Skip to main content

Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Physics ((LNP,volume 1007))

  • 1178 Accesses

Abstract

We discuss the notions of local thermodynamic equilibrium and Le Châtelier’s principle, a corollary of the Second Principle of thermodynamics, as well as some of their consequences. The latter include the positiveness of both specific heat at constant volume and of adiabatic compressibility. As a counterexample, we discuss gravitational collapse from the point of view of thermodynamics. If local thermodynamic equilibrium always holds everywhere, then the general evolution criterion follows. The distinction between continuous and discontinuous systems is introduced, as well as the notion of thermodynamic flux.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Here, we refer to Sects. 13, 16, 21, 22 and 103 of [1].

  2. 2.

    Here, we assume that this is a global maximum, not a local one. Local maxima of \( S_{TOT} \) correspond to states such that the entropy decreases for an infinitesimal deviation from the state and the body then returns to the initial state, whereas for a finite deviation the entropy may be greater than in the original state. After such a finite deviation the body does not return to its original state, but will tend to pass to some other equilibrium state corresponding to a maximum entropy greater than that in the original state. Accordingly, we must distinguish between ‘metastable’ and ‘stable’ equilibrium states. A body in a metastable state may not return to it after a sufficient deviation. Although a metastable state is stable within certain limits, the body will always leave it sooner or later for another state which is stable, corresponding to the greatest of the possible maxima of entropy. A body which is displaced from this state will always eventually return to it [1]. A problem with local maxima of \( S_{TOT} \) is discussed in Sect. 3.4. See also the note in Sect. 3.2.

  3. 3.

    The actual definitions of x and y are not relevant here. We drop the subscript \( _{TOT} \) in the following for simplicity.

  4. 4.

    Here, we invoke the identity \( \frac{\partial ^2 }{\partial x \partial y} = \frac{\partial ^2 }{\partial y \partial x} \)

  5. 5.

    The quantity (‘Jacobian’) \( \frac{\partial \left( u , v \right) }{\partial \left( a , b \right) } \equiv \frac{\partial u}{\partial a} \frac{\partial v}{\partial b} - \frac{\partial u}{\partial b} \frac{\partial v}{\partial a} \) satisfies the identities \( \frac{\partial \left( u , v \right) }{\partial \left( a , v \right) } = \left( \frac{\partial u}{\partial a} \right) _{v} \) and \( \frac{\partial \left( u , v \right) }{\partial \left( a , b \right) } = \frac{\partial \left( u , v \right) }{\partial \left( c , d \right) } \frac{\partial \left( c , d \right) }{\partial \left( a , b \right) } \) for arbitrary quantities uvabc and d [1].

  6. 6.

    It is often impossible to write down rigorous criteria a priori for the validity of LTE in a given problem, and the issue is settled by comparison of LTE-based predictions with observations. This is far from surprising, as similar considerations hold for true thermodynamic equilibrium too—see Sect. 1.5 of Ref. [4].

  7. 7.

    Or, more precisely, that the evolution of the cigarette is a succession of LTE states.

  8. 8.

    Here is why we postulated in Sect. 3.1 that S has only a global maximum, not local maxima. The First Principle of thermodynamics in the form \( dE = TdS - pdV \) gives \( C_v \equiv T ( \frac{\partial S}{\partial T} ) _{v} = ( \frac{\partial E}{\partial T} ) _{v}\) and \( (\frac{dE}{dS})_{v} = T\), hence \( (\frac{dS}{dE})_{v} = \frac{1}{T}\) and \( ( \frac{\partial ^2 S}{\partial E^2} )_{v} = -\frac{1}{T^2}(\frac{dT}{dE})_{v} = - \frac{\left[ (\frac{dS}{dE})_{v} \right] ^2}{C_v} \), i.e. \( C_v = - \frac{\left[ (\frac{dS}{dE})_{v} \right] ^2}{( \frac{\partial ^2 S}{\partial E^2} )_{v}} \) [6]. If \(S = S\left( E \right) \) has local maxima, \( ( \frac{\partial ^2 S}{\partial E^2} )_{v} > 0 \) and \( C_{v} < 0 \) in a neighbourhood of the local minimum of S which is located between two adjacent local maxima of \( S \left( E \right) \), which in turn correspond to metastable states (see note in Sect. 3.1).

  9. 9.

    Here, we refer to Eqs. (4.13), (8.14) (11.3), (11.20) and Problem (11.4) of [7], as well as to [8] and to Chaps. 1 and 2 of [2].

  10. 10.

    We take into account that \( df = \left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} \right) _{y} dx + \left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} \right) _{x} dy\) and that \( \frac{\partial ^2 f}{\partial x \partial y} = \frac{\partial ^2 f}{\partial y \partial x}\) for arbitrary differentiable \( f \left( x , y \right) \).

  11. 11.

    Of course, \( \sum _{k} c_{k} = 1 \) identically at all times, hence \( \sum _{k} \dfrac{d c_{k}}{d t} = 0\) at all times.

  12. 12.

    This step is allowed because the number N of particles is \( \gg 1 \). If N is not \( \gg 1 \), then different relationships hold [9]. See note in Sect. 1.

  13. 13.

    Here, we refer to Sect. 21 of [1, 6, 10, 11].

  14. 14.

    Here, ‘self-gravitating’ means that each particle is subject only to the Newtonian gravitational attraction of all other particles. As for the contribution to the entropy balance, e.g. of nuclear fusion in stars, see Ref. [10].

  15. 15.

    i.e. whenever the particle density at the centre of the sphere is at least 709 times larger than the particle density at the edge of the sphere [11]. For a discussion, see Sect. 3 of Ref. [12].

  16. 16.

    See note of Sect. 3.1.

  17. 17.

    Here, we may refer to the adiabatic compressibility with no loss of generality, so that temperature is not yet involved. Its impact will be discussed below.

  18. 18.

    Realistic models of gravitational collapse include the impact of non-gravitational forces, including the nuclear ones.

  19. 19.

    See the note in Sect. 3.2.

  20. 20.

    For a detailed discussion, see Ref. [6].

  21. 21.

    If we attempt to apply thermodynamics to the entire Universe, regarded as a single isolated system, then [1] we immediately encounter a glaring contradiction [...] any finite region of it, however large, should have a finite relaxation time and should be in equilibrium. Everyday experience shows us, however, that the properties of Nature bear no resemblance to those of an equilibrium system; and astronomical results show that the same is true throughout the vast region of the Universe accessible to our observation. [...] The reason is that, when large regions of the Universe are considered, the gravitational fields [...] may in a sense be regarded as ‘external conditions’ to which the bodies are subject. The statement that an isolated system must, over a sufficiently long time, reach a state of equilibrium applies of course only to a system in steady external conditions. On the other hand, the general cosmological expansion of the Universe means that [...] the ‘external conditions’ are by no means steady [...]. Here, it is important that the gravitational field cannot itself be included in an isolated system: the Universe as a whole must be regarded not as an isolated system but as a system in a variable gravitational field. Consequently, the application of the law of increase of entropy does not prove that [...] equilibrium must necessarily exist.

  22. 22.

    In contrast, it has been shown [14] that a self-consistent thermodynamic description exists for a system (a) which is in thermal equilibrium with a thermal bath; (b) which is made of positive and negative electric charges; (c) where every particle interacts with all other particles via electrostatic, Coulombian interactions; (d) and where the net electric charge is zero everywhere. Every particle undergoes both attractive and repulsive interactions on an equal footing, contrary to the self-gravitating particles which undergo attractive interactions only.

  23. 23.

    The lack of thermal equilibrium between a body A with negative heat capacity and a heat bath B is a particular case, as \( C_{vB} \gg \vert C_{vA} \vert \) by definition of the heat bath. If the specific heat of B is assumed to be large but finite, then a description of the interaction of A and B is available which is in agreement with Le Châtelier’s principle [6].

  24. 24.

    Through the so-called ‘Hawking radiation’, a quantum effect

  25. 25.

    Here, we refer to Sect. 15 of [1].

  26. 26.

    Since \( \sum _{k} c_{k} \equiv 1 \), \( \sum _{k} d c_{k} = d \left( \sum _{k} c_{k} \right) \equiv 0.\)

  27. 27.

    We stress the following two points. Firstly, in steady state \( S = \) constant by definition. Suitable transport processes carry away the amount of entropy produced per unit time at rate \( \frac{dS}{dt} \) in order to maintain \( S = \) const. throughout our system. Secondly, S is often invoked because of the Second Principle of thermodynamics, and the Second Principle does not involve time in its formulation—see note in Sect. 2.2. It is the assumption of LTE everywhere at all times which allows S to be a differentiable function of t, as S is the volume integral of \( \rho s \) and both \( \rho \) and s may depend on both space and time; in particular, \( s = s ( T, p, \ldots )\) just like in thermodynamic equilibrium, and p, T, etc. are solutions of the balance equations of energy, momentum, etc. which depend on space and time.

  28. 28.

    In its original version, GEC includes also an additive, non-positive term \( -\frac{\rho }{T} \left[ \frac{\partial \vert {\textbf {v}} \vert }{\partial t }\right] ^2 \). However, the proof of GEC in Sect. A.1 holds regardless of this term. For further applications, see both [8, 18].

References

  1. Landau, L.D., Lifshitz, E.: Statistical Physics. Pergamon, Oxford, UK (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  2. DeGroot, S.R., Mazur, P.: Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics. North Holland, Amsterdam (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Landau, L.D., Lifshitz, E.: Fluid Mechanics. Pergamon, Oxford, UK (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Callen, H.B.: Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fermi, E.: Thermodynamics. Dover Publications (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Velazquez, L.: J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2016(3), 033105 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zemansky, M.W.: Heat and Thermodynamics. McGraw Hill, New York (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Glansdorff, P., Prigogine, I.: Physica 30, 351 (1964)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Hill, T.L.: Thermodynamics of Small Systems. W.A. Benjamin, Inc. Publisher, New York (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wallace, D.: Br. J. Philos. Sci. 61(3), 513 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lynden-Bell, D.: Phys. A 263(1–4), 293–304 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Padmanabhan, T.: Phys. Rep. 188(5), 285–362 (1990)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Landau, L.D., Lifshitz, E.: Mechanics. Pergamon, Oxford, UK (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lebowitz, J.L., Lieb, E.H.: PRL 22(13), 631–634 (1969)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thirring, W.: Z. Physik 235, 339–352 (1970)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. LoPresto, M.C.: Phys. Teach. 41, 299–301 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shimizu, H., Yamaguchi, Y.: Prog. Theor. Phys. 67, 1 (1982). (Progress Letters)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Di Vita, A.: Phys. Rev. E 81, 041137 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Di Vita .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Di Vita, A. (2022). Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium. In: Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 1007. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12221-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics