Skip to main content

Mixed Neuroendocrine and Non-neuroendocrine Neoplasms (Mi NEN)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neuroendocrine Neoplasia Management
  • 642 Accesses

Abstract

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) is the term that the 2019 WHO classification has adopted to decline all digestive neoplasms consisting of at least 30% by a neuroendocrine and a non-neuroendocrine component. MiNENs category represents the results of a plethora of terminologies that have followed over time. At present, MiNENs category encompasses well- and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine components, differently to MANECs term that included only poorly differentiated NECs. MiNENs represent a rare category of neoplasms that account an incidence of 0.01 on 100,000 population per year. The rarity of the disease and the strict diagnostic criteria lead that MiNENs mostly be underestimated. Indeed, in diagnostic process, biopsy could not be representative of whole tumoral mass, underestimating the features of one or both the components. MiNENs virtually can arise from every tissue or organ, but 2019 WHO classification has accepted the term only for digestive NENs, even if some authors put forward the idea of an extension of the term MiNENs to the other neoplasms over GEP tract.

Anyway, due to all the pitfalls around MiNENs, the management of this category of neoplasms is already unknown. In the absence of international guidelines, MiNENs are commonly treated as pure NECs or non-neuroendocrine neoplasms from the same site of origin. On the other hand, mutations in some driver genes seem to be promising in MiNENs, representing a field that should be improved by prospective trials. The analyses of immunohistochemistry and mutational pattern, mostly shared between neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine components of MiNENs, lead to the pathogenetic theory of a common precursor, a stem cell undergoing a divergent differentiation. Improving knowledge about the pathogenetic pathways seems to be the key to a better therapeutic management of these rare entities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. La Rosa S, Sessa F, Uccella S. Mixed Neuroendocrine-Nonneuroendocrine Neoplasms (MiNENs): unifying the concept of a heterogeneous group of neoplasms. Endocr Pathol. 2016;27(4):284–311.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Volante M, Rindi G, Papotti M. The grey zone between pure (neuro)endocrine and non-(neuro)endocrine tumours: a comment on concepts and classification of mixed exocrine-endocrine neoplasms. Virchows Arch. 2006;449(5):499–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. 4th ed. IARC; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  4. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). WHO classification of tumours of endocrine organs. 4th ed. IARC; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lewin K. Carcinoid tumors and the mixed (composite) glandular-endocrine cell carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 1987;11(Suppl 1):71–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. WHO classification of tumours. Digestive system tumours. 5th ed. IARC; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Solcia, G. Kloppel, L.H. Sobin, (In collaboration with 9 pathologist from 9 countries). Histological typing of endocrine tumors, 2nd ed. WHO international histological classification of tumors. Springer (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Surveillance of rare cancers in Europe Registry. Available from: http://www.rarecarenet.eu/rarecarenet/images/indicators/Incidence.pdf.

  9. National Cancer Institute. About the SEER registries. http://seer.cancer.gov/registries/index.html.

  10. https://www.registri-tumori.it/PDF/AIRTUM2016/TUMORIRARI/AIRTUM_RARI_full.pdf.

  11. https://www.aiom.it/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019_LG_AIOM_Neuroendocrini.pdf.

  12. Pavel M, Oberg K, Falconi M, Krenning E, Sundin A, Perren A, et al. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(7):844–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Garcia-Carbonero R, Sorbye H, Baudin E, Raymond E, Wiedenmann B, Niederle B, et al. ENETS consensus guidelines for high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas. Neuroendocrinology. 2016;103(2):186–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/neuroendocrine_blocks.pdf

  15. Cheng H, Leblond CP. Origin, differentiation and renewal of the four main epithelial cell types in the mouse small intestine. V. Unitarian theory of the origin of the four epithelial cell types. Am J Anat. 1974;141(4):537–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Han B, Mori I, Wang X, Nakamura M, Nakamura Y, Kakudo K. Combined small-cell carcinoma of the stomach: p53 and K-ras gene mutational analysis supports a monoclonal origin of three histological components. Int J Exp Pathol. 2005;86(4):213–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Scardoni M, Vittoria E, Volante M, Rusev B, Bersani S, Mafficini A, et al. Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract: targeted next-generation sequencing suggests a monoclonal origin of the two components. Neuroendocrinology. 2014;100(4):310–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Furlan D, Cerutti R, Genasetti A, Pelosi G, Uccella S, La Rosa S, et al. Microallelotyping defines the monoclonal or the polyclonal origin of mixed and collision endocrine-exocrine tumors of the gut. Lab Investig. 2003;83(7):963–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. La Rosa S, Uccella S, Molinari F, Savio A, Mete O, Vanoli A, et al. Mixed Adenoma Well-differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumor (MANET) of the digestive system: an indolent subtype of Mixed Neuroendocrine-NonNeuroendocrine Neoplasm (MiNEN). Am J Surg Pathol. 2018;42(11):1503–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller H, Flora R, Drymousis P, Wasan H, Goldin R, Schmid KW, Kidd M, Modlin IM, Frilling A. Heterogeneity in the Ki-67 index of neuroendocrine tumors. ENETS, Abstract #961.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Singh S, Hallet J, Rowsell C, Law CH. Variability of Ki67 labeling index in multiple neuroendocrine tumors specimens over the course of the disease. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014;40(11):1517–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gao H, Jin K, Wang W, Zhang S, Xu J, Liu LC, Yu X. Is Ki67 index in biopsy tissue truly reflect grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm? ENETS, Abstract #1852.

    Google Scholar 

  23. De Both A, De Man M, Troisi R, Van Vlierberghe H, Hoorens A, Geboes K. Treatment of a mixed acinar-endocrine carcinoma with uptake on (68)Gallium-DOTATOC positron emission tomography-computed tomography: a case report. Oncol Lett. 2017;14(1):547–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Frizziero M, Chakrabarty B, Nagy B, Lamarca A, Hubner RA, Valle JW, et al. Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms: a systematic review of a controversial and underestimated diagnosis. J Clin Med. 2020;9(1):273.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Park JY, Ryu MH, Park YS, Park HJ, Ryoo BY, Kim MG, et al. Prognostic significance of neuroendocrine components in gastric carcinomas. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(16):2802–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jiang SX, Mikami T, Umezawa A, Saegusa M, Kameya T, Okayasu I. Gastric large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas: a distinct clinicopathologic entity. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30(8):945–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Burke AP, Marx A, Nicholson AG. WHO classification of tumours. Pathology & genetics of tumours of the lung, pleura, thymus and heart. IARC Press; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Uccella S, Sessa F, La Rosa S. Diagnostic approach to neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. Turk Patoloji Derg. 2015;31(Suppl 1):113–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. La Rosa S, Rigoli E, Uccella S, Chiaravalli AM, Capella C. CDX2 as a marker of intestinal EC-cells and related well-differentiated endocrine tumors. Virchows Arch. 2004;445(3):248–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Erickson LA, Papouchado B, Dimashkieh H, Zhang S, Nakamura N, Lloyd RV. Cdx2 as a marker for neuroendocrine tumors of unknown primary sites. Endocr Pathol. 2004;15(3):247–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hermann G, Konukiewitz B, Schmitt A, Perren A, Kloppel G. Hormonally defined pancreatic and duodenal neuroendocrine tumors differ in their transcription factor signatures: expression of ISL1, PDX1, NGN3, and CDX2. Virchows Arch. 2011;459(2):147–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schmitt AM, Riniker F, Anlauf M, Schmid S, Soltermann A, Moch H, et al. Islet 1 (Isl1) expression is a reliable marker for pancreatic endocrine tumors and their metastases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32(3):420–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Folpe AL, Gown AM, Lamps LW, Garcia R, Dail DH, Zarbo RJ, et al. Thyroid transcription factor-1: immunohistochemical evaluation in pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors. Mod Pathol. 1999;12(1):5–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. La Rosa S, Chiaravalli AM, Placidi C, Papanikolaou N, Cerati M, Capella C. TTF1 expression in normal lung neuroendocrine cells and related tumors: immunohistochemical study comparing two different monoclonal antibodies. Virchows Arch. 2010;457(4):497–507.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Krugmann J, Schwarz CL, Melcher B, Sterlacci W, Ozalinskaite A, Lermann J, et al. Malignant ascites occurs most often in patients with high-grade serous papillary ovarian cancer at initial diagnosis: a retrospective analysis of 191 women treated at Bayreuth Hospital, 2006-2015. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;299(2):515–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ramalingam P, Malpica A, Deavers MT. Mixed endocervical adenocarcinoma and high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix with ovarian metastasis of the former component: a report of 2 cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2012;31(5):490–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Horn LC, Hentschel B, Bilek K, Richter CE, Einenkel J, Leo C. Mixed small cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix: prognostic impact of focal neuroendocrine differentiation but not of Ki-67 labeling index. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2006;10(3):140–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bressenot A, Delaunay C, Gauchotte G, Oliver A, Boudrant G, Montagne K. Composite renal cell carcinoma with clear cell renal cell carcinomatous and carcinoid tumoral elements: a first case report. J Clin Pathol. 2010;63(2):174–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Al-Ahmadie H, Compérat E, Epstein JI. Neuroendocrine tumors. In: Moch H, Humphrey PA, Ulbright TM, Reuter VE, editors. WHO classification of tumours. Pathology & genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. 4th ed. IARC Press; 2016. p. 117–9.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS, Young RH. WHO classification of tumours of the female reproductive organs. WHO classification of tumours. IARC Press; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Peng Y, Lin J, Guan J, Chen L, Zhang X, Li S, et al. Ovarian collision tumors: imaging findings, pathological characteristics, diagnosis, and differential diagnosis. Abdom Radiol. 2018;43(8):2156–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Schizas D, Katsaros I, Michalinos A, Damaskos C, Garmpis N, Ntomi V, et al. Collision tumors of the gastrointestinal tract: a systematic review of the literature. Anticancer Res. 2018;38(11):6047–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ichijima K, Akaishi K, Toyoda N, Kobashi Y, Ueda Y, Matsuo S, et al. Carcinoma of the pancreas with endocrine component in childhood. A case report. Am J Clin Pathol. 1985;83(1):95–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gilmore G, Jensen K, Saligram S, Sachdev TP, Arekapudi SR. Goblet cell carcinoid of the appendix—diagnostic challenges and treatment updates: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2018;12(1):275.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Capella C, La Rosa S, Uccella S, Billo P, Cornaggia M. Mixed endocrine-exocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2000;17(2):91–103.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Howe MC, Chapman A, Kerr K, Dougal M, Anderson H, Hasleton PS. Neuroendocrine differentiation in non-small cell lung cancer and its relation to prognosis and therapy. Histopathology. 2005;46(2):195–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Makretsov N, Gilks CB, Coldman AJ, Hayes M, Huntsman D. Tissue microarray analysis of neuroendocrine differentiation and its prognostic significance in breast cancer. Hum Pathol. 2003;34(10):1001–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Pelosi G, Pasini F, Sonzogni A, Maffini F, Maisonneuve P, Iannucci A, et al. Prognostic implications of neuroendocrine differentiation and hormone production in patients with Stage I nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Cancer. 2003;97(10):2487–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sapino A, Righi L, Cassoni P, Papotti M, Pietribiasi F, Bussolati G. Expression of the neuroendocrine phenotype in carcinomas of the breast. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2000;17(2):127–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. van Krimpen C, Elferink A, Broodman CA, Hop WC, Pronk A, Menke M. The prognostic influence of neuroendocrine differentiation in breast cancer: results of a long-term follow-up study. Breast. 2004;13(4):329–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Bollito E, Berruti A, Bellina M, Mosca A, Leonardo E, Tarabuzzi R, et al. Relationship between neuroendocrine features and prognostic parameters in human prostate adenocarcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2001;12(Suppl 2):S159–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. La Rosa S, Furlan D, Franzi F, Battaglia P, Frattini M, Zanellato E, et al. Mixed exocrine-neuroendocrine carcinoma of the nasal cavity: clinico-pathologic and molecular study of a case and review of the literature. Head Neck Pathol. 2013;7(1):76–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Jesinghaus M, Konukiewitz B, Keller G, Kloor M, Steiger K, Reiche M, et al. Colorectal mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas and neuroendocrine carcinomas are genetically closely related to colorectal adenocarcinomas. Mod Pathol. 2017;30(4):610–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Capdevila J, Arques O, Hernandez Mora JR, Matito J, Caratu G, Mancuso FM, et al. Epigenetic EGFR gene repression confers sensitivity to therapeutic BRAFV600E blockade in colon neuroendocrine carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(4):902–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Semrau S, Agaimy A, Pavel M, Lubgan D, Schmidt D, Cavallaro A, et al. Long-term control with chemoradiation of initially metastatic mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma of the rectum: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2019;13(1):82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Kim BC, Kim YE, Chang HJ, Lee SH, Youk EG, Lee DS, et al. Lymph node size is not a reliable criterion for predicting nodal metastasis in rectal neuroendocrine tumours. Color Dis. 2016;18(7):O243–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhang L, Yang Z, Chen Q, Li M, Zhu X, Wan D, et al. Mixed adenoendocrine carcinoma in the extrahepatic biliary tract: a case report and literature review. Oncol Lett. 2019;18(2):1585–96.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Hong N, Kim HJ, Byun JH, Kim SY, Kim KW, Kim JH, et al. Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the extrahepatic bile duct: radiologic and clinical characteristics. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40(1):181–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Sundin A, Arnold R, Baudin E, Cwikla JB, Eriksson B, Fanti S, et al. ENETS consensus guidelines for the standards of care in neuroendocrine tumors: radiological, nuclear medicine & hybrid imaging. Neuroendocrinology. 2017;105(3):212–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Yamaga LYI, Wagner J, Funari MBG. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in nonneuroendocrine tumors: a pictorial essay. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42(6):e313–e6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Ishida H, Lam AK. Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: the latest surgical and medical treatment strategies based on the current World Health Organization classification. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2020;145:102835.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Pokrzywa CJ, Abbott DE, Matkowskyj KA, Ronnekleiv-Kelly SM, Winslow ER, Weber SM, et al. Natural history and treatment trends in pancreatic cancer subtypes. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;23(4):768–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Milione M, Maisonneuve P, Pellegrinelli A, Grillo F, Albarello L, Spaggiari P, et al. Ki67 proliferative index of the neuroendocrine component drives MANEC prognosis. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2018;25(5):583–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Nagata H, Tsujimoto H, Yaguchi Y, Kouzu K, Itazaki Y, Ishibashi Y, et al. Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma with loss of HER2 positivity after trastuzumab-based chemotherapy for HER2-positive gastric cancer: a case report. Surg Case Rep. 2020;6(1):5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Kanazawa Y, Kikuchi M, Imai Y, Katakami N, Kaihara S, Shinohara S. Successful treatment of a mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasm of the colon with metastases to the thyroid gland and liver. Case Rep Otolaryngol. 2020;2020:5927610.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Kai K, Nasu K, Nishida H, Daa T, Shikama A, Shiozaki T, et al. Correlation of World Health Organization 2010 classification for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms with the prognosis of ovarian neuroendocrine neoplasms: Kansai Clinical Oncology Group-Protocol Review Committee/Intergroup Study. Neuroendocrinology. 2021;111(4):320–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Tagai N, Goi T, Morikawa M, Kurebayashi H, Kato S, Fujimoto D, et al. Favorable response of colonic mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma to streptozocin monotherapy. Int Cancer Conf J. 2017;6(4):175–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Toptas T, Tasova-Yildirim G, Karaveli S, Simsek T. Malignant mixed Mullerian tumor with small cell neuroendocrine differentiation: a case report and review of the literature. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2014;35(2):180–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Quaas A, Waldschmidt D, Alakus H, Zander T, Heydt C, Goeser T, et al. Therapy susceptible germline-related BRCA 1-mutation in a case of metastasized mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) of the small bowel. BMC Gastroenterol. 2018;18(1):75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Oza AM, Cibula D, Benzaquen AO, Poole C, Mathijssen RH, Sonke GS, et al. Olaparib combined with chemotherapy for recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(1):87–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Frizziero M, Wang X, Chakrabarty B, Childs A, Luong LV, Walter T, Elshafie M, Shah T, Fulford P, Minicozzi A. Mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) of the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tract: a multicentre retrospective study. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(Suppl. 5):466.

    Google Scholar 

  72. La Rosa S, Inzani F, Vanoli A, Klersy C, Dainese L, Rindi G, et al. Histologic characterization and improved prognostic evaluation of 209 gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms. Hum Pathol. 2011;42(10):1373–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Zheng Z, Chen C, Li B, Liu H, Zhou L, Zhang H, et al. Biliary neuroendocrine neoplasms: clinical profiles, management, and analysis of prognostic factors. Front Oncol. 2019;9:38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Vakar-Lopez F, True LD. How wide is the spectrum of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the urinary bladder? Am J Clin Pathol. 2007;128(5):723–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Wang G, Xiao L, Zhang M, Kamat AM, Siefker-Radtke A, Dinney CP, et al. Small cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder: a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of 81 cases. Hum Pathol. 2018;79:57–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Spada .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Laffi, A., Fazio, N., Rubino, M., Spada, F. (2021). Mixed Neuroendocrine and Non-neuroendocrine Neoplasms (Mi NEN). In: Beretta, G., Berruti, A., Bombardieri, E., Fazio, N., Goletti, O. (eds) Neuroendocrine Neoplasia Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72830-4_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72830-4_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-72829-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-72830-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics