Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Production of Smelter Grade Alumina (SGA) by Calcination

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Smelter Grade Alumina from Bauxite

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Materials Science ((SSMATERIALS,volume 320))

  • 788 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter covers the changes in calcination technology, energy consumption, air pollution control and quality of SGA developed over time since the end of the 2nd World War and up until today. The demand for SGA with high specific surface area ranging from 50 to 80 m2/g (BET method) originated from the alumina smelter customers driven by the increasing need to capture HF gas emitted from the smelter cell’s by so-called Dry-Scrubbing with virgin alumina in Gas Treatment Centers (GTC) located at the alumina smelter. The physio-chemisorbed HF on the virgin alumina collected in the GTC as secondary alumina, was then fed to the alumina smelter cells, or pots, via pot feeding systems. This development starting around 1970 made the Floury type SGA, with very low specific surface area around 5 m2/g, obsolete, and Floury SGA was gradually replaced with so-called Sandy type SGA. The oil crisis around 1972 accelerated the development, scale-up and commercialization of stationary calciners for production of SGA initiated by Alcoa in the mid 1950 ties. The 25–30% reduction in specific thermal energy consumption in Rotary Kilns, when compared to Stationary Calciners was a very strong driver. The retention time in the Rotary Kiln was reduced from hours to minutes in Fluidized Bed calciners and from minutes to seconds in Gas Suspension or Flash calciners. Simultaneously with the above development several Rotary Kilns were retrofitted with pre-heater cyclones, and in one case also with a calciner furnaces, to reduce the specific thermal energy consumption and increase the production capacity of SGA. The largest Rotary Kilns for production of SGA had a design capacity of 1400 tpd SGA. This capacity was exceeded several times at Queensland Alumina, Australia, where the new Gas Suspension Calciners installed in 2002–2004 was designed for 4500 tpd SGA, driven by economy of scale. Today, the preferred design capacity of stationary calciners is around 3500 tpd SGA to match the single train production capacity of the Bayer Process circuit in modern alumina refineries. However, the above technology shifts have not come without new challenges to the Bayer process design. One such major challenge is to produce a hydrate quality, which upon calcination to SGA in stationary calciners, results in a particle size distribution and strength as SGA, that meets the specification of the smelters. Driven by environmental requirements of reduced dust emission Queensland Alumina, Australia, as the first in the alumina industry, decided in 2002, to install Baghouses or Fabric filters on their new Gas Suspension Calciners instead of Electrostatic Precipitators (ESPs), in order to avoid excessive dust emission during a power failure. Up until today heavy fuel oil, natural gas and coal gas (CO + H2) is used as fuel in stationary calciners. But the challenges laying ahead with a predicted increase of the global warming of mother earth, makes hydrogen produced by electrolysis powered with renewable energy the preferred fuel for the not so distant future with potential to make the production of SGA CO2 free.

Benny E. Raahauge is deceased.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O. Tschamper,Improvements by the new Alusuisse process for producing coarse aluminium hydrate in the bayer process, in Light Metals, pp. 103–115 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  2. W.C. Sleppy, et al., Non-metallurgical use of alumina and bauxite, in Light Metals, pp. 117–124 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Welch, Chapter 9.12b “aluminum”, in SME mineral processing and extractive metallurgy handbook (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. Ashida, et al., New approaches to phase analysis of smelter grade alumina, in Light Metals, pp. 93–96 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. S.J. Lindsay, Customer impacts of Na2O and CaO in smelter grade alumina, in Light Metals, pp. 163–167 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Ishihare,et al., Conversion of conventional rotary kiln into effective sandy alumina calciner, in Light Metals, pp. 143–152 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Labriot, Modification of rotary kiln for calcination of alumina and metal hydrates, in Light Metals, pp. 153–158 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  8. B.E. Raahauge, et al., Experience with gas suspension calciner for alumina, in Light Metals (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. W.M. Fish, Alumina calcination in the fluid-flash calciner, in Light Metals, pp. 673–682 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Reh, H. W. Schmidt, Application of circulating fluid bed calciners in large scale aluminaplants, in Light Metals, pp. 519–532 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  11. B.E. Raahauge, FLS stationary calciner for alumina—a new simple approach in alumina calcining, in ICSOBA 1979, Calgari, Sardegna, Italy (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  12. T.A. Venugopalan, Experience with gas suspension calciner alumina, in Alumina Quality Workshop, pp. 53–66 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. Reh, New and efficient high-temperature processes with circulating fluidized bed reactors. Chem. Eng. Technol. 18, 75–89 (1995)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Hundebøl, S. Kumar, Retention time of particles in calciners of the cement industry. Zement-Kalk-Gips, Nr. 8, 422–425 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  15. L.M. Perander, et al., Two perspectives on the evolution and future of alumina, in Light Metals, pp. 151–155 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. B.E. Raahauge, N. Devarajan, Experience with particle breakdown in gas suspension calciners, in ICSOBA, Dubai, UAE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Aughinish Alumina—Up-grade project 2001 introducing FLS Cyclone technology

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. Klett, Alumina calcination: a mature technology under review fromsupplier perspective, in Light Metals, pp. 79–84 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Missalla, et al., Significant improvement of energy efficiency in alunorte’s calcination facility, in Light Metals, pp. 157–162 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. Petersen, et al., Application of optimized energy efficient calcination—configuration to AOS stade CFB calciners, in 9th International Alumina Quality Workshop, pp. 371–374 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. K. Yamada, et al., Development of fluid calciner with suspension preheaters, in Light Metals, pp. 159–172 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Pinoncely, K. Tsouria, FCB flash calciner–10 years of experience, in Light Metals, pp. 113–120 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Wischnewski, et al., Alunorte global energy efficiency, in Light Metals, pp. 179–184 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. B.E. Raahauge, et al., Energy saving production of alumina with gas suspension calciner, in Light Metals, pp. 173 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. H.W. Schmidt, et al., Practical experience with operation of Lurgi/VAW—fluid-bed calciners, in Light Metals (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  26. H.W. Schmidt, et al., Alumina calcination with the advanced circulating fluid bed technology, in Light Metals, pp. 129–135 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  27. W.J. Borer, H. Günthard, Lattice energy, lattice constant, and thermodynamic properties of γ–Al2O3. Halvetica Chim. Acta 53(Face.5), 119–120, 1043–1050 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  28. T. Yokokawa, O.J. Kleppa, A calorimetric study of the transformation of some meta stable modifications of alumina to get to α–Al2O3. J. Phys. Chem. 68(11), 3246 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  29. B.E. Raahauge, Thermal energy consumption in gas suspension calciners, in ICSOBA (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  30. D. Kunii, O. Levenspiel, Fluidization Engineering, 2nd edn (Butterworth-Heinemann Series in Chemical Engineering, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  31. L. Perander, et al., Circo CalTM—Pushing energy efficiency to its limit in circulating fluid bed calcination, in ICSOBA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  32. L. Perander, et al. Impact of calciner technologies on smelter grade alumina—micro structure and properties, in 8th International Alumina Quality Workshop, pp. 103–107 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  33. K. Yamada, et al., Dehydration products of gibbsite by rotary kiln and stationary calciner, in Light Metals, pp. 157–171 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. Rouquerol et al., Thermal decomposition of gibbsite under low pressure—I. Formation of boehmitic phase. J. Catal. 36, 90–110 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. D.D. Perlmutter, L. Canela, Pore structures and kinetics of the thermal decomposition of Al(OH)3. AIChE J. 32(9) (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  36. L. Rozic et al., The kinetics of the partial dehydration of gibbsite to activated alumina in a reactor for pneumatic transport. J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 66(4), 240–273 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. S.W. Sucech, C. Misra, Alcoa pressure calcination process for alumina, in TMS Light Metals, pp. 119–124 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Das et al., Thermal decomposition of precipitated fine aluminium trihydroxide. Scand. J. Metall. 33, 211–219 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  39. V.J. Ingram-Jones, et al., Dehydroxylation sequences of gibbsite and boehmite: study of differences between soak and flash calcination and particle size effects. J. Mater. Chem. 6(1), 73–79 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  40. B. Wittington, D. Illevski, Determination of the gibbsite dehydration reaction pathway at conditions relevant to Bayer refineries. Chem. Eng. J. 98, 89–97 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. H. Wang, et al., Kinetic modelling of gibbsite dehydration/amorphization in the temperature range 823–923 K. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 67, 2567–2582 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  42. D. Illevski, New two-stage calcination technology, in 2012, 9th International Alumina Quality Workshop, pp. 364–370 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  43. S. Wind, B.E. Raahauge, Experience with commissioning new generation gas suspension calciner, in Light Metals, pp. 155–162 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  44. A. Taylor, Impacts of the refinery process on the quality of smelter grade alumina, in 2005, 7th International Alumina Quality Workshop, pp. 103–107 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  45. A. Saatci, et al., Attrition behavior of laboratory calcined alumina from various hydrates and its influence on SG alumina quality and calcination design, in TMS Light Metals, pp. 81–86 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  46. C. Klett, et al., Improvement of product quality in circulating fluidized bed calcination, in Light Metals, pp. 33–38 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  47. L. Perander, et al., Reducing particle breakage in alumina calcination, in IBAAS-CHALIECO International Symposium 2013 Proceedings, pp. 65–70 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  48. L. Perander, et al., Coal gasification and impacts on alumina CFB design, in Proceedings of the 10th International Alumina Quality Workshop pp. 243–250 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  49. B.E. Raahauge, J. Nickelsen, Industrial prospects and operational experience with 32 mtpd stationary alumina calciner, in Light Metals, pp. 81–104 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  50. S.C. Libby, Decrepitation of calcined abrasive grade bauxite, Moengo, Surinam, in Light Metals (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  51. N. Brown, T. J. Cole, The behavior of sodium oxalate in Bayer alumina plants, in Light Metals, pp. 105–118 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  52. B.E. Raahauge, et al., Application of gas suspension calciner in relation to Bayer hydrate properties, in The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 1981 Annual Conference, Sydney NSW (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  53. B.E. Raahauge, et al., Energy saving production of alumina with gas suspension calciner, in 111th AIME Annual Meeting, Dallas, US (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  54. S. Wind, C. Jensen-Holm, B.E. Raahauge, Development of particle breakdown and alumna strength during calcination, in Proceedings of the 9th International Alumina Quality Workshop, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  55. B.E. Raahauge, N. Devarajan, Experience driven design improvements of gas suspension calciners, in 11th Alumina Quality Workshop International Conference (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  56. S. Lindsay, Attrition of alumina in smelter handling and scrubbing systems, in Light Metals, pp. 163–168 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  57. W.L. Forsyth, W.R. Hertwig, Attrition characteristics of fluid cracking catalyst. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1200–1206 (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  58. J.D. Zwicker, The generation of fines due to heating of aluminium trihydrate, in Light Metals, pp. 373–395 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  59. J.V. Sang, Factors affecting the attrition strength of alumina products, in Light Metals, pp. 121–127 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  60. J.E. Lopez, I. Quintero, Evaluation of agglomeration stage conditions to control alumina and hydrate particle breakage, in Light Metals, pp. 199–202 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  61. P. Clerin, V. Laurent, Alumina particle breakage in attrition test, in Light Metals, pp. 41–47 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  62. S. Chandraskar, et al., Alumina fines’ journey from cradle to grave, in Proceedings of the 7th International Alumina Quality Workshop (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Rio Tinto—Alcoa Media Release 10 May 2018

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledegements

The author is thankful to all those former colleagues at FLSmidth, who over more than 40 years have contributed with their dedicated and hard work has made the development, commercialization, and commissioning of the Gas Suspension Calcination technology for alumina possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. FLSmidth A/S - Retired, Deceased, General Manager–Pyro and Alumina Technology, Valby, Staden København, Denmark

    Benny E. Raahauge

Authors
  1. Benny E. Raahauge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. FLSmidth A/S, General Manager–Pyro& Alumina Technology, Valby, Staden København, Denmark

    Benny E. Raahauge

  2. Retired Alcoa, Longmont, CO, USA

    Fred S. Williams

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Raahauge, B.E. (2022). Production of Smelter Grade Alumina (SGA) by Calcination. In: Raahauge, B.E., Williams, F.S. (eds) Smelter Grade Alumina from Bauxite. Springer Series in Materials Science, vol 320. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88586-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation