Skip to main content

Combining Implications and Conceptual Analysis to Learn from a Pesticidal Plant Knowledge Base

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Graph-Based Representation and Reasoning (ICCS 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12879))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Supporting organic farming aims to find alternative solutions to synthetic pesticides and antibiotics, using local plants, to protect crops. Moreover, in the One Health approach (OHA), a pesticidal plant should not be harmful to humans, meaning it cannot be toxic if the crop is consumed or should have a limited and conscious use if it is used for medical care. Knowledge on plant use presented in the scientific literature was compiled in a knowledge base (KB). The challenge is to develop a KB exploration method that informs experts (including farmers) about protection systems properties that respect OHA. In this paper, we present a method that extracts the Duquenne-Guigues basis of implications from knowledge structured using Relational Concept Analysis (RCA). We evaluate the impact of three data representations on the implications and their readability. The experimentation is conducted on 562 plant species used to protect 15 crops against 29 pest species of the Noctuidae family. Results show that consistently splitting data into several tables fosters less redundant and more focused implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.lirmm.fr/cogui/.

  2. 2.

    \(Food\_X\) means is consumed; \(Food\_\) means is not consumed, and similarly for \(Medical\_X\) and \(Medical\_\).

References

  1. Bertet, K., Demko, C., Viaud, J.F., Guérin, C.: Lattices, closures systems and implication bases: a survey of structural aspects and algorithms. Theor. Comput. Sci. 743, 93–109 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Dolques, X., Ber, F.L., Huchard, M., Grac, C.: Performance-friendly rule extraction in large water data-sets with AOC posets and relational concept analysis. Int. J. Gener. Syst. 45(2), 187–210 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Fayyad, U.M., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P.: The KDD process for extracting useful knowledge from volumes of data. Commun. ACM 39(11), 27–34 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Frank, D.: One world, one health, one medicine. Can. Vet. J. 49(11), 1063–1065 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis - Mathematical Foundations. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Guigues, J.L., Duquenne, V.: Famille minimale d’implications informatives résultant d’un tableau de données binaires. Math. et Sci. Hum. 24(95), 5–18 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hacene, M.R., Huchard, M., Napoli, A., Valtchev, P.: Relational concept analysis: mining concept lattices from multi-relational data. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 67(1), 81–108 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Janostik, R., Konecny, J., Krajča, P.: Pruning techniques in LinCbO for computation of the Duquenne-Guigues basis. In: Braud, A., Buzmakov, A., Hanika, T., Le Ber, F. (eds.) ICFCA 2021. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12733, pp. 91–106. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77867-5_6

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Keip, P., Ferré, S., Gutierrez, A., Huchard, M., Silvie, P., Martin, P.: Practical comparison of FCA extensions to model indeterminate value of ternary data. In: CLA 2020, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2668, pp. 197–208 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Keip, P., et al.: Effects of input data formalisation in relational concept analysis for a data model with a ternary relation. In: Cristea, D., Le Ber, F., Sertkaya, B. (eds.) ICFCA 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11511, pp. 191–207. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21462-3_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuznetsov, S.O., Poelmans, J.: Knowledge representation and processing with formal concept analysis. Wiley Interd. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Disc. 3(3), 200–215 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Martin, P., et al.: Dataset on noctuidae species used to evaluate the separate concerns in conceptual analysis: application to a life sciences knowledge base (2021). https://doi.org/10.18167/DVN1/HTFE8T

  13. Martin, P., Silvie, P., Sarter, S.: Knomana - usage des plantes á effet pesticide, antimicrobien, antiparasitaire et antibiotique (patent APP IDDN.FR.001.130024.000.S.P.2019.000.31235) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Braud, A., Buzmakov, A., Hanika, T., Le Ber, F. (eds.): ICFCA 2021. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12733. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77867-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Wajnberg, M.: Analyse relationnelle de concepts: une méthode polyvalente pour l’extraction de connaissance. Ph.D. thesis, Université du Québec à Montréal (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wajnberg, M., Valtchev, P., Lezoche, M., Massé, A.B., Panetto, H.: Concept analysis-based association mining from linked data: a case in industrial decision making. In: Proceedings of the Joint Ontology Works. 2019 Episode V: The Styrian Autumn of Ontology. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2518. CEUR-WS.org (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the French National Research Agency under the Investments for the Future Program, referred as ANR-16-CONV-0004.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marianne Huchard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mahrach, L. et al. (2021). Combining Implications and Conceptual Analysis to Learn from a Pesticidal Plant Knowledge Base. In: Braun, T., Gehrke, M., Hanika, T., Hernandez, N. (eds) Graph-Based Representation and Reasoning. ICCS 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12879. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86982-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86982-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86981-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86982-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics