Skip to main content

The Horizontal Perspective: Twinning, Networks and Territorial Cooperation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Local Government in the European Union
  • 248 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter covers the external adaptation, cooperation and coordination of local government in the EU. As part of a horizontal Europeanisation, local authorities reach out to their European counterparts to share information and experiences, exchange knowledge and best practice, and articulate joint positions towards EU policies. This patchwork of cooperation involves town-twinning arrangements, transnational municipal networks and territorial cooperation to pool resources and capacities within and across state borders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For Ercole et al. (o.c.), participation in the advisory councils of the EU represents a fourth collective activity of local authorities in the EU. We will discuss this activity in Chap. 6.

  2. 2.

    There is a wide array of synonyms for twinning arrangements, including sister/connected/double/partner/twin cities, twin city partnerships, jumelages, etc. (see De Villiers et al., 2007, p. 1; Kern, 2009, p. 15; Joenniemi & Sergunin, 2011, pp. 121–122; Janczak, 2017, p. 479). Town twinning can also refer to partnerships between cities in the same country (cf. Joenniemi & Sergunin, 2011) or to the specific twinning of two cities lying across a national border (‘border twin towns’; cf. Janczak, 2017).

  3. 3.

    The importance of reconciliation and peacekeeping as drivers of town twinning is reflected in the prevalence of French-German twinnings in the first phase of town twinning after World War Two (Falkenhain et al., 2012). These efforts followed from the establishment of the Union Internationale des Maires in 1947, which led to the first official post-war jumelage in 1950 (Ludwigsburg and Montbéliard). In the same period, twinnings between British and German cities were also signed (e.g. Bristol-Hannover, Oxford-Bonn, Reading-Düsseldorf in 1947) (De Villiers et al., 2007).

  4. 4.

    These objectives were fostered by joint activities, including junkets for dignitaries; events related to sport, culture, religion, food, remembrance and music; language and student programmes; and the exchange of trade, information, advice and equipment (Zelinsky, 1991, p. 3).

  5. 5.

    For example, the bond between Paderborn and Le Mans established in 836. Next to the pioneering cities, other specific social and economic groups bonding with each other (e.g. youth movements, missionary efforts, world’s fairs, business conventions) were predecessors of modern town twinning.

  6. 6.

    This tradition is still reflected in the standard twinning oath and several twinning rituals.

  7. 7.

    Initiated in 1989 and following from an ad hoc Committee report and a resolution from Parliament, Europe for Citizens is managed by the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) and currently funded with EUR 187 718 000 of which 60% is allocated to town twinning, networks of towns and civil society projects.

  8. 8.

    Especially for young people, twinning projects are often a first way to get acquainted with the EU. According to Falkenhain et al. (2012, p. 230), alongside ERASMUS, town twinning has been a mechanism of ‘social engineering’ through which the EU and Member States sought to foster networking and exchange from the bottom up. Twinnings between cities from Central, Eastern and Western Europe are outstanding examples thereof (Hoetjes, 2009).

  9. 9.

    Yet despite its explicit inclusive purpose (cf. Zelinsky, 1991, p. 3), in practice twinning also tends to attract a particular group of citizens with higher levels of education and socio-economic status (Hoetjes, 2009).

  10. 10.

    We do not consider these ideal types to be mutually exclusive as many networks can be transformative or have overlapping or variable functions in practice.

  11. 11.

    CEPLI was founded in 2008 by the associations of local counties from Belgium, Bulgaria, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland and Romania, which in total present 1167 intermediate authorities (CEPLI ).

  12. 12.

    Founded in 1961 the CEEP includes 20 associations of local and regional authorities and public service providers and promotes municipal public service provision at the EU level.

  13. 13.

    CEMR is also the European section of United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG), a worldwide umbrella organisation.

  14. 14.

    https://ccre.org/en/article/introducing_cemr.

  15. 15.

    https://ccre.org/en/article/about_members.

  16. 16.

    The ‘Association Française pour le Conseil de Commune et Régions d’Europe’ (AFCCRE).

  17. 17.

    https://www.eurotowns.org/.

  18. 18.

    http://www.eurocities.eu/eurocities/home.

  19. 19.

    This includes sub-programmes, such as Comenous for Schools, Erasmus for Higher Education, Leonardo da Vinci for vocational education and training and Grundtvig for adult education.

  20. 20.

    URBACT I (2000–2006), URBACT II (2007–2013) and URBACT III (2014–2020). The overall budget for URBACT III was about €96m; for an overview of all networks, see https://urbact.eu/all-networks.

  21. 21.

    For a detailed discussion of new institutional approaches to cross-border cooperation, see Van Bever et al. (2011c, pp. 246–250).

  22. 22.

    The Arbeitsgemeinschaft Europäische Grenzregion represents over 100 different border regions across Europe vis-à-vis Brussels.

  23. 23.

    For an overview of over 70 cross-border regions between 1958 and 1999, see Perkmann (2003, pp. 161–162).

  24. 24.

    https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/98/european-territorial-cooperation.

  25. 25.

    https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/cooperation/european-territorial/egtc/.

  26. 26.

    https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/studies/pdf/assess_egtc_applic_en.pdf.

  27. 27.

    This is most pronounced in Poland and less the case in the Czech Republic and Hungary.

  28. 28.

    https://www.suedwestfalen-agentur.com/.

  29. 29.

    http://www.regionale2016.de/de/start.html.

  30. 30.

    Therefore, the network approach is also closely linked to the literature on multilevel governance (Fleurke & Willemse, 2006, p. 85). Both approaches highlight the role of informal relations between organisations and actors instead of formal institutions (Goldsmith & Klausen, 1997, p. 9).

References

  • Atkinson, R., & Rossignolo, C. (2010). Cities and the ‘soft side’ of Europeanization: The role of urban networks. In A. Hamedinger & A. Wolffhardt (Eds.), The Europeanization of cities. Policies, urban change & urban networks (pp. 197–210). Techne Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bache, I., & Flinders, M. (2004). Multi-level governance. University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, C. (2016). Europa im Rathaus. LIT Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baycan-Levent, T., Gülümser Akgün, A. A., & Kundak, S. (2010). Success conditions for urban networks: Eurocities and sister cities. European Planning Studies, 18(8), 1187–1206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benington, J., & Harvey, J. (1999). Networking in Europe. In G. Stoker (Ed.), The new management of British local governance (pp. 197–221). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A. (1998). German regions in the European Union – From joint policy-making to multi-level governance. In P. Le Galès & C. Lequesne (Eds.), Regions in Europe (pp. 111–129). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A. (2010). The European Union as a loosely coupled multi-level system. In H. Enderlein, S. Wälti, & M. Zürn (Eds.), Handbook on multi-level governance (pp. 214–226). Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullmann, U. (2001). Germany: Federalism under strain. In J. Loughlin (Ed.), Subnational democracy in the European Union. Challenges and opportunities (pp. 83–116). University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEMR (Council of European Municipalities and Regions). (2007). Twinning for tomorrow’s world. Practical handbook. https://www.ccre.org/img/uploads/piecesjointe/filename/twinning_for_tomorrows_world_en.pdf

  • Clarke, N. (2010). Town twinning in cold-war Britain: (Dis)continuities in twentieth-century municipal internationalism. Contemporary British History, 24(2), 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dąbrowski, M. (2014). EU cohesion policy, horizontal partnership and the patterns of sub-national governance: Insights from Central and Eastern Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 21(3), 364–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Villiers, J. C., de Coning, T. J., & Smit, E. v. d. M. (2007). Towards an understanding of the success factors in international twinning and sister-city relationships. South African Journal of Business Management, 38(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wachter, B. (2011). Jumelage checklist. VVSG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eising, R., & Kohler-Koch, B. (1999). Introduction—Network governance in the European Union. In B. Kohler-Koch & R. Eising (Eds.), The transformation of governance in the European Union (pp. 3–13). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ercole, E., Walters, M., & Goldsmith, M. (1997). Cities, networks, Euregions, European offices. In M. J. F. Goldsmith & K. K. Klausen (Eds.), European integration and local government (pp. 219–236). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • EUREGIO. (2019). Geschäftsbericht 2019. EUREGIO.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2018). Assessment of the application of EGTC regulation. Final report. 2017CE160AT116. April, Brussel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evrard, E., & Engl, A. (2018). Taking stock of the European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC): From policy formulation to policy implementation. In E. Medeiros (Ed.), European Territorial Cooperation: Theoretical and empirical approaches to the process and impacts of cross-border and transnational cooperation in Europe (pp. 209–227). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Falkenhain, M., Hoelscher, M., & Ruser, A. (2012). Twinning peaks—Potential and limits of an evolving network in shaping Europe as a social space. Journal of Civil Society, 8(3), 229–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleurke, F., & Willemse, R. (2006). Measuring local autonomy: A decision-making approach. Local Government Studies, 32(1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, M. (1993). The Europeanisation of local government. Urban Studies, 30(4), 683–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, M., & Klausen, K. K. (Eds.). (1997). European integration and local government. Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J. (2011). Interest representation in the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guderjan, M. (2013). When Europe meets the local level: A fusing multilevel compound? PhD thesis, Manchester Metropolitan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillermo-Ramirez, M. (2018). The added value of European Territorial Cooperation. Drawing from case studies. In E. Medeiros (Ed.), European Territorial Cooperation: Theoretical and empirical approaches to the process and impacts of cross-border and transnational cooperation in Europe (pp. 24–47). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinelt, H., & Niederhafner, S. (2008). Cities and organised interest intermediation in the EU multilevel governance. European Urban and Regional Studies, 12(2), 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrschel, T., & Newman, P. (2017). Cities as international actors. Urban and regional governance beyond the nation state. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoetjes, B. J. S. (2009). Trends and issues in municipal twinnings from the Netherlands. Habitat International, 33, 157–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (1996). “Europe with the regions”: Channels of regional representation in the European Union. The Journal of Federalism, 26(1), 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huggins, C. (2018a). Subnational government and transnational networking: The rationalist logic of local level Europeanization. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(6), 1263–1282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huggins, C. (2018b). Subnational transnational networking and the continuing process of local-level Europeanization. European Urban and Regional Studies, 25(2), 206–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janczak, J. (2017). Town twinning in Europe. Understanding manifestations and strategies. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 32(4), 477–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joenniemi, P., & Janczak, J. (2017). Theorizing town twinning—Towards a global perspective. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 32(4), 423–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joenniemi, P., & Sergunin, A. (2011). Another face of integration: City twinning in Europe. Research Journal of International Studies, 22, 120–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, P. (1997). Sub-national partnerships and European integration—The difficult case of London and the South East. In J. Bradbury & J. Mawson (Eds.), British regionalism and devolution—The challenges of state reform and European integration (pp. 235–253). Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, P. (2000). The Europeanisation of sub-national governance. Urban Studies, 37(5–6), 877–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, P. (2001). Local governance in Western Europe. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. W., & Scully, R. (2010). Introduction: Europe, regions, and European regionalism. In R. Scully & R. W. Jones (Eds.), Regions and European regionalism (pp. 1–15). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaltenbrunner, A., Aragón, P., Laniado, D., & Volkovich, Y. (2014). Not all paths lead to Rome: Analysing the network of sister cities. In W. Elmenreich, F. Dressler, & V. Loreto (Eds.), Self-organizing systems (IWSOS 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8221) (pp. 151–156). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Karvounis, A. (2011). The Europeanization of the local government in the EU multi-level governance system: The city networking paradigm and the Greek case. In E. Van Bever, H. Reynaert, & K. Steyvers (Eds.), The road to Europe. Main street or backward alley for local governments in Europe? (pp. 211–231). Vanden Broele.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M. (2017). Contesting European regions. Regional Studies, 51(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.122777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kern, K. (2009). Cities in a European setting. Paper submitted for presentation at the Conference “Innovation for Good Local and Regional Governance: A European Challenge”, University of Twente (Enschede), April 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, K., & Bulkeley, H. (2009). Cities, Europeanization and multi-level governance: Governing climate change through transnational municipal networks. Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(2), 309–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landua, D. (2012). Abschlussbericht zur Difu-Umfrage: EU-Aktivitäten von Städten, Gemeinden und Kreisen in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Deutsches Institut für Urbanisitik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Galès, P. (2002). European cities: Social conflicts and governance. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leitermann, W. (2006). Kommunale Interessenvertretung im Rahmen des Rates der Gemeinden und Regionen Europas. In U. von Alemann & C. Münch (Eds.), Europafähigkeit der Kommunen—Die lokale Ebene in der Europäischen Union (pp. 333–338). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, H., & Sheppard, E. (1999). Transcending interurban competition: Conceptual issues and policy alternatives in the European Union. In A. E. G. Jonas & D. Wilson (Eds.), The urban growth machine. Critical perspectives two decades later (pp. 227–243). State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindh, M., Lödén, H., Miles, L., Räftegard, C., & Stegmann McCallion, M. (2009). Fusing regions? Sustainable regional action in the context of European integration. Nordic Council of Ministers Research Programme Report 2009(8). Stockholm: Nordregio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (2005). Europeanization at the urban level: Local actors, institutions and the dynamics of multi-level interaction. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(4), 668–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (2008). Local governance. In I. Bache & A. Jordan (Eds.), The Europeanization of British politics (pp. 98–115). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. (1997). The effects of EU regional policy on local institutional structures and policies. In J. Bachtler & I. Turok (Eds.), The coherence of EU regional policy (pp. 51–65). Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S., & Pearce, G. (1999). Differentiated multi-level governance? The response of British sub-national governments to European integration. Regional & Federal Studies, 9(2), 32–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, J. (2000). The European Union and British democracy—Towards convergence. Macmillan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mawson, J. (1998). Britain—The rise of the regional agenda to combat increased fragmentation? In P. Le Galès & C. Lequesne (Eds.), Regions in Europe (pp. 218–238). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros, E. (2018a). Introduction. In E. Medeiros (Ed.), European Territorial Cooperation: Theoretical and empirical approaches to the process and impacts of cross-border and transnational cooperation in Europe (pp. 1–3). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros, E. (2018b). The role of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) in EU cohesion policy. In E. Medeiros (Ed.), European Territorial Cooperation: Theoretical and empirical approaches to the process and impacts of cross-border and transnational cooperation in Europe (pp. 69–93). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Münch, C. (2006a). Emanzipation der lokalen Ebene? Kommunen auf dem Weg nach Europa. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münch, C. (2006b). Optionen der kommunalen Interessenvertretung. In U. von Alemann & C. Münch (Eds.), Europafähigkeit der Kommunen—Die lokale Ebene in der Europäischen Union (pp. 356–380). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P. (2000). Changing patterns of regional governance in the EU. Urban Studies, 37(5–6), 895–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkmann, M. (2003). Cross-border regions in Europe: Significance and drivers of regional cross-border co-operation. European Urban & Regional Studies, 10, 153–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkmann, M. (2005). The emergence and governance of Euroregions: The case of the EUREGIO on the Dutch-German border. Paper presented at the workshop ‘Euroregions: Experiences and lessons’. Institut Universitari d’Estudis Europeus. University of Barcelona. 15–16 December 2005, 157–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, N. A., McNeill, D., & Parsons, N. (2002). In search of a European edge urban identity: Trans-European networking among edge urban municipalities. European Urban and Regional Studies, 9(3), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/096977640200900302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitel, B., Wassenberg, B., & Peyrony, J. (2018). The INTERREG experience in bridging European territories. A 30-year summary. In E. Medeiros (Ed.), European Territorial Cooperation: Theoretical and empirical approaches to the process and impacts of cross-border and transnational cooperation in Europe (pp. 7–23). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, C. (2011). Regional representations in the EU: Between diplomacy and interest mediation. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1998). The sub-regional level—Key battleground for the Structural Funds? In P. Le Galès & C. Lequesne (Eds.), Regions in Europe (pp. 50–66). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spengler, I. (2009). Sitzung des Arbeitskreises der EU- und Förderreferenten in Mannheim: Vielfältige Themen und reger Austausch. Europa Kommunal, 33(6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Struve, T. (2006). Die Bürogemeinschaft Europabüro der kommunalen Selbstverwaltung—Lobbyarbeit in Brüssel. In U. von Alemann & C. Münch (Eds.), Europafähigkeit der Kommunen—Die lokale Ebene in der Europäischen Union (pp. 339–355). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, R., & Dieringer, J. (2005). The Europeanisation of regions in Eastern and Western Europe: Theoretical perspective. Regional & Federal Studies, 15(3), 279–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Bever, E., Reynaert, H., & Steyvers, K. (2011a). Lokale besturen & Europa: Een verkennend onderzoek naar de invloed van Europa op de lokale besturen in Vlaanderen. Burger, bestuur & beleid, 7(4), 271–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bever, E., Reynaert, H., & Steyvers, K. (2011b). The road to Europe: Main street or backward alley for local governments in Europe? In E. Van Bever, H. Reynaert, & K. Steyvers (Eds.), The road to Europe. Main street or backward alley for local governments in Europe? (pp. 13–29). Vanden Broele.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bever, E., Reynaert, H., & Steyvers, K. (2011c). Together we are strong(er). Cross-border cooperation in a EU multi-level system. In E. Van Bever, H. Reynaert, & K. Steyvers (Eds.), The road to Europe. Main street or backward alley for local governments in Europe? (pp. 233–252). Vanden Broele.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Heiden, N. (2011). A multi-level governance analysis of urban foreign policy. The role of the EU in city-to-city cooperation. In E. Van Bever, H. Reynaert, & K. Steyvers (Eds.), The road to Europe. Main street or backward alley for local governments in Europe? (pp. 189–210). Vanden Broele.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wusten, H., & Mamadouh, V. (2010). The networks of European city governance. In A. Hamedinger & A. Wolffhardt (Eds.), The Europeanization of cities. Policies, urban change & urban networks (pp. 211–225). Techne Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vion, A. (2002). Europe from the bottom up: Town twinning in France during the Cold War. Contemporary European History, II(4), 623–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wassenberg, B., & Reitel, B. (2015). Territorial cooperation in Europe: A historical perspective. European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, W. (2000). Die Öffnung des Staates—Modelle und Wirklichkeit grenzüberschreitender Verwaltungspraxis 1960–1995. Leske & Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, F. (2006). Europakompetenz in der Stadtverwaltung: Die Europaarbeit der Stadt Köln. In U. von Alemann & C. Münch (Eds.), Europafähigkeit der Kommunen—Die lokale Ebene in der Europäischen Union (pp. 251–268). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zelinsky, W. (1991). The twinning of the world: Sister cities in geographic and historical perspective. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 81(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerbinati, S. (2004). Europeanization and EU funding in Italy and England. A comparative local perspective. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(6), 1000–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerbinati, S., & Massey, A. (2008). Italian and English local funding networks: Is there a winning formula? Local Government Studies, 34(1), 81–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marius Guderjan .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Guderjan, M., Verhelst, T. (2021). The Horizontal Perspective: Twinning, Networks and Territorial Cooperation. In: Local Government in the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74382-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics