Skip to main content
Log in

Incidence and imaging appearance of urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leaks following da Vinci robotic prostatectomy

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The advent of the da Vinci robotic prostatectomy has several advantages over open and laparoscopic prostatectomy, including fewer complications, better continence and potency. We evaluate the incidence and imaging features of urinary leaks after robotic prostatectomy.

Methods

A retrospective study examining the anastomotic leak rates from 490 consecutive robotic prostatectomy patients. Routine postoperative cystography on day 7 was reviewed for presence and severity of urinary anastomotic leaks.

Results

A total of 490 patients were reviewed, of which 442 had cystographic imaging postoperatively (n = 442). A total of 67 urinary leaks were identified; 40 were small, limited extraperitoneal leaks confined to the surgical bed, 21 were moderate sized leaks limited to the extraperitoneal pelvic space, and six extended in to the peritoneal cavity. Two of these six patients required CT-guided drainage for peritoneal urinoma. Other cystography findings included two cases of vesicoureteral reflux and one case of colovesical fistula.

Conclusion

The incidence of postoperative anastomotic urinary leaks following robotic prostatectomy (13.6%) is the same or better than laparoscopic prostatectomy and traditional radical retropubic prostatectomy. The vast majority of urethrovesical leaks are transient, requiring no follow-up intervention. The incidence of large anastomotic leaks requiring CT guided intervention is exceedingly low 2/490 (<0.5%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaul S, Menon M (2006) Robotic radical prostatectomy: evolution from conventional VIP. World J Urol 24(2):152–160 (Topic paper)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rassweiler J, Seeman O, Schulze M, et al. (2003) Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. J Urol 169(5):1689–1693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bandani K, Hemal A, Peobody J, et al. (2006) Robotic radical prostaectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute training experience. World J Urol 24:148–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Seifert A, Huntington T (2006) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a community hospital without robotic assistance. Urology 68:831–833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yablon C, Banner M, Ramchandani P, et al. (2004) Complications of prostate cancer treatment: spectrum on imaging findings. Radiographics 24:181–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Menon M, Hemal A (2006) Robotic urologic surgery: is this the way of the future? World J Urol 24(2):119 (Invited editorial)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Berlin J, Ramchandani P, Banner M, et al. (1994) Voiding cystourethography after radical prostatectomy. AJR 162:87–91

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gnanapragasm V, Baker P, Naisby G, et al. (2005) Identification and validation of risk factors for vesicourethral leaks following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Int J Urol 12:948–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Leibovitch I, Rowland R, Little J, et al. (1995) Cystography after radical retropubic prostatectomy: clinical implications of abnormal findings. Urology 46(1):78–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Todd R. Williams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, T.R., Longoria, O.J., Asselmeier, S. et al. Incidence and imaging appearance of urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leaks following da Vinci robotic prostatectomy. Abdom Imaging 33, 367–370 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9247-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9247-8

Keywords

Navigation