Skip to main content

The Single Knot Running Vesico-Urethral Anastomosis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Abstract

The vesico-urethral anastomosis (VUA) represents the conclusion of a complex operation as radical prostatectomy. Its correct performance is vital to assure optimal functional results after surgery and avoid complications. In 2000, in our center we introduced a single-knot running VUA, today more known as the van Velthoven technique. In this chapter we fully describe the original technique, all its modifications and applications to complicated clinical scenarios including salvage setting and post-BPH surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Van Velthoven RF, Ahlering TE, Peltier A, Skarecky DW, Clayman RV. Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis: the single knot method. Urology. 2003;61(4):699–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A, Shrivastava A, Bhandari A. The technique of apical dissection of the prostate and urethrovesical anastomosis in robotic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2004;93(6):715–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Simone G, Papalia R, Ferriero M, Guaglianone S, Gallucci M. Laparoscopic «single knot-single running» suture vesico-urethral anastomosis with posterior musculofascial reconstruction. World J Urol. 2012;30(5):651–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Meeks JJ, Zhao LC, Greco KA, Wu SD, Nadler RB. Application of continuous tension to aid in performing the vesicourethral anastomosis for robot-assisted prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2009;23(12):1941–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Montorsi F, Wilson TG, Rosen RC, Ahlering TE, Artibani W, Carroll PR, et al. Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):368–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rocco F, Carmignani L, Acquati P, Gadda F, Dell’Orto P, Rocco B, et al. Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 2006;175(6):2201–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tewari A, Jhaveri J, Rao S, Yadav R, Bartsch G, Te A, et al. Total reconstruction of the vesico-urethral junction. BJU Int. 2008;101(7):871–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vis AN, van der Poel HG, Ruiter AEC, Hu JC, Tewari AK, Rocco B, et al. Posterior, anterior, and periurethral surgical reconstruction of urinary continence mechanisms in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a description and video compilation of commonly performed surgical techniques. Eur Urol. 2019;76(6):814–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Teber D, Erdogru T, Cresswell J, Gözen AS, Frede T, Rassweiler JJ. Analysis of three different vesicourethral anastomotic techniques in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2008;26(6):617–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Surya BV, Provet J, Johanson KE, Brown J. Anastomotic strictures following radical prostatectomy: risk factors and management. J Urol. 1990;143(4):755–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schatzl G, Madersbacher S, Hofbauer J, Pycha A, Reiter WJ, Svolba G, et al. The impact of urinary extravasation after radical retropubic prostatectomy on urinary incontinence and anastomotic strictures. Eur Urol. 1999;36(3):187–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Williams TR, Longoria OJ, Asselmeier S, Menon M. Incidence and imaging appearance of urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leaks following da Vinci robotic prostatectomy. Abdom Imaging. 2008;33(3):367–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hemal AK, Agarwal MM, Babbar P. Impact of newer unidirectional and bidirectional barbed suture on vesicourethral anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and its comparison with polyglecaprone-25 suture: an initial experience. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012;44(1):125–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hu JC, Nelson RA, Wilson TG, Kawachi MH, Ramin SA, Lau C, et al. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2006;175(2):541–6; discussion 546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rebuck DA, Haywood S, McDermott K, Perry KT, Nadler RB. What is the long-term relevance of clinically detected postoperative anastomotic urine leakage after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy? BJU Int. 2011;108(5):733–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cohen MS. J Endourol. 2006;20(8):574–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2006.20.574.

  17. Diamand R, Al Hajj Obeid W, Accarain A, Limani K, Hawaux E, van Velthoven R, et al. Management of anastomosis leakage post-RALP: a simple trick for a complex situation. Urol Case Rep. 2017;12:28–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ouzaid I, Xylinas E, Ploussard G, Hoznek A, Vordos D, Abbou C-C, et al. Anastomotic stricture after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: what should be expected from the Van Velthoven single-knot running suture? J Endourol. 2012;26(8):1020–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gontero P, Marra G, Alessio P, Filippini C, Oderda M, Munoz F, et al. Salvage radical prostatectomy for recurrent prostate cancer: morbidity and functional outcomes from a large multicenter series of open versus robotic approaches. J Urol. 2019;202(4):725–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rocco B, Cozzi G, Spinelli MG, Grasso A, Varisco D, Coelho RF, et al. Current status of salvage robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for radiorecurrent prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep. 2012;13(3):195–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yuh B, Ruel N, Muldrew S, Mejia R, Novara G, Kawachi M, et al. Complications and outcomes of salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single-institution experience. BJU Int. 2014;113(5):769–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Herrera-Caceres JO, Nason GJ, Salgado-Sanmamed N, Goldberg H, Woon DTS, Chandrasekar T, et al. Salvage radical prostatectomy following focal therapy: functional and oncological outcomes. BJU Int. 2020;125(4):525–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Campobasso D, Fiori C, Amparore D, Checcucci E, Garrou D, Manfredi M, et al. Total anatomical reconstruction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with previous prostate surgery. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2019;71(6):605–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gupta NP, Singh P, Nayyar R. Outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with previous transurethral resection of prostate. BJU Int. 2011;108(9):1501–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dev H, Sharma NL, Dawson SN, Neal DE, Shah N. Detailed analysis of operating time learning curves in robotic prostatectomy by a novice surgeon. BJU Int. 2012;109(7):1074–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tewari AK, Srivastava A, Sooriakumaran P, Slevin A, Grover S, Waldman O, et al. Use of a novel absorbable barbed plastic surgical suture enables a «self-cinching» technique of vesicourethral anastomosis during robot-assisted prostatectomy and improves anastomotic times. J Endourol. 2010;24(10):1645–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Weld KJ, Ames CD, Hruby G, Humphrey PA, Landman J. Evaluation of a novel knotless self-anchoring suture material for urinary tract reconstruction. Urology. 2006;67(6):1133–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Erdogru T, Celik O, Hladun T, Kazimoglu H, Micoogullari U, Akincioglu E, et al. Comparison of suture material for vesico-urethral anastomosis in robotic radical prostatectomy. Cent Eur J Urol. 2020;73(2):134–9.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Massoud W, Thanigasalam R, El Hajj A, Girard F, Théveniaud PE, Chatellier G, et al. Does the use of a barbed polyglyconate absorbable suture have an impact on urethral anastomosis time, urethral stenosis rates, and cost effectiveness during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy? Urology. 2013;82(1):90–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Moran ME, Marsh C, Perrotti M. Bidirectional-barbed sutured knotless running anastomosis v classic Van Velthoven suturing in a model system. J Endourol. 2007;21(10):1175–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sammon J, Kim T-K, Trinh Q-D, Bhandari A, Kaul S, Sukumar S, et al. Anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: randomized controlled trial comparing barbed and standard monofilament suture. Urology. 2011;78(3):572–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zorn KC, Trinh Q-D, Jeldres C, Schmitges J, Widmer H, Lattouf J-B, et al. Prospective randomized trial of barbed polyglyconate suture to facilitate vesico-urethral anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: time reduction and cost benefit. BJU Int. 2012;109(10):1526–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Murtha AP, Kaplan AL, Paglia MJ, Mills BB, Feldstein ML, Ruff GL. Evaluation of a novel technique for wound closure using a barbed suture. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(6):1769–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Warner JP, Gutowski KA. Abdominoplasty with progressive tension closure using a barbed suture technique. Aesthet Surg J. 2009;29(3):221–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sengupta S, Ischia J, Webb DR. Single-layer anatomical reconstruction of the vesico-urethral anastomosis during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). BJU Int. 2011;107(2):340–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Albisinni S, Limani K, Hawaux E, Peltier A, Van Velthoven R. Evaluation of the single-knot running vesicourethral anastomosis 10 years after its introduction: results from an international survey. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014;24(9):640–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hruby G, Weld KJ, Marruffo F, Collins S, Durak E, Mitchell R, et al. Comparison of novel tissue apposing device and standard anastomotic technique for vesicourethral anastomoses. Urology. 2007;70(1):190–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simone Albisinni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Albisinni, S., Diamand, R., Valerio, M., van Velthoven, R. (2022). The Single Knot Running Vesico-Urethral Anastomosis. In: Ren, S., Nathan, S., Pavan, N., Gu, D., Sridhar, A., Autorino, R. (eds) Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05855-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05855-4_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05854-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05855-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics