Skip to main content
  • 139 Accesses

Abstract

Despite the potential for increased integration as our nation’s student enrollment becomes increasingly racially diverse, school segregation has intensified since the peak of desegregation in the 1980s (Frankenberg et al. 2019). Deepening school segregation can be attributed to numerous causes, including changes in case law that influence student assignment policies (Orfield and Eaton 1996; Siegel-Hawley and Frankenberg 2011), school districts having been released from court-ordered desegregation (Reardon et al. 2012), residential segregation (Denton 2001; Frankenberg 2013), and shifting educational priorities from equity and access to excellence, competition, and choice (Petrovich and Wells 2005). A lack of political will, and in some cases an outright hostility toward integration, also contribute to intensifying segregation. This chapter explores how the national sociopolitical context, largely driven by former President Donald Trump and Michigan-native, former Secretary of Education Betsy DeVosBetsy DeVos, undermines school integrationintegration efforts, and in doing so, makes these efforts even more imperative. A cornerstone of the Trump Administration, unregulated choice in the form of charter schools, tends to stratify and segregate students along the lines of race, class, and achievement (Cobb and Glass 2009). An examination of charter school segregationsegregation trends at various levels, including national, state (Michigan), and local (Detroit), confirms that, in general, charter schools tend to be more segregated than traditional public schoolspublic schools, barring students and communities from accessing the benefits of desegregated schooling that have been documented through decades of social science research. Finally, suggestions are offered regarding how state and local leaders could pursue school desegregation efforts, despite the broader context in which the proliferation of charter schools inhibits school desegregation efforts.

Unless our children begin to learn together, there is little hope that our people will ever begin to live together.

—Justice Thurgood Marshall, Milliken v. Bradley, 1974

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    At the local level, Detroit’s charter sector is not reflective of the state’s charter sector. As will be discussed later in this chapter, Detroit’s charter sector is predominantly Black.

Bibliography

  • Allport, Gordon Williard. 1954. The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayscue, Jenn, Amy Hawn Nelson, Roslyn Mickelson, Jason Giersch, and Martha Cecilia Bottia 2018. “Charters as a driver of resegregation.” Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balfanz, Robert, and Nettie Legters. 2004. “Locating the dropout crisis: Which high schools produce the nation’s dropouts?” In Dropouts in America: Confronting the graduation crisis edited by Gary Orfield, 57–84. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braddock, Jomills, and James M. McPartland. 1989. Social-psychological processes that perpetuate racial segregation: The relationship between school and employment desegregation. Journal of Black Studies, 19, no. 3: 267–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, Jennifers, and Christine MacDonald. 2017. “Despite gains, Mich. schools among most segregated.” The Detroit News. December 04, 2017. http://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/education/2017/12/04/michigan-schools-education-segregated/108295160/.

  • Clotfelter, Charles T., Helen F. Ladd, and Jacob L. Vigdor. 2005. “Classroom-level segregation and resegregation in North Carolina.” In School resegregation: Must the South turn back?, Edited by John Charles Boger, and Gary Orfield, 70–86. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clotfelter, Charles T., Helen F. Ladd, and Jacob L. Vigdor. 2010. Teacher mobility, school segregation, and pay-based policies to level the playing field. Education, Finance, and Policy, 6, no. 3: 399–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, Cassey D., and Gene V. Glass. 2009. School choice in a post-desegregation world. Peabody Journal of Education, 84, no. 2: 262–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costello, Maurine B. 2016. “The Trump effect: The impact of the presidential campaign on our nation’s schools.” Montgomery, AL: Southern Poverty Law Center. https://www.splcenter.org/sites/default/files/splc_the_trump_effect.pdf.

  • David, Rebecca, Kevin Hasla, and Susan Aud Pendergrass. 2017. “A growing movement: America’s largest public charter school communities.” Washington, DC: National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. https://www.publiccharters.org/sites/default/files/documents/2017-10/Enrollment_Share_Report_Web_0.pdf.

  • Denton, Nancy A. 2001. “The persistence of segregation: Links between residential segregation and school segregation.” In In pursuit of a dream deferred: Linking housing and education policy, edited by John A. Powell, Gavin Kearney, and Vina Kay. 89–119. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diverse Charter Schools Coalition. 2018. “Our members.” http://diversecharters.org/members/.

  • Douglas-Gabriel, Daniel and Tracy Jan. 2017. “DeVos called HBCUs ‘pioneers’ of ‘school choice.’ It didn’t go over well.” The Washington Post, February 28, 2017. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/grade-point/wp/2017/02/28/devos-called-hbcus-pioneers-of-school-choice-it-didnt-go-over-well/?utm_term=.535b4c2a0f95.

  • Einhorn, Erin. 2016. “Detroit just created its first intentionally diverse charter school. Here’s why it might not stay that way.” Chalkbeat. November 30, 2016. https://www.chalkbeat.org/posts/detroit/2016/11/30/detroit-just-created-its-first-intentionally-diverse-charter-school-heres-why-it-might-not-stay-that-way/.

  • Frankenberg, Erica. 2013. “The role of residential segregation in contemporary school segregation.” Education and Urban Society, 45, no. 5: 548–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberg, Erica, Jongyeon Ee, Jennifer B. Ayscue, and Gary Orfield. 2019. “Harming our common future: America’s segregated schools 65 years after Brown.” Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project/ Proyecto Derechos Civiles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberg, Erica and Genevieve Siegel-Hawley. 2009. “Equity overlooked: Charter schools and civil rights policy.” Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberg, Erica, Genevieve Siegel-Hawley, and Jia Wang. 2010. “Choice without equity: Charter school segregation and the need for civil rights standards.” Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, Lori. 2017. “Report: For-profit run charter schools perform worse.” Detroit Free Press, June 17, 2017. https://www.freep.com/story/news/education/2017/06/18/charter-schools-profit-performance/393071001/.

  • Jackson, Kibaro. 2009. “Student demographics, teacher sorting, and teacher quality: Evidence from the end of school desegregation.” Journal of Labor Economics, 27, no. 2: 213–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Rucker C. 2011. “Long-run impacts of school desegregation and school quality on adult attainments.” Working Paper 16664. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w16664/w16664.pdf.

  • Kahlenberg, Richard D., and Halley Potter. 2014. A smarter charter: Finding what works for charter schools and public education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurlaender, Michal, and John T. Yun. 2005. “Fifty years after Brown: New evidence of the impact of school racial composition on student outcomes.” International Journal of Educational Policy, Research and Practice, 6, no. 1: 51–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonhardt, David, and Ian Prasad Philbrick. 2018. “Donald Trump’s racism: The definitive list.” The New York Times, January 15, 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/01/15/opinion/leonhardt-trump-racist.html.

  • Linn, Robert L., and Kevin Welner. 2007. “Race-conscious policies for assigning students to schools: Social science research and the Supreme Court cases.” Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, German. 2018. “Trump’s defenders are willfully ignoring the broader context of his ‘shithole’ comments.” Vos, January 12, 2018. https://www.vox.com/identities/2018/1/12/16882716/trump-shithole-racism-haiti-africa (accessed October 25, 2021).

  • Malkus, Nat. 2016a. “Differences on balance: National comparisons of charter and traditional public schools.” Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute. https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Differences-on-balance.pdf?x91208.

  • Malkus, Nat. 2016b. Unlike their neighbors: comparisons of charter and traditional public schools across states. The Free Library (October 1), https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Unliketheirneighbors:comparisonsofcharterandtraditionalpublic...-a0470369810 (accessed October 25, 2021).

  • McVicar, Brian. 2017. “Charter schools could give enrollment preference to low-income students under House bill.” MLive, May 18, 2017. http://www.mlive.com/news/index.ssf/2017/05/charter_schools_could_grant_en.html.

  • Michigan Department of Education. Racial census report by school districts 2016–2017. Detroit, MI: Michigan Department of Education, 2017a, https://www.michigan.gov/documents/mde/RacialCensus0506_204440_7.pdf (accessed October 25, 2021).

  • Michigan Department of Education. Michigan charter schools—Questions and answers. Detroit, MI: Michigan Department of Education, 2017b, https://www.michigan.gov/documents/PSAQA_54517_7.pdf (accessed October 25, 2021).

  • Mickelson, Roslyn Arlin, Martha Cecilia Bottia, and Richard Lambert 2013. “Effects of school racial composition on K-12 mathematics outcomes: A metaregression analysis.” Review of Educational Research, 83, no. 1: 121–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mickelson, Roslyn Arlin, Martha Cecilia Bottia, Savannah Larimore, and Richard Lambert (2016). “The effects of school composition on k-12 reading and math achievement.” In School integration matters, edited by Erica Frankenberg, Liliana M. Garces, and Megan Hopkins, 56–72. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mickelson, Roslyn Arlin, and Mokubung Nkomo. 2012. “Integrated schooling, life course outcomes, and social cohesion in multiethnic democratic societies.” Review of Research in Education, 36, no. 1 (January): 197–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miron, Giron, and Charisse Gulosino. 2013. Profiles of for-profit and nonprofit education management organizations: Fourteenth edition 2011–2012. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. https://nepc.colorado.edu/sites/default/files/emo-profiles-11-12.pdf (accessed October 25, 2021).

  • Moreno, Ivan, Larry Fenn, and Michael Melia. 2017. “US charter schools put growing numbers in racial isolation.” Milwaukee, WI: Associated Press, December 3, 2017. https://apnews.com/e9c25534dfd44851a5e56bd57454b4f5.

  • National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. 2012. Details from the dashboard: Charter school race/ethnicity demographics. Washington, DC: National Alliance for Public Charter Schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orfield, Gary. 1969. The reconstruction of Southern education: The schools and the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orfield, Gary, and Susan E. Eaton. 1996. Dismantling desegregation: The quiet reversal of Brown v. Board of Education. New York, NY: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrovich, Janice, and Amy Stuart Wells. 2005. Bringing equity back: Research for a new era in American educational policy. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, Thomas F., and Linda R. Tropp. 2006. “A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, no. 5: 751–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, Sean F., Elena Grewal, Demetra Kalogrides, and Erica Greenberg 2012. “Brown fades The end of court-ordered school desegregation and the resegregation of American public schools.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31, no. 4: 876–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, Sean F., John T. Yun, and Tamela McNulty Eitle. 2000. “The changing structure of school segregation: Measurement and evidence of multiracial metropolitan-area school segregation, 1989–1995.” Demography, 37, no. 2: 351–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, Gary, Nathan Jensen, Brian Kisida, and Josh B. McGee. 2010. “A closer look at charter schools and segregation: Flawed comparisons lead to overstated conclusions”. Education Next, 10, no. 3: 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, John. 2017. “Teaching and learning in the age of Trump: Increasing stress and hostility in America’s high schools.” Los Angeles, CA: UCLA’s Institute for Democracy, Education, and Access.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumberger, Russell. 2003. “The causes and consequences of student mobility.” The Journal of Negro Education, 72, no. 1: 6–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Janelle. 2009. “The politics of venture philanthropy in charter school policy and advocacy.” Educational Policy, 23, no. 1: 106–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel-Hawley, Genevieve. 2012. “How non-minority students also benefit from racially diverse schools.” Washington, DC: The National Coalition on School Diversity. October 12, 2020. https://www.school-diversity.org/pdf/DiversityResearchBriefNo8.pdf.

  • Siegel-Hawley, Genevieve, and Erica Frankenberg. 2011. “Redefining diversity: Political responses to the post-PICS environment.” Peabody Journal of Education, 86, no. 5: 529–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Tovia. 2017. “As white supremacists push onto campuses, schools wrestle with response.” National Public Radio, May 12, 2017. https://www.npr.org/2017/05/12/527985172/as-white-supremacists-push-onto-campuses-schools-wrestle-with-response

  • Swanson, Christopher B. 2004. “Sketching a portrait of public high school graduation: Who graduates? Who doesn’t?” In Dropouts in America: Confronting the graduation rate crisis, edited by Gary Orfield, 13–40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tropp, Linda, and Mary A. Prenovost. 2008. “The role of intergroup contact in predicting children’s interethnic attitudes: Evidence from meta-analytic and field studies.” In Intergroup attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood, edited by Levy, Sheri V., and Melanie Killen, 236–48. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. 2017. American factfinder. Community facts. Detroit city, Michigan: U.S. Census Bureau. https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/community_facts.xhtml?src=bkmk

  • U.S. Department of Education. 2014. Charter schools program, Title V, Part B of the ESEA, Nonregulatory guidance. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. www2.ed.gov/programs/charter/fy14cspnonregguidance.doc.

  • U.S. Department of Education 2017a. Secretary’s proposed supplemental priorities and definitions for discretionary grant programs. Federal Register Notice Doc. No. 82 FR 47484, 47484-47493. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/10/12/2017-22127/secretarys-proposed-supplemental-priorities-and-definitions-for-discretionary-grant-programs.

  • U.S. Department of Education. 2017b. Improving outcomes for all students: Strategies and considerations to increase student diversity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, Amy Stuart, and Robert L. Crain. 1994. “Perpetuation theory and the long-term effects of school desegregation.” Review of Educational Research, 64, no. 4: 531–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welner, Kevin G. 2013. “The Dirty Dozen: How Charter Schools Influence Student Enrollment.” Teachers College Record, April 22, 2013. http://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 17104.

  • Wermund, Benjamin. 2017. “DeVos closes civil rights complaints at a faster clip than predecessor.” Politico, August 10, 2017. https://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/10/devos-closes-civil-rights-complaints-at-faster-clip-than-predecessors-241483.

  • Yun, John T., and José F. Moreno. 2006. “College access, K-12 concentrated disadvantage, and the next 25 years of education research.” Educational Researcher, 35, no. 1: 12–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer B. Ayscue .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ayscue, J.B. (2022). Charter School Segregation in Detroit. In: Ivery, C.L., Bassett, J.A. (eds) Detroit and the New Political Economy of Integration in Public Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99796-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99796-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-99795-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-99796-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics