Skip to main content

Offender Motivations and Expectations of Data in Antiquities Looting

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Crime and Art

Part of the book series: Studies in Art, Heritage, Law and the Market ((SAHLM,volume 1))

  • 644 Accesses

Abstract

Understanding offender motivation is key to developing effective crime reduction policies. Criminological theories seeking to explain offender motivations are plentiful—some argue for a pure utilitarian agenda driven by opportunity (rational choice), others for the influence of socially constructed standards of behavior (strain, learning), and still others argue for accounting for multiple layers of influence (crime pattern theory). Though these theories have been used to explain the presence of antiquities looting, few have sought to examine offender motivations specifically due to a lack of data. But what kind of data should those interested in offender motivations be looking for? How does this align with possible underlying theoretical motivations? This study speaks to these questions by first considering how criminological theoretical paradigms account for antiquities looter motivations. Then, it traces how to approach examining looting motivation by identifying the types of evidence and data needed to test theoretical predictions and which methodologies would be appropriate for such an analysis. Finally, this study demonstrates this approach using case study featuring a newly collected spatiotemporal dataset on antiquities looting in Egypt. Looking from 2015 to 2017, this study will determine what can be learned about possible offender motivations in Egypt at this time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Accessing international crime statistics that are consistently available for multiple time periods (e.g., for longitudinal analysis) is a well-established issue. The United Nations has dedicated projects around the world to establish reliable methodologies and standards for international crime statistics (UN, 2017). Though availability of statistics has improved overall, there remains inconsistent availability longitudinally and the types of statistics available are country dependent. Countries with a history of or actively involved in conflict tend to have the least availability for crime statistics. This is mirrored in data available from other sources like the World Bank.

  2. 2.

    Criminological theories are more commonly applied to explain behavior within the art market, including techniques of neutralisation (Conklin, 1994; Mackenzie & Yates, 2016) and routine activity theory (Mackenzie & Green, 2009). These studies are able to access more varied data sources with a focus on how assumptions of offender motivations across theories can serve to improve preventative measures (e.g., through deterrence). This study focuses on how criminological theory can assist in understanding offender motivation specifically in the area of antiquities looting.

  3. 3.

    Other conceptualisations have also been offered in the literature. Fabiani (2018) offers ‘opportunistic’ and ‘strategic’ looters as a means of bypassing the implied mutual exclusivity between victim, criminal, and professional. Mac Ginty (2004) offered a typology of looting from a political science perspective, rejecting the premise that looting can be considered from a criminological lens since the crime of theft ignores important socio-political contexts.

  4. 4.

    This heuristic is based on my analysis of offender motivation in criminological theory. The presentation is informed Coyne and Eck’s (2014) representation of the differing levels of influence of situational choice in offender decision-making.

  5. 5.

    Lower Egypt refers to Egypt’s northern Delta region.

  6. 6.

    One approach would be to seek approval and funding for a community- or individual-level study in the area. Yet there may be any number of reasons such studies have not been undertaken in Egypt–inability to travel to the region of interest (e.g., due to conflict, global pandemics, etc.) or the inability to secure funding and appropriate permissions.

  7. 7.

    Tourist arrivals measure the portion of Egypt’s economy related to cultural heritage.

  8. 8.

    It is important to note that none of these theoretical relationships can be examined from a causal perspective in this case study.

  9. 9.

    Lower Egypt contains 13 governorates (geopolitical border akin to states in the United States) in the Nile Delta: Alexandria, Beheira, Cairo, Damietta, Daqahliyah, Al Gharbiyah, Ismailia, Kafr es Sheikh, Al Minufiyah, Port Said, Qalyubiyah, Al Sharqiyah, and Suez. Suez is excluded from this database due to an inability to identify any geo-coded archaeological site locations.

  10. 10.

    Coding for evidence of archaeological looting involved a set procedure to ensure consistency of coding: (1) creating a boundary around each site, (2) coding each source of imagery separately according to which has the earliest image per site and comparing sequences of imagery to detect change, (3) reviewing, validating, and aggregating the data. See Fabiani (2019) for a full description of the data collection. Detailed coding procedures are available at www.michellefabiani.com.

  11. 11.

    Data for socio-political stress were compiled from the Global Terrorism Database (GTD), Armed Conflict Location and Event Database (ACLED), and the Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP).

  12. 12.

    Overlaying a spatial grid on an area creates uniform more granular spatial units of analysis. See Fabiani (2019) for more information.

  13. 13.

    Operationalisations for all the variables are discussed in depth in Fabiani (2019).

  14. 14.

    Even with 10-km grid cells, neither environmental nor economic indicators proved granular enough to examine purely from a purely spatial perspective. Economic indicators also could not be examined spatiotemporally.

  15. 15.

    Total crop production and unemployment were dropped from the final model due to high collinearity with other environmental and economic measures, respectively.

  16. 16.

    This analysis is exploratory and is unable to speak to causality. It is possible that there is no spatial relationship in evidence.

References

  • Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01093.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, R. (2001). Building on the foundation of general strain theory: Specifying the types of strain most likely to lead to crime and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38(4), 319–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427801038004001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, R. (2006). Pressured into crime: An overview of general strain theory. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akers, R. L. (1985). Deviant behavior: A social learning approach. Wadsworth Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Azm, A., & Paul, K. (2019). Facebook’s black market in antiquities: ICOM Red List artifacts offered on Facebook. The Antiquities Trafficking and Heritage Anthropology Research Project (ATHAR). Retrieved from http://atharproject.org/report2019/

  • Alder, C., & Polk, K. (2002). Stopping this awful business: The traffic in antiquities examined as a criminal market. Art, Antiquity, & Law, 7(1), 35–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderman, K. L. (2012). Honor amongst thieves: Organized crime and the illicit antiquities trade. Indiana Law Review, 45(3), 601–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balcells Magrans, M. (2018). Contemporary archaeological looting: A criminological analysis of Italian Tomb Robbers. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balestrieri, A. B. B. (2018). Field archaeologists as eyewitnesses to site looting. Art, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts7030048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 1–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, B., Jaitman, L., & Machin, S. (2014). Crime deterrence: Evidence from the London 2011 riots. The Economic Journal, 124(576), 480–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (1789). In L. J. Lafleur (Ed.), An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Hafner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernick, L. (1998). Art and antiquities theft. Transnational Organized Crime, 4(2), 91–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borodkin, L. (1995). The economics of antiquities looting. Columbia Law Review, 95(2), 377–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boseley, S. (1997, June 19). Raider of Egypt’s lost art. The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, K. (2014, June 1). Egypt turns to technology in effort to protect ancient treasures from looters. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/01/egypt-museum-theft-satellite-technology

  • Brantingham, P. J. (2012). The theory of target search. In F. T. Cullen & P. Wilcox (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminological theory. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham, P., & Brantingham, P. (1993). Environment, routine and situation: Toward a pattern theory of crime. In R. Clarke & M. Felson (Eds.), Routine activity and rational choice: Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 5). Transaction Publishers. Retrieved from https://docdel.umd.edu/illiad/illiad.dll?Action=10&Form=75&Value=1248305

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham, P., & Brantingham, P. (2013). Crime pattern theory. In R. Wortley & L. Green (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 87–93). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203118214-13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Briar, S., & Piliavin, I. (1965). Delinquency, situational inducements, and commitment to conformity. Social Problems, 13(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/799304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, R., & Akers, R. (1966). A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior. Social Problems, 14(2), 128–147. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1966.14.2.03a00020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco-Jiménez, Edison. (2019). The looting during the social upsurge of October 2019 in Chile. SocArXiv. December 10. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/cyegn

  • Casey, M. (2006). Buried truth: A criminological analysis of the illicit antiquities trade. Trinity College Law Review, 9, 119–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics (CAPMAS). (2018). Statistical yearbook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. (1999). Hot products: Understanding, anticipating, and reducing demand for stolen goods (Paper 112; Police Research Series, pp. 1–48). Home Office Policing and Reducing Crime Unit Research, Development and Statistics Directorate. Retrieved from http://www.popcenter.org/tools/risky_facilities/PDFs/Clarke_1999.pdf

  • Conklin, J. E. (1994). Art crime. Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (1986). The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. Transaction Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, M. A., & Eck, J. E. (2014). Situational choice and crime events. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31(1), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986214552605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuneo, A., & Danti, M. (2019). Tracking heritage loss in the middle of armed conflict. Archaeology of conflict: Documenting destruction of cultural heritage in the Middle-East and Central Asia. In J. Bessenay-Prolonge, J.-J. Herr & M. Mura (Eds.), Archaeology of conflict / Archaeology in conflict–Documenting destruction of cultural heritage in the Middle-East and Central Asia, Routes de l’Orient Actes II (pp. 265–283). Paris: Association Routes de l’Orient.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine, J. A. (2016). Contesting global heritage in the Chicle Workers’ Museum. Latin American Research Review, 51(3), 101–122. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44000358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabiani, M. D. (2018). Disentangling strategic and opportunistic looting: The relationship between antiquities looting and armed conflict in Egypt. Art, 7(2), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts7020022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabiani, M. D. (2019). Building a baseline: Unifying spatial and temporal methodologies to understand archaeological looting in Egypt [Dissertation, University of Maryland College Park]. https://drum.lib.umd.edu/handle/1903/22107?show=full

  • Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (2004). Self-control and crime. In Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 537–552). The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersel, M. (2007). Transcending borders: Objects on the move. Archaeologies, 3(2), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-007-9013-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes. Retrieved from https://www.alnap.org/help-library/out-of-control-visceral-influences-on-behavior

  • Lowenthal, D. (2005). Why sanctions seldom work: Reflections on cultural property internationalism. International Journal of Cultural Property, 12(3), 393–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, R. (2004). Looting in the context of violent conflict: A conceptualisation and typology. Third World Quarterly, 25(5), 857–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, S., & Green, P. (Eds.). (2009). Criminology and archaeology: Studies in looted antiquities. Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, S., & Yates, D. (2016). Collectors on illicit collecting: Higher loyalties and other techniques of neutralization in the unlawful collecting of rare and precious orchids and antiquities. Theoretical Criminology, 20(3), 340–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, D. (1998, January). The ethics of archaeology, subsistence digging, and artifact looting in Latin America: Point muted counterpoint. International Journal of Cultural Property, 7(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739198770080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsueda, R., Kreager, D., & Huizinga, D. (2006). Deterring delinquents: A rational choice model of theft and violence. American Sociological Review, 71, 95–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCalister, A. (2005). Organized crime and the theft of Iraqi antiquities. Trends in Organized Crime, 9(1), 24–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parcak, S. (2015). Archaeological looting in Egypt: A geospatial view (case studies from Saqqara, Lisht, and el Hibeh). Near Eastern Archaeology, 78(3), 196–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paredes Maury, S. (1999). Surviving in the rainforest: The realities of looting in the rural villages of El Petén, Guatemala. Foundation for the Advancement of Meso-American Studies (FAMSI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, S. (2009). Drugs, guns, and dirt. Archaeology, 62(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paternoster, R., & Pogarsky, G. (2009). Rational choice, agency, and thoughtfully reflective decision making: The short and long-term consequences of making good decisions. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogarsky, G., & Piquero, A. (2003). Can punishment encourage offending? Investigating the “resetting” effect. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(1), 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427802239255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1979). Rational decision making in business organizations. American Economic Review, 69(4), 493–513. https://econpapers.repec.org/article/aeaaecrev/v_3a69_3ay_3a1979_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a493-513.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. (Ed.). (1937). The professional thief by a professional thief. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice (UN). (2017). World crime trends and emerging issues and responses in the field of crime prevention and criminal justice (E/CN.15/2017/1). United Nations Economic and Social Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weirich, C. (2019). Situational crime prevention of antiquities trafficking: A crime script analysis. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fabiani, M.D. (2021). Offender Motivations and Expectations of Data in Antiquities Looting. In: Oosterman, N., Yates, D. (eds) Crime and Art. Studies in Art, Heritage, Law and the Market, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84856-9_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84856-9_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84855-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-84856-9

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics