Abstract
Robo-advisors have recently become increasingly accessible and gaining interest among consumers. However, there still exist problems in acceptance of robo-advisors among consumers. In this study, we have identified influential factors of robo-advisor acceptance, conducting an online survey involving 207 participants to examine their relationship with use intention. A hierarchical model of robo-advisor acceptance was built that integrated product features, user perceptions, and use intention. The model showed that the competence and expected earnings of a robo-advisor contribute to users’ perception of its usefulness. Furthermore, the customization and competence of a robo-advisor decreases users’ perceived risk. Additionally, better designed account management and more authority for users increase perceived control over a robo-advisor. Moreover, although usefulness was regarded as the most important factor, only perceived risk (negatively) and perceived control (positively) were significantly associated with the intention to use robo-advisors. Based on the acceptance model, implications for the robo-advisor design were discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jung, D., Dorner, V., Glaser, F., Morana, S.: Robo-advisory. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 60, 81–86 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0521-9
Jung, D., Dorner, V., Weinhardt, C., Pusmaz, H.: Designing a robo-advisor for risk-averse, low-budget consumers. Electron. Mark. 28, 367–380 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-017-0279-9
Brown, M.: Millennials: Robo-Advisors or Financial Advisors? https://lendedu.com/blog/robo-advisors-vs-financial-advisors/. Accessed 19 July 2020
Issa, E.E.: Humans vs. Robots: Americans Prefer Financial Advisors Over Algorithms. https://www.nerdwallet.com/blog/investing/robo-advisor-survey/. Accessed 18 July 2020
Hohenberger, C., Lee, C., Coughlin, J.F.: Acceptance of robo-advisors: effects of financial experience, affective reactions, and self-enhancement motives. Financ. Plann. Rev. 2, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/cfp2.1047
Rühr, A.: Robo-advisor configuration: an investigation of user preferences and the performance-control dilemma. In: ECIS (2020)
Rühr, A., Berger, B., Hess, T.: Can i control my robo-advisor? Trade-offs in automation and user control in (digital) investment management. In: AMCIS 2019 Proceedings (2019)
Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research (1977)
Davis, F.D.: A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results (1985)
Ajzen, I., et al.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Processes 50, 179–211 (1991)
Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edn. Simon and Schuster (2010)
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425–478 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Heerink, M., Krose, B., Evers, V., Wielinga, B.: Studying the acceptance of a robotic agent by elderly users. Int. J. Assist. Rob. Mech. 7, 11 (2006)
Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., Wielinga, B.: Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the almere model. Int, J. Soc. Rob. 2, 361–375 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0068-5
Broadbent, E., Stafford, R., MacDonald, B.: Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: review and future directions. Int. J. Soc. Rob. 1, 319 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-009-0030-6
Flandorfer, P.: Population ageing and socially assistive robots for elderly persons: the importance of sociodemographic factors for user acceptance. Int. J. Popul. Res. 2012 (2012)
Beer, J.M., Prakash, A., Mitzner, T.L., Rogers, W.A.: Understanding robot acceptance (2011)
Gaudiello, I., Zibetti, E., Lefort, S., Chetouani, M., Ivaldi, S.: Trust as indicator of robot functional and social acceptance. An experimental study on user conformation to iCub answers. Comput. Hum. Behav. 61, 633–655 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.057
Looije, R., Cnossen, F., Neerincx, M.A.: Incorporating guidelines for health assistance into a socially intelligent robot. In: ROMAN 2006-The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 515–520. IEEE (2006)
Young, J.E., Hawkins, R., Sharlin, E., Igarashi, T.: Toward acceptable domestic robots: applying insights from social psychology. Int. J. Soc. Rob. 1, 95 (2009)
Cramer, H., et al.: The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content-based art recommender. User Mod. User-Adapt. Interact. 18, 455 (2008)
Hu, R., Pu, P.: Acceptance issues of personality-based recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the Third ACM Conference on Recommender systems, pp. 221–224. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1639714.1639753
Xiao, B., Benbasat, I.: E-commerce product recommendation agents: use, characteristics, and impact. MIS Q. 31, 137–209 (2007)
Ye, L.R., Johnson, P.E.: The impact of explanation facilities on user acceptance of expert systems advice. MIS Q. 19, 157–172 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2307/249686
Yoo, K.-H., Gretzel, U.: Creating more credible and persuasive recommender systems: the influence of source characteristics on recommender system evaluations. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B., Kantor, P.B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 455–477. Springer, Boston, MA (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_14
Al-Tamimi, H.A.H.: Factors influencing individual investor behavior: an empirical study of the UAE financial markets. Bus. Rev. 5, 225–233 (2006)
Jacobs-Lawson, J.M., Hershey, D.A.: Influence of future time perspective, financial knowledge, and financial risk tolerance on retirement saving behaviors. Financ. Serv. Rev.-Greenwich 14, 331 (2005)
Al-Jabri, I.M., Sohail, M.S.: Mobile banking adoption: application of diffusion of innovation theory. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 13, 379–391 (2012)
Lee, M.-C.: Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: an integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 8, 130–141 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2008.11.006
Krueger, R.A., Casey, M.A., et al.: A practical guide for applied research. In: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (2000)
Grable, J., Lytton, R.H.: Financial risk tolerance revisited: the development of a risk assessment instrument☆. Financ. Serv. Rev. 8, 163–181 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-0810(99)00041-4
Ghani, J.A., Supnick, R., Rooney, P.: The experience of flow in computer-mediated and in face-to-face groups. In: ICIS, pp. 229–237 (1991)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wu, M., Gao, Q. (2021). Understanding the Acceptance of Robo-Advisors: Towards a Hierarchical Model Integrated Product Features and User Perceptions. In: Gao, Q., Zhou, J. (eds) Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Technology Design and Acceptance. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12786. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78108-8_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78108-8_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78107-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78108-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)