Abstract
Teams in tech companies collaboratively solve creative problems, and this team creative process increasingly occurs online. Despite many innovative tool designs to support collaborative creativity, many teams did not adopt them. This study aimed to identify the barriers to adoption and teams’ needs for collaborative creativity support. We clarified the team creative process in practice by individual in-depth interviews with 15 employees in 12 different high-tech companies in China. The results suggested that the teams frequently shared information via communication tools or face to face, and many of them acknowledged the benefits of collaboration in team creativity. However, most of them ideated and evaluated ideas or solutions individually. The reasons for the low collaboration level included the features of their tasks, a lack of technical and managerial support for collaboration in the ideation and evaluation phase, and a lack of motivation for team creativity. Based on these findings, we outlined implications for designing tools to support team creativity and demonstrated a prototype of a communication tool with creative support features.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sawyer, R.K., DeZutter, S.: Distributed creativity: how collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychol. Aesthetics Creativity Arts 3, 81 (2009)
Wuchty, S., Jones, B.F., Uzzi, B.: The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316, 1036–1039 (2007)
Shin, S.J., Zhou, J.: When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. J. Appl. Psychol. 92, 1709 (2007)
Howard, T.J., Culley, S.J., Dekoninck, E.: Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Des. Stud. 29, 160–180 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.01.001
Lubart, T.I.: Models of the creative process: past, present and future. Creat. Res. J. 13, 295–308 (2001)
Amabile, T.M.: How to Kill Creativity. Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston (1998)
Ward, T.B.: Cognition, creativity, and entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Ventur. 19, 173–188 (2004)
Zeng, L., Proctor, R.W., Salvendy, G.: Creativity in ergonomic design: a supplemental value-adding source for product and service development. Hum. Factors 52, 503–525 (2010)
Paulus, P.B., Dzindolet, M.: Social influence, creativity and innovation. Soc. Influ. 3, 228–247 (2008)
Brown, S.L., Eisenhardt, K.M.: Product development: past research, present findings, and future directions. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20, 343–378 (1995)
Drach-Zahavy, A., Somech, A.: Understanding team innovation: the role of team processes and structures. Group Dyn. Theory Res. Pract. 5, 111 (2001)
Kratzer, J., Leenders, O.T.A., van Engelen, J.M.: Stimulating the potential: creative performance and communication in innovation teams. Creativity Innov. Manag. 13, 63–71 (2004)
Maaravi, Y., Heller, B., Shoham, Y., Mohar, S., Deutsch, B.: Ideation in the digital age: literature review and integrative model for electronic brainstorming. RMS 15(6), 1431–1464 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00400-5
West, M.A., Sacramento, C.A., Fay, D.: Creativity and innovation implementation in work groups: the paradoxical role of demands. Creativity Innov. Organ. Teams 137–159 (2006)
Frich, J., MacDonald Vermeulen, L., Remy, C., Biskjaer, M.M., Dalsgaard, P.: Mapping the landscape of creativity support tools in HCI. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–18 (2019)
Gabriel, A., Monticolo, D., Camargo, M., Bourgault, M.: Creativity support systems: a systematic mapping study. Think. Skills Creat. 21, 109–122 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.009
Remy, C., MacDonald Vermeulen, L., Frich, J., Biskjaer, M.M., Dalsgaard, P.: Evaluating creativity support tools in HCI research. In: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, pp. 457–476 (2020)
Wang, K., Nickerson, J.V.: A literature review on individual creativity support systems. Comput. Hum. Behav. 74, 139–151 (2017)
Lubart, T.: How can computers be partners in the creative process: classification and commentary on the special issue. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 63, 365–369 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.002
Siangliulue, P., Chan, J., Dow, S.P., Gajos, K.Z.: IdeaHound: improving large-scale collaborative ideation with crowd-powered real-time semantic modeling. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 609–624 (2016)
Sundholm, H., Artman, H., Ramberg, R.: Backdoor creativity: collaborative creativity in technology supported teams. Presented at the 6th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, Hyères, France, 11–14 May 2004 (2004)
Kim, T.S., Kim, S., Choi, Y., Kim, J.: Winder: linking speech and visual objects to support communication in asynchronous collaboration. In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–17 (2021)
Bao, P., Gerber, E., Gergle, D., Hoffman, D.: Momentum: getting and staying on topic during a brainstorm. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1233–1236 (2010)
Girotto, V., Walker, E., Burleson, W.: The effect of peripheral micro-tasks on crowd ideation. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1843–1854 (2017)
Tavanapour, N., Theodorakopoulos, D., Bittner, E.A.C.: A conversational agent as facilitator: guiding groups through collaboration processes. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) HCII 2020. LNCS, vol. 12206, pp. 108–129. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50506-6_9
Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 77–101 (2006)
Ali, A., Wang, H., Khan, A.N.: Mechanism to enhance team creative performance through social media: a transactive memory system approach. Comput. Hum. Behav. 91, 115–126 (2019)
Santos, C.M., Uitdewilligen, S., Passos, A.M.: Why is your team more creative than mine? The influence of shared mental models on intra-group conflict, team creativity and effectiveness. Creativity Innov. Manag. 24, 645–658 (2015)
Nijstad, B.A., Stroebe, W.: How the group affects the mind: a cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 10, 186–213 (2006)
Paulus, P.B., Brown, V.R.: Toward more creative and innovative group idea generation: a cognitive-social-motivational perspective of brainstorming. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass 1, 248–265 (2007)
Dennis, A.R., Fuller, R.M., Valacich, J.S.: Media, tasks, and communication processes: a theory of media synchronicity. MIS Q. 32, 575–600 (2008)
Wang, D., Tan, H., Lu, T.: Why users do not want to write together when they are writing together: users’ rationales for today’s collaborative writing practices. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, 1–18 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3134742
Ahmed, Y.A., Ahmad, M.N., Ahmad, N., Zakaria, N.H.: Social media for knowledge-sharing: a systematic literature review. Telematics Inform. 37, 72–112 (2019)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chen, Y., Wu, M., Gao, Q. (2022). Online Communication for Team Creativity in Tech Companies: Barriers and Tool Design. In: Rau, PL.P. (eds) Cross-Cultural Design. Applications in Business, Communication, Health, Well-being, and Inclusiveness. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13313. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06050-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06050-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06049-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06050-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)