Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Silver-coated endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus in case of tumour—is there an increased risk of periprosthetic infection by using a trevira tube?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and objectives

The aim of our study was to evaluate if there is an increased risk of periprosthetic infection (PJI) in patients following replacement of the proximal humerus by using a modular tumour prosthesis in combination with a trevira tube.

Methods

Thirty patients were treated by using a modular tumour endoprosthesis (MUTARS®) following intra-articular resection of the proximal humerus. Fifteen patients received treatment by using a trevira tube. In 15 further cases the use of a trevira tube was not necessary. The mean follow-up time was 26 months (range: 24 months to 84 months). Both, Enneking score and range of motion (ROM), was evaluated. Further radiographs were obtained in two planes.

Results

The survival rate one year after surgery was 83 % and 63 % after two years. We recorded a 96 % survival of the limb two years after surgery. We also observed only one case of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in the entire follow-up period in one patient who received treatment with a trevira tube. The mean Enneking score was 20 points (range 8 to 26 points). ROM was equal in both study groups. In total 20 % of the treated patients (n = 6) suffered complications.

Conclusions

Replacement of the proximal humerus by using a trevira tube in combination with a modular tumour endoprosthesis is a safe and viable treatment option for both, bone tumours and metastases. There is no statistically significant increased risk of infection by using trevira tube even among immunosuppressed patients.

Level of evidence

Level 3, retrospective comparative study

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gosheger G, Gebert C, Ahrens H, Streitbuerger A, Winkelmann W, Hardes J (2006) Endoprosthetic reconstruction in 250 patients with sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 450:164–171. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000223978.36831.39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mittermayer F, Krepler P, Dominkus M, Schwameis E, Sluga M, Heinzl H, Kotz R (2001) Long-term followup of uncemented tumor endoprostheses for the lower extremity. Clinical orthopaedics and related research:167–177

  3. Sluga M, Windhager R, Lang S, Heinzl H, Bielack S, Kotz R (1999) Local and systemic control after ablative and limb sparing surgery in patients with osteosarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res:120–127

  4. Raiss P, Kinkel S, Sauter U, Bruckner T, Lehner B (2010) Replacement of the proximal humerus with MUTARS tumor endoprostheses. Eur J Surg Oncol 36:371–377. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2009.11.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tang X, Guo W, Yang R, Tang S, Ji T (2015) Synthetic mesh improves shoulder function after intraarticular resection and prosthetic replacement of proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:1464–1471. doi:10.1007/s11999-015-4139-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Falagas ME, Kasiakou SK (2005) Mesh-related infections after hernia repair surgery. Clin Microbiol Infect 11:3–8. doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.01014.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bliziotis IA, Kasiakou SK, Kapaskelis AM, Falagas ME (2006) Mesh-related infection after hernia repair: case report of an emerging type of foreign-body related infection. Infection 34:46–48. doi:10.1007/s15010-006-4140-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miklos JR, Moore RD (2015) Laparoscopic transperitoneal extravesical approach to vesicovaginal fistula repair without omental flap: a novel technique. Int Urogynecol J 26:447–448. doi:10.1007/s00192-013-2292-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nelson GN, Davis DE, Namdari S (2016) Outcomes in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection after shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Should Elbow Surg/Am Should Elbow Surg. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.064

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gosheger G, Winkelmann W (2000) Mutars--a modular tumor- and revision system. Experiences at the Munster Tumor Center. Orthopade 29(Suppl 1):S54–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gosheger G, Hardes J, Ahrens H, Gebert C, Winkelmann W (2005) Endoprosthetic replacement of the humerus combined with trapezius and latissimus dorsi transfer: a report of three patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125:62–65. doi:10.1007/s00402-004-0713-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Enneking W, Dunham W, Gebhardt M, Malawar M, Pritchard D (1990) A system for the classification of skeletal resections. La Chirurgia degli Organi di Movimento 75:217–240

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rodl RW, Gosheger G, Gebert C, Lindner N, Ozaki T, Winkelmann W (2002) Reconstruction of the proximal humerus after wide resection of tumours. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 84:1004–1008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wada T, Usui M, Isu K, Yamawakii S, Ishii S (1999) Reconstruction and limb salvage after resection for malignant bone tumour of the proximal humerus. A sling procedure using a free vascularised fibular graft. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 81:808–813

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Enneking WF, Eady JL, Burchardt H (1980) Autogenous cortical bone grafts in the reconstruction of segmental skeletal defects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:1039–1058

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Getty PJ, Peabody TD (1999) Complications and functional outcomes of reconstruction with an osteoarticular allograft after intra-articular resection of the proximal aspect of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1138–1146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rodl RW, Ozaki T, Hoffmann C, Bottner F, Lindner N, Winkelmann W (2000) Osteoarticular allograft in surgery for high-grade malignant tumours of bone. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 82:1006–1010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar D, Grimer RJ, Abudu A, Carter SR, Tillman RM (2003) Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus. Long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 85:717–722

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ross AC, Sneath RS, Scales JT (1987) Endoprosthetic replacement of the humerus and elbow joint. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 69:652–655

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Malawer MM, Chou LB (1995) Prosthetic survival and clinical results with use of large-segment replacements in the treatment of high-grade bone sarcomas. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1154–1165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cannon CP, Paraliticci GU, Lin PP, Lewis VO, Yasko AW (2009) Functional outcome following endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal humerus. J Should Elbow Surg 18:705–710. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2008.10.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Asavamongkolkul A, Waikakul S, Phimolsarnti R, Kiatisevi P, Wangsaturaka P (2007) Endoprosthetic reconstruction for malignant bone and soft-tissue tumors. J Med Assoc Thai 90:706–717

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Natarajan M, Sameer M, Kunal D, Balasubramanian N (2012) Custom-made endoprosthetic total humerus reconstruction for musculoskeletal tumours. Int Orthop 36:125–129. doi:10.1007/s00264-011-1316-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dieckmann R, Liem D, Gosheger G, Henrichs MP, Holl S, Hardes J, Streitburger A (2013) Evaluation of a reconstruction reverse shoulder for tumour surgery and tribological comparision with an anatomical shoulder arthroplasty. Int Orthop 37:451–456. doi:10.1007/s00264-012-1771-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Bos G, Sim F, Pritchard D, Shives T, Rock M, Askew L, Chao E (1987) Prosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res:178–191

  27. Jensen KL, Johnston JO (1995) Proximal humeral reconstruction after excision of a primary sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res:164–175

  28. Mankin HJ, Gebhardt MC, Jennings LC, Springfield DS, Tomford WW (1996) Long-term results of allograft replacement in the management of bone tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res:86–97

  29. Ross AC, Wilson JN, Scales JT (1987) Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 69:656–661

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Black AW, Szabo RM, Titelman RM (2007) Treatment of malignant tumors of the proximal humerus with allograft-prosthesis composite reconstruction. J Should Elbow Surg 16:525–533. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2006.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Schmolders.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We disclose any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence (bias) our work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schmolders, J., Koob, S., Schepers, P. et al. Silver-coated endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus in case of tumour—is there an increased risk of periprosthetic infection by using a trevira tube?. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 423–428 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3329-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3329-6

Keywords

Navigation