Abstract
Predictions by some in the early 1990s that United States criminal justice was dominated by a “new penology” of rational risk management (Feeley and Simon, Criminology 30.4: 449–474, 1992; The Futures of Criminology 173: 174, 1994) proved at best premature, as the nation adopted extreme penal policies and aggressive policing tactics with no particular basis in scientific evidence and rejected proposals to moderate penal severity by risk. Since the end of the first decade of the twenty-first century, however, signs abound that the risk paradigm is gaining ground in the name of “criminal justice reform” (Kohlher et al. 2018). While reservations about risk remain significant, many of them express concern about racial justice consequences of risk management instruments that will carry over the criminalization patterns of recent decades into the future. This chapter argues that the delayed arrival of risk rationality reflects the initial stages of a slow but inexorable shift in generational political criminology as the influence of “Baby Boomers” (Boomers), born between 1946 and 1964, crests and that of “Millennials,” born between 1981 and 1996, rises (PEW, Defining Generations: Where Millennials End and Generation Z Begins, 2019). I offer a historical-cultural hypothesis for why Baby Boomers rejected rational risk logics when it came to crime and why Millennials are more open to it. Looking at “period effects” on generational imaginaries points to striking differences in the political landscape in which crime was experienced by these distinct cohorts as they entered young adulthood, a phase that sociologists have long viewed as having enduring influence across the life course (Mannheim, Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1927). Specifically, I argue that Boomers and Millennials have been influenced by “signal crimes” (Innes, Signal Crimes: Social Reactions to Crime, Disorder and Control, Oxford University Press, 2014) that point in very different directions, with very different implications about both behavior and the meaning of crime for social organization. This is especially clear when we consider these highly publicized crimes against two contexts that have long been drivers of punitive turns in crime policy in America: Black communities and central cities. Boomer signal crimes, experienced against a background of racialized violence and urban crisis, made Boomers receptive to penal populism (Pratt, Penal Populism, Routledge, 2007). I offer the hypothesis that Millennial signal crimes, decoupled largely from Black communities and decentered from urban landscapes, have laid the groundwork for a generation more receptive to rational risk logics about crime. Baby Boomers came to think about crime through a broader “culture of fear” that led to an angry, hot, penal populism. Millennials are not immune to crime fear, but are much more exposed to sources of anxiety or dread like climate change and economic inequality, against which crime is perceived as one more problem to manage.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Durkheim seems to have come to see this as problematic and returned to the topic in his “Two Laws of Penal Evolution,” where he offers some sources of shorter term changes in penal sensibilities (Durkheim 1903/1973).
- 2.
PEW Research has cataloged considerable data on generational differences on their website. PEW defines Boomers as those born in 1946–1964, and Millennials as those born in 1981–1996. Their data also identifies the “Silent Generation” born in 1928–1945, and “Generation X” born in 1965–1980 and very recently, “Generation Z” born after 1997. I focus on Boomers and Millennials for reasons discussed but the PEW data suggests considerable continuity between Boomers and Generation X. https://www.pewresearch.org/topics/generations-and-age/.
- 3.
Though anti-terrorism has become a major new theme in the policing of large cities (and especially places with symbolic or major tourism), it appears quite distinct from the aggressive style of crime suppression policing that began in the late twentieth century and has in many cases continued in the present although with increasing political controversy.
- 4.
Of course the active armed parts of the war, in Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan, involve very serious violence against Muslim civilians caught between US backed forces and militias fighting them.
- 5.
- 6.
This may in fact be changing for some Boomers who are retiring back to the center attracted to lower crime rates, urban amenities, and access to reliable public transportation.
- 7.
It will be interesting as affluent retiring Boomers return to central cities, often bidding up the price of neighborhoods beyond the reach of Millennials, with their late twentieth century security sensibilities. There could be a curious mutation as cities become even more securitized to satisfy their aging and affluent residents while the suburbs de-gate and attempt to urbanize to satisfy their Millennial residents.
- 8.
By world here I’m following Martin Heidegger’s usage in Being and Time to mean a comprehensive network of interconnecting practices, values, equipment, and physical infrastructures in which people can predictably live their lives.
- 9.
Romero understood these racial meanings and cast a Black actor as the film’s hero. Spoiler alert! He is killed at the end after surviving the apparently one-night zombie onslaught by a crew of White police officers who mistake him for a zombie and shoot him through the window of the house he has successfully sought refuge in.
References
Aviram, Hadar. 2015. Cheap on Crime: Recession-Era Politics and the Transformation of American Punishment. University of California Press.
Cohen, Stanley. 2011. Folk devils and moral panics. Routledge.
Cohen, Stanley. 1985. Visions of social control: Crime, punishment and classification. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Davis, Mike. 1990/2006. City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles (New Edition). Verso Books.
Durkheim, Emile. 1893/2014. The division of labor in society. Simon and Schuster.
Durkheim, Emile. “Two laws of penal evolution.” Economy and Society 2.3 (1903/1973): 285–308.
Eberhardt, Jennifer L. et al. 2004. “Seeing black: race, crime, and visual processing.” Journal of personality and social psychology 87.6: 876.
Feeley, Malcolm M., and Jonathan Simon. “The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications.” Criminology 30.4 (1992): 449–474.
Feeley, Malcolm, and Jonathan Simon. “Actuarial justice: The emerging new criminal law.” The Futures of Criminology 173 (1994): 174.
Garland, David. 2001. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press (2001)
Grasso, M., Farrall, S., Gray, E., Hay, C., & Jennings, W. (2019). Thatcher’s Children, Blair’s Babies, Political Socialization and Trickle-down Value Change: An Age, Period and Cohort Analysis. British Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000375
Gray, Emily, et al. “Political Socialization, Worry about Crime and Antisocial Behaviour: An Analysis of Age, Period and Cohort Effects.” The British Journal of Criminology 59.2 (2018): 435–460.
Greenwood, Peter W., and Allan F. Abrahamse. Selective incapacitation. Santa Monica, CA: Rand, 1982.
Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J., and Roberts, B. 1978/2013. Policing the crisis: Mugging, the state and law and order. Macmillan International Higher Education.
Hannikainen, Ivar R., Edouard Machery, and Fiery A. Cushman. “Is utilitarian sacrifice becoming more morally permissible?” Cognition 170 (2018): 95–101.
Heidegger, Martin. 1927. Being and Time. Trans. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York: Harper (1962).
Hinton, Elizabeth. 2016. From the War on Poverty to the War on Crime: The Making of Mass Incarceration. Harvard University Press.
Innes, Martin. 2014. Signal crimes: Social reactions to crime, disorder and control. Oxford University Press.
Koehler, Johann A., Gil Rothschild-Elyassi, and Jonathan Simon. 2018. “The New Penology.” In Heubner, Beth M. (ed.) Oxford Bibliographies in Criminology. Oxford University Press. Oxford, U.K.
Knepper, P. (2015). Writing the History of Crime. London: Bloomsbury.
Kracauer, Siegfried. 1949/1959. From Caligari to Hitler: A psychological history of the German film. Princeton University Press.
Low, Setha. Behind the gates: Life, security, and the pursuit of happiness in fortress America. Routledge, 2004.
Mannheim, Karl. 1927. “The Problem of Generations.” In Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Milkman, Ruth. 2017. A new political generation: Millennials and the post-2008 wave of protest. American Sociological Review, 82(1), 1–31.
Milkman, R. (2018). The Senior Precariat. New Labor Forum, 27(1), 44–52.
Miller, Lisa Lynn. 2016. The Myth of Mob Rule: Violent Crime and Democratic Politics. Oxford University Press.
Muhammad, Khalil Gibran. 2011. The condemnation of blackness. Harvard University Press.
Myers, Dowell. “Peak millennials: Three reinforcing cycles that amplify the rise and fall of urban concentration by millennials.” Housing Policy Debate 26.6 (2016): 928–947.
Ozog, Cassandra Anne. 2013. Fear rises from the dead: A sociological analysis of contemporary zombie films as mirrors of social fears. Diss. Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research, University of Regina.
PEW Research Center. 2018. “Younger generations making up increasing share of US House,” https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/11/21/millennials-gen-x-increase-their-ranks-in-the-house-especially-among-democrats/ft_18-11-16_congressgenerations_1/.
PEW Research Center. 2019. Defining Generations: Where Millennials End and Generation Z Begins, https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/.
Pratt, John. 2007. Penal populism. Routledge.
Reichman, Nancy. Managing crime risks: Toward an insurance based model of social control. Research in Law, Deviance and Social Control 8 (1986): 151–172.
Rothschild-Elyassi, Gil, Johann A. Koehler, and Jonathan Simon. 2019. “Actuarial Justice,” in Deflem, Matthieu and Charles F. Wellford (eds.) Handbook of Social Control. Wiley Handbooks in Criminology and Criminal Justice. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, pp. 194–206.
Rothstein, Richard. 2017. The color of law: A forgotten history of how our government segregated America. Liveright Publishing.
Simon, Jonathan. 2007. Governing through crime: How the war on crime transformed American democracy and created a culture of fear. Oxford University Press.
Simon, Jonathan. 2010. “Consuming obsessions: Housing, homicide, and mass incarceration since 1950.” University of Chicago Legal Forum, Vol. 2010: 165.
Simon, Jonathan. 2014. Mass incarceration on trial: A remarkable court decision and the future of prisons in America. New Press.
Simon, Jonathan. 2017. “Beyond tough on crime: Towards a better politics of prosecution.” Prosecutors and Democracy: A Cross-National Study 250–275.
Sugrue, Thomas J. 2014. The Origins of the Urban Crisis: Race and Inequality in Postwar Detroit-Updated Edition. Vol. 6. Princeton University Press.
Thompson, Heather Ann. 2017. Blood in the water: The Attica prison uprising of 1971 and its legacy. Vintage.
Wilson, James Q., and George L. Kelling. 1982. “Broken windows.” Atlantic Monthly 249.3: 29–38.
Zimring, Franklin E. 2006. The great American crime decline. Oxford University Press, USA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Simon, J. (2020). Millennials and the New Penology: Will Generational Change in the U.S. Facilitate the Triumph of Risk Rationality in Criminal Justice. In: Pratt, J., Anderson, J. (eds) Criminal Justice, Risk and the Revolt against Uncertainty. Palgrave Studies in Risk, Crime and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37948-3_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37948-3_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37947-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37948-3
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)