Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the perceptions of 60 in-service teachers’ regarding the use of drones through mobile applications. After a brief introduction to drones’ applications, practices and operation through mobile apps, the sample completed tasks that required assembling, programming, simulating and flying drones. Data were collected via an online questionnaire using open-ended questions adapted from the Technology Acceptance Model, namely perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness and facilitating conditions. The results showed positive perceptions on using drones through mobile applications. Regarding perceived ease of use, teachers deemed smartphone to drone pairing, programming and simulating mobile apps, and flying the drone to be easy tasks. Regarding perceived usefulness, teachers believed that the use of drones through mobile applications will be useful for them and for their pupils’ learning and will help students to develop a number of skills. Regarding facilitating conditions, teachers indicated the need for teacher training on the pedagogical use of drones, assistance on visual programming and infrastructure support. This study has a number of implications regarding the use of drones through mobile apps in teaching as well as the need for further research on the field of educational aerial robotics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Magistretti, S., Dell’Era, C.: Unveiling opportunities afforded by emerging technologies: evidences from the drone industry. Technol. Anal. Strategic Manage. 31, 606–623 (2018)
Coşkun, S., Kayıkcı, Y., Gençay, E.: Adapting engineering education to industry 4.0 Vision. Technologies 7(1), 10 (2019)
Feron, E., Johnson, E.: Aerial Robotics. In: Siciliano, B., Khatib, O. (eds.) Springer Handbook of Robotics. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Vergouw, B., Nagel, H., Bondt, G., Custers, B.: Drone technology: types, payloads, applications, frequency spectrum issues and future developments. In: Custers, B. (ed.) The Future of Drone Use. ITLS, vol. 27, pp. 21–45. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-132-6_2
Tezza, D., Garcia, S., Andujar, M.: Let’s Learn! An Initial guide on using drones to teach STEM for children. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) HCII 2020. LNCS, vol. 12206, pp. 530–543. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50506-6_36
Farr, V., Light, G.: Integrated STEM helps drone education fly. In: 2019 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (2019)
Carnahan, C., Crowley, K., Hummel, L., Sheehy, L.: New perspectives on education: drones in the classroom. In: Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (2016)
Yamamori, K.: Classroom practices of low-cost STEM education using scratch. J. Adv. Res. Soc. Sci. Hum. 4(6), 192–198 (2019)
Hoffert, F.D.: Examining the possibility of using programming language with low-cost drones. In: International Conference on Applied Computer and Communication Technologies (2017)
Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M.: Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice-Hall, NJ (1980)
Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50(2), 179–211 (1991)
Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319 (1989)
Clarke, R.: Understanding the drone epidemic. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 30(3), 230–246 (2014)
Hassanalian, M., Abdelkefi, A.: Classifications, applications, and design challenges of drones: a review. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 91, 99–131 (2017)
Daponte, P., De Vito, L., Lamonaca, F., Picariello, F., Rapuano, S., Riccio, M.: Measurement science and education in the drone times. In: IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (2017)
Chou, P.-N.: Smart technology for sustainable curriculum: using drone to support young students’ learning. Sustainability 10(10), 3819 (2018)
Bouck, E.C., Working, C., Bone, E.: Manipulative apps to support students with disabilities in mathematics. Interv. Sch. Clin. 53(3), 177–182 (2017)
Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M.: Mobile educational applications for children: what educators and parents need to know. Int. J. Mob. Learn. Organ. 11(3), 256–277 (2017)
DJI Virtual flight. https://www.dji.com/es/downloads/djiapp/dji-virtual-flight. Accessed 22 Jun 2021
Tilley, E., Gray, J.: Dronely: a visual block programming language for the control of drones. In: Proceedings of the SouthEast Conference (2017)
Tynker. https://www.tynker.com/mobile/. Accessed 22 Jun 2021
Droneblocks, https://www.droneblocks.io/. Accessed 22 Jun 2021
Voštinár, P., Horváthová, D., Klimová, N.: The programmable drone for STEM education. In: Clua, E., Roque, L., Lugmayr, A., Tuomi, P. (eds.) ICEC 2018. LNCS, vol. 11112, pp. 205–210. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99426-0_18
Joyce, K.E., Meiklejohn, N., Mead, P.C.H.: Using minidrones to teach geospatial technology fundamentals. Drones 4(3), 57 (2020)
Scherer, R., Teo, T.: Unpacking teachers’ intentions to integrate technology: a meta-analysis. Educ. Res. Rev. 27, 90–109 (2019)
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., Tondeur, J.: The technology acceptance model (TAM): a meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Comput. Educ. 128, 13–35 (2019)
Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage. Sci. 35(8), 982–1003 (1989)
Huang, L.: Acceptance of mobile learning in classroom instruction among college English teachers in China using an extended TAM. In: Proceedings of International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (2017)
Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Olmos-Migueláñez, S., García-Peñalvo, F. J.: MLearning and pre-service teachers: an assessment of the behavioral intention using an expanded TAM model. Comput. Hum. Behav. 72, 644–654 (2017)
Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S.: Evaluating pre-service kindergarten teachers’ intention to adopt and use tablets into teaching practice for natural sciences. Int. J. Mob. Learn. Organ. 13(1), 113 (2019)
Islamoglu, H., Kabakci Yurdakul, I., Ursavas, O.F.: Pre-service teachers’ acceptance of mobile-technology-supported learning activities. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 69(2), 1025–1054 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09973-8
Shodipe, T.O., Ohanu, I.B.: Electrical/electronic technology education teacher’s attitude, engagement, and disposition towards actual usage of Mobile learning in higher institutions. Educ. Inf. Technol. 26(1), 1023–1042 (2020)
Sadaf, A., Newby, T.J., Ertmer, P.A.: Exploring pre-service teachers’ beliefs about using web 2.0 technologies in K-12 classroom. Comput. Educ. 59, 937–945 (2012)
Smarkola, C.: Efficacy of a planned behavior model: beliefs that contribute to computer usage intentions of student teachers and experienced teachers. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24, 1196–1215 (2008)
Koutromanos, G., Mavromatidou, E.: Augmented reality books: what student teachers believe about their use in teaching. In: Tsiatsos, T., Demetriadis, S., Mikropoulos, A., Dagdilelis, V. (eds.) Research on E-Learning and ICT in Education, pp. 75–91. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64363-8_5
Corbin, J., Strauss, A.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sivenas, T., Koutromanos, G. (2022). Using Mobile Applications to Interact with Drones: A Teachers’ Perception Study. In: Auer, M.E., Tsiatsos, T. (eds) New Realities, Mobile Systems and Applications. IMCL 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 411. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96296-8_59
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96296-8_59
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-96295-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-96296-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)