Skip to main content

Improving Products by Combining Usability and Emotions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Design Methodology for Future Products

Abstract

User-friendly and successful products usually emerge when pure functionality meets good usability as well as an emotional and aesthetic design. Modern theoretical approaches consider all of those three aspects as equally important. In practice, however, they are often still treated independently from one another. Thus, neither positive nor negative interdependencies can be taken into account. This chapter tries to close this gap by examining the relationship of usability and emotions and introducing the idea of dual user integration that aims for combining both aspects. A concrete approach to balance both aspects focusing on emotional impressions and physical capacities of the user is presented to make dual user integration applicable. This proactive approach is called Application for Computer-Aided Design of Emotional impressions and Physical capacities (ACADE+P) and consists of three main steps: (1) user/product description, (2) product evaluation and (3) data-based derivation of quantitative recommendations for design improvements. In addition to the general framework, the specific workflow of the method including an analysis and synthesis phase is explained in detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bender B, Gericke K (eds) (2021) Pahl/Beitz Konstruktionslehre: Methoden und Anwendung erfolgreicher Produktentwicklung, 9th edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongwald O, Luttmann A, Laurig W (1995) Leitfaden für die Beurteilung von Hebe- und Tragetätigkeiten: Gesundheitsgefährdung, gesetzliche Regelungen, Messmethoden, Beurteilungskriterien und Beurteilungsverfahren. HVBG, Sankt Augustin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bubb H, Popova-Dlugosch S, Breuninger J (2016) Ergonomische Produktgestaltung. In: Lindemann U (ed) Handbuch Produktentwicklung. Carl Hanser, München, pp 837–865

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin DB (2005) Improving digital human modelling for proactive ergonomics in design. Ergonomics 48:478–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130400029191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creusen MEH, Schoormans JPL (2005) The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice. J Prod Innovat Manag 22:63–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmet P (2002) Designing emotions. Delft University of Technology, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • DIN EN ISO 26800 (2011) Ergonomie—Genereller Ansatz, Prinzipien und Konzepte. DIN, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr B, Russel JA (1984) Concept of emotion viewed from a prototype perspective. J Exp Psychol 113:464–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenech OC, Borg JC (2007) Exploiting emotions for successful product design. In: Bocquet J-C (ed) DS 42: Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th international conference on engineering design, Paris, France, 28–31.07.2007, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Germann R, Kurth L, Matthiesen S (2020) Disruptive factors in the evaluation of perceived quality aspects—consideration of the brand influence. Int J Ind Ergon 76:102931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2020.102931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein EB (2015) Cognitive psychology: connecting mind, research, and everyday experience, 4th edn. Cengage, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein EB, Brockmole JR (2017) Sensation and perception, 10th edn. Cengage Learning, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gräßler I, Roesmann D, Pottebaum J (2020a) Entwicklung eines Prüfstands für die Bewertung von kompetenzbildenden Assistenzsystemen in Cyber-physischen Produktionssystemen. In: Frühjahrskongress 2020—Digitaler Wandel, digitale Arbeit, digitaler Mensch? Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft e.V., Dortmund, B.6.4

    Google Scholar 

  • Gräßler I, Roesmann D, Pottebaum J (2020b) Model based integration of human characteristics in production systems: a literature survey. In: 14th CIRP conference on intelligent computation in manufacturing engineering. Elsevier B.V, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassenzahl M (2018) The Thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and product. In: Blythe M, Monk A (eds) Funology 2. Springer, Cham, pp 301–313

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hassenzahl M, Monk A (2010) The inference of perceived usability from beauty. Hum Comput Interact 25:235–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassenzahl M, Burmester M, Koller F (2003) AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. In: Szwillus G, Ziegler J (eds) Mensch & Computer 2003: Interaktion in Bewegung, vol 57. Teubner, Stuttgart, pp 187–196

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hekkert P, Desmet P (2002) The basis of product emotions. In: Jordan P, Green W (eds) Pleasure with products. CRC, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoermann M, Schwalm M (2015) Evaluation of a vehicle exterior’s sportiness under real vs. virtual conditions. In: Shumaker R, Lackey S (eds) Virtual, augmented and mixed reality, vol 9179. Springer, Cham, pp 470–479

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ISO 9241-11:2018 Ergonomics of human-system interaction—Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts. ISO

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan PW (1998) An introduction to usability. CRC, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan PW (2002) Designing pleasurable products: an introduction to the new human factors. CRC, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Karwowski W (2005) Ergonomics and human factors: the paradigms for science, engineering, design, technology and management of human-compatible systems. Ergonomics 48:436–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130400029167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kett SG, Wartzack S (2016) Considering emotional impressions in product design: taking on the challenges ahead. In: Krzywinski J, Linke M, Wölfel C (eds) Entwerfen, Entwickeln, Erleben 2016: Beiträge zum Industrial Design. TUD, Dresden, pp 215–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber-Riel W, Weinberg P, Gröppel-Klein A (2009) Konsumentenverhalten, 9th edn. Vahlen, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuijt-Evers LFM, Groenesteijn L, de Looze MP, Vink P (2004) Identifying factors of comfort in using hand tools. Appl Ergon 35:453–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2004.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagamachi M, Lokman AM (2011) Innovations of Kansei engineering. CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen J (2001) Usability engineering. Kaufmann, Amsterdam

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Puschmann P, Horlitz T, Wittstock V, Schütz A (2016) Risk analysis (assessment) using virtual reality technology—effects of subjective experience: an experimental study. Procedia CIRP 50:490–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JM, Tran TQ (2010) Attractive phones don’t have to work better: independent effects of attractiveness, effectiveness, and efficiency on perceived usability. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 353–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröppel T, Diepold T, Miehling J, Wartzack S (2019a) A concept for physiological user description in the context of dual user integration. Proc Int Conf Eng Des 1:3791–3800. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröppel T, Miehling J, Wartzack S (2019b) Roadmap für die Entwicklung einer Methodik zur dualen Nutzerintegration. In: Binz H, Bertsche B, Bauer W, Riedel O, Spath D, Roth D (eds) Stuttgarter Symposium für Produktentwicklung SSP 2019. Frauenhofer IAO, Stuttgart, pp 293–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröppel T, Miehling J, Wartzack S (2020) How to identify relevant product properties in the context of user-product interaction? Procedia CIRP 91:615–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schütte S (2007) Towards a common approach in Kansei engineering: a proposed model. In: Marasek K, Sikorski M (eds) Proceedings of the conference: Interfejs użytkownika Kansei w praktyce. Wydawnictwo PJWSTK, Warsaw, pp 8–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel M, Loch CH, Chahil S (2005) Quo vadis, automotive industry? A vision of possible industry transformations. Eur Manag J 23:439–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2005.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seva RR, Gosiaco KGT, Santos MCED, Pangilinan DML (2011) Product design enhancement using apparent usability and affective quality. Appl Ergon 42:511–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackel B (2009) Usability – Context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. Interact Comput 21:339–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2009.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy MJ (1982) Self-concept in consumer behavior: a critical review. J Consum Res 9:287–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavrakos KS, Ahmed-Kristensen S (2013) Investigating the role of aesthetics for interaction design. In: Lindemann U, Venkataraman S, Kim YS, Lee SW (eds) ICED 13, the 19th International conference on engineering design: 19th-22nd August 2013, Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Seoul, Korea. The Design Society, pp 557–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Trathen S (2014) Aesthetics versus usability: what drives our product choices? In: Bohemia E, Eger A, Eggink W, Kovačević A, Parkinson B, Wits W (eds) Design education & human technology relations: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on engineering and product design education. Institution of Engineering Designers; The Design Society, Westbury, Wiltshire, Glasgow, pp 706–712

    Google Scholar 

  • Triberti S, Chirico A, La Rocca G, Riva G (2017) Developing emotional design: emotions as cognitive processes and their role in the design of interactive technologies. Front Psychol 8:1773. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trommsdorff V (2009) Konsumentenverhalten, 9th edn. Kohlhammer-Edition Marketing. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • van Gorp T, Adams E (2012) Design for emotion. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • van Welie M, van der Veer GC, Eliëns APW (1999) Breaking down usability. In: Sasse MA, Johnson C (eds) Human computer interaction—Proceedings of interact 99 , 30th August–3rd September 1999, Edinburgh, Scotland. IOS, pp 613–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallisch A, Paetzold K (2019) Designing user research designs for systematic user involvement in requirements engineering. In: Eriksson Y, Paetzold K (eds) Human behaviour in design: Proceedings of the 2nd SIG conference April 2019. Institut für Technische Produktentwicklung, Universität der Bundeswehr München, München, pp 51–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallisch A, Sankowski O, Paetzold K, Krause D (2019) Overcoming fuzzy design practice: revealing potentials of user-centered design research and methodological concepts related to user involvement. In: 2019 IEEE international conference on engineering, technology and innovation (ICE/ITMC). IEEE, Piscataway, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartzack S, Schröppel T, Wolf A, Miehling J (2019) Roadmap to consider physiological and psychological aspects of user-product interactions in virtual product engineering. Proc Int Conf Eng Des 1:3989–3998. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber C (2005) CPM/PDD—an extended theoretical approach to modelling products and product development processes. In: Bley H, Jansen H, Krause F-L, Shpitalni M (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd German-Israeli symposium on advances in methods and systems for development of products and processes. Fraunhofer-IRB, Stuttgart, pp 159–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens CD, Lee JD, Liu Y, Gordon Becker SE (2004) An introduction to human factors engineering, 2nd edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf A, Binder N, Miehling J, Wartzack S (2019) Towards virtual assessment of human factors: a concept for data driven prediction and analysis of physical user-product interactions. Proc Int Conf Eng Des 1:4029–4038. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf A, Miehling J, Wartzack S (2020) Challenges in interaction modelling with digital human models—a systematic literature review of interaction modelling approaches. Ergonomics 63:1442–1458. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2020.1786606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf A, Buker T, Molz C, Scherb D, Wartzack S, Miehling J (2021) Proactive integration of user data into engineering processes - a generic approach and specific examples. In: Duffy VG, Lehto MR, Yih Y, Proctor RW (eds) Human-automation interaction: manufacturing, services and UX

    Google Scholar 

  • Yannou B, Wang J, Rianantsoa N, Hoyle C, Drayer M, Chen W, Alizon F, Mathieu J-P (2009) Usage coverage model for choice modeling: principles. In: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, U.S. (ed) Proceedings of the ASME 2009 international design engineering technical conferences & computers and information in engineering conference: Volume 5: 35th Design automation conference, part A & part B. ASME, pp 407–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann P (2008) Virtual reality aided design. A survey of the use of VR in automotive industry. In: Talaba D, Amditis A (eds) Product engineering. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 277–296

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zöller SG (2019) Mapping individual subjective values to product design: an attitudes-based approach for user centered design. Dissertation, FAU University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Zöller SG, Wartzack S (2017) Considering users’ emotions in product development processes and the need to design for attitudes. In: Fukuda S (ed) Emotional engineering, 5th edn. Springer, Cham, pp 69–97

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zöller SG, Schröppel T, Wartzack S (2017) Ein Vergleich von Datenanalysemethoden für eine Affective Engineering Methode. In: Krause D, Paetzold K, Wartzack S (eds) Design for X: Beiträge zum 28. DfX-Symposium Oktober 2017. TuTech, Hamburg, pp 287–298

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) under Grant WA 2913/32-1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandro Wartzack .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Buker, T., Miehling, J., Wartzack, S. (2022). Improving Products by Combining Usability and Emotions. In: Krause, D., Heyden, E. (eds) Design Methodology for Future Products. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78368-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78368-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78367-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78368-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics