Skip to main content

Interpretable Models via Pairwise Permutations Algorithm

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (ECML PKDD 2021)

Abstract

One of the most common pitfalls often found in high dimensional biological data sets are correlations between the features. This may lead to statistical and machine learning methodologies overvaluing or undervaluing these correlated predictors, while the truly relevant ones are ignored. In this paper, we will define a new method called pairwise permutation algorithm (PPA) with the aim of mitigating the correlation bias in feature importance values. Firstly, we provide a theoretical foundation, which builds upon previous work on permutation importance. PPA is then applied to a toy data set, where we demonstrate its ability to correct the correlation effect. We further test PPA on a microbiome shotgun dataset, to show that the PPA is already able to obtain biological relevant biomarkers.

T. Maasland and J. Pereira—Equal contribution to this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kiers, H., Smilde, A.: A comparison of various methods for multivariate regression with highly collinear variables. Stat. Meth. Appl. 16, 193 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Breiman, L.: Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1), 5–32 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fisher, A., Rudin, C., Dominici, F.: Model class reliance: variable importance measures for any machine learning model class, from the “Rashomon” perspective (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Strobl, C., Boulesteix, A.L., Kneib, T., Augustin, T., Zeileis, A.: Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinform. 9, 307 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lundberg, S.M., Lee, S.-I.: A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ribeiro, M., Singh, S., Guestrin, C.: Why should i trust you?: explaining the predictions of any classifier. eprint arXiv:1602.04938 (2016)

  7. Pereira, J., Groen, A.K., Stroes, E.S.G., Levin, E.: Graph space embedding. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Main Track, pp. 3253–3259 (2019). https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2019/451

  8. Shrikumar, A., Greenside, P., Kundaje, A.: Learning important features through propagating activation differences. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.02685 (2017)

  9. Kootte, R.S., et al.: Improvement of insulin sensitivity after lean donor feces in metabolic syndrome is driven by baseline intestinal microbiota composition. Cell Metab. 26, 611–619 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ojala, M., Garriga, G.C.: Permutation tests for studying classifier performance. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11, 1833–1863 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hooker, G., Mentch, L.: Please stop permuting features an explanation and alternatives. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.03151v1 (2019)

  12. Grömping, U.: Variable importance assessment in regression: linear regression versus Random Forest. Am. Stat. 63(4), 308–319 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1198/tast.2009.08199

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Tolosi, L., Lengauer, T.: Classification with correlated features: unreliability of feature ranking and solutions. Bioinformatics 27(14), 1986–1994 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gregorutti, B., Michel, B., Saint-Pierre, P.: Correlation and variable importance in random forests. Stat. Comput. 27(3), 659–678 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-016-9646-1

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Imangaliyev, S., Keijser, B., Crielaard, W., Tsivtsivadze, E.: Personalized microbial network inference via co-regularized spectral clustering. Methods 83, 28–35 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ishwaran, H., et al.: Variable importance in binary regression trees and forests. Electron. J. Stat. 1, 519–537 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Caruana, R., Niculescu-Mizil, A., Crew, G., et al.: Ensemble selection from libraries of models. In: 21st International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2004, vol. 18. ACM (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, T., Guestrin, C.: XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 785–794. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Meinshausen, N., Bühlmann, P.: Stability selection. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Stat. Methodol.) 72, 417–473 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Vangay, P., Hillmann, B.M., Knights, D.: Microbiome Learning Repo (ML Repo): a public repository of microbiome regression and classification tasks. GigaScience 8, 1–12 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Qin, J., Li, Y., Cai, Z., et al.: A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature 490, 55–60 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cohen, M.R.: The New Chinese Medicine Handbook: An Innovative Guide to Integrating Eastern Wisdom with Western Practice for Modern Healing, Fair Winds Press (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chang, S.Y., Kim, D.-H., Han, M.J.: Physicochemical and sensory characteristics of soy yogurt fermented with Bifidobacterium breve K-110, Streptococcus thermophilus 3781, or Lactobacillus acidophilus Q509011. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 19, 107–113 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-010-0015-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bedani, R., Rossi, E.A., Isay Saad, S.M.: Impact of inulin and okara on Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis Bb-12 viability in a fermented soy product and probiotic survival under in vitro simulated gastrointestinal conditions. Food Microbiol. 34(2), 382–389 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kanda, H., Wang, H.L., Hesseltine, C.W., et al.: Yoghurt production by Lactobacillus fermentation of soybean milk. Process Biochem. 11(4), 23 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kwon, D.Y., Daily, J.W., III., Kim, H.J.: Antidiabetic effects of fermented soybean products on type 2 diabetes. Nutr. Res. 30(1), 1–13 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mueller, N.T., Odegaard, A.O., Gross, M.D., et al.: Soy intake and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Chinese Singaporeans. Eur. J. Nutr. 51, 1033–1040 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Münger, L.H., Trimigno, A., Picone, G., et al.: Identification of urinary food intake biomarkers for milk, cheese, and soy-based drink by untargeted GC-MS and NMR in healthy humans. J. Proetome Res. 16(9), 3321–3335 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cook, G.M., Wells, J.E., Russell, J.B.: Ability of Acidaminococcus Fermentans to oxidize trans-aconitate and decrease the accumulation of tricarballylate, a toxic end product of ruminal fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60(7), 2533–2537 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Moens, F., Verce, M., De Vuyst, L.: Lactate- and acetate-based cross-feeding interactions betweeen selected strains of Lactobacilli. Bifidobacteria and colon bacteria in the presence of inulin-type fructans. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 241, 225–236 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Saulnier, D.M.A., Spinler, J.K., Gibson, G.R., et al.: Mechanisms of Probiosis and Prebiosis: considerations for enhanced functional foods. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 20(2), 135–141 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. de Goffau, M.C., Luopajärvi, K., Knip, M., et al.: Fecal microbiota composition differs between children with beta-cell autoimmunity and those without. Diabetes 62(4), 1238–1244 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hur, K.Y., Lee, M.-S.: Gut microbiota and metabolic disorders. Diabetes Metab. J. 39(3), 198–203 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hartstra, A.V., Bouter, K.E.C., Bäckhed, F., et al.: Insights into the role of the microbiome in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 38(1), 159–165 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Murri, M., Leiva, I., Gomez-Zumaquero, J.M., et al.: Gut microbiota in children with type 1 diabetes differs from that in healthy children: a case-control study. BMC Med. 11, 46 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Noureldein, M.H., Bitar, S., Youssef, N.: Butyrate modulates Diabetes-linked gut dysbiosis: epigenetic and mechanistic modifications. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 64(1), 29–42 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Endesfelder, D., Engel, M., Davis-Richardson, A.G., et al.: Towards a functional hypothesis relating anti-islet cell autoimmunity to the dietary impact on microbial communities and butyrate production. Microbiome 4, 17 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jia, L., Li, D., Feng, N., et al.: Anti-diabetic effects of clostridium butyricum CGMCC0313.1 through promoting the growth of gut butyrate-producing bacteria in Type 2 Diabetic Mice. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 7046 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Khan, S., Jena, G.: Sodium butyrate reduces insulin-resistance, fat accumulation and dyslipidemia in Type-2 Diabetic rat: a comparative study with metformin. Chem. Biol. Interact. 254, 124–134 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Donohoe, D.R., Garge, N., Zhang, X., et al.: The microbiome and butyrate regulate energy metabolism and autophagy in the mammalian colon. Cell Metab. 13(5), 517–526 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pereira, J., Groen, A.K., Stroes, E.S.G., Levin, E.: Graph space embedding. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2019 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sharma, S., Taliyan, R.: Histone deacetylase inhibitors: future therapeutics for insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Pharmacol. Res. 113(Pt A), 320–326 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Dirice, E., Ng, R.W.S., Martinez, R., et al.: Isoform-selective inhibitor of histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) limits pancreatic islet infiltration and protects female nonobese diabetic mice from diabetes. J. Biol. Chem. 292(43), 17598–17608 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Khan, S., Jena, G.: The role of butyrate, a histone deacetylase inhibitor in diabetes mellitus: experimental evidence for therapeutic intervention. Epigenomics 7(4), 669–680 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Canfora, E.E., Jocken, J.W., Blaak, E.E.: Short-chain fatty acids in control of body weight and insulin sensitivity. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 11(10), 577–591 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Manon Balvers for helping with computational experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evgeni Levin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Maasland, T. et al. (2021). Interpretable Models via Pairwise Permutations Algorithm. In: Kamp, M., et al. Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases. ECML PKDD 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1524. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93736-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93736-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-93735-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-93736-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics