Abstract
User-friendly and successful products usually emerge when pure functionality meets good usability as well as an emotional and aesthetic design. Modern theoretical approaches consider all of those three aspects as equally important. In practice, however, they are often still treated independently from one another. Thus, neither positive nor negative interdependencies can be taken into account. This chapter tries to close this gap by examining the relationship of usability and emotions and introducing the idea of dual user integration that aims for combining both aspects. A concrete approach to balance both aspects focusing on emotional impressions and physical capacities of the user is presented to make dual user integration applicable. This proactive approach is called Application for Computer-Aided Design of Emotional impressions and Physical capacities (ACADE+P) and consists of three main steps: (1) user/product description, (2) product evaluation and (3) data-based derivation of quantitative recommendations for design improvements. In addition to the general framework, the specific workflow of the method including an analysis and synthesis phase is explained in detail.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bender B, Gericke K (eds) (2021) Pahl/Beitz Konstruktionslehre: Methoden und Anwendung erfolgreicher Produktentwicklung, 9th edn. Springer, Berlin
Bongwald O, Luttmann A, Laurig W (1995) Leitfaden für die Beurteilung von Hebe- und Tragetätigkeiten: Gesundheitsgefährdung, gesetzliche Regelungen, Messmethoden, Beurteilungskriterien und Beurteilungsverfahren. HVBG, Sankt Augustin
Bubb H, Popova-Dlugosch S, Breuninger J (2016) Ergonomische Produktgestaltung. In: Lindemann U (ed) Handbuch Produktentwicklung. Carl Hanser, München, pp 837–865
Chaffin DB (2005) Improving digital human modelling for proactive ergonomics in design. Ergonomics 48:478–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130400029191
Creusen MEH, Schoormans JPL (2005) The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice. J Prod Innovat Manag 22:63–81
Desmet P (2002) Designing emotions. Delft University of Technology, Delft
DIN EN ISO 26800 (2011) Ergonomie—Genereller Ansatz, Prinzipien und Konzepte. DIN, Berlin
Fehr B, Russel JA (1984) Concept of emotion viewed from a prototype perspective. J Exp Psychol 113:464–486
Fenech OC, Borg JC (2007) Exploiting emotions for successful product design. In: Bocquet J-C (ed) DS 42: Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th international conference on engineering design, Paris, France, 28–31.07.2007, pp 1–12
Germann R, Kurth L, Matthiesen S (2020) Disruptive factors in the evaluation of perceived quality aspects—consideration of the brand influence. Int J Ind Ergon 76:102931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2020.102931
Goldstein EB (2015) Cognitive psychology: connecting mind, research, and everyday experience, 4th edn. Cengage, Boston, MA
Goldstein EB, Brockmole JR (2017) Sensation and perception, 10th edn. Cengage Learning, Boston, MA
Gräßler I, Roesmann D, Pottebaum J (2020a) Entwicklung eines Prüfstands für die Bewertung von kompetenzbildenden Assistenzsystemen in Cyber-physischen Produktionssystemen. In: Frühjahrskongress 2020—Digitaler Wandel, digitale Arbeit, digitaler Mensch? Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft e.V., Dortmund, B.6.4
Gräßler I, Roesmann D, Pottebaum J (2020b) Model based integration of human characteristics in production systems: a literature survey. In: 14th CIRP conference on intelligent computation in manufacturing engineering. Elsevier B.V, Amsterdam
Hassenzahl M (2018) The Thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and product. In: Blythe M, Monk A (eds) Funology 2. Springer, Cham, pp 301–313
Hassenzahl M, Monk A (2010) The inference of perceived usability from beauty. Hum Comput Interact 25:235–260
Hassenzahl M, Burmester M, Koller F (2003) AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. In: Szwillus G, Ziegler J (eds) Mensch & Computer 2003: Interaktion in Bewegung, vol 57. Teubner, Stuttgart, pp 187–196
Hekkert P, Desmet P (2002) The basis of product emotions. In: Jordan P, Green W (eds) Pleasure with products. CRC, London
Hoermann M, Schwalm M (2015) Evaluation of a vehicle exterior’s sportiness under real vs. virtual conditions. In: Shumaker R, Lackey S (eds) Virtual, augmented and mixed reality, vol 9179. Springer, Cham, pp 470–479
ISO 9241-11:2018 Ergonomics of human-system interaction—Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts. ISO
Jordan PW (1998) An introduction to usability. CRC, London
Jordan PW (2002) Designing pleasurable products: an introduction to the new human factors. CRC, London
Karwowski W (2005) Ergonomics and human factors: the paradigms for science, engineering, design, technology and management of human-compatible systems. Ergonomics 48:436–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130400029167
Kett SG, Wartzack S (2016) Considering emotional impressions in product design: taking on the challenges ahead. In: Krzywinski J, Linke M, Wölfel C (eds) Entwerfen, Entwickeln, Erleben 2016: Beiträge zum Industrial Design. TUD, Dresden, pp 215–232
Kroeber-Riel W, Weinberg P, Gröppel-Klein A (2009) Konsumentenverhalten, 9th edn. Vahlen, München
Kuijt-Evers LFM, Groenesteijn L, de Looze MP, Vink P (2004) Identifying factors of comfort in using hand tools. Appl Ergon 35:453–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2004.04.001
Nagamachi M, Lokman AM (2011) Innovations of Kansei engineering. CRC, Boca Raton
Nielsen J (2001) Usability engineering. Kaufmann, Amsterdam
Puschmann P, Horlitz T, Wittstock V, Schütz A (2016) Risk analysis (assessment) using virtual reality technology—effects of subjective experience: an experimental study. Procedia CIRP 50:490–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.115
Quinn JM, Tran TQ (2010) Attractive phones don’t have to work better: independent effects of attractiveness, effectiveness, and efficiency on perceived usability. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 353–362
Schröppel T, Diepold T, Miehling J, Wartzack S (2019a) A concept for physiological user description in the context of dual user integration. Proc Int Conf Eng Des 1:3791–3800. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.386
Schröppel T, Miehling J, Wartzack S (2019b) Roadmap für die Entwicklung einer Methodik zur dualen Nutzerintegration. In: Binz H, Bertsche B, Bauer W, Riedel O, Spath D, Roth D (eds) Stuttgarter Symposium für Produktentwicklung SSP 2019. Frauenhofer IAO, Stuttgart, pp 293–302
Schröppel T, Miehling J, Wartzack S (2020) How to identify relevant product properties in the context of user-product interaction? Procedia CIRP 91:615–620
Schütte S (2007) Towards a common approach in Kansei engineering: a proposed model. In: Marasek K, Sikorski M (eds) Proceedings of the conference: Interfejs użytkownika Kansei w praktyce. Wydawnictwo PJWSTK, Warsaw, pp 8–17
Seidel M, Loch CH, Chahil S (2005) Quo vadis, automotive industry? A vision of possible industry transformations. Eur Manag J 23:439–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2005.06.005
Seva RR, Gosiaco KGT, Santos MCED, Pangilinan DML (2011) Product design enhancement using apparent usability and affective quality. Appl Ergon 42:511–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.09.009
Shackel B (2009) Usability – Context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. Interact Comput 21:339–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2009.04.007
Sirgy MJ (1982) Self-concept in consumer behavior: a critical review. J Consum Res 9:287–300
Stavrakos KS, Ahmed-Kristensen S (2013) Investigating the role of aesthetics for interaction design. In: Lindemann U, Venkataraman S, Kim YS, Lee SW (eds) ICED 13, the 19th International conference on engineering design: 19th-22nd August 2013, Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Seoul, Korea. The Design Society, pp 557–566
Trathen S (2014) Aesthetics versus usability: what drives our product choices? In: Bohemia E, Eger A, Eggink W, Kovačević A, Parkinson B, Wits W (eds) Design education & human technology relations: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on engineering and product design education. Institution of Engineering Designers; The Design Society, Westbury, Wiltshire, Glasgow, pp 706–712
Triberti S, Chirico A, La Rocca G, Riva G (2017) Developing emotional design: emotions as cognitive processes and their role in the design of interactive technologies. Front Psychol 8:1773. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01773
Trommsdorff V (2009) Konsumentenverhalten, 9th edn. Kohlhammer-Edition Marketing. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart
van Gorp T, Adams E (2012) Design for emotion. Elsevier, Amsterdam
van Welie M, van der Veer GC, Eliëns APW (1999) Breaking down usability. In: Sasse MA, Johnson C (eds) Human computer interaction—Proceedings of interact 99 , 30th August–3rd September 1999, Edinburgh, Scotland. IOS, pp 613–620
Wallisch A, Paetzold K (2019) Designing user research designs for systematic user involvement in requirements engineering. In: Eriksson Y, Paetzold K (eds) Human behaviour in design: Proceedings of the 2nd SIG conference April 2019. Institut für Technische Produktentwicklung, Universität der Bundeswehr München, München, pp 51–62
Wallisch A, Sankowski O, Paetzold K, Krause D (2019) Overcoming fuzzy design practice: revealing potentials of user-centered design research and methodological concepts related to user involvement. In: 2019 IEEE international conference on engineering, technology and innovation (ICE/ITMC). IEEE, Piscataway, pp 1–9
Wartzack S, Schröppel T, Wolf A, Miehling J (2019) Roadmap to consider physiological and psychological aspects of user-product interactions in virtual product engineering. Proc Int Conf Eng Des 1:3989–3998. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.406
Weber C (2005) CPM/PDD—an extended theoretical approach to modelling products and product development processes. In: Bley H, Jansen H, Krause F-L, Shpitalni M (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd German-Israeli symposium on advances in methods and systems for development of products and processes. Fraunhofer-IRB, Stuttgart, pp 159–179
Wickens CD, Lee JD, Liu Y, Gordon Becker SE (2004) An introduction to human factors engineering, 2nd edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Wolf A, Binder N, Miehling J, Wartzack S (2019) Towards virtual assessment of human factors: a concept for data driven prediction and analysis of physical user-product interactions. Proc Int Conf Eng Des 1:4029–4038. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.410
Wolf A, Miehling J, Wartzack S (2020) Challenges in interaction modelling with digital human models—a systematic literature review of interaction modelling approaches. Ergonomics 63:1442–1458. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2020.1786606
Wolf A, Buker T, Molz C, Scherb D, Wartzack S, Miehling J (2021) Proactive integration of user data into engineering processes - a generic approach and specific examples. In: Duffy VG, Lehto MR, Yih Y, Proctor RW (eds) Human-automation interaction: manufacturing, services and UX
Yannou B, Wang J, Rianantsoa N, Hoyle C, Drayer M, Chen W, Alizon F, Mathieu J-P (2009) Usage coverage model for choice modeling: principles. In: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, U.S. (ed) Proceedings of the ASME 2009 international design engineering technical conferences & computers and information in engineering conference: Volume 5: 35th Design automation conference, part A & part B. ASME, pp 407–418
Zimmermann P (2008) Virtual reality aided design. A survey of the use of VR in automotive industry. In: Talaba D, Amditis A (eds) Product engineering. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 277–296
Zöller SG (2019) Mapping individual subjective values to product design: an attitudes-based approach for user centered design. Dissertation, FAU University Press
Zöller SG, Wartzack S (2017) Considering users’ emotions in product development processes and the need to design for attitudes. In: Fukuda S (ed) Emotional engineering, 5th edn. Springer, Cham, pp 69–97
Zöller SG, Schröppel T, Wartzack S (2017) Ein Vergleich von Datenanalysemethoden für eine Affective Engineering Methode. In: Krause D, Paetzold K, Wartzack S (eds) Design for X: Beiträge zum 28. DfX-Symposium Oktober 2017. TuTech, Hamburg, pp 287–298
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) under Grant WA 2913/32-1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Buker, T., Miehling, J., Wartzack, S. (2022). Improving Products by Combining Usability and Emotions. In: Krause, D., Heyden, E. (eds) Design Methodology for Future Products. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78368-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78368-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78367-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78368-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)