Skip to main content
Log in

Robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy

  • Invited Review
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of review

Robotic-assisted renal surgery is being increasingly utilized; however, the majority of these are performed via a transperitoneal approach. Retroperitoneal robotic surgery is a relatively new technique allowing direct access to the posterolateral surface of the kidney, as well as posterior hilar structures. In this review, we summarize the most recent publications and review our experience of robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy.

Recent findings

The retroperitoneal approach has been successfully applied to robotic partial nephrectomy. The current series find this approach ideal for posterior and lateral renal masses, and technically feasible with the advances in robotic technology. The retroperitoneal approach has been shown to decrease operative times, narcotic need, and permit quicker return of bowel function. Furthermore, there does not appear to be any increase in perioperative complications using this approach. Since 2006, we have treated 68 patients using this approach. The mean age was 58.9 years, and mean preoperative tumor size 2.5 cm (range 1–5 cm). Mean operative and warm ischemia time were 125 min and 20.7 min, respectively. The majority of patients had renal cell carcinoma, with a 4.4 % positive margin rate. The most common complication was an arterial pseudoaneurysm in 3 (4.4 %) patients.

Summary

The limited data using this technique offer an encouraging outlook on robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy. The retroperitoneal approach permits direct access to the renal hilum, no need for bowel mobilization, and excellent visualization for posteriorly located renal masses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

TP:

Transperitoneal

RP:

Retroperitoneal

RALPN:

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

LPN:

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

LRN:

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy

LN:

Laparoscopic nephrectomy

BMI:

Body mass index

ASA:

American Society of Anaesthesiologist

References

  1. Bhayani SB, Das N (2008) Robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for suspected renal cell carcinoma: retrospective review of surgical outcomes of 35 cases. BMC Surg 24:8–16

    Google Scholar 

  2. Michli EE, Parra RO (2009) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial clinical experience. Urology 73:302–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wright JL, Porter JR (2005) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. J Urol 174:841–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Benway BM, Wang AJ, Cabello JM, Bhayani SB (2009) Robotic partial nephrectomy with sliding-clip renorrhaphy: technique and outcomes. Eur Urol 5(3):592–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Patel MN, Kaul SA, Laugani R, Eun D, Bhandari M, Menon M, Rogers C (2009) Retroperitoneal robotic renal surgery: technique and early results. J Robot Surg 3(1):1–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McDougall EM, Clayman RV (1996) Laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign disease: comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. J Endourol 10:45–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Desai MM, Strzempkowski B, Gill IS et al (2005) Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 173:38–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ng CS, Gill IS, Ramani AP et al (2005) Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: patient selection and perioperative outcomes. J Urol 174:846–849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kieran K, Montgomery JS, Daignault S et al (2007) Comparison of intraoperative parameters and perioperative complications of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: support for a retroperitoneal approach in selected patients. J Endourol 21:754–759

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pyo P, Chen A, Grasso M (2008) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: surgical experience and outcomes. J Urol 180:1279–1283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with daVinci robotic system. Urology 64:914–918

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weizer AZ, Gaetano VP, Montgomery JS, Miller DC, Hafez KS (2011) Robotic-assisted retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy: technique and perioperative results. J Endourol 25(4):553–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Mayank Patel None; James Porter, M.D., is a speaker for Intuitive Surgical.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Porter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patel, M., Porter, J. Robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy. World J Urol 31, 1377–1382 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1038-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1038-y

Keywords

Navigation