Skip to main content

Measuring and Predicting Human Trust in Recommendations from an AI Teammate

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in HCI (HCII 2022)

Abstract

Predicting compliance with AI recommendations and knowing when to intervene are critical facets of human-AI teaming. AIs are typically deployed in settings where their abilities to evaluate decision variables far exceed the abilities of their human counterparts. However, even though AIs excel at weighing multiple issues and computing near optimal solutions with speed and accuracy beyond that of any human, they still make mistakes. Thus, perfect compliance may be undesirable. This means, just as individuals must know when to follow the advice of other people, it is critical for them to know when to adopt the recommendations from their AI. Well-calibrated trust is thought to be a fundamental aspect of this type of knowledge. We compare the ability of a common trust inventory and the ability of a behavioral measure of trust to predict compliance and success in a reconnaissance mission. We interpret the experimental results to suggest that the behavioral measure is a better predictor of overall mission compliance and success. We discuss how this measure could possibly be used in compliance interventions and related open questions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. APA dictionary of psychology. American Psychological Association. https://dictionary.apa.org/trust

  2. Amershi, S., et al.: Guidelines for human-AI interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–13 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Araujo, T., Helberger, N., Kruikemeier, S., De Vreese, C.H.: In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence. AI Soc. 35(3), 611–623 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barnes, M.J., Wang, N., Pynadath, D.V., Chen, J.Y.: Human-agent bidirectional transparency. In: Trust in Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 209–232. Elsevier (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Christoforakos, L., Gallucci, A., Surmava-Große, T., Ullrich, D., Diefenbach, S.: Can robots earn our trust the same way humans do? A systematic exploration of competence, warmth, and anthropomorphism as determinants of trust development in HRI. Front. Robot. AI 8, 79 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Elliot, J.: Artificial social intelligence for successful teams (ASIST) (2021). https://www.darpa.mil/program/artificial-social-intelligence-for-successful-teams

  7. Gurney, N., Pynadath, D.V., Wang, N.: Compliance in human-robot interactions (2022). Submitted to the Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gurney, N., Pynadath, D.V., Wang, N.: Explainable reinforcement learning in human-machine teams: the impact of decision-tree based explanations on transparency communication and team performance (2022). Submitted to the International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hoff, K.A., Bashir, M.: Trust in automation: integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Hum. Factors 57(3), 407–434 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaelbling, L.P., Littman, M.L., Moore, A.W.: Reinforcement learning: a survey. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 4, 237–285 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kunkel, J., Donkers, T., Michael, L., Barbu, C.M., Ziegler, J.: Let me explain: impact of personal and impersonal explanations on trust in recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–12 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee, J.D., See, K.A.: Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Hum. Factors 46(1), 50–80 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D.: An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20(3), 709–734 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McKnight, D.H., Choudhury, V., Kacmar, C.: Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology. Inf. Syst. Res. 13(3), 334–359 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pynadath, D.V., Wang, N., Rovira, E., Barnes, M.J.: Clustering behavior to recognize subjective beliefs in human-agent teams. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, pp. 1495–1503 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Quinlan, J.R.: Induction of decision trees. Mach. Learn. 1(1), 81–106 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Seeber, I., et al.: Machines as teammates: a research agenda on AI in team collaboration. Inf. Manage. 57(2), 103174 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shneiderman, B.: Human-centered artificial intelligence: reliable, safe & trustworthy. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 36(6), 495–504 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G.: Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, N., Pynadath, D.V., Hill, S.G.: Trust calibration within a human-robot team: comparing automatically generated explanations. In: 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 109–116. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, N., Pynadath, D.V., Hill, S.G., Ground, A.P.: Building trust in a human-robot team with automatically generated explanations. In: Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference (I/ITSEC), vol. 15315, pp. 1–12 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, N., Pynadath, D.V., Rovira, E., Barnes, M.J., Hill, S.G.: Is it my looks? Or something I said? The impact of explanations, embodiment, and expectations on trust and performance in human-robot teams. In: Ham, J., Karapanos, E., Morita, P.P., Burns, C.M. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2018. LNCS, vol. 10809, pp. 56–69. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78978-1_5

  23. Yin, M., Wortman Vaughan, J., Wallach, H.: Understanding the effect of accuracy on trust in machine learning models. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–12 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, Y., Liao, Q.V., Bellamy, R.K.: Effect of confidence and explanation on accuracy and trust calibration in AI-assisted decision making. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 295–305 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David V. Pynadath .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gurney, N., Pynadath, D.V., Wang, N. (2022). Measuring and Predicting Human Trust in Recommendations from an AI Teammate. In: Degen, H., Ntoa, S. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in HCI. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13336. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05643-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05643-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05642-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05643-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics