Abstract
Under the background of “big design” and “post-formal education”, the reform of design education is advancing to a deeper level, and online collaborative tools provide great potential for the development of design education. This paper puts forward an innovative pedagogical framework based on digital collaboration tools, discusses the new path of knowledge dissemination, and guides the reform of basic design courses. This paper proposes the communication dimension of digital collaborative environment. The research studies the students’ participation and the types of knowledge creation in teaching cooperation, and carries out the integration of learning mode integration. We establish an innovative pedagogical framework of CAPD course empowered by online collaborative tool. The results show that the framework can achieve the goal of integrating design output. The combination of the innovation of pedagogical framework and digital collaboration tools may also contain greater potential in promoting the transformation of design education in the future.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jones, P.H.: Systemic design principles for complex social systems. In: Metcalf, G.S. (ed.) Social Systems and Design. TSS, vol. 1, pp. 91–128. Springer, Tokyo (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54478-4_4
Gidley, J.M.: Educating for evolving consciousness: voicing the emergency for love, life and wisdom. In: de Souza, M., Francis, L.J., O’Higgins-Norman, J., Scott, D. (eds.) International handbook of education for spirituality, care and wellbeing. IHRE, vol. 3, pp. 553–561. Springer, Dordrecht (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9018-9_29
Barak, M.: Problem-, project-and design-based learning: their relationship to teaching science, technology and engineering in school. J. Probl. Based Learn. 7(2), 94–97 (2020)
Verganti, R., Vendraminelli, L., Iansiti, M.: Innovation and design in the age of artificial intelligence. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 37(3), 212–227 (2020)
Sachse, P., Furtner, M.: Embodied knowledge in design. In: Leidlmair, K. (ed.) After Cognitivism, pp. 163–179. Springer, Dordrecht (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9992-2_10
Rieuf, V., Bouchard, C., Meyrueis, V., Omhover, J.-F.: Emotional activity in early immersive design: sketches and moodboards in virtual reality. Design Stud. 48, 43–75 (2017)
Li, T., Zhao, D.: Mood board tool on high-level semantics visual representation to favor creative design. In: Rebelo, F. (ed.) Advances in Ergonomics in Design: Proceedings of the AHFE 2021 Virtual Conference on Ergonomics in Design, July 25-29, 2021, USA, pp. 408–419. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79760-7_49
Dindler, C., Smith, R., Iversen, O.S.: Computational empowerment: participatory design in education. CoDesign 16(1), 66–80 (2020)
Karakaya, A.F., Demirkan, H.: Collaborative digital environments to enhance the creativity of designers. Comput. Human Behav. 42, 176–186 (2015)
Hung, W.: Team-based complex problem solving: a collective cognition perspective. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 61(3), 365–384 (2013)
Arlin, P.K.: The wise teacher: a developmental model of teaching. Theory Into Pract. 38(1), 12–17 (1999)
Cartwright, K.B.: Cognitive developmental theory and spiritual development. J. Adult Dev. 8(4), 213–220 (2001)
Thompson, J.R.: From Engagement to Empowerment: Exploring the Potential for Pedagogical Partnerships in Design (2020)
Eris, O., Leifer, L.: Faciliating product development knowledge acquisition: interaction between the expert and the team. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 19(1), 142–152 (2003)
Auernhammer, J., Lenzen, M., Leifer, L.: Dancing with Creativity: Changes in Conception in Design Thinking within Product Innovation Projects (2020)
Sweller, J., Kirschner, P.A., Clark, R.E.: Why minimally guided teaching techniques do not work: a reply to commentaries. Educ. Psychol. 42(2), 115–121 (2007)
Balan, L., Yuen, T., Mehrtash, M.: Problem-based learning strategy for CAD software using free-choice and open-ended group projects. Procedia Manuf. 32, 339–347 (2019)
Savery, J.R.: Overview of problem-based learning: definitions and distinctions. Essential readings in problem-based learning: exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. Barrows. Interdiscip. J. Prob. Based Learn. 9(2), 5–15 (2015)
Melles, G., et al.: Problem finding through design thinking in education. Inquiry-Based Learning for Multidisciplinary Programs: A Conceptual and Practical Resource for Educators. Emerald Group Publishing Limited (2015)
Brod, G.: Generative learning: which strategies for what age? Educ. Psychol. Rev. 33(4), 1295–1318 (2020)
Acknowledgements
We would love to thank all the students from the CAPD course participating in the research. This research is funded by the Collaborative education project of industry-university cooperation of the Chinese Ministry of Education, grant number 202102100014, and by the General Project of Zhejiang Provincial Department of Education, grant number 21086103-F, and by the research startup fund for Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, grant number 20082337-Y.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Li, T., Dai, N., Zhu, X. (2022). Innovative Pedagogical Framework Based on Digital Collaborative Tools: A Design Education Practice of CADP Course for Freshmen in Design. In: Rau, PL.P. (eds) Cross-Cultural Design. Applications in Learning, Arts, Cultural Heritage, Creative Industries, and Virtual Reality. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13312. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06047-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06047-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06046-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06047-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)