolution (New York: Harper Perennial, 2007).

  12. 12.

    Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 427.

  13. 13.

    Zygmunt Bauman, Postmodernity and Its Discontents (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997), 185.

  14. 14.

    Discovery Institute, ‘The “Wedge Document”’, 13–14.

  15. 15.

    Ibid., 14.

  16. 16.

    Michael Behe, Darwin’s Black Box (New York: Free Press, 1996), 193.

  17. 17.

    I analyze M. Behe’s book in greater detail in Chapter 10 of this book.

  18. 18.

    Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 400 F. Supp. 2d 707 (M.D. Pa. 2005). The full decision of judge Jones III is available at: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/400/707/2414073/.

  19. 19.

    Despite the seriousness of Ronald Numbers’ work, he does not analyze the social causes of the globalization of creationism. In his book, the reader will find a predominately descriptive account of the process.

  20. 20.

    Karl Marx, ‘On the Jewish Question’, in MECW, vol. 3 (London: Lawrence & Wishart, 2010), 171.

  21. 21.

    UN Secretary-General, ‘Secretary-General’s Nelson Mandela Lecture: “Tackling the Inequality Pandemic: A New Social Contract for a New Era” [as Delivered]’, 18 July 2020, https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2020-07-18/secretary-generals-nelson-mandela-lecture-%E2%80%9Ctackling-the-inequality-pandemic-new-social-contract-for-new-era%E2%80%9D-delivered.

  22. 22.

    Watts and Kutschera, ‘On the Historical Roots of Creationism and Intelligent Design’.

  23. 23.

    Harry Braverman, Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century (New York and London: Monthly Review Press, 1974), 1.

  24. 24.

    Teresa Sullivan, Elizabeth Warren, and Jay L. Westbrook, ‘Una Prosperidad Precaria: La Inseguridad Financiera de la Clase Media’, in Repensar los Estados Unidos, ed. Loïc Wacquant (Barcelona: Anthropos, 2005), 40.

  25. 25.

    Norbert Elias and John L. Scotson, Os Estabelecidos e Os Outsiders (Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 2000), 206. The reference here is to the Afterword of the 1990 German edition of the book, translated to English as “Further Facets of Established – Outsider Relationships: The Maycomb Model.”

  26. 26.

    Juliet Schor, The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure (New York: Basic Books, 1993).

  27. 27.

    Dawkins, The God Delusion, 169. Dawkins’ irony does not, however, prevent him from slipping into biological reductionism in some passages of this book. In his words: “Perhaps Islam is analogous to a carnivorous gene complex, Buddhism to a herbivorous one.” Ibid., 200. A vast set of economic, social and cultural causes of different religions is leveled here in favor of a supposed genetic determinism.

  28. 28.

    Pierre Bourdieu, A Economia das Trocas Simbólicas (São Paulo: Perspectiva, 1974), 183–202.

  29. 29.

    Bauman, Postmodernity and Its Discontents, 184.

  30. 30.

    Dawkins, The God Delusion, 341.

  31. 31.

    Apud Elisa Martins and Valéria França, ‘Rosinha contra Darwin: Governo do Rio de Janeiro Institui Aulas que Questionam a Evolução das Espécies’, Época, 24 May 2004, http://revistaepoca.globo.com/Epoca/0,6993,EPT731549-1664-1,00.html. Rosinha Garotinho was Governor of the Brazilian state of Rio de Janeiro from 2003 to 2007.

  32. 32.

    Numbers, The Creationists, 417.

  33. 33.

    Marcelo Leite, ‘Criacionismo no Mackenzie’, Folha de São Paulo, 30 November 2008, Caderno Mais!, 9.

  34. 34.

    Regina Novaes, ‘Crenças Religiosas e Convicções Políticas’, in Política e Cultura: Século XXI, ed. Luis Carlos Fridman (Rio de Janeiro: Relume Dumará, 2002), 80, my emphasis.

  35. 35.

    Anthony and Rosinha Garotinho are a couple and politicians who were each Governor of the state of Rio de Janeiro. Anthony Garotinho held the office from 1999 to 2002; Rosinha Garotinho from 2003 to 2007.

  36. 36.

    Also noteworthy is the incidence of the word Satan used in the discourse of this political group to designate their opponents, characterizing a regressive amalgam between religion and politics that should be repudiated by any democratic worldview.

  37. 37.

    Julio J. Waiselfisz, Mapa Da Violência 2013: Mortes Matadas Por Armas de Fogo (Brasil: Cebela/Flacso, 2013), 9, http://mapadaviolencia.org.br/pdf2013/MapaViolencia2013_armas.pdf.

  38. 38.

    William McNeill, ‘A História da Violência Urbana’, in Insegurança Pública, ed. Nilson V. Oliveira (São Paulo: Nova Alexandria, 2002), 22.

  39. 39.

    At the end of his life, György Lukács strongly emphasized the importance of considering the conflict between capitalism and socialism for an understanding not only of the economic characteristics of the twentieth century, but also of several of its cultural manifestations. György Lukács, Para Uma Ontologia do Ser Social, vol. 2 (São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial, 2013), 820–25.

  40. 40.

    Novaes, ‘Crenças Religiosas e Convicções Políticas’, 81.

  41. 41.

    Dembski, ‘The Task of Apologetics’, 43.

  42. 42.

    Echoing Dembski’s words, Michael Behe asserts that the Darwinian theory of evolution “should be banished.” Behe, Darwin’s Black Box, 186.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mauricio Vieira Martins .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vieira Martins, M. (2022). When a Sociology of Science Is Necessary: Contemporary Aspects of the Conflict Between Creationists and Evolutionists. In: Marx, Spinoza and Darwin. Marx, Engels, and Marxisms. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13025-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13025-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-13024-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-13025-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics