Abstract
The chapter covers the external adaptation, cooperation and coordination of local government in the EU. As part of a horizontal Europeanisation, local authorities reach out to their European counterparts to share information and experiences, exchange knowledge and best practice, and articulate joint positions towards EU policies. This patchwork of cooperation involves town-twinning arrangements, transnational municipal networks and territorial cooperation to pool resources and capacities within and across state borders.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For Ercole et al. (o.c.), participation in the advisory councils of the EU represents a fourth collective activity of local authorities in the EU. We will discuss this activity in Chap. 6.
- 2.
There is a wide array of synonyms for twinning arrangements, including sister/connected/double/partner/twin cities, twin city partnerships, jumelages, etc. (see De Villiers et al., 2007, p. 1; Kern, 2009, p. 15; Joenniemi & Sergunin, 2011, pp. 121–122; Janczak, 2017, p. 479). Town twinning can also refer to partnerships between cities in the same country (cf. Joenniemi & Sergunin, 2011) or to the specific twinning of two cities lying across a national border (‘border twin towns’; cf. Janczak, 2017).
- 3.
The importance of reconciliation and peacekeeping as drivers of town twinning is reflected in the prevalence of French-German twinnings in the first phase of town twinning after World War Two (Falkenhain et al., 2012). These efforts followed from the establishment of the Union Internationale des Maires in 1947, which led to the first official post-war jumelage in 1950 (Ludwigsburg and Montbéliard). In the same period, twinnings between British and German cities were also signed (e.g. Bristol-Hannover, Oxford-Bonn, Reading-Düsseldorf in 1947) (De Villiers et al., 2007).
- 4.
These objectives were fostered by joint activities, including junkets for dignitaries; events related to sport, culture, religion, food, remembrance and music; language and student programmes; and the exchange of trade, information, advice and equipment (Zelinsky, 1991, p. 3).
- 5.
For example, the bond between Paderborn and Le Mans established in 836. Next to the pioneering cities, other specific social and economic groups bonding with each other (e.g. youth movements, missionary efforts, world’s fairs, business conventions) were predecessors of modern town twinning.
- 6.
This tradition is still reflected in the standard twinning oath and several twinning rituals.
- 7.
Initiated in 1989 and following from an ad hoc Committee report and a resolution from Parliament, Europe for Citizens is managed by the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) and currently funded with EUR 187 718 000 of which 60% is allocated to town twinning, networks of towns and civil society projects.
- 8.
Especially for young people, twinning projects are often a first way to get acquainted with the EU. According to Falkenhain et al. (2012, p. 230), alongside ERASMUS, town twinning has been a mechanism of ‘social engineering’ through which the EU and Member States sought to foster networking and exchange from the bottom up. Twinnings between cities from Central, Eastern and Western Europe are outstanding examples thereof (Hoetjes, 2009).
- 9.
- 10.
We do not consider these ideal types to be mutually exclusive as many networks can be transformative or have overlapping or variable functions in practice.
- 11.
CEPLI was founded in 2008 by the associations of local counties from Belgium, Bulgaria, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland and Romania, which in total present 1167 intermediate authorities (CEPLI ).
- 12.
Founded in 1961 the CEEP includes 20 associations of local and regional authorities and public service providers and promotes municipal public service provision at the EU level.
- 13.
CEMR is also the European section of United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG), a worldwide umbrella organisation.
- 14.
- 15.
- 16.
The ‘Association Française pour le Conseil de Commune et Régions d’Europe’ (AFCCRE).
- 17.
- 18.
- 19.
This includes sub-programmes, such as Comenous for Schools, Erasmus for Higher Education, Leonardo da Vinci for vocational education and training and Grundtvig for adult education.
- 20.
URBACT I (2000–2006), URBACT II (2007–2013) and URBACT III (2014–2020). The overall budget for URBACT III was about €96m; for an overview of all networks, see https://urbact.eu/all-networks.
- 21.
For a detailed discussion of new institutional approaches to cross-border cooperation, see Van Bever et al. (2011c, pp. 246–250).
- 22.
The Arbeitsgemeinschaft Europäische Grenzregion represents over 100 different border regions across Europe vis-à-vis Brussels.
- 23.
For an overview of over 70 cross-border regions between 1958 and 1999, see Perkmann (2003, pp. 161–162).
- 24.
- 25.
- 26.
- 27.
This is most pronounced in Poland and less the case in the Czech Republic and Hungary.
- 28.
- 29.
- 30.
References
Atkinson, R., & Rossignolo, C. (2010). Cities and the ‘soft side’ of Europeanization: The role of urban networks. In A. Hamedinger & A. Wolffhardt (Eds.), The Europeanization of cities. Policies, urban change & urban networks (pp. 197–210). Techne Press.
Bache, I., & Flinders, M. (2004). Multi-level governance. University Press.
Bacon, C. (2016). Europa im Rathaus. LIT Verlag.
Baycan-Levent, T., Gülümser Akgün, A. A., & Kundak, S. (2010). Success conditions for urban networks: Eurocities and sister cities. European Planning Studies, 18(8), 1187–1206.
Benington, J., & Harvey, J. (1999). Networking in Europe. In G. Stoker (Ed.), The new management of British local governance (pp. 197–221). Palgrave Macmillan.
Benz, A. (1998). German regions in the European Union – From joint policy-making to multi-level governance. In P. Le Galès & C. Lequesne (Eds.), Regions in Europe (pp. 111–129). London: Routledge.
Benz, A. (2010). The European Union as a loosely coupled multi-level system. In H. Enderlein, S. Wälti, & M. Zürn (Eds.), Handbook on multi-level governance (pp. 214–226). Edward Elgar.
Bullmann, U. (2001). Germany: Federalism under strain. In J. Loughlin (Ed.), Subnational democracy in the European Union. Challenges and opportunities (pp. 83–116). University Press.
CEMR (Council of European Municipalities and Regions). (2007). Twinning for tomorrow’s world. Practical handbook. https://www.ccre.org/img/uploads/piecesjointe/filename/twinning_for_tomorrows_world_en.pdf
Clarke, N. (2010). Town twinning in cold-war Britain: (Dis)continuities in twentieth-century municipal internationalism. Contemporary British History, 24(2), 173–191.
Dąbrowski, M. (2014). EU cohesion policy, horizontal partnership and the patterns of sub-national governance: Insights from Central and Eastern Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 21(3), 364–383.
De Villiers, J. C., de Coning, T. J., & Smit, E. v. d. M. (2007). Towards an understanding of the success factors in international twinning and sister-city relationships. South African Journal of Business Management, 38(1), 1–10.
De Wachter, B. (2011). Jumelage checklist. VVSG.
Eising, R., & Kohler-Koch, B. (1999). Introduction—Network governance in the European Union. In B. Kohler-Koch & R. Eising (Eds.), The transformation of governance in the European Union (pp. 3–13). Routledge.
Ercole, E., Walters, M., & Goldsmith, M. (1997). Cities, networks, Euregions, European offices. In M. J. F. Goldsmith & K. K. Klausen (Eds.), European integration and local government (pp. 219–236). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
EUREGIO. (2019). Geschäftsbericht 2019. EUREGIO.
European Commission. (2018). Assessment of the application of EGTC regulation. Final report. 2017CE160AT116. April, Brussel.
Evrard, E., & Engl, A. (2018). Taking stock of the European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC): From policy formulation to policy implementation. In E. Medeiros (Ed.), European Territorial Cooperation: Theoretical and empirical approaches to the process and impacts of cross-border and transnational cooperation in Europe (pp. 209–227). Springer.
Falkenhain, M., Hoelscher, M., & Ruser, A. (2012). Twinning peaks—Potential and limits of an evolving network in shaping Europe as a social space. Journal of Civil Society, 8(3), 229–250.
Fleurke, F., & Willemse, R. (2006). Measuring local autonomy: A decision-making approach. Local Government Studies, 32(1), 71–87.
Goldsmith, M. (1993). The Europeanisation of local government. Urban Studies, 30(4), 683–699.
Goldsmith, M., & Klausen, K. K. (Eds.). (1997). European integration and local government. Edward Elgar.
Greenwood, J. (2011). Interest representation in the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan.
Guderjan, M. (2013). When Europe meets the local level: A fusing multilevel compound? PhD thesis, Manchester Metropolitan University.
Guillermo-Ramirez, M. (2018). The added value of European Territorial Cooperation. Drawing from case studies. In E. Medeiros (Ed.), European Territorial Cooperation: Theoretical and empirical approaches to the process and impacts of cross-border and transnational cooperation in Europe (pp. 24–47). Springer.
Heinelt, H., & Niederhafner, S. (2008). Cities and organised interest intermediation in the EU multilevel governance. European Urban and Regional Studies, 12(2), 173–187.
Herrschel, T., & Newman, P. (2017). Cities as international actors. Urban and regional governance beyond the nation state. Palgrave Macmillan.
Hoetjes, B. J. S. (2009). Trends and issues in municipal twinnings from the Netherlands. Habitat International, 33, 157–164.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (1996). “Europe with the regions”: Channels of regional representation in the European Union. The Journal of Federalism, 26(1), 73–91.
Huggins, C. (2018a). Subnational government and transnational networking: The rationalist logic of local level Europeanization. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(6), 1263–1282.
Huggins, C. (2018b). Subnational transnational networking and the continuing process of local-level Europeanization. European Urban and Regional Studies, 25(2), 206–227.
Janczak, J. (2017). Town twinning in Europe. Understanding manifestations and strategies. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 32(4), 477–495.
Joenniemi, P., & Janczak, J. (2017). Theorizing town twinning—Towards a global perspective. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 32(4), 423–428.
Joenniemi, P., & Sergunin, A. (2011). Another face of integration: City twinning in Europe. Research Journal of International Studies, 22, 120–131.
John, P. (1997). Sub-national partnerships and European integration—The difficult case of London and the South East. In J. Bradbury & J. Mawson (Eds.), British regionalism and devolution—The challenges of state reform and European integration (pp. 235–253). Jessica Kingsley.
John, P. (2000). The Europeanisation of sub-national governance. Urban Studies, 37(5–6), 877–894.
John, P. (2001). Local governance in Western Europe. Sage.
Jones, R. W., & Scully, R. (2010). Introduction: Europe, regions, and European regionalism. In R. Scully & R. W. Jones (Eds.), Regions and European regionalism (pp. 1–15). Palgrave Macmillan.
Kaltenbrunner, A., Aragón, P., Laniado, D., & Volkovich, Y. (2014). Not all paths lead to Rome: Analysing the network of sister cities. In W. Elmenreich, F. Dressler, & V. Loreto (Eds.), Self-organizing systems (IWSOS 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8221) (pp. 151–156). Springer.
Karvounis, A. (2011). The Europeanization of the local government in the EU multi-level governance system: The city networking paradigm and the Greek case. In E. Van Bever, H. Reynaert, & K. Steyvers (Eds.), The road to Europe. Main street or backward alley for local governments in Europe? (pp. 211–231). Vanden Broele.
Keating, M. (2017). Contesting European regions. Regional Studies, 51(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.122777
Kern, K. (2009). Cities in a European setting. Paper submitted for presentation at the Conference “Innovation for Good Local and Regional Governance: A European Challenge”, University of Twente (Enschede), April 2–3.
Kern, K., & Bulkeley, H. (2009). Cities, Europeanization and multi-level governance: Governing climate change through transnational municipal networks. Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(2), 309–332.
Landua, D. (2012). Abschlussbericht zur Difu-Umfrage: EU-Aktivitäten von Städten, Gemeinden und Kreisen in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Deutsches Institut für Urbanisitik.
Le Galès, P. (2002). European cities: Social conflicts and governance. Oxford University Press.
Leitermann, W. (2006). Kommunale Interessenvertretung im Rahmen des Rates der Gemeinden und Regionen Europas. In U. von Alemann & C. Münch (Eds.), Europafähigkeit der Kommunen—Die lokale Ebene in der Europäischen Union (pp. 333–338). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Leitner, H., & Sheppard, E. (1999). Transcending interurban competition: Conceptual issues and policy alternatives in the European Union. In A. E. G. Jonas & D. Wilson (Eds.), The urban growth machine. Critical perspectives two decades later (pp. 227–243). State University of New York Press.
Lindh, M., Lödén, H., Miles, L., Räftegard, C., & Stegmann McCallion, M. (2009). Fusing regions? Sustainable regional action in the context of European integration. Nordic Council of Ministers Research Programme Report 2009(8). Stockholm: Nordregio.
Marshall, A. (2005). Europeanization at the urban level: Local actors, institutions and the dynamics of multi-level interaction. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(4), 668–686.
Marshall, A. (2008). Local governance. In I. Bache & A. Jordan (Eds.), The Europeanization of British politics (pp. 98–115). Palgrave Macmillan.
Martin, S. (1997). The effects of EU regional policy on local institutional structures and policies. In J. Bachtler & I. Turok (Eds.), The coherence of EU regional policy (pp. 51–65). Jessica Kingsley.
Martin, S., & Pearce, G. (1999). Differentiated multi-level governance? The response of British sub-national governments to European integration. Regional & Federal Studies, 9(2), 32–52.
Mather, J. (2000). The European Union and British democracy—Towards convergence. Macmillan Press.
Mawson, J. (1998). Britain—The rise of the regional agenda to combat increased fragmentation? In P. Le Galès & C. Lequesne (Eds.), Regions in Europe (pp. 218–238). Routledge.
Medeiros, E. (2018a). Introduction. In E. Medeiros (Ed.), European Territorial Cooperation: Theoretical and empirical approaches to the process and impacts of cross-border and transnational cooperation in Europe (pp. 1–3). Springer.
Medeiros, E. (2018b). The role of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) in EU cohesion policy. In E. Medeiros (Ed.), European Territorial Cooperation: Theoretical and empirical approaches to the process and impacts of cross-border and transnational cooperation in Europe (pp. 69–93). Springer.
Münch, C. (2006a). Emanzipation der lokalen Ebene? Kommunen auf dem Weg nach Europa. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Münch, C. (2006b). Optionen der kommunalen Interessenvertretung. In U. von Alemann & C. Münch (Eds.), Europafähigkeit der Kommunen—Die lokale Ebene in der Europäischen Union (pp. 356–380). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Newman, P. (2000). Changing patterns of regional governance in the EU. Urban Studies, 37(5–6), 895–908.
Perkmann, M. (2003). Cross-border regions in Europe: Significance and drivers of regional cross-border co-operation. European Urban & Regional Studies, 10, 153–171.
Perkmann, M. (2005). The emergence and governance of Euroregions: The case of the EUREGIO on the Dutch-German border. Paper presented at the workshop ‘Euroregions: Experiences and lessons’. Institut Universitari d’Estudis Europeus. University of Barcelona. 15–16 December 2005, 157–181.
Phelps, N. A., McNeill, D., & Parsons, N. (2002). In search of a European edge urban identity: Trans-European networking among edge urban municipalities. European Urban and Regional Studies, 9(3), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/096977640200900302
Reitel, B., Wassenberg, B., & Peyrony, J. (2018). The INTERREG experience in bridging European territories. A 30-year summary. In E. Medeiros (Ed.), European Territorial Cooperation: Theoretical and empirical approaches to the process and impacts of cross-border and transnational cooperation in Europe (pp. 7–23). Springer.
Rowe, C. (2011). Regional representations in the EU: Between diplomacy and interest mediation. Palgrave Macmillan.
Smith, A. (1998). The sub-regional level—Key battleground for the Structural Funds? In P. Le Galès & C. Lequesne (Eds.), Regions in Europe (pp. 50–66). Routledge.
Spengler, I. (2009). Sitzung des Arbeitskreises der EU- und Förderreferenten in Mannheim: Vielfältige Themen und reger Austausch. Europa Kommunal, 33(6).
Struve, T. (2006). Die Bürogemeinschaft Europabüro der kommunalen Selbstverwaltung—Lobbyarbeit in Brüssel. In U. von Alemann & C. Münch (Eds.), Europafähigkeit der Kommunen—Die lokale Ebene in der Europäischen Union (pp. 339–355). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Sturm, R., & Dieringer, J. (2005). The Europeanisation of regions in Eastern and Western Europe: Theoretical perspective. Regional & Federal Studies, 15(3), 279–294.
Van Bever, E., Reynaert, H., & Steyvers, K. (2011a). Lokale besturen & Europa: Een verkennend onderzoek naar de invloed van Europa op de lokale besturen in Vlaanderen. Burger, bestuur & beleid, 7(4), 271–287.
Van Bever, E., Reynaert, H., & Steyvers, K. (2011b). The road to Europe: Main street or backward alley for local governments in Europe? In E. Van Bever, H. Reynaert, & K. Steyvers (Eds.), The road to Europe. Main street or backward alley for local governments in Europe? (pp. 13–29). Vanden Broele.
Van Bever, E., Reynaert, H., & Steyvers, K. (2011c). Together we are strong(er). Cross-border cooperation in a EU multi-level system. In E. Van Bever, H. Reynaert, & K. Steyvers (Eds.), The road to Europe. Main street or backward alley for local governments in Europe? (pp. 233–252). Vanden Broele.
Van der Heiden, N. (2011). A multi-level governance analysis of urban foreign policy. The role of the EU in city-to-city cooperation. In E. Van Bever, H. Reynaert, & K. Steyvers (Eds.), The road to Europe. Main street or backward alley for local governments in Europe? (pp. 189–210). Vanden Broele.
Van der Wusten, H., & Mamadouh, V. (2010). The networks of European city governance. In A. Hamedinger & A. Wolffhardt (Eds.), The Europeanization of cities. Policies, urban change & urban networks (pp. 211–225). Techne Press.
Vion, A. (2002). Europe from the bottom up: Town twinning in France during the Cold War. Contemporary European History, II(4), 623–640.
Wassenberg, B., & Reitel, B. (2015). Territorial cooperation in Europe: A historical perspective. European Union.
Wessels, W. (2000). Die Öffnung des Staates—Modelle und Wirklichkeit grenzüberschreitender Verwaltungspraxis 1960–1995. Leske & Budrich.
Wolf, F. (2006). Europakompetenz in der Stadtverwaltung: Die Europaarbeit der Stadt Köln. In U. von Alemann & C. Münch (Eds.), Europafähigkeit der Kommunen—Die lokale Ebene in der Europäischen Union (pp. 251–268). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Zelinsky, W. (1991). The twinning of the world: Sister cities in geographic and historical perspective. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 81(1), 1–31.
Zerbinati, S. (2004). Europeanization and EU funding in Italy and England. A comparative local perspective. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(6), 1000–1019.
Zerbinati, S., & Massey, A. (2008). Italian and English local funding networks: Is there a winning formula? Local Government Studies, 34(1), 81–104.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Guderjan, M., Verhelst, T. (2021). The Horizontal Perspective: Twinning, Networks and Territorial Cooperation. In: Local Government in the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74382-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74382-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74381-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74382-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)