Skip to main content

Anterior Cervical Approaches: Decompression and Fusion with Cages

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cervical Spine

Abstract

The preferred approach for fusion of the middle cervical spine (C3–C7) and cervicothoracic junction is the anterior one.

During 1950 a novel cervical spine surgical technique emerged: in 1955 Smith G.W. and Robinson R.A. developed a surgical technique concerning anterior removal of cervical disc and replace it with a rectangular bone graft.

Afterwards, Cloward in 1958 developed a different technique which consists in milling the anterior profile between two adjacent vertebras, filling it with a bone cylindrical autograft dowel, after the disc removal (Cloward RB, J Neurosurg. 15(6):602–17, 1958).

At today, Anterior Cervical Discectomy and fusion (ACDF), as Cloward or Smith Robinson designed, is worldwidely adopted (Fig. 14.1).

Nowadays, fusion is performed with cages, stand-alone, or reinforced with plates or with a posterior instrumentation. A new type of stand-alone cage, provided with lag screws, work as a cage-plate construct with a single implantable.

We personally prefer this new cages, manufactured with a low profile and biomechanically comparable to the standard cages with a separate plate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cloward RB. The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg. 1958;15(6):602–17. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1958.15.6.0602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, Quintens E, Waerzeggers Y, Depreitere B, Van Calenbergh F, van Loon J. Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004;17(2):79–85. https://doi.org/10.1097/00024720-200404000-00001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ebraheim NA, Lu J, Skie M, Heck BE, Yeasting RA. Vulnerability of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in the anterior approach to the lower cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22(22):2664–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199711150-00015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kilburg C, Sullivan HG, Mathiason MA. Effect of approach side during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion on the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;4(4):273–7. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2006.4.4.273.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheung KM, Mak KC, Luk KD. Anterior approach to cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(5):E297–302. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318239ccd8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nassr A, Lee JY, Bashir RS, Rihn JA, Eck JC, Kang JD, Lim MR. Does incorrect level needle localization during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion lead to accelerated disc degeneration? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(2):189–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181913872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Watters WC 3rd, Levinthal R. Anterior cervical discectomy with and without fusion. Results, complications, and long-term follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994;19(20):2343–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199410150-00016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Epstein JA, Carras R, Lavine LS, Epstein BS. The importance of removing osteophytes as part of the surgical treatment of myeloradiculopathy in cervical spondylosis. J Neurosurg. 1969;30(3):219–26. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1969.30.3part1.0219.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Song KJ, Lee KB. A preliminary study of the use of cage and plating for single-segment fusion in degenerative cervical spine disease. J Clin Neurosci. 2006;13(2):181–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2005.02.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen Y, Chen H, Wu X, Wang X, Lin W, Yuan W. Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes between zero-profile implant and cages with plate fixation in treating multilevel cervical spondilotic myelopathy: a three-year follow-up. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016;144:72–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.03.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheung ZB, Gidumal S, White S, Shin J, Phan K, Osman N, Bronheim R, Vargas L, Kim JS, Cho SK. Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a stand-alone interbody cage versus a conventional cage-plate technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Global Spine J. 2019;9(4):446–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568218774576.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Scholz M, Reyes PM, Schleicher P, Sawa AG, Baek S, Kandziora F, Marciano FF, Crawford NR. A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(2):156–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818ff9c4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lu VM, Mobbs RJ, Fang B, Phan K. Clinical outcomes of locking stand-alone cage versus anterior plate construct in two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2019;28(1):199–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5811-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Balsano, M., Vacchiano, A., Spina, M., Ulgelmo, M., Calzi, D. (2022). Anterior Cervical Approaches: Decompression and Fusion with Cages. In: Menchetti, P.P.M. (eds) Cervical Spine. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94829-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94829-0_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-94828-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-94829-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics