Abstract
The end of the new normal that has resulted from the pandemic is uncertain. Meanwhile the effects of the introduction of new ways of doing things in the field of academic pedagogy are being studied from different perspectives. Within the series of trials and errors in the introduction of new technological teaching systems, greater amount of research is required, especially in populations of adult students who have suffered a deeper impact due to the pandemic, since their lives have changed by carrying out parenting, study and work processes from their homes.
Initially, a review of various models that study learning acceptance and student satisfaction was carried out. From them, a series of variables and dimensions were selected developing 5 hypotheses that were arranged to be measured by an information collection instrument that was applied through an online survey to a non-probabilistic sample of 148 adult students. Then, a structural equation model was used to explore online learning acceptance and satisfaction. The model utilizes 3 dimensions: perceived online support services, perceived ease of use, and perceived utility.
The main results made evident the key role of the perceived utility of online learning acceptance and student satisfaction. A second finding was the low importance of perceived ease-of-use in accepting online learning and student satisfaction. The authors concluded that several changes can be observed in the perception of students and in how they accomplish satisfaction and learning acceptance, if these are compared to previous studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Busaidi, K.A.: Learners’ perspective on critical factors to LMS success in blended learning: an empirical investigation. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 30(1), 2 (2012)
Bao, W.: COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: a case study of Peking University. Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol. 2(2), 113–115 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191
Bollen, K.A.: A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociol. Methods Res. 17(3), 303–316 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124189017003004
Byrne, B.M.: Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/WINDOWS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (1994)
Byrne, B.M.: Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, 2nd edn. Routledge, London (2009)
Chen, T., Peng, L., Yin, X., Rong, J., Yang, J., Cong, G.: Analysis of user satisfaction with online education platforms in China during the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare 8(3), 200 (2020)
Cheng, Y.M.: Effects of quality antecedents on e-learning acceptance. Internet Res. 22(3), 361–390 (2012)
Cheung, G.W., Rensvold, R.B.: Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct. Equ. Model. 9(2), 233–255 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Cho, V., Cheng, T.E., Lai, W.J.: The role of perceived user-interface design in continued usage intention of self-paced e-learning tools. Comput. Educ. 53(2), 216–227 (2009)
Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 319–340 (1989)
Delone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 19(4), 9–30 (2003)
Escobedo Portillo, M.T., Hernández Gómez, J.A., Estebané Ortega, V., Martínez Moreno, G.: Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales: Características, fases, construcción, aplicación y resultados. Ciencia & Trabajo 18(55), 16–22 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-24492016000100004
Ferro, C., Martínez, A.I., Otero, M.D.C.: Ventajas del uso de las TICs en el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje desde la óptica de los docentes universitarios españoles. Edutec: Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa 29, a119–a119 (2009)
Gay, G.H.E.: An assessment of online instructor e-learning readiness before, during, and after course delivery. J. Comput. High. Educ. 28(2), 199–220 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9115-z
Ghazal, S., Al-Samarraie, H., Aldowah, H.: “I am still learning”: modeling LMS critical success factors for promoting students’ experience and satisfaction in a blended learning environment. IEEE Access 6, 77179–77201 (2018)
Crawford, J., et al.: COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. J. Appl. Learn. Teach. 3(1), 1–20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7
Kaplan, D.: Structural Equation Modeling Foundations and Extensions. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2000)
Kumar Sharma, S., Kumar Chandel, J., Madhumohan Govindaluri, S.: Students’ acceptance and satisfaction of learning through course websites. Educ. Bus. Soc. Contemp. Middle East. Issues 7(2/3), 152–166 (2014)
Lee, J.K., Lee, W.K.: The relationship of e-Learner’s self-regulatory efficacy and perception of e-Learning environmental quality. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24(1), 32–47 (2008)
Lee, J.W.: Online support service quality, online learning acceptance, and student satisfaction. Internet High. Educ. 13(4), 277–283 (2010)
Lee, S.J., Srinivasan, S., Trail, T., Lewis, D., Lopez, S.: Examining the relationship among student perception of support, course satisfaction, and learning outcomes in online learning. Internet High. Educ. 14(3), 158–163 (2011)
Lin, J.C.C., Lu, H.: Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a web site. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 20(3), 197–208 (2000)
Lin, F.H.: Measuring online learning systems success: applying the updated DeLone and McLean Model. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 10(6), 817–820 (2007)
Lwoga, E.: Critical success factors for adoption of web-based learning management systems in Tanzania. Int. J. Educ. Dev. ICT 10(1), 4–21 (2014)
Machado-Da-Silva, N.B., Meirelles, D.S.F., Filenga, D., Filho, B.M.: Student satisfaction process in virtual learning system: Considerations based in information and service quality from Brazil’s experience. Turk. Online J. Distance Educ. 15(3), 122–142 (2014)
Moorhouse, B.L.: Adaptations to a face-to-face initial teacher education course ‘forced’ online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Educ. Teach. 46, 609–611 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1755205
Mullen, G.E., Tallent-Runnels, M.K.: Student outcomes and perceptions of instructors’ demands and support in online and traditional classrooms. Internet High. Educ. 9(4), 257–266 (2006)
Muñoz-Miralles, R., et al.: The problematic use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in adolescents by the cross sectional JOITIC study. BMC Pediatr. 16(1), 1–11 (2016)
Pai, F.Y., Huang, K.I.: Applying the technology acceptance model to the introduction of healthcare information systems. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 78(4), 650–660 (2011)
Ramayah, T., Lee, J.W.C.: System characteristics, satisfaction and e-learning usage: a structural equation model (SEM). Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol.-TOJET 11(2), 196–206 (2012)
Roca, J.C., Chiu, C.M., Martínez, F.J.: Understanding e-learning continuance intention: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 64(8), 683–696 (2006)
Sahu, P.: Closure of universities due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): impact on education and mental health of students and academic staff. Cureus (2020). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7541
Saeed, K.A., Hwang, Y., Mun, Y.Y.: Toward an integrative framework for online consumer behavior research: a meta-analysis approach. J. Organ. End User Comput. (JOEUC) 15(4), 1–26 (2003)
Schumacker, R.E., Lomax, R.G.: A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. Psychology Press, London (2004)
Selim, H.M.: An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites. Comput. Educ. 40(4), 343–360 (2003)
Song, L., Singleton, E.S., Hill, J.R., Koh, M.H.: Improving online learning: student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet High. Educ. 7(1), 59–70 (2004)
Sun, P.C., Tsai, R.J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.Y., Yeh, D.: What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Comput. Educ. 50(4), 1183–1202 (2008)
Tarhini, A., Hone, K., Liu, X.: User acceptance towards web-based learning systems: investigating the role of social, organizational and individual factors in European higher education. Procedia Comput. Sci. 17, 189–197 (2013)
Teo, T., Wong, S.L.: Modeling key drivers of e-learning satisfaction among student teachers. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 48(1), 71–95 (2013)
Vega-Hernández, M.-C., Patino-Alonso, M.-C., Galindo-Villardón, M.-P.: Multivariate characterization of university students using the ICT for learning. Comput. Educ. 121, 124–130 (2018)
Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage. Sci. 46(2), 186–204 (2000)
Vululleh, P.: Determinants of students’ e-learning acceptance in developing countries: an approach based on Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Int. J. Educ. Dev. ICT 14(1), 141–151 (2018)
Wang, H.C., Chiu, Y.F.: Assessing e-learning 2.0 system success. Comput. Educ. 57(2), 1790–1800 (2011)
Wang, S.Y., Wang, Y.H., Shee, Y.D.: Measuring e-learning systems success in an organizational context: scale development and validation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23(4), 1792–1808 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fernández-Robin, C., Améstica, G., Yáñez, D., Toledo, E. (2021). Online Learning and Student Satisfaction in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic. In: Meiselwitz, G. (eds) Social Computing and Social Media: Applications in Marketing, Learning, and Health. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12775. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77685-5_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77685-5_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77684-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77685-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)