Abstract
The humerus is a relatively common site for primary bone tumour or metastatic bone disease. In our database of 4870 primary bone tumours and 3916 metastatic bone tumours, the humerus accounted for 9% (n = 448) and 14% (n = 543) of cases. However, of these 991 humeral tumours, a total humerus endoprosthetic replacement (THEPR) was only undertaken in 44 cases (4%). The indications were predominantly for primary bone tumours, with only three cases (7%) being undertaken for metastatic bone disease. Undertaking a THEPR, therefore, is an unusual operation for a surgeon and even in a large tertiary referral primary bone tumour unit; it may only be indicated once or twice per year. The tumour rarely involves 100% of the humerus; however, a THEPR may be chosen over a sub-total humeral replacement or biological replacement due to:
-
1.
Poor fixation available in a small distal or proximal section of bone unaffected by the tumour.
-
2.
The presence of a fracture or other factor that means the delay in manufacture of a custom-made prosthesis would be a detriment to the patient.
As all the supporting ligaments and muscle attachments of the humerus will be removed following en bloc resection with a tumour dependent wide margin, the primary aims of the operation are to provide stability at the shoulder and preserve good function to the elbow and hand. The approach and knowledge of, particularly, neurovascular anatomy is essential to provide the best outcome. We present our experience of THEPRs, illustrating a typical case of a 67-year-old female presenting with a minimally displaced pathological fracture of the humerus through a central chondrosarcoma.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Park KJ, Romero BA, Ahmadi S. Identification of radial nerve in relationship to deltoid tuberosity and brachioradialis. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2019;7(3):246–50.
Krishna G. 8 – Arm. In: BD Chaurasia’s human anatomy (Regional and applied dissection and clinical) Volume 1—Upper limb and thorax. 5th ed. India: CBS Publishers and Distributors Pvt Ltd; 2010. p. 95, 111, 122, 128.
Wafa H, Reddy K, Grimer R, Abudu A, Jeys L, Carter S, Tillman R. Does total humeral endoprosthetic replacement provide reliable reconstruction with preservation of a useful extremity? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(3):917–25.
Schmolders J, Koob S, Schepers P, Kehrer M, Frey SP, Wirtz DC, Pennekamp PH, Strauss AC. Silver-coated endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus in case of tumour-is there an increased risk of periprosthetic infection by using a trevira tube? Int Orthop. 2017;41(2):423–8.
Gosheger G, Hillmann A, Lindner N, Rödl R, Hoffmann C, Bürger H, Winkelmann W. Soft tissue reconstruction of megaprostheses using a trevira tube. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:264–71.
Bischel OE, Suda AJ, Böhm PM, Lehner B, Bitsch RG, Seeger JB. En-bloc resection of metastases of the proximal femur and reconstruction by modular arthroplasty is not only justified in patients with a curative treatment option—an observational study of a consecutive series of 45 patients. J Clin Med. 2020;9(3):758.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jeys, L.M., Morris, G.V., Kurisunkal, V. (2022). Implant Reconstruction of the Humeral Diaphysis: Total Humerus Prosthesis. In: Özger, H., Sim, F.H., Puri, A., Eralp, L. (eds) Orthopedic Surgical Oncology For Bone Tumors . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73327-8_44
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73327-8_44
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73326-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73327-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)