Abstract
Beyond the skills of the surgeon, the key to the success of a robot-assisted laparoscopic procedure is good patient positioning and proper port placement. An optimal port placement is necessary to access the targeted organ at best, to avoid patient injury due to the bulky nature of the robot, to minimize collision arm to arm, and to minimize intraoperative range-of-motion limits. Regarding renal surgery, the kidney robot-assisted transperitoneal approach has gradually taken the place of standard laparoscopy. However, the retroperitoneal approach is increasingly used, particularly for posterior or lateral renal tumors. Regardless of the approach, the positioning of the trocars for kidney surgery depends on the robotic device (Si, X, or Xi da Vinci® surgical system), the patient’s morphology, the location of the tumor, and the preferences of the surgeon. In principle, four 8-mm da Vinci trocars are used, with a 12-mm assisting port and sometimes a second 5-mm assisting port. It is recommended to insert all the ports carefully under direct visual control.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, Dierks SM, Merety KS, Darcy MD, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(19):1370–1.
Kallingal GJS, Swain S, Darwiche F, Punnen S, Manoharan M, Gonzalgo ML, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy with the Da Vinci Xi. Adv Urol. 2016;2016:9675095.
Mikhail D, Sarcona J, Mekhail M, Richstone L. Urologic robotic surgery. Surg Clin N Am. 2020;100(2):361–78.
Durand X, Molimard B, Bayoud Y. Néphrectomie partielle par voie laparoscopique robot-assistée transpéritonéale. EMC – Techniques chirurgicales – Urologie. 2014;7(4):1–5.
Mittakanti HR, Heulitt G, Li H-F, Porter JR. Transperitoneal vs. retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a matched-paired analysis. World J Urol. 2020;38(5):1093–9.
Patel M, Porter J. Robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy. World J Urol. 2013;31(6):1377–82.
M P, J P. Robotic retroperitoneal surgery: a contemporary review. Current opinion in urology [Internet]. janv 2013 [cité 18 juin 2021];23(1). Disponible sur: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23159992/
Hemal AK, Goldberg H. NARUS 2019: port placement principles for Xi and Si robots. 3rd Annual North American Robotic Urology Symposium (NARUS). 2019.
Pathak RA, Patel M, Hemal AK. Comprehensive approach to port placement templates for robot-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgeries. J Endourol. 2017;31(12):1269–76.
Ljungberg B, Hanbury DC, Kuczyk MA, Merseburger AS, Mulders PFA, Patard J-J, et al. Renal cell carcinoma guideline. Eur Urol. 2007;51(6):1502–10.
Aron M, Gill IS. Minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery (MINSS) for renal tumours part I: laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2007;51(2):337–46; discussion 46–47.
Singh I. Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: current review of the technique and literature. J Minim Access Surg. 2009;5(4):87–92.
Atalla MA, Dovey Z, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic versus robotic pyeloplasty: man versus machine. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2010;7(1):27–34.
Casale P, Lughezzani G, Buffi N, Larcher A, Porter J, Mottrie A, et al. Evolution of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: techniques and outcomes from the transatlantic robotic nephron-sparing surgery study group. Eur Urol. 2019;76(2):222–7.
Stolzenburg J-U, Türk IA, Liatsikos EN, éditeurs. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery in urology: Atlas of standard procedures. Berlin: Springer; 2011.
Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG, Porter JR, Buffi NM, Figenshau RS, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: an international experience. Eur Urol. 2010;57(5):815–20.
Sammon JD, Karakiewicz PI, Sun M, Ravi P, Ghani KR, Jeong W, et al. Robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: utilization rates and perioperative outcomes. Int Braz J Urol. 2013;39(3):377–86.
Wright JL, Porter JR. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. J Urol. 2005;174(3):841–5.
Hu JC, Treat E, Filson CP, McLaren I, Xiong S, Stepanian S, et al. Technique and outcomes of robot-assisted retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter study. Eur Urol. 2014;66(3):542–9.
Xia L, Zhang X, Wang X, Xu T, Qin L, Zhang X, et al. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2016;30:109–15.
Kim EH, Larson JA, Potretzke AM, Hulsey NK, Bhayani SB, Figenshau RS. Retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for posterior renal masses is associated with earlier hospital discharge: a single-institution retrospective comparison. J Endourol. 2015;29(10):1137–42.
Choo SH, Lee SY, Sung HH, Jeon HG, Jeong BC, Jeon SS, et al. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: matched-pair comparisons by nephrometry scores. World J Urol. 2014;32(6):1523–9.
Hughes-Hallett A, Patki P, Patel N, Barber NJ, Sullivan M, Thilagarajah R. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. J Endourol. 2013;27(7):869–74.
Maurice MJ, Kaouk JH, Ramirez D, Bhayani SB, Allaf ME, Rogers CG, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy for posterior tumors through a retroperitoneal approach offers decreased length of stay compared with the transperitoneal approach: a propensity-matched analysis. J Endourol. 2017;31(2):158–62.
Tanaka K, Shigemura K, Furukawa J, Ishimura T, Muramaki M, Miyake H, et al. Comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in an initial case series in Japan. J Endourol. 2013;27(11):1384–8.
Huang WC, Levey AS, Serio AM, Snyder M, Vickers AJ, Raj GV, et al. Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(9):735–40.
Kim SP, Murad MH, Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, Weight CJ, Han LC, et al. Comparative effectiveness for survival and renal function of partial and radical nephrectomy for localized renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. 2012.
Fan X, Xu K, Lin T, Liu H, Yin Z, Dong W, et al. Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2013;111(4):611–21.
Xia L, Talwar R, Taylor BL, Shin MH, Berger IB, Sperling CD, et al. National trends and disparities of minimally invasive surgery for localized renal cancer, 2010 to 2015. Urol Oncol. 2019;37(3):182.e17–27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vaessen, C., Grobet-Jeandin, E., Stolzenburg, JU., Arthanareeswaran, VKA., Porter, J. (2022). Port Placement for Robotic Renal Surgery. In: Wiklund, P., Mottrie, A., Gundeti, M.S., Patel, V. (eds) Robotic Urologic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-00363-9_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-00363-9_37
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-00362-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-00363-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)